Immunologic evaluation of 10 different adjuvants for use in vaccines for chickens against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

Avian influenza viruses (AIV) are a threat to poultry production worldwide. Vaccination is utilized as a component of control programs for both high pathogenicity (HP) and low pathogenicity (LP) AIV. Over 95% of all AIV vaccine used in poultry are inactivated, adjuvanted products. To identify the best formulations for chickens, vaccines were prepared with beta-propiolactone (BPL) inactivated A/British Columbia/314514-1/2004 H7N3 LP AIV using ten commercially available or experimental adjuvants. Each vaccine formulation was evaluated for immunogenicity in chickens. Challenge studies with an antigenically homologous strain of HPAIV were conducted to compare protection against mortality and measure reductions in virus levels in oral swabs. The four best adjuvants from the studies with BPL inactivated antigen were selected and tested identically, but with vaccines prepared from formalin inactivated virus. Mineral and vegetable oil based adjuvants generally induced the highest antibody titers with 100% seroconversion by 3weeks post vaccination. Chitosan induced positive antibody titers in 100% of the chickens, but the titers were significantly lower than those of most of the oil based adjuvants. Antibody levels from calcium phosphate and alginate adjuvanted groups were similar to those of non-adjuvanted virus. All groups that received adjuvanted vaccines induced similar levels of protection against mortality (0-20%) except the groups vaccinated with calcium phosphate adjuvanted vaccines, where mortality was similar (70%) to groups that received non-adjuvanted inactivated virus or no vaccine (60-100% mortality). Virus shedding in oral swabs was variable among the treatment groups. Formalin inactivated vaccine induced similar antibody titers and protection against challenge compared to BPL inactivated vaccine groups. These studies support the use of oil adjuvanted vaccines for use in the poultry industry for control for AIV.

A screening assay for neuraminidase inhibitors using neuraminidases N1 and N3 from a baculovirus expression system.

CONTEXT: Development of inexpensive and safe enzymatic assays to screen for putative neuraminidase inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: Validate the use of recombinant neuraminidase expressed in baculovirus located on the viral surface capsule to develop a neuraminidase inhibitor screening assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recombinant baculovirus particles displaying neuraminidase N1 and N3 were used as enzyme sources. The assay set-up required the use of 2'-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-α-D-acetyl neuraminic acid as substrate and oseltamivir carboxylate as benchmark inhibitor. RESULTS: The assay was set up in a standard 96-well plate. The within- and between-assay coefficients of variation were, on average, less than 10%. The 50% inhibitory concentration values of the inhibitor were in good agreement with those determined by independent kinetic experiments. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The assay showed satisfactory within- and between-assay repeatability. The obtained results suggest that recombinant baculovirus expressing neuraminidase located on the virus membrane capsule can be used to set up affordable and reliable neuraminidase inhibitors screening assays.