Voltage and propagation mapping: New tools to improve successful ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Mapping system is useful in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and localization of anatomic variances. Voltage mapping identifies a low voltage area in the Koch triangle called low-voltage-bridge (LVB); propagation mapping identifies the collision point (CP) of atrial wavefront convergence. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the relationship between LVB and CP with successful site of ablation and identify standard value for LVB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the right atria were constructed from intracardiac recordings using the ablation catheter. Cut-off values on voltage map were adjusted until LVB was observed. On propagation map, atrial wavefronts during sinus rhythm collide in the site representing CP, indicating the area of slow pathway conduction. Ablation site was selected targeting LVB and CP site, confirmed by anatomic position on fluoroscopy and atrioventricular ratio. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. LVB and CP were present in all patients. Postprocedural evaluation identified standard cut-off of 0.3-1 mV useful for LVB identification. An overlap between LVB and CP was observed in 23 (85%) patients. Procedure success was achieved in all patient with effective site at first application in 22 (81%) patients. There was a significant correlation between LVB, CP, and the site of effective ablation (p = .001). CONCLUSION: We found correlation between LVB and CP with the site of effective ablation, identifying a voltage range useful for standardized LVB identification. These techniques could be useful to identify ablation site and minimize radiation exposure.

Reversible Pulsed Electrical Fields as an In Vivo Tool to Study Cardiac Electrophysiology: The Advent of Pulsed Field Mapping.

BACKGROUND: During electrophysiological mapping of tachycardias, putative target sites are often only truly confirmed to be vital after observing the effect of ablation. This lack of mapping specificity potentiates inadvertent ablation of innocent cardiac tissue not relevant to the arrhythmia. But if myocardial excitability could be transiently suppressed at critical regions, their suitability as targets could be conclusively determined before delivering tissue-destructive ablation lesions. We studied whether reversible pulsed electric fields (PFREV) could transiently suppress electrical conduction, thereby providing a means to dissect tachycardia circuits in vivo. METHODS: PFREV energy was delivered from a 9-mm lattice-tip catheter to the atria of 12 swine and 9 patients, followed by serial electrogram assessments. The effects on electrical conduction were explored in 5 additional animals by applying PFREV to the atrioventricular node: 17 low-dose (PFREV-LOW) and 10 high-dose (PFREV-HIGH) applications. Finally, in 3 patients manifesting spontaneous tachycardias, PFREV was applied at putative critical sites. RESULTS: In animals, the immediate post-PFREV electrogram amplitudes diminished by 74%, followed by 78% recovery by 5 minutes. Similarly, in patients, a 69.9% amplitude reduction was followed by 84% recovery by 3 minutes. Histology revealed only minimal to no focal, superficial fibrosis. PFREV-LOW at the atrioventricular node resulted in transient PR prolongation and transient AV block in 59% and 6%, while PFREV-HIGH caused transient PR prolongation and transient AV block in 30% and 50%, respectively. The 3 tachycardia patients had atypical atrial flutters (n=2) and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. PFREV at putative critical sites reproducibly terminated the tachycardias; ablation rendered the tachycardias noninducible and without recurrence during 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Reversible electroporation pulses can be applied to myocardial tissue to transiently block electrical conduction. This technique of pulsed field mapping may represent a novel electrophysiological tool to help identify the critical isthmus of tachycardia circuits.

Junctional Tachycardia: A Critical Reassessment.

Junctional tachycardia (JT) is typically considered to have an automatic mechanism originating from the distal atrioventricular node. When there is 1:1 retrograde conduction via the fast pathway, JT would resemble the typical form of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Atrial pacing maneuvers have been proposed to exclude AVNRT and suggest a diagnosis of JT. However, after excluding AVNRT, one should consider the possibility of an infra-atrial narrow QRS re-entrant tachycardia, which can exhibit features that resemble AVNRT as well as JT. Pacing maneuvers and mapping techniques should be performed to assess for infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia before concluding that JT is the mechanism of a narrow QRS tachycardia. Distinguishing JT from typical AVNRT or infra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia has notable implications regarding the approach to ablation of the tachycardia. Ultimately, a contemporary review of the evidence on JT raises some questions as to the mechanism and source of what has traditionally been considered JT.

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping-Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Direct slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping-guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping-guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping-guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping-guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation. RESULTS: Among 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: DSPC mapping-guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.

An unusual case of non-reentrant atrioventricular nodal tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Although uncommonly encountered, dual atrioventricular nodal non-reentrant tachycardia (DAVNNRT) is a well-described arrhythmia that can manifest in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways physiology. This arrhythmia is characterized on electrocardiogram (ECG) by a single P wave followed by two conducted QRS complexes (so-called "double fire"), and on intracardiac electrograms by a single atrial electrogram followed by two separate His deflections and ventricular electrograms. METHODS/RESULTS: We report a rare case of "triple-fire" atrioventricular non-reentrant tachycardia in which a patient was found to have three distinct atrioventricular nodal pathways and multiple triple fire responses, both on surface ECG and intracardiac electrograms. CONCLUSION: Multiple pathways physiology and it's clinical ramifications are discussed.

Randomized trial of intracardiac echocardiography-guided slow pathway ablation.

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow pathway (SP) in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is highly effective; however, it may require prolonged fluoroscopy and RF time. We postulated that visualization of the SP region with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could decrease ablation time, minimize radiation exposure, and facilitate SP ablation compared to the standard, fluoroscopy-guided approach. METHODS: In our study, we randomized 91 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study and SP ablation for AVNRT into 2 groups: fluoroscopy-only (n = 48) or ICE-guided (n = 43) group. Crossover to ICE-guidance was allowed after 8 unsuccessful RF applications. RESULTS: Mapping plus ablation time (mean ± standard deviation: 18.8 ± 16.1 min vs 11.6 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.031), fluoroscopy time (median [interquartile range]: 4.9 [2.93-8.13] min vs. 1.8 [1.2-2.8] min, p < 0.001), and total ablation time (144 [104-196] s vs. 81 [60-159] s, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the ICE group. ICE-guidance was associated with reduced radiation exposure (13.2 [8.2-13.4] mGy vs. 3.7 [1.5-5.8] mGy, p < 0.001). The sum of delivered RF energy (3866 [2786-5656] Ws vs. 2283 [1694-4284] Ws, p = 0.002) and number of RF applications (8 [4.25-12.75] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.001) were also lower with ICE-guidance. Twelve (25%) patients crossed over to the ICE-guided group. All were treated successfully thereafter with similar number, time, and cumulative energy of RF applications compared to the ICE group. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ICE-guidance during SP ablation significantly reduces mapping and ablation time, radiation exposure, and RF delivery in comparison to fluoroscopy-only procedures. Moreover, early switching to ICE-guided ablation seems to be an optimal choice in challenging cases.

Transesophageal electrophysiology study in the diagnosis of dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia.

"Double fire" is generally characterized by 1:2 atrioventricular conduction of sinus beats traveling down fast and slow pathways that result in double ventricular response. When this phenomenon repeats rapidly, dual atrioventricular nodal nonreentrant tachycardia (DAVNNT) occurs. We report a case of an irregular tachycardia with a comprehensive record that includes an electrocardiogram, a transesophageal electrophysiology study, and an intracardiac electrophysiology study. This is the first report of transesophageal electrophysiology study in the diagnosis of DAVNNT. A diagnosis of DAVNNT was deduced, and the patient was successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway.

Characteristics of a large-scale cohort with accessory pathway(s): A cross-sectional retrospective study highlighting over a twenty-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter ablation following electrophysiologic study (EPS) is the mainstay of diagnosis and treatment for patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), demonstrating excellent long-term outcome and a low rate of complications. In this study, our aim was to assess our experience in patients with accessory pathway (AP) and to compare our data with the literature. METHODS: We included 1,437 patients who were diagnosed and treated for AP in our hospital between 1998 and 2020. The demographic data of all the patients, AP location, and periprocedural results were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 1,437 patients, 1,299 (90.4%) were men; and the mean age of the population was 26.67 years. The location of 1,418 APs were along the left free wall (647 [45.6%] patients), in the posteroseptal region (366 [25.3%] patients), in the anteroseptal region (290 [20.4%] patients), and along the right free wall (115 [8.1%] patients). The ratio of the second AP existence was 3.0% and AVNRT co-existence was 2.0%. A total of 55 (3.8%) patients had recurrent sessions for relapse. Our center's total success rate was 95.5%, and total complication rate was 0.26%. CONCLUSION: According to our retrospective analysis, EPS is a highly functional tool in the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias such as AVRT for high-risk patient groups like military personnel with the aim of risk stratification and medical management.

Wenckebach cycle length: A novel predictor for AV block in AVNRT patients treated with ablation.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation remains the most effective management option for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). The risk of atrioventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker is substantial, but, currently, a reliable method to predict this complication is lacking. METHODS: The electrophysiologic studies (EPS) and baseline characteristics of patients who underwent catheter ablation for the treatment of AVNRT were retrospectively analyzed to investigate predisposing factors for AV block after treatment. Patients were followed for AV block at one month and one year after hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 784 patients treated with catheter ablation for AVNRT between 1999 to 2019, 15 developed AV block. Patients with AV block were older (p = .001). Among the recorded EPS parameters, patients with AV block had significantly higher Atrial His interval (120 vs. 110 ms, p = .049), Wenckebach cycle length (WCL) (400 vs. 353 ms, p < .001) and tachycardia CL (400 vs. 387 ms, P = .01) during the ablation compared to their peers without AV block. Additionally, only WCL (OR = 1.1, 95% CI 1.02-1.19, p = .017) remained significant after adjustment for age, gender, ERP, AH interval, and HR. This association was confirmed by comparing patients with (n = 15) and without (n = 15) AV block using propensity score-matching. A WCL≥400ms was associated with a 4-fold higher incidence of AV block (4.79% vs. 1.25%). CONCLUSION: Increased pre-procedural WCL was associated with a high risk for AV block after catheter ablation treatment for AVNRT. These findings suggest that this readily available EPS-derived parameter may be a novel marker of risk for severe complications in these patients.

Para-Hisian Pacing During Sinus Rhythm: Establishing Threshold Values to Distinguish Nodal From Septal Pathway Conduction.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify minimum threshold values below which conduction over the atrioventricular (AV) node would be unexpected. BACKGROUND: Para-Hisian pacing is used to evaluate for the presence of a septal accessory pathway (AP); however, threshold values to differentiate nodal from AP conduction are unknown. METHODS: The authors performed high- and low-output para-Hisian pacing during sinus rhythm to capture the His and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (H+V) and para-Hisian ventricular myocardium (V) alone, respectively. The change in stimulation (stim)-to-atrial electrogram interval after loss of His bundle capture in patients with (AP+) and without (AP-) a septal AP was evaluated. Stim-to-proximal coronary sinus (PCS) and stim-to-high right atrium (HRA) intervals were measured and within-patient differences (△) for V and H+V capture were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 23 AP+ and 45 AP- patients were evaluated. The difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the high right atrial catheter seen with the loss of His bundle capture (△-stim-HRA) (21 ms; interquartile range [IQR]: 3 to 43 ms vs. 64 ms; IQR: 56 to 73 ms; p < 0.001) and difference in stimulus to earliest atrial signal in the proximal coronary sinus catheter seen with the loss of His Bundle capture (△-stim-PCS) (11 ms; IQR: 0 to 30 ms vs. 61 ms; IQR: 52 to 72 ms; p < 0.001) were shorter in AP+ patients. The shortest △-stim-PCS and △-stim-HRA in AP- patients were 37 ms and 32 ms, respectively, whereas the longest corresponding intervals in AP+ patients were 51 ms and 75 ms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A △-stim-PCS <37 ms or △-stim-HRA <32 ms confirmed the presence of a septal AP, whereas a value >51 ms for △-stim-PCS or >75 ms for △-stim-HRA excluded it. Alternatively, the minimum △-stim-PCS with loss of His capture compatible with AV nodal conduction in isolation was 37 ms, and a △-stim-PCS >51 ms effectively ruled out the presence of a septal AP.

