Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 53
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 22(3): 677-690, 2021 09 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565069

RESUMEN

Heart Failure (HF) is characterized by an elevated readmission rate, with almost 50% of events occurring after the first episode over the first 6 months of the post-discharge period. In this context, the vulnerable phase represents the period when patients elapse from a sub-acute to a more stabilized chronic phase. The lack of an accurate approach for each HF subtype is probably the main cause of the inconclusive data in reducing the trend of recurrent hospitalizations. Most care programs are based on the main diagnosis and the HF stages, but a model focused on the specific HF etiology is lacking. The HF clinic route based on the HF etiology and the underlying diseases responsible for HF could become an interesting approach, compared with the traditional programs, mainly based on non-specific HF subtypes and New York Heart Association class, rather than on detailed etiologic and epidemiological data. This type of care may reduce the 30-day readmission rates for HF, increase the use of evidence-based therapies, prevent the exacerbation of each comorbidity, improve patient compliance, and decrease the use of resources. For all these reasons, we propose a dedicated outpatient HF program with a daily practice scenario that could improve the early identification of symptom progression and the quality-of-life evaluation, facilitate the access to diagnostic and laboratory tools and improve the utilization of financial resources, together with optimal medical titration and management.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente , Pronóstico
4.
Open Heart ; 7(1): e001262, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32399252

RESUMEN

Aims: Guidelines recommend specialist valve clinics as best practice for the assessment and conservative management of patients with heart valve disease. However, there is little guidance on how to set up and organise a clinic. The aim of this study is to describe a clinic run by a multidisciplinary team consisting of cardiologists, physiologist/scientists and a nurse. Methods: The clinical and organisational aims of the clinic, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and links with other services are described. The methods of training non-clinical staff are detailed. Data were prospectively entered onto a database and the study consisted of an analysis of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of all patients seen between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Results: There were 2126 new patients and 9522 visits in the 10-year period. The mean age was 64.8 and 55% were male. Of the visits, 3587 (38%) were to the cardiologists, 4092 (43%) to the physiologist/scientists and 1843 (19%) to the nurse. The outcomes from the cardiologist clinics were cardiology follow-up in 460 (30%), referral for surgery in 354 (23%), referral to the physiologist/scientist clinic in 412 (27%) or to the nurse clinic in 65 (4.3%) and discharge in 230 (15%). The cardiologist needed to see 6% from the nurse clinic and 10% from the physiologist/scientist clinic, while advice alone was sufficient in 10% and 9%. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary specialist valve clinic is feasible and sustainable in the long term.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/terapia , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Anciano , Cardiólogos/organización & administración , Bases de Datos Factuales , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Femenino , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Londres , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Flujo de Trabajo
5.
Open Heart ; 7(1)2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32393657

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Assessing the impact of a new integrated heart failure service (IHFS) in a medium-sized district general hospital (DGH) on heart failure (HF) mortality, readmission rates, and provision of HF care. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study encompassing all patients admitted with a diagnosis of HF over two 12-month periods before (2012/2013), and after (2015/2016) IHFS establishment. RESULTS: Total admissions for HF increased by 40% (385 vs 540), with a greater number admitted to the cardiology ward (231 vs 121). After IHFS implementation, patients were more likely to see a cardiologist (35.1% vs 43.7%, p=0.009), undergo echocardiography (70.1% vs 81.5%, p<0.001), be initiated on all three disease modifying HF medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA)) in the heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) group (42% vs 99%, p<0.001) and receive specialist HF input (81.6% vs 85.4%, p=0.2). Both 30-day post-discharge mortality and HF related readmissions were significantly lower in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (8.9% vs 3.1%, p=0.032, 58% reduction, p=0.043 respectively) with no-significant reductions in all other HF groups. In-patient mortality was similar. Length of stay in Cardiology wards increased from 8.4 to 12.7 days (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Establishment of an IHFS within a DGH with limited resources and only a modest service re-design has resulted in significantly improved provision of specialist in-patient care, use of HFrEF medications, early heart failure nurse follow-up, and is associated with a reduction in early mortality, particularly in the HFpEF cohort, and HF related readmissions.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Capacidad de Camas en Hospitales , Hospitales de Distrito/organización & administración , Hospitales Generales/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Readmisión del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 21(5): 374-384, 2020 May.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310929

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The healthcare sector is among the most complex ones where partnerships and interdependencies between different hospitals can achieve real technical and managerial operational models aimed at optimizing resources. However, the construction of this type of interdependence is not simple to implement, making it necessary to integrate at different organizational and professional levels. The aim of this work is to present the integration process and results achieved during the first 3 years of experience after a synergic integration of the interventional cath lab units of the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano and the Infermi Hospital Local Health Unit TO 3, Rivoli. METHODS: Starting from March 2016, data concerning number and type of procedures as well as the distribution of workloads of each operator in the two cath labs were recorded and monitored. Moreover, numbers of urgent procedures performed as well as the door-to-balloon time in case of primary angioplasty were recorded. RESULTS: Compared to the first 12 months of non-integrated activity, the number of procedures remained constant with an overall trend of activity increase (total procedures: +2.6% from 2016 to 2017; +8.7% from 2017 to 2018). No statistically significant differences were found in the average door-to-balloon time, either by stratifying by period (year 2015 vs 2016 vs 2017 vs 2017 vs 2018) or by single institution. All ST-elevation myocardial infarctions were treated at the arrival site, displacing the medical availability team. The mortality rate and the number of complications were not different compared to the trend recorded in previous years. The implementation of joint programs with an exchange of expertise between operators has allowed the rapid development of skills necessary for the execution of structural heart procedures not previously performed in one of the operating centers. CONCLUSIONS: The model of an integrated cath lab unit represents an example of a partnership between two hospitals, which allows a synergistic growth of professional skills, even facing daily logistical challenges. The integration has made it possible to expand the number and type of procedures performed as well to join the on-call equipe without impacting on the door-to-balloon time in case of primary coronary angioplasty.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Carga de Trabajo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
7.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) ; 21(3): 171-181, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004241

RESUMEN

: In recent years, the increasing number of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) has required different approaches in terms of the device's control and surveillance. It is increasingly difficult to keep the traditional in-office protocol device's control: we must think of a different organization dedicated to the activity of remote control and monitoring (RC/RM) of devices and patients.A CIED team structured with nurses, technicians and physicians should be organized inside the hospital, with the aim of CIED patients' managing and of creating a network between the various departments.Small hospitals may not be able to manage independently the CIEDs RC/RM and it is possible to hypothesize the creation of a collaborative network between neighbouring structures.This activity must combine the use of technology with the ability to take care of patients and to maintain adequate and meaningful relationships.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Desfibriladores Implantables , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardiopatías/terapia , Modelos Organizacionales , Marcapaso Artificial , Tecnología de Sensores Remotos , Consenso , Conducta Cooperativa , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/fisiopatología , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Participación del Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 32(1): 128-137, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31518703

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to simulate regionalization of congenital heart surgery (CHS) in the United States and assess the impact of such a system on travel distance and mortality. Patients ≤18 years of age who underwent CHS were identified in 2012 State Inpatient Databases. Operations were stratified by the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery, version 1 (RACHS-1) method, with high risk defined as RACHS-1 levels 4-6. Regionalization was simulated by progressive closure of hospitals, beginning with the lowest volume hospital. Patients were moved to the next closest hospital. Analyses were conducted (1) maintaining original hospital mortality rates and (2) estimating mortality rates based on predicted surgical volumes after absorbing moved patients. One hundred fifty-three hospitals from 36 states performed 1 or more operation (19,064 operations). With regionalization wherein, all hospitals performed >310 operations, 37 hospitals remained, from 12.5% to 17.4% fewer deaths occurred (83-116/666), and median patient travel distance increased from 38.5 to 69.6 miles (P < 0.01). When only high-risk operations were regionalized, 3.9-5.9% fewer deaths occurred (26-39/666), and the overall mortality rate did not change significantly. Regionalization of CHS in the United States to higher volume centers may reduce mortality with minimal increase in patient travel distance. Much of the mortality reduction may be missed if solely high-risk patients are regionalized.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Cardiopatías Congénitas/cirugía , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Regionalización/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Áreas de Influencia de Salud , Bases de Datos Factuales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Cardiopatías Congénitas/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiopatías Congénitas/mortalidad , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Viaje , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
10.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 12(5): e005251, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092020

RESUMEN

Background Hospital management practices are associated with cardiovascular process of care measures and patient outcomes. However, management practices related to acute cardiac care in India has not been studied. Methods and Results We measured management practices through semistructured, in-person interviews with hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers in Kerala, India between October and November 2017 using the adapted World Management Survey. Trained interviewers independently scored management interview responses (range: 1-5) to capture management practices ranging from performance data tracking to setting targets. We performed univariate regression analyses to assess the relationship between hospital-level factors and management practices. Using Pearson correlation coefficients and mixed-effect logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between management practices and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events defined as all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke, or major bleeding. Ninety managers from 37 hospitals participated. We found suboptimal management practices across 3 management levels (mean [SD]: 2.1 [0.5], 2.0 [0.3], and 1.9 [0.3] for hospital administrators, physician managers, and nurse managers, respectively [ P=0.08]) with lowest scores related to setting organizational targets. Hospitals with existing healthcare quality accreditation, more cardiologists, and private ownership were associated with higher management scores. In our exploratory analysis, higher physician management practice scores related to operation, performance, and target management were correlated with lower 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event. Conclusions Management practices related to acute cardiac care in participating Kerala hospitals were suboptimal but were correlated with clinical outcomes. We identified opportunities to strengthen nonclinical practices to improve patient care.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Administración Hospitalaria , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , India , Liderazgo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras Administradoras/organización & administración , Ejecutivos Médicos/organización & administración , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Trials ; 20(1): 95, 2019 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30704508

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) is one of the most common diagnoses for elderly patients in the emergency department (ED), with an admission rate above 80% and 1-month mortality around 10%. The European guidelines for the management of AHF are based on moderate levels of evidence, due to the lack of randomized controlled trials and the scarce evidence of any clinical added value of a specific treatment to improve outcomes. Recent reports suggest that the very early administration of full recommended therapy may decrease mortality. However, several studies have highlighted that elderly patients often received suboptimal treatment. Our hypothesis is that an early care bundle that comprises early and comprehensive management of symptoms, along with prompt detection and treatment of precipitating factors should improve AHF outcome in elderly patients. METHODS/DESIGN: ELISABETH is a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled, clinical trial in 15 emergency departments in France recruiting all patients aged 75 years and older with a diagnosis of AHF. The tested intervention is a care bundle with a checklist that mandates detection and early treatment of AHF precipitating factors, early and intensive treatment of congestion with intravenously administered nitrate boluses, and application of other recommended treatment (low-dose diuretics, non-invasive ventilation when indicated, and preventive low-molecular-weight heparin). Each center is randomized to the order in which they will switch from a "control period" to an "intervention period." All centers begin the trials with the control period for 2 weeks, then after each 2-week step a new center will enter the intervention period. At the end of the trial, all clusters will receive the intervention regimen. The primary outcome is the number of days alive and out of the hospital at 30 days. DISCUSSION: If our hypothesis is confirmed, this trial will strengthen the level of evidence of AHF guidelines and stress the importance of the associated early and comprehensive treatment of precipitating factors. This trial could be the first to report a reduction in short-term morbidity and mortality in elderly AHF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03683212. Prospectively registered on 25 September 2018.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Enfermedad Aguda , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Lista de Verificación , Femenino , Francia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Angiology ; 70(6): 547-553, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30630345

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hajj is the largest human gathering with over 2 million people. We evaluated the effect of bundle care intervention on mortality. METHODS: A population-based, before and after study compared the effect of an intervention on mortality. The intervention included recruitment of cardiac team, introducing 24/7 catheterization service, cardiac coordination, standardized cardiac care pathways, and establishment of an effective transportation system. RESULTS: Cardiac mortality accounted for about 52% of all in-hospital deaths before intervention in 2009. This decreased significantly to 43.3%, 32.5%, and 19.7% in 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. In-hospital mortality of acute coronary syndromes was 4.7%, 4.6%, and 3.0%, in the years 2009, 2010, and 2011, respectively. Mortality due to other causes remained largely unaffected. There was no significant change in the national mortality due to cardiac causes over the same period provided a reassurance that the observed improvement in in-hospital acute coronary syndrome mortality was not due to overall improvement in health care. The numbers of cardiac catheterization procedures increased 3-fold and cardiac surgical procedures increased 5-fold between 2009 and 2011. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that an evidence-based intensive bundle care intervention substantially reduced the cardiac mortality among the pilgrims assembling for Hajj in Makkah.


Asunto(s)
Árabes , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Conducta Ceremonial , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Cardiopatías/terapia , Islamismo , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Cardiopatías/diagnóstico , Cardiopatías/etnología , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Arabia Saudita/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Korean J Intern Med ; 33(6): 1039-1049, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29779361

RESUMEN

The populations of Asian countries are expected to age rapidly in the near future, with a dramatic increase in the number of heart failure (HF) patients also anticipated. The need for palliative and end-of-life care for elderly patients with advanced HF is currently recognized in aging societies. However, palliative care and active treatment for HF are not mutually exclusive, and palliative care should be provided to reduce suffering occurring at any stage of symptomatic HF after the point of diagnosis. HF patients are at high risk of sudden cardiac death from the early stages of the disease onwards. The decision of whether to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of an emergency is challenging, especially in elderly HF patients, because of the difficulty in accurately predicting the prognosis of the condition. Furthermore, advanced HF patients are often fitted with a device, and device deactivation at the end of life is a complicated process. Treatment strategies should thus be discussed by multi-disciplinary teams, including palliative experts, and should consider patient directives to address the problems discussed above. Open communication with the HF patient regarding the expected prognosis, course, and treatment options will serve to support the patient and aid in future planning.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Cuidado Terminal/organización & administración , Planificación Anticipada de Atención/organización & administración , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Asia/epidemiología , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Órdenes de Resucitación , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 11(5): e005706, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29716933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early success with regionalization of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care has led many states to adopt statewide prehospital STEMI hospital destination policies, allowing emergency medical services to bypass non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals. The association between adoption of these policies and patterns of care among STEMI patients is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2014, from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry, 6 states with bypass policies (cases included Delaware, Iowa, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts) were matched to 6 states without bypass policies (controls included South Carolina, Minnesota, Virginia, Texas, New York, and Connecticut) a priori on region, hospital density, and percent state participation in the registry. Using the matched sample, logistic regression models were adjusted for patient- and state-level characteristics. Outcomes were receipt of reperfusion and receipt of timely percutaneous coronary intervention. Our study cohort included 19 287 patients at 379 sites across 12 states. Patients from states with hospital destination policies were similar in age, sex, and comorbidities to patients from states without such policies. After adjustment for patient- and state-level characteristics, 57.9% (95% confidence intervals, 53.2%-62.5%) of patients living in states with hospital destination policies when compared with 47.5% (95% confidence intervals, 43.4%-51.7%) living in states without hospital destination policies received primary percutaneous coronary intervention within their relevant guideline-recommended time from first medical contact. CONCLUSIONS: Statewide adoption of STEMI hospital destination policies allowing emergency medical services to bypass non-percutaneous coronary intervention-capable facilities is associated with significantly faster treatment times for patients with STEMI.


Asunto(s)
American Heart Association , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Regionalización/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Organizacionales , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Formulación de Políticas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 46: 142-146, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28887248

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In January 2015, we created a multidisciplinary Aortic Center with the collaboration of Vascular Surgery, Cardiac Surgery, Interventional Radiology, Anesthesia and Hospital Administration. We report the initial success of creating a Comprehensive Aortic Center. METHODS: All aortic procedures performed from January 1, 2015 until December 31, 2016 were entered into a prospectively collected database and compared with available data for 2014. Primary outcomes included the number of all aortic related procedures, transfer acceptance rate, transfer time, and proportion of elective/emergent referrals. RESULTS: The Aortic Center included 5 vascular surgeons, 2 cardiac surgeons, and 2 interventional radiologists. Workflow processes were implemented to streamline patient transfers as well as physician and operating room notification. Total aortic volume increased significantly from 162 to 261 patients. This reflected an overall 59% (P = 0.0167) increase in all aorta-related procedures. We had a 65% overall increase in transfer requests with 156% increase in acceptance of referrals and 136% drop in transfer denials (P < 0.0001). Emergent abdominal aortic cases accounted for 17% (n = 45) of our total aortic volume in 2015. The average transfer time from request to arrival decreased from 515 to 352 min, although this change was not statistically significant. We did see a significant increase in the use of air-transfers for aortic patients (P = 0.0041). Factorial analysis showed that time for transfer was affected only by air-transfer use, regardless of the year the patient was transferred. Transfer volume and volume of aortic related procedures remained stable in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Designation as a comprehensive Aortic Center with implementation of strategic workflow systems and a culture of "no refusal of transfers" resulted in a significant increase in aortic volume for both emergent and elective aortic cases. Case volumes increased for all specialties involved in the center. Improvements in transfer center and emergency medical services communication demonstrated a trend toward more efficient transfer times. These increases and improvements were sustainable for 2 years after this designation.


Asunto(s)
Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Radiólogos/organización & administración , Radiología Intervencionista/organización & administración , Cirujanos/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/clasificación , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicios Centralizados de Hospital/clasificación , Conducta Cooperativa , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/clasificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Urgencias Médicas , Florida , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/clasificación , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Radiólogos/clasificación , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Radiología Intervencionista/clasificación , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirujanos/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Centros Traumatológicos/clasificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/clasificación , Flujo de Trabajo , Carga de Trabajo
17.
Circulation ; 137(4): 376-387, 2018 01 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29138292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Regional variations in reperfusion times and mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction are influenced by differences in coordinating care between emergency medical services (EMS) and hospitals. Building on the Accelerator-1 Project, we hypothesized that time to reperfusion could be further reduced with enhanced regional efforts. METHODS: Between April 2015 and March 2017, we worked with 12 metropolitan regions across the United States with 132 percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and 946 EMS agencies. Data were collected in the ACTION (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network)-Get With The Guidelines Registry for quarterly Mission: Lifeline reports. The primary end point was the change in the proportion of EMS-transported patients with first medical contact to device time ≤90 minutes from baseline to final quarter. We also compared treatment times and mortality with patients treated in hospitals not participating in the project during the corresponding time period. RESULTS: During the study period, 10 730 patients were transported to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals, including 974 in the baseline quarter and 972 in the final quarter who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 61 years; 27% were women, 6% had cardiac arrest, and 6% had shock on admission; 10% were black, 12% were Latino, and 10% were uninsured. By the end of the intervention, all process measures reflecting coordination between EMS and hospitals had improved, including the proportion of patients with a first medical contact to device time of ≤90 minutes (67%-74%; P<0.002), a first medical contact to device time to catheterization laboratory activation of ≤20 minutes (38%-56%; P<0.0001), and emergency department dwell time of ≤20 minutes (33%-43%; P<0.0001). Of the 12 regions, 9 regions reduced first medical contact to device time, and 8 met or exceeded the national goal of 75% of patients treated in ≤90 minutes. Improvements in treatment times corresponded with a significant reduction in mortality (in-hospital death, 4.4%-2.3%; P=0.001) that was not apparent in hospitals not participating in the project during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Organization of care among EMS and hospitals in 12 regions was associated with significant reductions in time to reperfusion in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction as well as in in-hospital mortality. These findings support a more intensive regional approach to emergency care for patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Regionalización/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Transporte de Pacientes/organización & administración , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
19.
Heart ; 103(23): 1874-1879, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28490619

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Heart failure is a major cause of disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). There is an urgent need for better strategies for heart failure management in this region. However, there is little information on the capacity to diagnose and treat heart failure in SSA. We aim to provide a better understanding of the capacity to diagnose and treat heart failure in Kenya and Uganda to inform policy planning and interventions. METHODS: We analysed data from a nationally representative survey of health facilities in Kenya and Uganda (197 health facilities in Uganda and 143 in Kenya). We report on the availability of cardiac diagnostic technologies and select medications for heart failure (ß-blockers, ACE inhibitors and furosemide). Facility-level data were analysed by country and platform type (hospital vs ambulatory facilities). RESULTS: Functional and staffed radiography, ultrasound and ECG were available in less than half of hospitals in Kenya and Uganda combined. Of the hospitals surveyed, 49% of Kenyan and 77% of Ugandan hospitals reported availability of the heart failure medication package. ACE inhibitors were only available in 51% of Kenyan and 79% of Ugandan hospitals. Almost one-third of the hospitals in each country had a stock-out of at least one of the medication classes in the prior quarter. CONCLUSIONS: Few facilities in Kenya and Uganda were prepared to diagnose and manage heart failure. Medication shortages and stock-outs were common. Our findings call for increased investment in cardiac care to reduce the growing burden of heart failure.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/provisión & distribución , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Países en Desarrollo , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/provisión & distribución , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/provisión & distribución , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca , Diuréticos/provisión & distribución , Electrocardiografía , Furosemida/provisión & distribución , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Humanos , Kenia/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uganda/epidemiología
20.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 13: 139-142, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28458558

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess if a change in our cardiology fellowship program impacted our ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) program. BACKGROUND: Fellows covering the cardiac care unit were spending excessive hours in the hospital while on call, resulting in increased duty hours violations. A night float fellow system was started on July 1, 2012, allowing the cardiac care unit fellow to sign out to a night float fellow at 5:30 pm. The night float fellow remained in-house until the morning. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study assessing symptom onset to arrival, arterial access to first device, and door-to-balloon (D2B) times, in consecutive STEMI patients presenting to our emergency department before and after initiation of the night float fellow system. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2013, 208 STEMI patients presented to our emergency department and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no difference in symptom onset to arrival (150±102 minutes vs 154±122 minutes, p=0.758), arterial access to first device (12±8 minutes vs 11±7 minutes, p=0.230), or D2B times (50±32 minutes vs 52±34 minutes, p=0.681) during regular working hours. However, there was a significant decrease in D2B times seen during off-hours (72±33 minutes vs 49±15 minutes, p=0.007). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (11% vs 8%, p=0.484) or need for intra-aortic balloon pump placement (7% vs 8%, p=0.793). CONCLUSION: In academic medical centers, in-house cardiology fellow coverage during off-hours may expedite care of STEMI patients.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Atención Posterior/organización & administración , Cardiólogos/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Anciano , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Organizacionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Flujo de Trabajo , Carga de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA