Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 198
Filtrar
Más filtros

Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 45(5): 1109-1121, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33730384

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Computer-based delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may be a less costly approach to increase dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments for alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, comprehensive evaluations of costs, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit of computer-delivered interventions are rare. METHODS: This study used data from a completed randomized clinical trial to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of a computer-based version of CBT (CBT4CBT) for AUD. Sixty-three participants were randomized to receive one of the following treatments at an outpatient treatment facility and attended at least one session: (1) treatment as usual (TAU), (2) CBT4CBT plus treatment as usual (CBT4CBT+TAU), or (3) CBT4CBT plus brief monitoring. RESULTS: Median protocol treatment costs per participant differed significantly between conditions, Kruskal-Wallis H(2) = 8.40, p = 0.02, such that CBT4CBT+TAU and CBT4CBT+monitoring each cost significantly more per participant than TAU. However, when nonprotocol treatment costs were included, total treatment costs per participant did not differ significantly between conditions. Median incremental cost-effective ratios (ICERs) revealed that CBT4CBT+TAU was more costly and more effective than TAU. It cost $35.08 to add CBT4CBT to TAU to produce a reduction of one additional drinking day per month between baseline and the end of the 8-week treatment protocol: CBT4CBT+monitoring cost $33.70 less to produce a reduction of one additional drinking day per month because CBT4CBT+monitoring was less costly than TAU and more effective at treatment termination, though not significantly so. Net benefit analyses suggested that costs of treatment, regardless of condition, did not offset monthly costs related to healthcare utilization, criminal justice involvement, and employment disruption between baseline and 6-month follow-up. Benefit-cost ratios were similar for each condition. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this pilot economic evaluation suggest that an 8-week course of CBT4CBT may be a cost-effective addition and potential alternative to standard outpatient treatment for AUD. Additional research is needed to generate conclusions about the cost-benefit of providing CBT4CBT to treatment-seeking individuals participating in standard outpatient treatment.


Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Terapia Asistida por Computador/economía , Adulto , Alcoholismo/economía , Atención Ambulatoria , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Int J Equity Health ; 20(1): 6, 2021 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Korea's health security system named the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid has revolutionized the nation's mandatory health insurance and continues to reduce excessive copayments. However, few studies have examined healthcare utilization and expenditure by the health security system for severe diseases. This study looked at reverse discrimination regarding end-stage renal disease by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid. METHODS: A total of 305 subjects were diagnosed with end-stage renal disease in the Korea Health Panel from 2008 to 2013. Chi-square, t-test, and ANCOVA were conducted to identify the healthcare utilization rate, out-of-pocket expenditure, and the prevalence of catastrophic expenditure. Mixed effect panel analysis was used to evaluate total out-of-pocket expenditure by the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid over a 6-year period. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the healthcare utilization rate for emergency room visits, admissions, or outpatient department visits between the National Health Insurance and Medical Aid because these healthcare services were essential for individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease. Meanwhile, each out-of-pocket expenditure for an admission and the outpatient department by the National Health Insurance was 2.6 and 3.1 times higher than that of Medical Aid (P < 0.05). The total out-of-pocket expenditure, including that for emergency room visits, admission, outpatient department visits, and prescribed drugs, was 2.9 times higher for the National Health Insurance than Medical Aid (P < 0.001). Over a 6-year period, in terms of total of out-of-pocket expenditure, subjects with the National Health Insurance spent more than those with Medical Aid (P < 0.01). If the total household income decile was less than the median and subjects were covered by the National Health Insurance, the catastrophic health expenditure rate was 92.2%, but it was only 58.8% for Medical Aid (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Individuals with serious diseases, such as end-stage renal disease, can be faced with reverse discrimination depending on the type of insurance that is provided by the health security system. It is necessary to consider individuals who have National Health Insurance but are still poor.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fallo Renal Crónico/economía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Programas de Gobierno/economía , Programas de Gobierno/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , República de Corea
3.
J Asthma ; 58(7): 865-873, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32155089

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the prevalence of health care utilization (including conventional medicine, self-care and complementary medicine treatments) for the management of asthma by women aged 45 years and over and their associated out-of-pocket expenditure. METHODS: A self-reported mail survey of 375 Australian women, a cohort of the national 45 and Up Study, reporting a clinical diagnosis of asthma. The women were asked about their use of health care resources including conventional medicine, complementary medicine, and self-prescribed treatments for asthma and their associated out-of-pocket spending. Spearman's correlation coefficient, student's t-test and chi-square test were used as appropriate. Population level costs were created by extrapolating the costs reported by participants by available national prevalence data. RESULTS: Survey respondents (N = 375; response rate, 46.9%) were, on average, 67.0 years old (min 53, max 91). The majority (69.1%; n = 259) consulted at least one health care practitioner in the previous 12 months for their asthma. Most of the participants (n = 247; 65.9%) reported using at least one prescription medication for asthma in the previous 12 months. The total out-of-pocket expenditure on asthma treatment for Australian women aged 50 years and over is estimated to be AU$159 million per annum. CONCLUSIONS: The breadth of conventional and complementary medicine health care services reported in this study, as well as the range of treatments that patients self-prescribe, highlights the challenges of coordinating care for individuals living with asthma.


Asunto(s)
Asma/economía , Asma/terapia , Financiación Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Australia , Terapias Complementarias/economía , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33203010

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to elicit the relative importance of treatment attributes that influence residents' choice, assuming they are suffering severe non-communicable diseases (NCDs), to explore how they make trade-offs between these attributes and to estimate the monetary value placed on different attributes and attribute levels. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted with adults over 18 years old in China. Preferences were evaluated based on four treatment attributes: care provider, mode of service, distance to practice and cost. A mixed logit model was used to analyze the relative importance of the four attributes and to calculate the willingness to pay (WTP) for a changed attribute level. RESULTS: A total of 93.47% (2019 of 2160) respondents completed valid questionnaires. The WTP results suggested that participants would be willing to pay CNY 822.51 (USD 124.86), CNY 470.54 (USD 71.41) and CNY 68.20 (USD 10.35) for services provided by experts, with integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine (WM) and with a service distance <=30 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that mode of service, care provider, distance to practice and cost should be considered in priority-setting decisions. The government should strengthen the curative service capability in primary health facilities and give full play to the role of TCM in the prevention and treatment of severe chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud , Enfermedades no Transmisibles , Prioridad del Paciente , Adulto , China , Conducta de Elección , Enfermedad Crónica , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/economía , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/terapia , Prioridad del Paciente/economía , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32340141

RESUMEN

Background: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) place a considerable burden on medical costs and add to an increased number of inpatient days in Taiwan. Continuity of care (COC) has not been investigated in this population thus far. Materials and Methods: We designed a retrospective population-based cohort study using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients aged 0 to 18 years with CP catastrophic illness certificates were enrolled. We investigated the association of COC index (COCI) with medical costs and inpatient days. We also investigated the possible clinical characteristics affecting the outcome. Results: Over five years, children with CP with low COCI levels had higher medical costs and more inpatient days than did those with high COCI levels. Younger age at CP diagnosis, more inpatient visits one year before obtaining a catastrophic illness certificate, pneumonia, and nasogastric tube use increased medical expenses and length of hospital stay. Conclusions: Improving COC reduces medical costs and the number of inpatient days in children with CP. Certain characteristics also influence these outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral/economía , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/economía , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos , Adolescente , Parálisis Cerebral/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán/epidemiología
6.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 19(1): 928, 2019 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31796039

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine is the use of telecommunication technology to remotely provide healthcare services. Evaluation of telemedicine use often relies on administrative data, but the validity of identifying telemedicine encounters in administrative data is not known. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of billing codes for identifying telemedicine use. METHODS: In this retrospective study of encounters within a large integrated health system from January 2016 to December 2017, we examined the accuracy of billing codes for identifying live-interactive and store-and-forward telemedicine encounters compared to manual chart review. To further examine external validity, we applied these codes and assessed patient and visit characteristics for identified live-interactive telemedicine encounters and store-and-forward telemedicine encounters in a second data set. RESULTS: In manual review of 390 encounters, 75 encounters were live-interactive telemedicine and 158 were store-and-forward telemedicine. In weighted analysis, the presence of the GT modifier in the absence of the GQ modifier or CPT code 99444 yielded 100% sensitivity and 99.99% specificity for identification of live-interactive telemedicine encounters. The presence of either the GQ modifier or the CPT code 99444 had 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for identification of store-and-forward telemedicine encounters. Applying these algorithms to a second data set (n = 5,917,555) identified telemedicine encounters with expected patient and visit characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for use of CPT codes to perform telemedicine research in administrative data, aiding ongoing work to understand the role of non-face-to-face care in optimizing health care delivery.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Current Procedural Terminology , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Honorarios y Precios , Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Telemedicina/clasificación , Telemedicina/economía
7.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 28(4): 209-221, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, management of patients presenting with chronic rotator cuff tears in Alberta is in need of quality improvements. This article explores the potential impact of a proposed care pathway whereby all patients presenting with chronic rotator cuff tears in Alberta would adopt an early, conservative management plan as the first stage of care; ultrasound investigation would be the preferred tool for diagnosing a rotator cuff tear; and only patients are referred for surgery once conservative measures have been exhausted. METHODS: We evaluate evidence in support of surgery and conservative management, compare care in the current state with the proposed care pathway, and identify potential solutions in moving toward optimal care. RESULTS: A literature search resulted in an absence of indications for either surgical or conservative management. Conservative management has the potential to reduce utilization of public health care resources and may be preferable to surgery. The proposed care pathway has the potential to avoid nearly Can $87 000 in public health care costs in the current system for every 100 patients treated successfully with conservative management. CONCLUSION: The proposed care pathway is a low-cost, first-stage treatment that is cost-effective and has the potential to reduce unnecessary, costly surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/economía , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/terapia , Canadá , Enfermedad Crónica , Terapias Complementarias/organización & administración , Tratamiento Conservador/economía , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/economía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Lesiones del Manguito de los Rotadores/cirugía
8.
BMJ Open ; 9(5): e027220, 2019 05 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122989

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges, and mortality of a programme for frequent hospital utilisers and a programme for patients requiring high acuity post-discharge care as part of an integrated healthcare model. DESIGN: A retrospective quasi-experimental study without randomisation where patients who received post-discharge care interventions were matched 1:1 with unenrolled patients as controls. SETTING: The National University Health System (NUHS) Regional Health System (RHS), which was one of six RHS in Singapore, implemented the NUHS RHS Integrated Interventions and Care Extension (NICE) programme for frequent hospital utilisers and the NUHS Transitional Care Programme (NUHS TCP) for high acuity post-discharge care. The programmes were supported by the Ministry of Health in Singapore, which is a city-state nation located in Southeast Asia with a 5.6 million population. PARTICIPANTS: Linked healthcare administrative data, for the time period of January 2013 to December 2016, were extracted for patients enrolled in NICE (n=554) or NUHS TCP (n=270) from June 2014 to December 2015, and control patients. INTERVENTIONS: For both programmes, teams conducted follow-up home visits and phone calls to monitor and manage patients' post-discharge. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: One-year pre- and post-enrolment healthcare utilisation frequencies and charges of all-cause inpatient admissions, emergency admissions, emergency department attendances, specialist outpatient clinic (SOC) attendances, total inpatient length of stay and mortality rates were compared. RESULTS: Patients in NICE had lower mortality rate, but higher all-cause inpatient admission, emergency admission and emergency department attendance charges. Patients in NUHS TCP did not have lower mortality rate, but had higher emergency admission and SOC attendance charges. CONCLUSIONS: Both NICE and NUHS TCP had no improvements in 1 year healthcare utilisation across various setting and metrics. Singular interventions might not be as impactful in effecting utilisation without an overhauling transformation and restructuring of the hospital and healthcare system.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Atención Ambulatoria , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Precios de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita Domiciliaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Singapur , Teléfono
9.
Int J Equity Health ; 18(1): 32, 2019 02 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Indigenous Australians diagnosed with cancer have poorer survival compared to non-Indigenous Australians. We aim to: 1) identify differences by Indigenous status in out-of-pocket expenditure for the first three-years post-diagnosis; 2) identify differences in the quantity and cost of healthcare services accessed; and 3) estimate the number of additional services required if access was equal between Indigenous and non-Indigenous people with cancer. METHODS: We used CancerCostMod, a model using linked administrative data. The base population was all persons diagnosed with cancer in Queensland, Australia (01JUL2011 to 30JUN2012) (n = 25,553). Each individual record was then linked to their Admitted Patient Data Collection, Emergency Data Information System, Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS), and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) records (01JUL2011 to 30JUN2015). We then weighted the population to be representative of the Australian population (approximately 123,900 Australians, 1.7% Indigenous Australians). The patient co-payment charged for each MBS service and PBS prescription was summed for each month from date of diagnosis to 36-months post-diagnosis. We then limited our model to MBS items to identify the quantity and type of healthcare services accessed during the first three-years. RESULTS: On average Indigenous people with cancer had less than half the out-of-pocket expenditure for each 12-month period (0-12 months: mean $401 Indigenous vs $1074 non-Indigenous; 13-24 months: mean $200 vs $484; and 25-36 months: mean $181 vs $441). A stepwise generalised linear model of out-of-pocket expenditure found that Indigenous status was a significant predictor of out of pocket expenditure. We found that Indigenous people with cancer on average accessed 236 services per person, however, this would increase to 309 services per person if Indigenous people had the same rate of service use as non-Indigenous people. CONCLUSIONS: Indigenous people with cancer had lower out-of-pocket expenditure, but also accessed fewer Medicare services compared to their non-Indigenous counterparts. Indigenous people with cancer were less likely to access specialist attendances, pathology tests, and diagnostic imaging through MBS, and more likely to access primary health care, such as services provided by general practitioners.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/economía , Grupos de Población/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Nativos de Hawái y Otras Islas del Pacífico/estadística & datos numéricos , Queensland , Adulto Joven
10.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(1): 26-31, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30667608

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe and evaluate the impact of primary and specialty care integration via asynchronous communication at a large integrated healthcare system. STUDY DESIGN: In January 2014, Geisinger's primary care providers (PCPs) were given access to an asynchronous communication tool, Ask-a-Doc (AAD), that enabled direct communication with specialists in 14 medical specialties and 5 surgical specialties. Internal data were collected to assess PCPs' acceptance and use of the tool, as well as satisfaction. Insurance claims data were obtained to assess the impact on healthcare utilization and cost. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of health plan claims data was conducted among those patients who had at least 1 specialist visit with 1 of the participating specialties between January 2014 and December 2016. A set of difference-in-differences multivariate linear regression models with patient fixed effects was estimated, in which those who were not exposed to AAD served as the comparison group. RESULTS: Acceptance and use of AAD among PCPs gradually increased over time but varied by specialty. AAD was associated with an approximately 14% reduction in total cost of care during the first month of follow-up and a 20% reduction (P <.001) during the second month. These reductions in cost of care appeared to be driven by reductions in emergency department visits and physician office visits. CONCLUSIONS: Geisinger's AAD experience suggests that the integration of primary and specialty care via the use of a highly reliable and efficient asynchronous communication system can potentially lead to reductions in avoidable care and more efficient use of specialty care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Intercambio de Información en Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Especialización , Anciano , Comunicación , Femenino , Gastos en Salud , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Nutr ; 148(10): 1605-1614, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30169665

RESUMEN

Background: Sustained improvements in infant and young child feeding (IYCF) require continued implementation of effective interventions. From 2010-2014, Alive & Thrive (A&T) provided intensive interpersonal counseling (IPC), community mobilization (CM), and mass media (MM) in Bangladesh, demonstrating impact on IYCF practices. Since 2014, implementation has been continued and scaled up by national partners with support from other donors and with modifications such as added focus on maternal nutrition and reduced program intensity. Objective: We assessed changes in intervention exposure and IYCF knowledge and practices in the intensive (IPC + CM + MM) compared with nonintensive areas (standard nutrition counseling + less intensive CM and MM) 2 y after termination of initial external donor support. Methods: We used a cluster-randomized design with repeated cross-sectional surveys at baseline (2010, n = 2188), endline (2014, n = 2001), and follow-up (2016, n = 2400) in the same communities, among households with children 0-23.9 mo of age. Within-group differences over time and differences between groups in changes were tested. Results: In intensive areas, exposure to IPC decreased slightly between endline and follow-up (88.9% to 77.2%); exposure to CM activities decreased significantly (29.3% to 3.6%); and MM exposure was mostly unchanged (28.1-69.1% across 7 TV spots). Exposure to interventions did not expand in nonintensive areas. Most IYCF indicators in intensive areas declined from endline to follow-up, but remained higher than at baseline. Large differential improvements of 12-17 percentage points in intensive, compared with nonintensive areas, between baseline and follow-up remained for early initiation of and exclusive breastfeeding, timely introduction of foods, and consumption of iron-rich foods. Differential impact in breastfeeding knowledge remained between baseline and follow-up; complementary feeding knowledge increased similarly in both groups. Conclusions: Continued IPC exposure and sustained impacts on IYCF knowledge and practices in intensive areas indicated lasting benefits from A&T's interventions as they underwent major scale-up with reduced intensity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02740842.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Comunicación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Servicios de Salud , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Adulto , Bangladesh , Consejo , Estudios Transversales , Dieta , Composición Familiar , Conducta Alimentaria , Femenino , Organización de la Financiación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Promoción de la Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Lactante , Hierro/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Medios de Comunicación de Masas , Características de la Residencia
12.
BMJ Open ; 8(9): e023113, 2018 09 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30196269

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the characteristics and healthcare utilisation of high-cost patients and to compare high-cost patients across payers and countries. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed and Embase databases were searched until 30 October 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND OUTCOMES: Our final search was built on three themes: 'high-cost', 'patients', and 'cost' and 'cost analysis'. We included articles that reported characteristics and utilisation of the top-X% (eg, top-5% and top-10%) patients of costs of a given population. Analyses were limited to studies that covered a broad range of services, across the continuum of care. Andersen's behavioural model was used to categorise characteristics and determinants into predisposing, enabling and need characteristics. RESULTS: The studies pointed to a high prevalence of multiple (chronic) conditions to explain high-cost patients' utilisation. Besides, we found a high prevalence of mental illness across all studies and a prevalence higher than 30% in US Medicaid and total population studies. Furthermore, we found that high costs were associated with increasing age but that still more than halve of high-cost patients were younger than 65 years. High costs were associated with higher incomes in the USA but with lower incomes elsewhere. Preventable spending was estimated at maximally 10% of spending. The top-10%, top-5% and top-1% high-cost patients accounted for respectively 68%, 55% and 24% of costs within a given year. Spending persistency varied between 24% and 48%. Finally, we found that no more than 30% of high-cost patients are in their last year of life. CONCLUSIONS: High-cost patients make up the sickest and most complex populations, and their high utilisation is primarily explained by high levels of chronic and mental illness. High-cost patients are diverse populations and vary across payer types and countries. Tailored interventions are needed to meet the needs of high-cost patients and to avoid waste of scarce resources.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Global/economía , Salud Global/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/economía , Afecciones Crónicas Múltiples/epidemiología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Prevalencia
13.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0201552, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30059534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer care represents a substantial and rapidly rising healthcare cost in Australia. Our aim was to provide accurate population-based estimates of the health services cost of cancer care using large-scale linked patient-level data. METHODS: We analysed data for incident cancers diagnosed 2006-2010 and followed to 2014 among 266,793 eligible participants in the 45 and Up Study. Health system costs included Medicare and pharmaceutical claims, inpatient hospital episodes and emergency department presentations. Costs for cancer cases and matched cancer-free controls were compared, to estimate monthly/annual excess costs of cancer care by cancer type, before and after diagnosis and by phase of care (initial, continuing, terminal). Total costs incurred in 2013 were also estimated for all people diagnosed in Australia 2009-2013. RESULTS: 7624 participants diagnosed with cancer were matched with up to three controls. The mean excess cost of care per case was AUD$1,622 for the year before diagnosis, $33,944 for the first year post-diagnosis and $8,796 for the second year post-diagnosis, with considerable variation by cancer type. Mean annual cost after the initial treatment phase was $4,474/case and the mean cost for the last year of life was $49,733/case. In 2013 the cost for cancers among people in Australia diagnosed during 2009-2013 was ~$6.3billion (0.4% of Gross Domestic Product; $272 per capita), with the largest costs for colorectal cancer ($1.1billion), breast cancer ($0.8billion), lung cancer ($0.6billion) and prostate cancer ($0.5billion). CONCLUSIONS: The cost of cancer care is substantial and varies by cancer type and time since diagnosis. These findings emphasise the economic importance of effective primary and secondary cancer prevention strategies.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud , Servicios de Salud/economía , Neoplasias/economía , Neoplasias/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Neoplasias/epidemiología
14.
J Med Econ ; 21(9): 869-877, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29857775

RESUMEN

AIMS: Budesonide with multi-matrix technology (MMX) is an oral corticosteroid, shown to have high topical activity against ulcerative colitis (UC) while maintaining low systemic bioavailability with few adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of budesonide MMX versus commonly used corticosteroids, in the second-line treatment of active mild-to-moderate UC in the Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An eight-state Markov model with an 8 week cycle length captured remission, four distinct therapy stages, hospitalization, possible colectomy and mortality. Remission probability for budesonide MMX was based on the CORE-II study. Population characteristics were derived from the Dutch Inflammatory Bowel Disease South Limburg cohort (n = 598) and included patients with proctitis (39%), left-sided (42%) and extensive disease (19%). Comparators (topical budesonide foam and enema, oral budesonide and prednisolone) were selected based on current Dutch clinical practice. Treatment effects were evaluated by network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed over a 5 year time horizon from a societal perspective, with costs, health-state and adverse event utilities derived from published sources. Outcomes were weighted by disease extent distribution and corresponding comparators. RESULTS: Budesonide MMX was associated with comparable quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain versus foam and oral formulations (+0.01 QALYs) in the total UC population, whilst being cost-saving (EUR 366 per patient). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis evaluated an 86.6% probability of budesonide MMX being dominant (cost-saving with QALY gain) versus these comparators. Exploratory analysis showed similar findings versus prednisolone. LIMITATIONS: Differing definitions of trial end-points and remission across trials meant indirect comparison was not ideal. However, in the absence of head-to-head clinical data, these comparisons are reasonable alternatives and currently offer the only comparison of second-line UC treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In the present analysis, budesonide MMX was shown to be cost-effective versus comparators in the total UC population, for the second-line treatment of active mild-to-moderate UC in the Netherlands.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Antiinflamatorios/economía , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/economía , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Econométricos , Países Bajos , Prednisolona/economía , Prednisolona/uso terapéutico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Inducción de Remisión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
15.
J Med Econ ; 21(6): 564-570, 2018 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29359606

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine the comorbidity and economic burden among moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients in the US Department of Defense (DoD) population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort claims analysis was conducted using DoD data from November 2010 to October 2015. Adult patients with ≥2 diagnoses of PsO and/or PsA (cases) were identified, and the first diagnosis date from November 2011 to October 2014 was defined as the index date. Patients were considered moderate-to-severe if they had ≥1 non-topical systemic therapy or phototherapy during the 12 months pre- or 1 month post-index date. Patients without a PsO/PsA diagnosis during the study period (controls) were matched to cases on a 10:1 ratio based on age, sex, region, and index year; the index date was randomly selected. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to compare study outcomes in the first year post-index date, including healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, and comorbidity incidence. RESULTS: A total of 7,249 cases and 72,490 controls were identified. The mean age was 48.1 years. After PSM, comorbidity incidence was higher among cases, namely dyslipidemia (18.3% vs 13.5%, p < .001), hypertension (13.8% vs 8.7%, p < .001), and obesity (8.8% vs 6.1%, p < .001). Case patients had significantly higher HRU and costs, including inpatient ($2,196 vs $1,642; p < .0016), ambulatory ($8,804 vs 4,642; p < .001), emergency room ($432 vs $350; p < .001), pharmacy ($6,878 vs $1,160; p < .001), and total healthcare costs ($18,311 vs $7,795; p < .001). LIMITATIONS: Claims data are collected for payment purposes; therefore, such data may have limitations for clinical research. CONCLUSIONS: During follow-up, DoD patients with moderate-to-severe PsO and/or PsA experienced significantly higher HRU, cost, and comorbidity burden.


Asunto(s)
Empleados de Gobierno/estadística & datos numéricos , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Psoriasis/economía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Artritis Psoriásica/economía , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Características de la Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
16.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 30(2): 95-106, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302987

RESUMEN

Medical and long-term care costs are increasing all over the world. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of groups with high cost of medical and long-term care to define targets for curbing social security costs. As a result, for the population covered by the National Health Insurance, a large portion of medical costs were incurred for mental disorders, malignant neoplasms, and lifestyle-related diseases. For those covered by the Late Elderly Health Insurance System, most medical costs were incurred for lifestyle-related diseases, femoral fractures, neurological diseases, mental disorders, pneumonia, malignant neoplasms, and Alzheimer's disease. From multiple regression analysis, the hospitalization days, use of advanced medical treatment, outpatient days, and high long-term care level influenced the increased costs. On the other hand, disease characteristics had only a very low effect. These findings suggest that the target population has complex medical and long-term care needs because they have multiple diseases.


Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Cuidados a Largo Plazo/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Seguridad Social/economía
17.
Indian J Med Ethics ; 3(1): 61-65, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28971830

RESUMEN

Universal health coverage (UHC) in the Indian context is understood as easily accessible and affordable health services for all citizens. The Planning Commission of India constituted a High Level Expert Group (HLEG) in October 2010 for the purpose of drafting the guidelines of UHC. While the primary focus of UHC is to provide financial protection to all citizens, its delivery requires an adequate health infrastructure, skilled health human resources, and access to affordable drugs and technologies so that all people receive the level and quality of care they are entitled to. This paper attempts to link the ayurveda, yoga and naturopathy, unani, siddha and homoeopathy (AYUSH) systems of medicine with UHC. Here, the AYUSH system refers to the AYUSH workforce, therapeutics and principles, and their individual role in delivering UHC to the citizens of India. In outlining the role of AYUSH, the paper lays stress on the 10 guiding principles of UHC, as proposed by the HLEG. However, as the AYUSH system is not the principal health service provider in India, the dominant system being that of allopathic medicine, a few components of UHC may not fit neatly into the AYUSH system. This paper has adopted the definition of UHC quoted by the HLEG.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias , Atención a la Salud/métodos , Equidad en Salud , Servicios de Salud , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud , Terapias Complementarias/economía , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/ética , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Personal de Salud , Servicios de Salud/economía , Homeopatía , Humanos , India , Medicina Ayurvédica , Medicina Unani , Naturopatía , Recursos Humanos , Yoga
18.
Curr Urol Rep ; 18(11): 88, 2017 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28921390

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: For many diseases that place a large burden on our health care system, men often have worse health outcomes than women. As the largest single provider of health care to men in the USA, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) has the potential to serve as leader in the delivery of improved men's health care to address these disparities. RECENT FINDINGS: The VA system has made recent strides in improving benefits for aspects of men's health that are traditionally poorly covered, such as treatment for male factor infertility. Despite this, review of Quality Enhancement Research Initiatives (QUERIs) within the VA system reveals few efforts to integrate disparate areas of care into a holistic men's health program. Policies to unify currently disparate aspects of men's health care will ensure that the VA remains a progressive model for other health care systems in the USA.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Servicios de Salud/normas , Salud del Hombre/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/normas , Salud de los Veteranos/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/economía , Salud Holística/economía , Salud Holística/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Salud del Hombre/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economía , Salud de los Veteranos/economía
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 17(1): 145, 2017 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28209145

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Contributory social health insurance for formal sector employees only has proven challenging for moving towards universal health coverage (UHC). This is because the informally employed and the poor usually remain excluded. One way to expand UHC is to fully or partially subsidize health insurance contributions for excluded population groups through government budget transfers. This paper analyses the institutional design features of such government subsidization arrangements in Latin America and assesses their performance with respect to UHC progress. The aim is to identify UHC conducive institutional design features of such arrangements. METHODS: A literature search provided the information to analyse institutional design features, with a focus on the following aspects: eligibility/enrolment rules, financing and pooling arrangements, and purchasing and benefit package design. Based on secondary data analysis, UHC progress is assessed in terms of improved population coverage, financial protection and access to needed health care services. RESULTS: Such government subsidization arrangements currently exist in eight countries of Latin America (Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay). Institutional design features and UHC related performance vary significantly. Notably, countries with a universalist approach or indirect targeting have higher population coverage rates. Separate pools for the subsidized maintain inequitable access. The relatively large scopes of the benefit packages had a positive impact on financial protection and access to care. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In the long term, merging different schemes into one integrated health financing system without opt-out options for the better-off is desirable, while equally expanding eligibility to cover those so far excluded. In the short and medium term, the harmonization of benefit packages could be a priority. UHC progress also depends on substantial supply side investments to ensure the availability of quality services, particularly in rural areas. Future research should generate more evidence on the implementation process and impact of subsidization arrangements on UHC progress.


Asunto(s)
Presupuestos , Seguro de Salud/economía , Cobertura Universal del Seguro de Salud/economía , Costa Rica , Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Humanos , América Latina , México , América del Sur
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA