Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Nutr ; 43(6): 1299-1307, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38663051

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to investigate the effects of different dietary supplements on the mortality and clinical status of adults with sepsis. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials until February 2023. The inclusion criteria were: 1) randomized controlled trials (RCT)s; 2) adults suffering sepsis or septic shock; 3) evaluation of short- or long-mortality; and 4) publications between 1994 and 2023. The general information of studies and details of interventions were extracted. The primary outcome was short-term mortality (<90 days), and the secondary outcomes were long-term mortality (≥90 days), length of ICU and hospital stays, and duration of mechanical ventilation (MV). The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 (ROB2). A random effect NMA was performed to rank the effect of each intervention using a frequentist approach. RESULTS: Finally, 56 RCTs with 5957 participants met the criteria. Approximately, one-third of RCTs were low risk of bias. NMA analysis revealed that there was no treatment more effective in short- or long-term mortality than control or other interventions, except for magnesium (RR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.79; GRADE = low) and vitamin C (RR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67, 0.99; low certainty evidence), which had beneficial effects on short-term mortality. Moreover, eicosapentaenoic acid, gamma-linolenic acid, and antioxidants (EPA + GLA + AOs) combination was the most effective, and magnesium, vitamin D and vitamin C were the other effective approaches in terms of duration of MV, and ICU length of stay. There was no beneficial dietary supplement for hospital stay in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients, none of the dietary supplements had a substantial effect on mortality except for magnesium and vitamin C, which were linked to lower short-term mortality with low certainty of evidence. Further investigation into high-quality studies with the use of dietary supplements for sepsis should be highly discouraged.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Metaanálisis en Red , Sepsis , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Sepsis/mortalidad , Sepsis/terapia , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad
2.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 47(3): 405-413, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32931666

RESUMEN

Objective: Given the high mortality and prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation of COVID-19 patients, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen for COVID-19 patients with respiratory distress. Methods: This is a single-center clinical trial of COVID-19 patients at NYU Winthrop Hospital from March 31 to April 28, 2020. Patients in this trial received hyperbaric oxygen therapy at 2.0 atmospheres of pressure in monoplace hyperbaric chambers for 90 minutes daily for a maximum of five total treatments. Controls were identified using propensity score matching among COVID-19 patients admitted during the same time period. Using competing-risks survival regression, we analyzed our primary outcome of inpatient mortality and secondary outcome of mechanical ventilation. Results: We treated 20 COVID-19 patients with hyperbaric oxygen. Ages ranged from 30 to 79 years with an oxygen requirement ranging from 2 to 15 liters on hospital days 0 to 14. Of these 20 patients, two (10%) were intubated and died, and none remain hospitalized. Among 60 propensity-matched controls based on age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, troponin, D-dimer, hospital day, and oxygen requirement, 18 (30%) were intubated, 13 (22%) have died, and three (5%) remain hospitalized (with one still requiring mechanical ventilation). Assuming no further deaths among controls, we estimate that the adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios were 0.37 for inpatient mortality (p=0.14) and 0.26 for mechanical ventilation (p=0.046). Conclusion: Though limited by its study design, our results demonstrate the safety of hyperbaric oxygen among COVID-19 patients and strongly suggests the need for a well-designed, multicenter randomized control trial.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Puntaje de Propensión , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Presión Atmosférica , COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Seguridad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Crit Care Med ; 48(7): 993-1000, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32355133

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Prior studies report significant mortality in fibrotic interstitial lung disease patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Little is known about baseline characteristics or ventilator strategies that might improve outcomes. We analyzed the ventilator characteristics of a large cohort of fibrotic interstitial lung disease patients from the perspective of an acute respiratory distress syndrome paradigm to see if any specific mechanical ventilation strategies might improve in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, multihospital medical ICUs. PATIENTS: Consecutive fibrotic interstitial lung disease patients who experienced mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. INTERVENTIONS: Interstitial lung disease characteristics, demographics, and ventilator variables were analyzed for univariable and multivariable predictors of in-hospital mortality, adjusted for confounding with an a priori causation model. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 111 patients accounted for 114 admissions. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis comprised 34% with idiopathic acute exacerbation (65%) being the most common admission type. Ninety-five percent were initiated on mandatory volume-control ventilation with only 50% achieving a low tidal volume strategy (plateau pressure ≤ 30 cm H2O) within 3 hours of intubation. Unadjusted clinical predictors of in-hospital mortality included age (unit odds ratio, 1.05; 1.01-1.10; p = 0.015), time from admission to intubation (hr) (unit odds ratio, 1.01; 1.01-1.03; p = 0.017), and use of paralytics (relative risk, 1.54; 1.26-1.90, p < 0.001). Adjusted mechanical ventilation-related predictors of in-hospital mortality included achieving early targeted plateau pressures (odds ratio, 0.23; 0.07-0.76; p = 0.016), PaO2/FIO2 ratio at 3 (unit odds ratio, 0.98; 0.96-0.99, p = 0.002) and 48 hours (unit odds ratio, 0.98; 0.97-0.99, p = 0.018), initial mean airway pressure (unit odds ratio, 1.13; 1.02-1.28, p = 0.019), and total net fluid status (mL) (unit odds ratio, 1.01; 1.001-1.02, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Several factors predict in-hospital mortality in fibrotic interstitial lung disease-associated mechanical ventilation when viewed through an acute respiratory distress syndrome model. Further research is needed to refine strategies that may perhaps improve survival if mechanical ventilation is pursued in this set of patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Cardiol J ; 27(2): 175-183, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286679

RESUMEN

Coronaviruses cause disease in animals and people around the world. Human coronaviruses (HCoV) are mainly known to cause infections of the upper and lower respiratory tract but the symptoms may also involve the nervous and digestive systems. Since the beginning of December 2019, there has been an epidemic of SARS-CoV-2, which was originally referred to as 2019-nCoV. The most common symptoms are fever and cough, fatigue, sputum production, dyspnea, myalgia, arthralgia or sore throat, headache, nausea, vomiting or diarrhea (30%). The best prevention is to avoid exposure. In addition, contact per-sons should be subjected to mandatory quarantine. COVID-19 patients should be treated in specialist centers. A significant number of patients with pneumonia require passive oxygen therapy. Non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy can be applied in mild and moderate non-hypercapnia cases. A lung-saving ventilation strategy must be implemented in acute respiratory distress syndrome and mechanically ventilated patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a highly specialized method, available only in selected centers and not applicable to a significant number of cases. Specific pharmacological treatment for COVID-19 is not currently available. Modern medicine is gearing up to fight the new coronavirus pandemic. The key is a holistic approach to the patient including, primar-ily, the use of personal protective equipment to reduce the risk of further virus transmission, as well as patient management, which consists in both quarantine and, in the absence of specific pharmacological therapy, symptomatic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Vías Clínicas , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Respiración Artificial , Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Terapia Combinada , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Difusión de Innovaciones , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/mortalidad , Humanos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/efectos adversos , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/mortalidad , Pandemias , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pronóstico , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas Virales/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
5.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(20): e15473, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096444

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Selenium supplementation is a potentially promising adjunctive therapy for critically ill patients, but the results are controversy among studies. Accordingly, we performed this meta-analysis to more clearly detect the efficacy and safety of selenium supplementation on critically ill patients. METHODS: Systematic literature retrieval was carried out to obtain RCTs on selenium supplementation for critically ill patients up to August 2017. Data extraction and quality evaluation of these studies were performed by 2 investigators. Statistical analyses was performed by RevMan 5.3. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to control the risks of type I and type II errors and calculate required information size (RIS). RESULTS: Totally 19 RCTs involving 3341 critically ill patients were carried out in which 1694 participates were in the selenium supplementation group, and 1647 in the control. The aggregated results suggested that compared with the control, intravenous selenium supplement as a single therapy could decrease the total mortality (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95, P = .002, TSA-adjusted 95% CI = 0.77-0.96, RIS = 4108, n = 3297) and may shorten the length of stay in hospital (MD -2.30, 95% CI -4.03 to -0.57, P = .009), but had no significant treatment effect on 28-days mortality (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.85-1.09, P = .54) and could not shorten the length of ICU stay (MD -0.15, 95% CI -1.68 to 1.38, P = .84) in critically ill patients. Our results also showed that selenium supplementation did not increase incidence of drug-induced side effect compared with the control (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.30, P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence suggests that the use of selenium could reduce the total mortality, and TSA results showed that our outcome is reliable and no more randomized controlled trials are needed. But selenium supplementation might have no effect on reducing 28-days mortality as well as the incidence of new infections, or on length of stay in ICU or mechanical ventilation. However, the results should be used carefully because of potential limitations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Selenio/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Selenio/uso terapéutico , Oligoelementos/administración & dosificación , Oligoelementos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
6.
Nutrients ; 10(11)2018 Oct 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30380680

RESUMEN

Modified NUTRIC (mNUTRIC) score is a useful assessment tool to determine the risk of malnutrition in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV). We identified associations between postoperative calorie adequacy, 30-day mortality, and surgical outcomes in patients with high mNUTRIC scores. Medical records of 272 patients in the intensive care unit who required MV support for >24 h after emergency gastro-intestinal (GI) surgery between January 2007 and December 2017 were reviewed. Calorie adequacy in percentage (Calorie intake in 5 days ÷ Calorie requirement for 5 days × 100) was assessed in patients with high (5⁻9) and low (0⁻4) mNUTRIC scores. In the high mNUTRIC score group, patients with inadequate calorie supplementation (calorie adequacy <70%) had higher 30-day mortality than those with adequate supplementation (31.5% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.010); this was not observed in patients with low mNUTRIC scores. This result was also confirmed through Kaplan⁻Meier survival curve (p = 0.022). Inadequate calorie supplementation in the high mNUTRIC score group was not associated with Intra-abdominal infection (p = 1.000), pulmonary complication (p = 0.695), wound complication (p = 0.407), postoperative leakage (p = 1.000), or infections (p = 0.847). Inadequate calorie supplementation after GI surgery was associated with higher 30-day mortality in patients with high mNUTRIC scores. Therefore, adequate calorie supplementation could contribute to improved survival of critically ill postoperative patients with high risk of malnutrition.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Desnutrición/mortalidad , Evaluación Nutricional , Terapia Nutricional/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Anciano , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Desnutrición/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Nutricional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
7.
Health Policy ; 122(9): 970-976, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30097352

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: An integrated delivery system with a prospective payment program (IPP) for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) was launched by Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) due to the costly and limited ICU resources. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of IPP and evaluate the factors associated with successful weaning and survival among patients with PMV. METHODS: Taiwan's NHI Research Database was searched to obtain the data of patients aged ≥17 years who had PMV from 2006 to 2010 (N=50,570). A 1:1 propensity score matching approach was used to compare patients with and without IPP (N=30,576). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to examine the factors related to successful weaning and survival. RESULTS: The related factors of lower weaning rate in IPP participants (hazard ratio [HR]=0.84), were older age, higher income, catastrophic illness (HR=0.87), and higher comorbidity. The effectiveness of IPP intervention for the PMV patients showed longer days of hospitalization, longer ventilation days, higher survival rate, and higher medical costs (in respiratory care center, respiratory care ward). The 6-month mortality rate was lower (34.0% vs. 32.9%). The death risk of IPP patients compared to those non-IPP patients was lower (HR=0.91, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The policy of IPP for PMV patients showed higher survival rate although it was costly and related to lower weaning rate.


Asunto(s)
Sistema de Pago Prospectivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/economía , Desconexión del Ventilador/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Catastrófica , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Taiwán , Desconexión del Ventilador/economía
8.
Trials ; 18(1): 574, 2017 Nov 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29187230

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a highly prevalent and morbid syndrome in intensive care units (ICUs). Changing the stressful environment within the ICU via music may be an effective and a scalable way to reduce the burden of delirium. METHODS/DESIGN: The Decreasing Delirium through Music (DDM) study is a three-arm, single-blind, randomized controlled feasibility trial. Sixty patients admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized to one of three arms (20 participants per arm): (1) personalized music, (2) non-personalized relaxing music, or (3) attention-control. Music preferences will be obtained from all enrolled participants or their family caregivers. Participants will receive two 1-h audio sessions a day through noise-cancelling headphones and mp3 players. Our primary aim is to determine the feasibility of the trial design (recruitment, adherence, participant retention, design and delivery of the music intervention). Our secondary aim is to estimate the potential effect size of patient-preferred music listening in reducing delirium, as measured by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Participants will receive twice daily assessments for level of sedation and presence of delirium. Enrolled participants will be followed in the hospital until death, discharge, or up to 28 days, and seen in the Critical Care Recovery Clinic at 90 days. DISCUSSION: DDM is a feasibility trial to provide personalized and non-personalized music interventions for critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Our trial will also estimate the preliminary efficacy of music interventions on reducing delirium incidence and severity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03095443 . Registered on 23 March 2017.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Delirio/prevención & control , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Musicoterapia/métodos , Música , Prioridad del Paciente , Protocolos Clínicos , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Delirio/diagnóstico , Delirio/mortalidad , Delirio/psicología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Indiana , Reproductor MP3 , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Musicoterapia/instrumentación , Alta del Paciente , Proyectos Piloto , Proyectos de Investigación , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(12): 1246-9, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23143364

RESUMEN

We retrospectively evaluated 99 intensive care unit patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia to determine whether having a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L affected mortality. This MIC was found in 5.1% of patients and was associated with the probability of death (adjusted odds ratio, 13.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-171.2]) independent of other factors.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/mortalidad , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , APACHE , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Intervalos de Confianza , Enfermedad Crítica , Endocarditis/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/mortalidad , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
10.
Crit Care Med ; 40(9): 2569-75, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22732289

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between volume of nonoperative mechanically ventilated patients receiving care in a specific Veterans Health Administration hospital and their mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-hundred nineteen Veterans Health Administration medical centers. PATIENTS: We identified 5,131 hospitalizations involving mechanically ventilated patients in an intensive care unit during 2009, who did not receive surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We extracted demographic and clinical data from the VA Inpatient Evaluation Center. For each hospital, we defined volume as the total number of nonsurgical admissions receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit during 2009. We examined the hospital contribution to 30-day mortality using multilevel logistic regression models with a random intercept for each hospital. We quantified the extent of interhospital variation in 30-day mortality using the intraclass correlation coefficient and median odds ratio. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the relationship between volume and 30-day mortality and risk-adjusted all models using a patient-level prognostic score derived from clinical data representing the risk of death conditional on treatment at a high-volume hospital. Mean age for the sample was 65 (SD 11) yrs, 97% were men, and 60% were white. The median VA hospital cared for 40 (interquartile range 19-62) mechanically ventilated patients in 2009. Crude 30-day mortality for these patients was 36.9%. After reliability and risk adjustment to the median patient, adjusted hospital-level mortality varied from 33.5% to 40.6%. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the hospital-level variation was 0.6% (95% confidence interval 0.1, 3.4%), with a median odds ratio of 1.15 (95% confidence interval 1.06, 1.38). The relationship between hospital volume of mechanically ventilated and 30-day mortality was not statistically significant: each 50-patient increase in volume was associated with a nonsignificant 2% decrease in the odds of death within 30 days (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Veterans Health Administration hospitals caring for lower volumes of mechanically ventilated patients do not have worse mortality. Mechanisms underlying this finding are unclear, but, if elucidated, may offer other integrated health systems ways to overcome the disadvantages of small-volume centers in achieving good outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Control de Calidad , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Respiración Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos , Carga de Trabajo
11.
J Pediatr (Rio J) ; 87(2): 145-9, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21503381

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of transferring a pediatric population to mechanical ventilator dependency units (MVDUs) or to home mechanical ventilation (HMV) on bed availability in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This is a longitudinal, retrospective study of hospitalized children who required prolonged mechanical ventilation at the MVDU located at the Hospital Auxiliar de Suzano, a secondary public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We calculated the number of days patients spent at MVDU and on HMV, and analyzed their survival rates with Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were admitted to the MVDU in 7.3 years. Median length of stay in this unit was 239 days (interquartile range = 102-479). Of these patients, 22 came from the ICU, where their transfer made available 8,643 bed-days (a mean of 14 new patients per month). HMV of eight patients made 4,022 bed-days available in the hospital in 4 years (a mean of 12 new patients per month in the ICU). Survival rates of patients at home were not significantly different from those observed in hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital unit for mechanical ventilator-dependent patients and HMV can improve bed availability in ICUs. Survival rates of patients who receive HMV are not significantly different from those of patients who remain hospitalized.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Respiratorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 87(2): 145-149, mar.-abr. 2011. graf, tab
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS | ID: lil-586623

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Determinar o impacto da transferência de uma população pediátrica para unidades de dependentes de ventilação mecânica (UDVMs) ou para ventilação mecânica domiciliar (VMD) na disponibilidade de leitos na unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) pediátrica. MÉTODOS: Estudo longitudinal retrospectivo de crianças hospitalizadas que necessitavam de VM prolongada na UDVM do Hospital Auxiliar de Suzano, um hospital público secundário do estado de São Paulo. Calculamos o número de dias que os pacientes passaram na UDVM e em VMD e analisamos sua sobrevida com o estimador Kaplan-Meier. RESULTADOS: Quarenta e um pacientes foram admitidos na UDVM em 7,3 anos. A mediana do tempo de internação na unidade foi de 239 dias (amplitude interquartil = 102-479). Desses pacientes, 22 vieram da UTI pediátrica, onde a transferência disponibilizou 8.643 leitos-dia (uma média de 14 novos pacientes por mês). A VMD de oito pacientes disponibilizou 4.022 leitos-dia no hospital em 4 anos (uma média de 12 novos pacientes por mês na UTI). A taxa de sobrevida dos pacientes em casa não foi significativamente diferente daquela verificada nos pacientes hospitalizados. CONCLUSÕES: Uma unidade hospitalar para dependentes de ventilação mecânica e a VMD podem melhorar a disponibilidade de leitos em UTIs. A taxa de sobrevida dos pacientes que recebem VMD não apresentou diferenças significativas em relação à dos pacientes que permanecem hospitalizados.


OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of transferring a pediatric population to mechanical ventilator dependency units (MVDUs) or to home mechanical ventilation (HMV) on bed availability in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: This is a longitudinal, retrospective study of hospitalized children who required prolonged mechanical ventilation at the MVDU located at the Hospital Auxiliar de Suzano, a secondary public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. We calculated the number of days patients spent at MVDU and on HMV, and analyzed their survival rates with Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were admitted to the MVDU in 7.3 years. Median length of stay in this unit was 239 days (interquartile range = 102-479). Of these patients, 22 came from the ICU, where their transfer made available 8,643 bed-days (a mean of 14 new patients per month). HMV of eight patients made 4,022 bed-days available in the hospital in 4 years (a mean of 12 new patients per month in the ICU). Survival rates of patients at home were not significantly different from those observed in hospitalized patients. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital unit for mechanical ventilator-dependent patients and HMV can improve bed availability in ICUs. Survival rates of patients who receive HMV are not significantly different from those of patients who remain hospitalized.


Asunto(s)
Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Respiratorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad
13.
Med. intensiva (Madr., Ed. impr.) ; 27(3): 155-161, mar. 2003. tab, graf
Artículo en Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-24280

RESUMEN

Describir las características epidemiológicas de los pacientes pediátricos con traumatismo craneoencefálico grave (TCEG) y los factores asociados con la mortalidad.Revisión de los pacientes ingresados en una unidad de medicina intensiva pediátrica (UMIP) con TCEG en el período comprendido entre julio de 1983 y enero de 2001.De los 262 pacientes con TCE ingresados en nuestra unidad durante el período de estudio, presentaron TCEG 125 (48 por ciento). La edad media de este grupo fue de 69,1 (41,5) meses, con una puntuación media en la escala de Glasgow (GCS) de 5,4 (1,8). El 43 por ciento de los pacientes presentaron lesión encefálica difusa (LED) grave en la TAC.En 32 pacientes (26 por ciento) se objetivaron secuelas de relevancia clínica, que fueron graves en un 66 por ciento de los casos. Un 75 por ciento de los pacientes en los que se monitorizó la presión intracraneal (PIC) presentaron hipertensión endocraneal (HTC). La mortalidad de los pacientes con TCEG fue de un 29 por ciento y se asoció de forma significativa a una menor puntuación del GCS, a la existencia de hiperglucemia o HTC, a la presencia de midriasis o shock y a la necesidad de ventilación mecánica. La mortalidad de la LED grave fue significativamente más elevada que la LED leve-moderada (69 frente a 6 por ciento; p < 0,001) y que la lesión focal (69 frente a 26 por ciento; p < 0,001). Los factores responsables de la mortalidad de forma independiente en los pacientes pediátricos con TCEG fueron la existencia de midriasis (p = 0,001), shock (p = 0,03) y LED grave en la TAC (p = 0,08).La morbimortalidad de la población estudiada con TCEG coincide globalmente con la mayoría de las series publicadas; b) la menor puntuación en la escala de Glasgow y la mayor afección en la TAC inicial se asociaron a una mayor mortalidad; c) los pacientes con TCEG en los que se monitorizó la PIC presentaron una alta incidencia de HTC; d) los factores de riesgo causantes de mortalidad fueron la midriasis, el shock y la lesión encefálica difusa grave en la TAC (AU)


Asunto(s)
Preescolar , Lactante , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/mortalidad , Evolución Clínica , Pronóstico , Respiración Artificial , Respiración Artificial/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/clasificación , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA