Midwives' experiences of professional learning when practicing collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labour: data from the oneplus trial.

BACKGROUND: Learning is a lifelong process and the workplace is an essential arena for professional learning. Workplace learning is particularly relevant for midwives as essential knowledge and skills are gained through clinical work. A clinical practice known as 'Collegial Midwifery Assistance' (CMA), which involves two midwives being present during the active second stage of labour, was found to reduce severe perineal trauma by 30% in the Oneplus trial. Research regarding learning associated with CMA, however, is lacking. The aim was to investigate learning experiences of primary and second midwives with varying levels of work experience when practicing CMA, and to further explore possible factors that influence their learning. METHODS: The study uses an observational design to analyse data from the Oneplus trial. Descriptive statistics and proportions were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Stratified univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1430 births performed with CMA were included in the study. Less experienced primary midwives reported professional learning to a higher degree (< 2 years, 76%) than the more experienced (> 20 years, 22%). A similar but less pronounced pattern was seen for the second midwives. Duration of the intervention ≥ 15 min improved learning across groups, especially for the least experienced primary midwives. The colleague's level of experience was found to be of importance for primary midwives with less than five years' work experience, whereas for second midwives it was also important in their mid to late career. Reciprocal feedback had more impact on learning for the primary midwife than the second midwife. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence that CMA has the potential to contribute with professional learning both for primary and second midwives, for all levels of work experience. We found that factors such as the colleague's work experience, the duration of CMA and reciprocal feedback influenced learning, but the importance of these factors were different for the primary and second midwife and varied depending on the level of work experience. The findings may have implications for future implementation of CMA and can be used to guide the practice.

Visual biofeedback for shortening second stage of labor: randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether visual biofeedback can be used during labor as an effective tool for shortening the second stage of labor and reducing the need for instrumental delivery. METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. Nulliparous women under epidural anesthesia were randomized at the point of full dilation into the biofeedback group (n = 50) or the control group (n = 50). Both groups received coached maternal pushing during four consecutive contractions, while an experienced obstetrician performed transperineal ultrasound. Only women in the biofeedback group observed the ultrasound display screen. Following this intervention, labor was managed routinely by the obstetric team. Angle of progression (AOP) was measured at rest and while pushing, before and during the first and fourth contractions. Second-stage duration and delivery outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Visual biofeedback did not affect the duration of the second stage, which lasted for a median of 2.28 (interquartile range (IQR), 1.25-3.10) h in the biofeedback group vs 2.08 (IQR, 1.58-3.02) h in the control group (P = 0.981). AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback group compared with the control group, both at rest before the fourth contraction (mean ± SD, 142.6° ± 15.9° vs 136.8° ± 13.1°; P = 0.049) and while pushing during the fourth contraction (mean ± SD, 159.3° ± 19.2° vs 149.4° ± 15.1°; P = 0.005). The increase in AOP was significantly higher in the biofeedback compared with the control group between rest and pushing at the last push (mean ± SD, 16.6° ± 11.0° vs 12.6° ± 8.3°; P = 0.041) and between the first rest and last push (mean ± SD, 24.4° ± 13.6° vs 17.9° ± 11.3°; P = 0.011). The rate of intact perineum was similar between groups (12% vs 8%; P = 0.505). CONCLUSIONS: Visual biofeedback during the second stage of labor may facilitate descent of fetal head during maternal pushing without affecting second-stage duration, possibly due to the short duration of the intervention. Future studies should focus on continuous intervention throughout the second stage of labor. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

The management framework of upright position in the second stage of labour: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Upright positions, as a non-pharmacological, have been well documented in multiple studies to promote normal labor, facilitate favourable birth outcomes and positive childbirth experience. Yet, the application status of upright positions in China, and even globally, is unfavourable. Thus, we have developed the Program for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labor (UPSSL program) for the widespread application of upright positions. While there is limited research evidence on the areas of improvement and corresponding strategies for embedding the evidence into midwifery practice. OBJECTIVES: To explore perspectives of health care providers on improvement areas of upright positions in the second stage of labor, and to identify corresponding strategies in order to develop a management framework for successful implementation of upright positions. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design with semi-structured interviews was conducted in the study. The participants involving 13 midwives, six obstetricians and six department managers were selected from three hospitals in Beijing, China. ATLAS.TI 8 software was utilized to manage, identify the transcript data, and the thematic analysis method guided the data analysis. RESULTS: A management framework of upright positions in the second stage of labor was developed based on our study, which included five improvement areas : (1) promoting the renewal of midwifery notions and the professional training;(2) strengthening maternal health education based on the "trinity" approach; (3) promoting multidisciplinary cooperation and refining the labor procedures in upright positions; (4) optimizing midwifery human resource allocation and formulating incentive policies; (5) encouraging partner involvement and improving the birth environment. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings could provide a comprehensive view to promote UPSSL Program to be utilized in practice. Our study also provided a way for midwives, obstetricians, and other healthcare providers to work together to facilitate high quality maternal care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings will be useful for nursing managers to carry out the UPSSL program through several strategies, such as strengthening the professional training for assisting labor in the upright positions, reallocating midwifery human resources, and developing the childbirth education on the upright positions.

Primary midwives' experiences of collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labor: Data from the Oneplus trial.

BACKGROUND: Collegial midwifery assistance during the active second stage of labor that involves a second midwife being present has been shown to reduce severe perineal trauma (SPT) by 30%. The aim of this study was to investigate primary midwives' experiences of collegial midwifery assistance with the purpose of preventing SPT during the active second stage of labor. METHODS: This study uses an observational design with data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (Oneplus). Data consist of clinical registration forms completed by the midwives after birth. Descriptive statistics as well as univariable and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The majority of the primary midwives felt confident (61%) and were positive (56%) toward the practice. Midwives with less than 2 years' work experience were more likely to completely agree they felt confident (aOR 9.18, 95% CI: 6.28-13.41) and experience the intervention as positive (aOR 4.04, 95% CI: 2.83-5.78) than those with over 20 years' work experience. Factors such as duration of time spent in the birthing room by the second midwife, opportunity for planning and if the second midwife provided support were further associated with the primary midwife's experience of the practice as being positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that having a second midwife present during the active second stage of labor was an accepted practice, with the majority of primary midwives feeling confident and positive toward the intervention. This was especially pronounced among midwives with less than 2 years' work experience.

Real-time imaging as visual biofeedback in active second stage of labor among nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A prolonged second stage of labor increases the risk of severe perineal laceration, postpartum hemorrhage, operative delivery, and poor Apgar score. The second stage is longer in nulliparas. Maternal pushing during the second stage of labor is an important contributor to the involuntary expulsive force developed by uterine contraction to deliver the fetus. Preliminary data indicate that visual biofeedback during the active second stage hastens birth. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if visual feedback focusing on the perineum reduced the length of the active second stage of labor in comparison with the control. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the University Malaya Medical Centre from December 2021 to August 2022. Nulliparous women about to commence the active second stage, at term, with singleton gestation, reassuring fetal status, and no contraindication for vaginal delivery were randomized to live viewing of the maternal introitus (intervention) or maternal face (sham/placebo control) as visual biofeedback during their pushing. A video camera Bluetooth-linked to a tablet computer display screen was used; in the intervention arm, the camera was focused on the introitus, and in the control arm, on the maternal face. Participants were instructed to watch the display screen during their pushing. The primary outcomes were the intervention-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction with the pushing experience assessed using a 0-to-10 visual numerical rating scale. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, perineal injury, delivery blood loss, birthweight, umbilical cord arterial blood pH and base excess at birth, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission. Data were analyzed with the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 230 women were randomized (115 to intervention and 115 to control arm). The active second stage duration (intervention-to-delivery interval) was a median (interquartile range) of 16 (11-23) and 17 (12-31) minutes (P=.289), and maternal satisfaction with the pushing experience was 9 (8-10) and 7 (6-7) (P<.001) for the intervention and control arm, respectively. Women randomized to the intervention arm were more likely to agree to recommend their management to a friend (88/115 [76.5%] vs 39/115 [33.9%]; relative risk, 2.26 [95% confidence interval, 1.72-2.97]; P<.001) and more likely to have less severe perineal injury (P=.018). CONCLUSION: Real-time viewing of the maternal introitus as visual biofeedback during pushing resulted in higher maternal satisfaction compared with the sham control of viewing the maternal face; however, the time to delivery was not significantly shortened.

Efficacy of perineal massage during the second stage of labor for the prevention of perineal injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Numerous interventions to reduce perineal trauma during childbirth have been studied in recent years, including perineal massage. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of perineal massage during the second stage of labor to prevent perineal damage. SEARCH STRATEGY: Systematic search in PubMed, Pedro, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, BioMed, SpringerLink, EBSCOhost, CINAHL, and MEDLINE with the terms Massage, Second labor stage, Obstetric delivery, and Parturition. SELECTION CRITERIA: The articles must have been published in the last 10 years; the perineal massage was administered to the study sample; and the experimental design consisted of randomized controlled trial. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Tables were used to describe both the studies' characteristics and the extracted data. The PEDro and Jadad scales were used to assess the quality of studies. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1172 total results identified, nine were selected. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis and indicated a statistically significant decreased number of episiotomies in perineal massage. CONCLUSIONS: Massage during the second stage of labor appears to be effective in preventing episiotomies and reducing the duration of the second stage of labor. However, it does not appear to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of perineal tears.

Effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration: An overview of systematic reviews.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence on the effects of different techniques during the second stage of labour on reducing perineal laceration depending on available systematic reviews to provide optimal evidence for decision-making. BACKGROUND: Preventing perineal laceration has been considered an important part of improving women's health. Various techniques have been used to prevent perineal laceration during the second stage of labour. However, systematic reviews evaluating the effects of different techniques on reducing perineal laceration show inconsistent results. DESIGN: Overview of systematic reviews. METHODS: Five English and four Chinese databases were systematically searched for relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 1 January 2016 and 31 August 2021. The quality of the included reviews was assessed by the AMSTAR 2 tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted to report the results of moderate-to-high quality systematic reviews. The overview was reported according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Eighteen reviews were included, of which four reviews had moderate-to-high methodological quality. Perineal massage and warm compresses significantly decreased the incidence of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (moderate-quality evidence). Hands-off technique had no impact on perineal laceration (low-to-moderate quality evidence). Ritgen's manoeuvre could reduce the incidence of first-degree perineal laceration but increase the incidence of second-degree perineal laceration (very low-quality evidence). Spontaneous pushing (low-quality evidence) and delayed pushing (moderate-quality evidence) had no impact on the incidence of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration. Upright positions did not increase the risk of third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration (very low- to low-quality evidence) but increased the risk of second-degree perineal laceration for women without epidural analgesia (low-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Perineal massage and warm compresses could be the better choice for preventing perineal laceration in the second stage of labour. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Midwives and obstetricians could use perineal massage and warm compresses to prevent perineal laceration and should consider women's preferences and experience with perineal techniques.

Swedish midwives' experiences of collegial midwifery assistance during the second stage of labour: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increased focus on clinical practice that may reduce severe perineal trauma due to awareness of the associated morbidity. Knowledge regarding the best practice to reduce these injuries is limited. Collegial midwifery assistance during the second stage of labour that involves an additional midwife being present has recently been implemented into many Swedish birth units with the aim of reducing severe perineal trauma. However, no studies have been conducted to evaluate midwives' experiences and views of this practice. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore midwives' experiences of collegial midwifery assistance during the second stage of labour. METHODS: A qualitative study was undertaken with five focus groups conducted with 37 midwives who were part of a multisite randomised controlled trial. The data was analysed with reflexive thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four key themes were generated: (i) "challenging the professional role"; (ii) "a balancing act between different roles"; (iii) "not just why and how - but who"; (iv) "a potential arena for learning". CONCLUSION: This practice enabled valuable collegial support and learning. The midwives' experiences were multifaceted and influenced by several factors, including norms and culture in the birth units as well as personal relationships and the midwives' views on their role and childbirth. Staffing should be adapted in clinical practice to optimise the conditions for collegial support and learning while avoiding unintended consequences.

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour in China: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Upright positions in the second stage of labour are recommended by many labour and birth guidelines, but they have not been widely used in China and the implementation varies greatly. Given this, we developed a Practice Programme for Upright Positions in the Second Stage of Labour (UPSSL Programme). Whether the UPSSL Programme can be translated into action in the local context is a crucial issue that needs to be further explored. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the UPSSL Programme in the Chinese context to facilitate the integration of evidence and routine clinical practice. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative design was adopted. SETTING: The study was conducted in the maternity unit of a tertiary general hospital in China. PARTICIPANTS: A purposeful sampling was used to recruit midwives, obstetricians and their leaders. Data were collected through semi-structured face-to-face interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide the development of interview guide and the analysis of qualitative data. The study was reported following the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. FINDINGS: Twelve eligible participants were interviewed, including eight midwives, two obstetricians, the head nurse of the delivery room, and the head of the maternity unit. Eight barriers and 10 facilitators were identified by using the directed content analysis. The barriers to implementing the UPSSL Programme were professionals' concerns about the potential risks of the programme (relative advantage), higher complexity (complexity), placement method of upright positions presented without pictures (design quality & packaging), staff shortage (cost), limited understanding of parturients' needs (patient needs & resources), lack of a training protocol for professionals (available resources), professionals' limited knowledge and skills in the programme (knowledge & beliefs about the intervention), and lack of confidence in the successful implementation of the programme (self-efficacy). KEY CONCLUSIONS: Participants expressed several barriers and facilitators to implementing the UPSSL Programme in clinical practice in the Chinese context. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings provide a reference for the development of targeted implementation strategies that could promote the integration of evidence and routine clinical practice, and thus facilitate the normative application and promotion of upright positions in China.

Culturally appropriate care to support maternal positions during the second stage of labour: Midwives' perspectives in South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  'Doing what the Romans do in Rome' was an expression raised by one of the midwives following workplace culture and disregarding women's birth choices. Midwifery practice in South Africa caters for a culturally diverse ethnic groups of childbearing women. Culturally appropriate care highlights the importance of including women in decision-making concerning their birth preferences including maternal positions during labour. Women's right to choose their maternal position and cultural preferences during labour has been overlooked, leading to poor maternal healthcare provision and negative birth experiences. AIM:  In this article, the researchers aimed to describe and explore midwives' perspectives on culturally appropriate care to support maternal positions during the second stage of labour. SETTING:  Midwives working in the maternity ward in a public hospital in South Africa. METHODS:  A qualitative descriptive design using individual interviews was used to collect data. The participants were selected using the purposive sampling method. The study population comprised 20 midwives who volunteered to participate in the study. Data were transcribed manually and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS:  The four main themes are as follows: (1) Caring for women from various ethnic groups, (2) midwives disregard women's beliefs and culture, (3) midwife personal cultural attributes and (4) midwifery unit workplace culture. CONCLUSION:  The authors concluded that culturally appropriate care towards the women's choices of birth position during the second stage of labour should form an integral part of the midwifery care rendered.

The effect of two midwives during the second stage of labour to reduce severe perineal trauma (Oneplus): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Severe perineal trauma (SPT) affecting the anal sphincter muscle complex is a serious complication following childbirth, associated with short-term and long-term maternal morbidity. Effective preventive strategies are still scarce. The aim of the Oneplus trial was to test the hypothesis that the presence of a second midwife during the second stage of labour, with the purpose of preventing SPT, would result in fewer injuries affecting the anal sphincter than if attended by one midwife. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled parallel group, unmasked trial done at five obstetric units in Sweden, women were randomly assigned to be assisted by either one or two midwives in late second stage. Nulliparous women and women planning the first vaginal birth after caesarean section who were age 18-47 years were randomly assigned to an intervention when reaching the second stage of labour. Further inclusion criteria were gestational week 37+0, carrying a singleton live fetus in vertex presentation, and proficiency in either Swedish, English, Arabic, or Farsi. Exclusion criteria were a multiple pregnancy, intrauterine fetal demise, a planned caesarean section, or women who were less than 37 weeks pregnant. Randomisation to the intervention group of two midwives or standard care group of one midwife (1:1) was done using a computer-based program and treatment groups were allocated by use of sealed opaque envelopes. All women and midwives were aware of the group assignment, but the statistician from Clinical Studies Forum South, who did the analyses, was masked to group assignment. Midwives were instructed to implement existing prevention models and the second midwife was to assist on instruction of the primary midwife, when asked. Midwives were also instructed to complete case report forms detailing assistance techniques and perineal trauma prevention techniques. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who had SPT, for which odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and logistic regression was done to adjust for study site. All analyses were done according to intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT0377096. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2018, and March 21, 2020, 8866 women were assessed for eligibility, and 4264 met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate. 3776 (88·5%) of 4264 women were randomly assigned to an intervention after reaching the second stage of labour. 1892 women were assigned to collegial assistance (two midwives) during the second stage of labour and 1884 women were assigned to standard care (one midwife). 13 women in each group did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. After further exclusions, 1546 women spontaneously gave birth in the intervention group and 1513 in the standard care group. 1546 women in the intervention group and 1513 in the standard care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. There was a significant reduction in SPT in the intervention group (3·9% [61 of 1546] vs 5·7% [86 of 1513]; adjusted OR 0·69 (0·49-0·97). INTERPRETATION: The presence of two midwives during the active second stage can reduce SPT in women giving birth for the first time. FUNDING: The Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare; Jan Hains Research Foundation; and Skane County Council's Research and Development Foundation.

Combined perineal massage and warm compress compared to massage alone during active second stage of labour in nulliparas: A randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of combined perineal massage and warm compress to the perineum (MassComp) compared to perineal massage alone during pushing in the second stage of labour in reducing perineal trauma requiring suturing in nulliparas. STUDY DESIGN: A randomised trial was performed in a University hospital, Malaysia from June 2020 to May 2021. 281 term nulliparas who were about to start pushing in the second stage of labour were randomised to combined perineal massage and warm compress or perineal massage alone to the perineum. Primary outcome was suturing for perineal injury (episiotomy or tear). The Chi-square test was used to analyse categorical data, Student t test to compare means and distributions for normally distributed continuous data and Mann Whitney U test for appropriate ordinal data. RESULTS: Data from 277 participants (140 MassComp arm, 137 perineal massage alone arm) were analysed based on modified intention to treat basis. Perineal suturing rates were 133/140(95.0%) [MassComp] vs. 128/137(93.4%) [perineal massage alone] RR 1.02(95%CI 0.96-1.08), P = 0.615. Of the secondary outcomes, Likert scale response to recommend allocated treatment to a friend was 103/140(73.6%) vs. 84/137(61.3%) RR 1.20(95%CI 1.02-1.42)NNTb 9(95%CI 4.3-76.4) P = 0.029, participants' satisfaction with care (visual numerical rating scale 0-10) median [interquartile range] 6[6-8] vs. 6[5-8] P = 0.392, intervention to delivery intervals were 25[15-35] vs. 19[14-30] minutes P = 0.012, major perineal injury (episiotomy, second degree or higher tears) rates 116/140(82.9%) vs. 119/137(86.9%) RR 0.95(95%CI 0.86-1.05), P = 0.404, episiotomy rates 97/140(69.3%) vs. 97/140(70.8%) RR 0.98(95%CI 0.84-1.14), P = 0.795, and spontaneous vaginal delivery rates 103/140(73.6%) vs. 106/137(77.4%) RR 0.95(95%CI 0.83-1.09), P = 0.488 for MassComp vs. perineal massage alone respectively. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Massage and warm compress during pushing did not decrease the likelihood of perineal injury requiring suturing in nulliparas when compared to perineal massage alone. Women were more likely to recommend massage and warm compress during pushing to a friend.

Chinese midwives' perceptions on upright positions during the second stage of labour: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Upright positions are recommended by many international organizations due to their positive effects on improving birth outcomes. The effects can only be achieved when upright positions are properly adopted by women under the guidance of midwives. However, whether midwives in China have a clear understanding of upright positions during the second stage of labour is an issue that has not been explored. The aim of this study was to explore midwives' perceptions on assisting women in upright positions during the second stage of labour in the context of China. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. We analysed the data using the conventional content analysis and reported the study in line with the COREQ checklist. SETTING: The study was conducted at the labour wards of two maternity hospitals and two general hospitals in China where the adoption of upright positions was encouraged during the second stage of labour. PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured individual interviews with 17 midwives were conducted between May and July 2020. FINDINGS: Three main themes were identified: (1) safety and availability; (2) unclear method of implementation; (3) lack of knowledge of the potential risks and precautions. Midwives' perceptions were based primarily on clinical experience rather than evidence-based practice. Their perceptions on the indications and contraindications of upright positions were divergent and ambiguous. Midwives' suggested that the indications and contraindications should be adjusted in the context of China. Time limit for keeping an upright position and maternal pushing during uterine contractions were two questions that still confused midwives. Midwives lacked knowledge of the potential risks of upright positions and rarely systematically summarized the precautions. KEY CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that assisting women to give birth in upright positions during the second stage of labour can be a challenge for midwives in China, and also highlights the need for clarifying the detailed implementation methods of upright positions in the context of China by evidence-based approaches. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An evidence-based protocol for implementing upright positions during the second stage of labour should be developed to guide midwives' practice and facilitate the successful use of upright positions in China.

Length of the Second Stage of Labor in Women Delivering Twins.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the length of the second stage of labor in twin deliveries and to compare the length of the second stage in twin and singleton gestations. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study from three large hospitals in Israel. Clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage (the time from documented 10-cm dilation until spontaneous vaginal delivery of the first twin). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association of clinical factors with the length of the second stage. The length of the second stage in twin and singleton pregnancies was compared. RESULTS: From 2011 to June, 2020, there were 2,009 twin deliveries and 135,217 singleton deliveries. Of the twin deliveries, 655 (32.6%) of the patients were nulliparous (95th percentile length of the second stage 3 hours and 51 minutes), 1,235 (61.5%) were parous (95th percentile 1 hour 56 minutes), and 119 (5.9%) were grand multiparous (five or more prior deliveries) (95th percentile 1 hour 24 minutes). In women delivering twins, epidural use was associated with a statistically significant increase in the length of the second stage of 40 minutes in nulliparous patients and 15 minutes in parous patients. In all groups, the length of the second stage was longer in patients delivering twins compared with singletons. Second-stage length longer than the 95th percentile in twins was associated with admission to the neonatal intensive care unit and need for phototherapy. CONCLUSION: Second-stage labor is longer in twins than singletons and is associated with obstetric history. Normal ranges for the second stage may be useful in guiding clinical practice.

Combined massage and warm compress to the perineum during active second stage of labor in nulliparas: A randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combined effect of massage and warm compress to the perineum (MassComp) compared with standard "hands-off" in the second stage of labor. METHODS: A randomized trial was conducted in a University hospital in Malaysia. Nulliparous women at term who were about to start pushing were randomized to massage during pushing and warm compress to the perineum in between pushes or to standard "hands-off" care. Primary outcome was suturing for perineal injury (episiotomy or tear). RESULTS: A total of 156 participants were analyzed based on intention to treat. Perineal repair rates were 53/79 (67%) for MassComp versus 70/77 (91%) for control (relative risk [RR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.98, number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome [NNTb ] 5, 95% CI 2.83-8.62, P < 0.001). Of the secondary outcomes, participants' satisfaction with care (visual numerical rating scale 0-10; 8.3 ± 1.2 vs 7.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.014), major perineal injury (second degree or higher) rates 34/79 (43%) versus 51/77 (66%) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.97, NNTb 5, 95% CI 2.61-12.56, P = 0.004), episiotomy rates 28/79 (37%) versus 40/77 (53%) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.98, NNTb 8, 95% CI 3.63-36.46, P = 0.043), intervention to delivery intervals 29.5 ± 13.6 versus 27.9 ± 13.8 minutes (P = 0.472) and spontaneous vaginal delivery rates 63/79 (79.7%) versus 56/77 (72.7%) (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92-1.34, P = 0.306) for MassComp versus control, respectively. CONCLUSION: Massage and warm compress during pushing decreased the perineal suturing, major perineal injury, and episiotomy rates and improved maternal satisfaction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN42773879.

FIGO good clinical practice paper: management of the second stage of labor.

This good clinical practice paper provides an overview of the current evidence around second stage care, highlighting the challenges and the importance of maintaining high-quality, safe, and respectful care in all settings. It includes a series of recommendations based on best available evidence regarding length of second stage, judicious use of episiotomy, and the importance of competent attendants and adequate resource to facilitate all aspects of second stage management, from physiological birth to assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean at full dilatation. The second stage of labor is potentially the most dangerous time for the baby and can have significant consequences for the mother, including death or severe perineal trauma or fistula, especially where there are failures to recognize and repair. This paper sets out principles of care, including the vital role of skilled birth attendants and birth companions, and the importance of obstetricians and midwives working together effectively and speaking with one voice, whether to women or to policy makers. The optimization of high-quality, safe, and personalized care in the second stage of labor for all women globally can only be achieved by appropriate attention to the training of birth attendants, midwives, and obstetricians. FIGO is committed to this aim alongside the WHO, ICM, and all FIGO's 132 member societies.

Key indicators influencing management of prolonged second stage labour by midwives in freestanding birth centres: Results from an ethnographic interview study.

PROBLEMS: Complications for newborns and postpartum clients in the hospital are more frequent after a prolonged second stage of labour. Midwives in community settings have little research to guide management in their settings. AIM: We explored how US birth centre midwives identify onset of second stage of labour and determine when to transfer clients to the hospital for prolonged second stage. METHODS: Ethnographic interviews of midwives with at least 2 years' experience in birth centres and participant observation of birth centre care. FINDINGS: We interviewed 21 midwives (18 CNMs, 3 CPMs/equivalent) from 18 birth centres in 11 US states, 45% with hospital practice privileges. Midwives relied on and engaged in embodied practice in evaluating each labour and making decisions concerning management of labour. Midwives considered time a useful but limited measure as a guiding factor in management. Though ideas of time and progress do play an important role in the decision-making process of midwives, their usefulness is limited due to the continual, multifactorial, and multisensory nature of the assessment. Relationship with the transfer hospital structured midwives' decision-making about transfers. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: These findings can inform future robust multivariate evaluation of factors, including but not limited to time, in guidelines for management of second stage of labour. Optimal management may require formal consideration of more than just time and parity. Our findings also suggest the need for evaluation of how structural issues involving hospital privileges for midwives and relationships between birth centre and hospital staff affect the well-being of childbearing families.

Effects of upright positions during the second stage of labour for women without epidural analgesia: A meta-analysis.

AIMS: To assess the effects of upright positions on maternal outcomes for women without epidural analgesia in comparison with recumbent positions during the second stage of labour. BACKGROUND: Upright positions have many physiological advantages. The underlying benefits and risks of upright positions during the second stage of labour have been reported in many studies but the results are divergent. DESIGN: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and ProQuest databases were systematically searched from inception to 17 June 2019. REVIEW METHODS: We conducted the quality appraisal using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and performed meta-analyses using the Review Manager 5.3 software. The primary outcomes were instrumental vaginal delivery and the duration of the second stage of labour. RESULTS: Overall, 12 studies including 4,314 women were included. Upright positions significantly decreased the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (risk ratio [RR] = 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93), shortened the active pushing phase (mean difference [MD] = -8.16 min, 95% CI -16.29 to -0.02), decreased the rate of severe perineal trauma (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.87) and episiotomy (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.92), but significantly increased the rate of second-degree perineal trauma (RR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.10-1.90). However, there was no significant difference in the duration of the second stage of labour or postpartum haemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Upright positions are beneficial for improving maternal outcomes. Several results should be considered with caution. Researchers need to clarify the definition of upright positions and conduct large, robust studies in the future to provide stronger evidence. IMPACT: This meta-analysis explores a crucial issue in intrapartum care and clarifies the benefits and possible risks of upright positions in the second stage of labour. Midwives and obstetricians are encouraged to apply upright positions depending on women's preferences and labour progress but should take measures to prevent perineal trauma.

[Normal childbirth: physiologic labor support and medical procedures. Guidelines of the French National Authority for Health (HAS) with the collaboration of the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) and the French College of Midwives (CNSF) - Maternal postures during the second stage of labour, delivery techniques and perineal protection]. / Accouchement normal : accompagnement de la physiologie et interventions médicales. Recommandations de la Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) avec la collaboration du Collège national des gynécologues obstétriciens français (CNGOF) et du Collège national des sages-femmes de France (CNSF) ­ postures maternelles lors du second stade du travail, techniques de l'accouchement et protection périnéale.

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal postures during the second stage of labour on course of labour, mode of delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity. To describe the different techniques of spontaneous vaginal delivery and their influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. To describe the different perineal protection techniques. METHOD: Systematic review of the literature through consultation of Medline, Cochrane databases and international recommendations. RESULTS: There is no particular posture that has demonstrated its superiority (Level of Evidence (LE) 2). In case of no contraindication and permanent maternal and fetal monitoring, it is recommended to encourage women to adopt the postures they consider most comfortable during the second stage of labour (Consensus agreement). There is insufficient evidence in the literature to recommend a technique for fetal head and shoulders delivery. There is not enough data in the literature to recommend the use of Ritgen maneuver (grade B), perineal massage (gradeC) or hot compresses (Consensus agreement). The abdominal expression must be abandoned (grade B). CONCLUSION: The second stage of labour is a crucial time in labour that can lead to significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. It is necessary to take the greatest possible care in the supervision and management of women, especially for the perineal protection. The influence of non-medicinal techniques on the course of the second stage of labour should be studied.