Predictors of zero X ray procedures in supraventricular arrhythmias ablation.

To evaluate predictors of zero-X ray procedures for supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) using minimally fluoroscopic approach (MFA). Patients referred for RF catheter ablation of SVT were admitted for a MFA with an electro-anatomical navigation system or a conventional fluoroscopic approach (ConvA). Exclusion criterion was the need to perform a transseptal puncture. 206 patients (98 men, age 53 ± 19 years) underwent an EP study, 93 (45%) with an MFA and 113 (55%) with a ConvA. Fifty-five had no inducible arrhythmias (EPS). Fifty-four had AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 49 patients had typical atrial flutter (AFL), 37 had AV reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT/WPW), 11 had focal atrial tachycardia (AT), and underwent a RF ablation. X-ray was not used at all in 51/93 (58%) procedures (zero X ray). MFA was associated with a significant reduction in total fluoroscopy time (5.5 ± 10 vs 13 ± 18 min, P = 0.01) and operator radiation dose (0.8 ± 2.5 vs 3 ± 8.2 mSV, P < 0.05). The greatest absolute dose reduction was observed in AVNRT (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 5.1 ± 10 mSV, P = 0.01, 98% relative dose reduction) and in AFL (1.3 ± 3.6 vs 11 ± 16 mSV, P = 0.003, 88% relative dose reduction) groups. Both AVNRT or AFL resulted the only statistically significant predictors of zero x ray at multivariate analysis (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.5-13 and OR 5, 95% CI 1.7-15, P < 0.001, respectively). Success and complication rate was comparable between groups (P = NS). Using MFA for SVT ablation, radiological exposure is significantly reduced. Type of arrhythmia is the strongest predictor of zero X ray procedure.

Slow-pathway visualization by using voltage-time relationship: A novel technique for identification and fluoroless ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is treatable by catheter ablation. Advances in mapping-system technology permit fluoroless workflow during ablations. As national practice trends toward fluoroless approaches, easily obtained, reproducible methods of slow-pathway identification, and ablation become increasingly important. We present a novel method of slow-pathway identification and initial ablation results from this method. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined AVNRT ablations performed at our institution over a 12-month period. In these cases, the site of the slow pathway was predicted by latest activation in the inferior triangle of Koch during sinus rhythm. Ablation was performed in this region. Proximity of the predicted site to the successful ablation location, complication rates, and patient outcomes were recorded. Junctional rhythm was seen in 40/41 ablations (98%) at the predicted site (mean, 1.3 lesions and median, 1 lesion per case). One lesion was defined as 5 mm of ablation. The initial ablation was successful in 39/41 cases (95%); in two cases, greater or equal to 2 echo beats were detected after the initial ablation, necessitating further lesion expansion. In 8/41 cases (20%), greater than one lesion was placed during initial ablation before attempted reinduction. Complications included one transient heart block and one transient PR prolongation. During follow-up (median, day 51), one patient had lower-extremity deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus, and one had a lower-extremity superficial venous thrombosis. There was one tachycardia recurrence, which prompted a redo ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping-system detection of late-activation, low-amplitude voltage during sinus rhythm provides an objective, and fluoroless means of identifying the slow pathway in typical AVNRT.