An in vitro investigation of the effectiveness of bioactive glass air-abrasion in the 'selective' removal of orthodontic resin adhesive.

The process of clinically debonding orthodontic brackets causes histomorphological damage to enamel that needs to be quantified and minimized. This study compared three methods for removing residual resin adhesive following bracket debonding. The surface finish following removal of residual adhesive using a slow-speed eight-bladed tungsten carbide bur (group 1), alumina air-abrasion (group 2), and bioactive-glass air-abrasion (group 3) and following polishing, was examined using scanning electron microscopy imaging of resin replicas. Contact profilometry was used to image surfaces before and after debonding for quantifiable volumetric analysis of enamel damage. Surface scarring was seen on scanning electron micrographs from group 1, a sharp pitted surface was identified in group 2, while group 3 exhibited similar, but subjectively smoother, pits. The surface finish following polishing was similar for groups 2 and 3 but did not completely remove the scarring evident from group 1. Quantifiable enamel lost was as follows: group 1, 0.285 mm(3); group 2, 0.386 mm(3); and group 3, 0.135 mm(3); statistical differences were observed between groups 2 and 3. From these results, bioactive-glass air-abrasion more consistently caused less physical damage to enamel and achieved a clinically smooth surface finish following polishing and is therefore to be recommended for clinical use.

Iatrogenic tooth abrasion comparisons among composite materials and finishing techniques.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Many different rotary instruments are available for shaping composite restorations. Whether use of these instruments causes undesirable iatrogenic abrasion of either the tooth surface or the composite restorative material is unknown. Assuming that damage occurs, which technique is least damaging is unknown. PURPOSE: This in vitro study quantified the loss of surface enamel and dentin surrounding Class V preparations during composite shaping and finishing procedures. The susceptibility of 2 types of composites to tooth abrasion was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized Class V cavities were prepared at the amelodentinal junction of 36 human molar teeth. The teeth were randomly assigned to 6 groups of 6 teeth each. They were restored with either a low- or high-viscosity composite (Revolution or Prodigy Condensable, respectively) and finished with aluminum oxide disks, tungsten carbide burs, or ultrafine finishing diamond burs. The preparations were profiled before and after restoration. After each finishing procedure, morphological measurements of surface changes in the dentin and enamel were made and reported as volume (in cubic millimeters); maximum depth, mean maximum depth, and mean depth (in micrometers); and surface area (in square millimeters). The results were subjected to a 2-way analysis of variance for restorative material and finishing technique (P<.05). RESULTS: Aluminum oxide disks removed significantly less enamel than tungsten carbide burs or ultrafine finishing diamond burs, as measured by volume, maximum depth, mean maximum depth, mean depth, and surface area (P<.05). Conversely, aluminum oxide disks removed significantly greater dentin than either tungsten carbide burs or ultrafine finishing burs as measured by loss of volume, mean depth, and surface area (P<.05). There was no significant difference in the loss of surrounding tooth substance based on resin type (low or high viscosity). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the 3 finishing systems tested resulted in varying degrees of iatrogenic abrasion of enamel and dentin. The composite material used had no significant effect on abrasion of the surrounding enamel or dentin.

Histopathologic effects of kinetic cavity preparation for the removal of enamel and dentin. An in vivo animal study.

Recent developments in technology, direct placement restorative materials, and cavity preparation design have renewed interest in kinetic cavity preparation, a term to describe the use of air-abrasion for removal of tooth structure. This study compared the pulpal response of 120 teeth in mixed-breed dogs treated with four kinetic cavity preparation combinations of pressure (80 psi and 160 psi) and aluminum oxide particle sizes (27 microns and 50 microns) to those treated with high-speed rotary burs. Class V buccal preparations were made and restored with an interim material. Teeth were collected 72 hours after surgery, decalcified, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and blindly evaluated by two examiners at the minimal dentin thickness. Samples were graded for extent of displacement, disruption, inflammation, and necrosis of pulpal structures. Differences between groups were analyzed with the use of Bonferroni-adjusted multiple Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests with p < 0.05 being significant. Higher pressures and smaller particles yielded significantly fewer pulpal effects than the high-speed treated teeth whereas lower pressures and larger particles were not significantly different for most effects evaluated. No adverse soft tissue effects were noted when kinetic cavity preparation was directed at attached gingiva.

Air-rotor stripping and enamel demineralization in vitro.

This investigation sought to evaluate the effects of air-rotor stripping on the susceptibility of human enamel to demineralization using an in vitro caries model. Crowns of extracted premolar teeth were abraded (0.5 mm) on one proximal surface by air-rotor stripping. The teeth were placed in a demineralizing gel and removed at various intervals up to 336 hours. Lesion depth and mineral content on the abraded and intact surfaces was measured with contact microradiography and computerized image analysis (double window technique). For each time interval measured, lesion depth was greater (p < 0.05) on the abraded surfaces and mineral density was significantly less (p < 0.05). In a second experiment, the effect of fluoride supplements (dentifrice or topical gel) were examined on abraded and intact enamel surfaces that were exposed to the acid gel for 192 hours. The data showed that fluoride treatments significantly reduced lesion penetration on intact and abraded surfaces compared with a no fluoride group. Lesion depth on the abraded, fluoride treated surfaces was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than on the intact untreated surfaces. No significant differences (p < 0.05) were apparent between the fluoride treatment groups with respect to lesion depth and mineral density within the lesion. These results suggest that air-rotor stripping significantly increases the susceptibility of proximal enamel surfaces to demineralization. As a result, the clinician should use caution in the application of this technique until the long-term effects on caries susceptibility have been determined.