Do composite resin polishing systems damage enamel?

Finishing and polishing of composite resin restorations may cause damage to the bordering enamel. Although many studies have investigated the effect of polish on restorative materials, few have quantified the effect on bordering enamel. The objective of this study was to compare enamel loss surrounding composite restorations after finishing and polishing sequences. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in enamel loss between different finishing and polishing sequences. Class V preparations on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 15 extracted human molars were restored with a composite resin and assigned to 1 of 2 finishing and polishing sequences, so that each tooth underwent both sequences (n = 15 per sequence). In sequence 1, a tungsten carbide finishing bur and aluminum oxide polishing discs were used; in sequence 2, a diamond finishing bur, aluminum oxide-impregnated finishing cup, and diamond-impregnated polishing cup were used. Tooth surfaces were scanned with an optical scanner after preparation, finishing, initial polishing, and final polishing. The finishing and polishing scans were aligned to the preparation scan using Cumulus software. The depth of enamel surface loss was calculated and statistically analyzed (α = 0.05; paired t test). Most enamel loss (mean [SD]) resulted from the finishing step with the tungsten carbide bur (51.8 [21.3] µm) or diamond bur (43.3 [12.6] µm). Each polishing step increased mean enamel loss by only a few microns. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 finishing and polishing sequences. The majority of enamel damage during finishing and polishing of composite resin restorations resulted from the finishing burs. Little enamel was removed by either of the tested composite resin polishing systems.

Effect of beverages on color and translucency of new tooth-colored restoratives.

This investigation examined the susceptibility to staining and translucency changes of some new tooth-colored restorative materials after immersion in different beverages. The materials studied were 3M Filtek Z350XT (ZT), 3M Filtek 350XT Flowable Restorative (ZF), Shofu Beautifil Flow Plus (BF), Shofu Beautifil II (B2), 3M Ketac Nano (N100), and 3M Photac Fil (PF). Following the manufacturers' instructions, 42 samples were made from each material and placed in an incubator at 100% humidity and 37°Celsius for 24 hours. Baseline L*, a*, b* readings were taken against white and black backgrounds using a photospectrometer. The samples were then randomly assigned to be immersed in seven beverages, namely cola drink, orange juice, red wine, vodka, black coffee, green tea, and distilled water for a period of seven days. Color readings were taken again by recording the L*, a*, b* values. Data was analyzed using t-tests, one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc and Pearson's correlation (p<0.05). BF generally performed as well as the conventional composite resin materials (ZT and ZF) but N100 and B2 did not. PF had the largest staining and translucency changes. Coffee, red wine, and tea resulted in the most staining and negative translucency changes. An inverse correlation between ΔE and ΔTP was observed for all materials and beverages with the exception of orange juice.

Combined effects of staining substances on resin composites before and after surface sealant application.

The objective was to measure the combined effect of mucin, chlorhexidine and tea solution on the staining of four dental resin composites, and to determine the effect of surface sealant on staining. One side of cured resin composite specimens of 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were polished with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. One group of specimens (n = 5) was treated with a surface sealant [BisCover, Bisco, USA; SS (surface sealant) group], and the other group was not (NO group; control). Specimens were sequentially immersed in the following substances: Mucin in phosphate buffered saline (PBS); chlorhexidine; tea solution; and ultrasonic cleaning and then immersion in PBS. Color was measured on a reflection spectrophotometer. Changes in color (DeltaE (*) (ab)) and color parameters, such as hue, chroma and value, after immersion in tea solution and subsequent cleaning were analyzed by repeated measures, analysis of variance at the 0.05 level of significance. The range of DeltaE (*) (ab) values after immersion in tea solution was 11.4-21.1 for NO group and 10.5-19.6 for SS group, and that after cleaning was 2.4-10.0 for NO group and 2.7-8.3 for SS group. After staining, CIE L (*) value (lightness) decreased, and CIE a (*) and b (*) values increased. Color changes of resin composites were not acceptable after sequential immersion treatment (DeltaE (*) ( ab ) > 3.3). The changes in color and color parameters of sealant applied group were not significantly different from those of control group except for a few combinations of color parameters and resin composites.

Double-blind study on materials testing with applied kinesiology.

Applied Kinesiology (AK) is a scientifically unproven method used in complementary medicine to recognize the (in)tolerance of dental materials. Test-retest reliability of AK was examined. The working hypothesis was the assumption that the reliability of AK would not exceed random chance. Two dentists qualified in AK examined 112 volunteers to determine individual (in)tolerance toward two dental composite materials. After the first examination, 31 subjects were excluded from further testing. At the end of the open test phase, 34 of 81 participants had been classified as "tolerant", and seven as "intolerant" to both materials. The remaining 40 individuals showed a combination of either tolerant (to material I)/intolerant (to material II), or the reverse (n = 20 each). Retrieval rate was tested under blind conditions. In 14 cases, the results of the open and blinded tests matched, whereas in 26 cases they did not (95% confidence interval, 21%-52%; p = 0.98). This outcome confirmed our working hypothesis.

Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Many different rotary instruments are available for shaping composite restorations. Whether use of these instruments causes undesirable iatrogenic abrasion of either the tooth surface or the composite restorative material is unknown. Assuming that damage occurs, which technique is least damaging is unknown. PURPOSE: This in vitro study quantified the loss of surface enamel and dentin surrounding Class V preparations during composite shaping and finishing procedures. The susceptibility of 2 types of composites to tooth abrasion was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared at the amelodentinal junction of 36 human molar teeth. The teeth were randomly assigned to 6 groups of 6 teeth each. They were restored with either a low- or high-viscosity composite (Revolution or Prodigy Condensable, respectively) and finished with aluminum oxide disks, tungsten carbide burs, or ultrafine finishing diamond burs. The preparations were profiled before and after restoration. After each finishing procedure, morphological measurements of surface changes in the dentin and enamel were made and reported as volume (in cubic millimeters); maximum depth, mean maximum depth, and mean depth (in micrometers); and surface area (in square millimeters). The results were subjected to a 2-way analysis of variance for restorative material and finishing technique (P<.05). RESULTS: Aluminum oxide disks removed significantly less enamel than tungsten carbide burs or ultrafine finishing diamond burs, as measured by volume, maximum depth, mean maximum depth, mean depth, and surface area (P<.05). Conversely, aluminum oxide disks removed significantly greater dentin than either tungsten carbide burs or ultrafine finishing burs as measured by loss of volume, mean depth, and surface area (P<.05). There was no significant difference in the loss of surrounding tooth substance based on resin type (low or high viscosity). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the 3 finishing systems tested resulted in varying degrees of iatrogenic abrasion of enamel and dentin. The composite material used had no significant effect on abrasion of the surrounding enamel or dentin.

Effects of direct resin pulp capping techniques on short-term response of mechanically exposed pulps.

The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the effects of direct pulp capping techniques on the short-term response of mechanically exposed pulps using three commercially available adhesive resin systems. Class V cavities were prepared on the facial surface of 200 intact monkey teeth. Pulps were exposed with a carbide bur on the cavity floor. Each exposed pulp was capped with one of three commercially available adhesive resins or a hard-setting calcium hydroxide liner. All cavities were sealed with an adhesive resin, and were restored with hybrid resin composites. Inflammatory cell infiltration and dentine bridging of the exposed pulp and protrusion of the exposed pulp tissue into the cavities were evaluated histologically at 3, 7, 14, 30 and 60 days. A slight inflammatory cell infiltration was the principal reaction of the exposed pulp. The exposed area was occluded over time with dentine bridging in all groups. However, a protrusion of pulp tissue into the prepared cavity was observed at the periphery of the exposed area in all groups. These tissues communicated with the underlying pulp. The incidence of pulp tissue protrusion was ranked in order of increasing severity: Liner Bond II < Dycal < Bondwell LC = Super Bond C&B. Following pulp capping of the mechanical exposures, slight inflammation was the main reaction. Exposures became occluded with a dentine bridge over time. However, the protrusion of pulp tissue into cavities varied, depending on the materials used.

Estudo da influência da retençäo de corantes na translucidez de resinas compostas: efeito de materiais, tempo e meios de imersäo / Dye retention influense in the composite resins translucence: effect of materials, time and immersion ways

Os autores investigaram "in vitro" a influência da retençäo de corantes na translucidez das resinas compostas Herculite X para Esmalte (M1), para Dentina (M2) e Silux Plus para Esmalte (M3) e para Dentina (M4). Os corpos de prova foram submedidos a quatro diferentes meios de imersäo: I1 - coca-cola; I2 - café; I3 - vinho tinto; I4 - nicotina. A medida da translucidez foi obtida em três tempos diferentes: P0 - 1 hora antes da imersäo; P1 - após 2 horas após imersäo e P2 - 24 horas após imersäo. Com base na metodologia os autores concluíram que: 1) o material M1 apresentou maiores níveis percentuais de translucidez quando comparado com o material M3; 2) o meio de imersäo I2 propiciou menor translucidez seguido em ordem crescente por I3 e I4 que se apresentaram semelhantes e menores que I1; 3) em relaçäo ao tempo, a translucidez apresentou-se decrescente caracterizando manchamento lento e gradual

The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel.

The wear of human dental enamel against amalgam, Concise composite, SR-Isosit Inlay/Onlay composite, Vitadur-N glazed porcelain, unglazed IPS Empress ceramic, and enamel (control) was investigated by use of a modified stress cycling machine. Testing was carried out in water and in citric acid (pH 4) and the enamel-material couples were subjected to 25,000 cycles of wear with a maximum load of 40 N. Tooth profile reduction was measured at baseline and at 5000 cyclic intervals with a computer image analysis program. The depth of the wear scars on material specimens was analyzed with a profilometer. All materials produced increased enamel wear in acid. Vitadur-N glazed porcelain was found to be the most destructive to human dental enamel, and this was closely followed by Empress and enamel.