Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 210
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 48(5): 707-715, 2023 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés, Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37539573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Gram-positive cocci is the main pathogen responsible for early infection after liver transplantation (LT), posing a huge threat to the prognosis of liver transplant recipients. This study aims to analyze the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-positive cocci, the risk factors for infections and efficacy of antibiotics within 2 months after LT, and to guide the prevention and treatment of these infections. METHODS: In this study, data of pathogenic bacteria distribution, drug resistance and therapeutic efficacy were collected from 39 Gram-positive cocci infections among 256 patients who received liver transplantation from donation after citizens' death in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to July 2022, and risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infection were analyzed. RESULTS: Enterococcus faecium was the dominant pathogenic bacteria (33/51, 64.7%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (11/51, 21.6%). The most common sites of infection were abdominal cavity/biliary tract (13/256, 5.1%) and urinary tract (10/256, 3.9%). Fifty (98%) of the 51 Gram-positive cocci infections occurred within 1 month after LT. The most sensitive drugs to Gram-positive cocci were teicoplanin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin. Vancomycin was not used in all patients, considering its nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin was not administered to all patients in view of its nephrotoxicity.There was no significant difference between the efficacy of daptomycin and teicoplanin in the prevention of cocci infection (P>0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >25 (P=0.005), intraoperative red blood cell infusion ≥12 U (P=0.013) and exposure to more than 2 intravenous antibiotics post-LT (P=0.003) were related to Gram-positive cocci infections. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MELD score >25 (OR=2.378, 95% CI 1.124 to 5.032, P=0.024) and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion ≥ 12 U (OR=2.757, 95% CI 1.227 to 6.195, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infections after LT. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in LT recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT (OR=0.269, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.598, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gram-positive cocci infections occurring early after liver transplantation were dominated by Enterococcus faecalis infections at the abdominal/biliary tract and urinary tract. Teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid were anti-cocci sensitive drugs. Daptomycin and teicoplanin were equally effective in preventing cocci infections due to Gram-positive cocci. Patients with high preoperative MELD score and massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion were more likely to suffer Gram-positive cocci infection after surgery. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT.


Asunto(s)
Daptomicina , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Cocos Grampositivos , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Daptomicina/farmacología , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Linezolid/farmacología , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Teicoplanina/farmacología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Tigeciclina/farmacología , Tigeciclina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/etiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Vancomicina/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060815

RESUMEN

Dalbavancin, a long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic targeting susceptible Gram-positive bacteria, is WHO critically important antibiotic, increasingly used in critical situations such as osteoarticular infections. To ensure its effectiveness and its safety, the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of dalbavancin is strongly recommended. In the absence of an available minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommends a breakpoint of 0.125 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, corresponding to a trough target concentration of 25 mg/L. Nowadays, the TDM is usually performed using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method coupled with a tandem mass spectrometry. However, this expensive and specialized equipment and reagents may be difficult to acquire for non-specialized laboratories. The use of HPLC coupled with diode array detector (DAD) facilitates TDM with a lower cost, while preserving the reliability of the results. Our aim was to provide a sensitive and specific method, relying on HPLC-DAD for extending the TDM of dalbavancin beyond non-specialized labs, therefore maximizing its efficiency and Benefit/risk ratio. Our method complied with the European Medicines Agency guidelines of bioanalytical validation. Irrespective of the concentrations of dalbavancin, the coefficient of variation < 10% confirmed the reliability of this analytical method, with a calibration curve ranging from 5 to 100 mg/L. No interferences nor carryover was observed. Our HPLC-DAD method, combined with a simple extraction, provides a widely usable, inexpensive and easy-to-implement new asset for the TDM of Dalbavancin.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo de Drogas , Teicoplanina , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Teicoplanina/farmacología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
3.
Artículo en Inglés | WPRIM | ID: wpr-982340

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES@#Gram-positive cocci is the main pathogen responsible for early infection after liver transplantation (LT), posing a huge threat to the prognosis of liver transplant recipients. This study aims to analyze the distribution and drug resistance of Gram-positive cocci, the risk factors for infections and efficacy of antibiotics within 2 months after LT, and to guide the prevention and treatment of these infections.@*METHODS@#In this study, data of pathogenic bacteria distribution, drug resistance and therapeutic efficacy were collected from 39 Gram-positive cocci infections among 256 patients who received liver transplantation from donation after citizens' death in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2019 to July 2022, and risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infection were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Enterococcus faecium was the dominant pathogenic bacteria (33/51, 64.7%), followed by Enterococcus faecalis (11/51, 21.6%). The most common sites of infection were abdominal cavity/biliary tract (13/256, 5.1%) and urinary tract (10/256, 3.9%). Fifty (98%) of the 51 Gram-positive cocci infections occurred within 1 month after LT. The most sensitive drugs to Gram-positive cocci were teicoplanin, tigecycline, linezolid and vancomycin. Vancomycin was not used in all patients, considering its nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin was not administered to all patients in view of its nephrotoxicity.There was no significant difference between the efficacy of daptomycin and teicoplanin in the prevention of cocci infection (P>0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score >25 (P=0.005), intraoperative red blood cell infusion ≥12 U (P=0.013) and exposure to more than 2 intravenous antibiotics post-LT (P=0.003) were related to Gram-positive cocci infections. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative MELD score >25 (OR=2.378, 95% CI 1.124 to 5.032, P=0.024) and intraoperative red blood cell transfusion ≥ 12 U (OR=2.757, 95% CI 1.227 to 6.195, P=0.014) were independent risk factors for Gram-positive cocci infections after LT. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in LT recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT (OR=0.269, 95% CI 0.121 to 0.598, P=0.001).@*CONCLUSIONS@#Gram-positive cocci infections occurring early after liver transplantation were dominated by Enterococcus faecalis infections at the abdominal/biliary tract and urinary tract. Teicoplanin, tigecycline and linezolid were anti-cocci sensitive drugs. Daptomycin and teicoplanin were equally effective in preventing cocci infections due to Gram-positive cocci. Patients with high preoperative MELD score and massive intraoperative red blood cell transfusion were more likely to suffer Gram-positive cocci infection after surgery. Postoperative Gram-positive cocci infections were reduced in recipients exposing to more than two intravenous antibiotics post-LT.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Linezolid/uso terapéutico , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Cocos Grampositivos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Tigeciclina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
4.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 32(6): NP95-NP97, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35791504

RESUMEN

There is a lack of epidemiological studies reporting bacteria profiles, susceptibility, and suggested empiric (first line) treatment in Northern Italy. Our internal audit of corneal scraping for microbial keratitis at University of Brescia reports 116 bacterial strains isolated between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2020. All cases had at least an epithelial defect of 1 mm in diameter. 36.2% (42) were Gram-positive, while 63.7% (74) Gram negative. In our results Gram-negatives are sensitive to ciprofloxacin in 94.5% and Pseudomonas in 95%. Grampositives are sensitive to teicoplanin in 91,1%. Those data may help to establish empiric treatment in case of bacterial keratitis.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo , Queratitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas del Ojo/epidemiología , Humanos , Queratitis/diagnóstico , Queratitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Queratitis/epidemiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Retrospectivos , Teicoplanina
5.
Musculoskelet Surg ; 106(2): 187-193, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33400185

RESUMEN

Purpose The timing and number of doses of antibiotics required for megaendoprosthetic replacement (MPR) in metastatic bone disease (MBD) is a matter of debate. The aim of our study is to present the results of a prospective cohort of MPR for MBD receiving a single dose of antibiotic at induction of anaesthesia. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary MPR in MBD were included in this prospective study. All penicillin-sensitive patients received one dose of cefuroxime 1.5gm intravenous at induction. In penicillin-allergic patients, teicoplanin 1.2gm and ciprofloxacin 500 mg intravenous was administered. The patients were followed up in the wound clinic and the specialist MBD clinic at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and then annually. Data collected included demographics, primary tumours, surgical procedures, complications and duration of follow-up. All calculations were performed using SPSS® 25(IBM, USA). A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: There were 51 patients with a mean age of 65.4 years. Procedures included proximal femoral replacement (35), distal femoral replacement (7), proximal humeral replacement (4), distal humeral replacement (3) and total femoral replacement (2). Thirty-seven patients received cefuroxime, and fourteen patients received teicoplanin and ciprofloxacin at induction of anaesthesia. The deep infection rate was 1.9%. Thirty-seven patients died with a median survival of 10 months (1 to 51 months). Mean follow-up was 18.9 months (1 to 70 months). CONCLUSION: Single dose of preoperative antibiotics at anaesthetic induction seems to be safe and effective for preoperative prophylaxis in orthopaedic oncology.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Neoplasias Óseas , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Neoplasias Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Cefuroxima/uso terapéutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Penicilinas , Estudios Prospectivos , Teicoplanina
6.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 58(5): 106445, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34614441

RESUMEN

Dalbavancin is increasingly used for the treatment of staphylococcal osteoarticular infections (OIs). Some population pharmacokinetic studies suggest that a regimen of two 1500 mg doses 1 week apart could ensure effective treatment for several weeks. Here we aim to provide clinicians with a proof-of-concept of the potential role that therapeutic drug monitoring may have in giving real-time feedback of the estimated duration of optimal treatment of staphylococcal OIs with dalbavancin in each single patient.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Teicoplanina/administración & dosificación , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico
7.
J Chemother ; 33(8): 547-553, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080519

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of various dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in neutropenic patients with cancer. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using pharmacokinetic parameters and pharmacodynamic data to determine cumulative fraction of response (CFRs) in terms of area under the concentration-time curve/minimum inhibition concentration target. Currently clinical standard dosing regimens of vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin were insufficient to provide expected CFRs against MRSA for neutropenic patients with cancer. The high dosing regimens of vancomycin (3500 mg/d), teicoplanin (800 mg/d) and daptomycin (8 mg/kg/d) could provide CFRs of ≥ 80%, showing a higher treatment success. However, the majority of CFRs with linezolid simulated dosing regimens reached < 80% against MRSA. Therefore, a strategy of high dosages of vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin may be needed to attain optimal therapeutic efficacy against MRSA in neutropenic patients with cancer.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Neutropenia Febril Inducida por Quimioterapia/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Peso Corporal , Creatinina/sangre , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Daptomicina/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Linezolid/administración & dosificación , Linezolid/farmacocinética , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método de Montecarlo , Teicoplanina/administración & dosificación , Teicoplanina/farmacocinética , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Vancomicina/farmacocinética
8.
ACS Chem Biol ; 16(5): 915-928, 2021 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33913701

RESUMEN

Glycopeptide antibiotics (GPAs) are last defense line drugs against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens. Natural GPAs teicoplanin and vancomycin, as well as semisynthetic oritavancin, telavancin, and dalbavancin, are currently approved for clinical use. Although these antibiotics remain efficient, emergence of novel GPA-resistant pathogens is a question of time. Therefore, it is important to investigate the natural variety of GPAs coming from so-called "rare" actinobacteria. Herein we describe a novel GPA producer-Nonomuraea coxensis DSM 45129. Its de novo sequenced and completely assembled genome harbors a biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) similar to the dbv BGC of A40926, the natural precursor to dalbavancin. The strain produces a novel GPA, which we propose is an A40926 analogue lacking the carboxyl group on the N-acylglucosamine moiety. This structural difference correlates with the absence of dbv29-coding for an enzyme responsible for the oxidation of the N-acylglucosamine moiety. Introduction of dbv29 into N. coxensis led to A40926 production in this strain. Finally, we successfully applied dbv3 and dbv4 heterologous transcriptional regulators to trigger and improve A50926 production in N. coxensis, making them prospective tools for screening other Nonomuraea spp. for GPA production. Our work highlights genus Nonomuraea as a still untapped source of novel GPAs.


Asunto(s)
Actinobacteria/química , Antibacterianos/química , Proteínas Bacterianas/química , Glicopéptidos/química , Proteínas Recombinantes/química , Actinobacteria/genética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/farmacología , Secuencia de Bases , Simulación por Computador , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica , Genómica/métodos , Glucosamina/química , Glicopéptidos/farmacología , Familia de Multigenes , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/farmacología , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Teicoplanina/química , Teicoplanina/farmacología
9.
Int J Infect Dis ; 107: 69-71, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33878463

RESUMEN

The activities of dalbavancin and comparator agents were evaluated against Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the lower respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients with pneumonia. Bacterial isolates (n = 357) were collected from CF patients in 36 medical centers worldwide (2018-2019) and susceptibility tested using reference broth microdilution. Susceptibility results from these isolates were compared with those for 725 S. aureus isolates consecutively collected from non-CF patients with pneumonia from the same medical centers over the same period. Only isolates determined to be the probable cause of pneumonia were included in the study. Susceptibility profiles were very similar among isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Dalbavancin exhibited potent activity (MIC50/90, 0.03/0.03 mg/L) and complete coverage (100.0% susceptibility) against isolates from CF and non-CF patients. Ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/1 mg/L) was active against 97.8% and 98.1% of isolates from CF and non-CF patients, respectively. Oxacillin resistance (MRSA) rates were 27.7% among CF and 28.7% among non-CF patients. Among MRSA isolates from CF/non-CF patients (n = 99/208), susceptibility to ceftaroline, clindamycin, levofloxacin, and tetracycline were 91.9%/93.3%, 58.6%/64.4%, 40.4%/29.3%, and 83.8%/89.4%, respectively. Dalbavancin demonstrated high potency against S. aureus from CF and non-CF patients and may represent a valuable treatment option for CF patients with MRSA pulmonary infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Neumonía Estafilocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Oxacilina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Estafilocócica/microbiología , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapéutico , Ceftarolina
10.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 46(3): 622-632, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33547647

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: It has been recommended that the trough concentration (Cmin ) of teicoplanin should be maintained at ≥20 µg/ml for difficult-to-treat complicated infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Conversely, Cmin of teicoplanin of at least 10 µg/ml is required for non-complicated MRSA infections. Considering the low incidence of nephrotoxicity for teicoplanin, Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml has been suggested for most MRSA infections. Thus, we assessed the clinical efficacy and adverse effects of teicoplanin at this target Cmin . METHODS: We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Ichushi-Web) to identify eligible studies. Studies were included if they provided the incidence of treatment success, mortality in patients with MRSA infection, and/or hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity according to the Cmin range. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Four trials assessing clinical success (n = 299) and three studies assessing adverse effects (n = 546) were included. Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml significantly increased the probability of treatment success compared with Cmin  < 15 µg/ml (odds ratio [OR] = 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14-6.32, p = 0.02). The all-cause mortality rate did not differ between the groups (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.13-1.61, p = 0.22). Cmin  = 15-30 µg/ml did not increase the risks of nephrotoxicity (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.49-1.69, p = 0.76) or hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.18-2.44, p = 0.54). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Teicoplanin therapy using a Cmin target of 15-30 µg/ml is likely to be associated with better clinical responses than Cmin  < 15 µg/ml without increasing the risk of adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Teicoplanina/administración & dosificación , Teicoplanina/efectos adversos
12.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 164: 2622-2631, 2020 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32853604

RESUMEN

The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has emerged as a global catastrophe. The virus requires main protease for processing the viral polyproteins PP1A and PP1AB translated from the viral RNA. In search of a quick, safe and successful therapeutic agent; we screened various clinically approved drugs for the in-vitro inhibitory effect on 3CLPro which may be able to halt virus replication. The methods used includes protease activity assay, fluorescence quenching, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), Thermofluor® Assay, Size exclusion chromatography and in-silico docking studies. We found that Teicoplanin as most effective drug with IC50 ~ 1.5 µM. Additionally, through fluorescence quenching Stern-Volmer quenching constant (KSV) for Teicoplanin was estimated as 2.5 × 105 L·mol-1, which suggests a relatively high affinity between Teicoplanin and 3CLPro protease. The SPR shows good interaction between Teicoplanin and 3CLPro with KD ~ 1.6 µM. Our results provide critical insights into the mechanism of action of Teicoplanin as a potential therapeutic against COVID-19. We found that Teicoplanin is about 10-20 fold more potent in inhibiting protease activity than other drugs in use, such as lopinavir, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, atazanavir etc. Therefore, Teicoplanin emerged as the best inhibitor among all drug molecules we screened against 3CLPro of SARS-CoV-2.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/farmacología , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Betacoronavirus/enzimología , Reposicionamiento de Medicamentos/métodos , Inhibidores de Proteasas/farmacología , Proteínas no Estructurales Virales/antagonistas & inhibidores , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Antivirales/química , Betacoronavirus/fisiología , COVID-19 , Proteasas 3C de Coronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Cisteína Endopeptidasas , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/virología , Inhibidores de Proteasas/química , SARS-CoV-2 , Teicoplanina/química , Teicoplanina/farmacología , Replicación Viral/efectos de los fármacos
13.
Virus Res ; 286: 198073, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32592817

RESUMEN

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has rapidly become a global pandemic. Up to now, numerous medicines have been applied or approved for the prevention and control of the virus infection. However, the efficiency of each medicine or combination is completely different or still unknown. In this review, we discuss the types, characteristics, antiviral mechanisms, and shortcomings of recommended candidate medicines for SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as perspectives of the drugs for the disease treatment, which may provide a theoretical basis for drug screening and application.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adenosina Monofosfato/uso terapéutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapéutico , Amidas/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , COVID-19 , China/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Indoles/uso terapéutico , Interferones/uso terapéutico , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/virología , Pirazinas/uso terapéutico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Análisis de Supervivencia , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico
14.
Ther Drug Monit ; 42(2): 165-168, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32195987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dalbavancin, albeit indicated for the treatment of skin structure infections, is used for a much wider range of infections. This drug is characterized by a long half-life (more than 200 hours), a favorable safety profile, and an activity against a wide array of gram-positive organisms, including several strains of Staphylococci and Enterococci. METHODS: In this study, we presented 3 cases of critically ill patients treated with dalbavancin. All patients were therapeutically monitored for plasma dalbavancin concentrations; ultrafiltrate dalbavancin concentrations were assessed in a patient undergoing continuous renal-replacement therapy. Dalbavancin concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatographic method coupled with mass spectrometry. RESULTS: All 3 severely ill patients experiencing necrotizing fasciitis were successfully treated during the acute phase with dalbavancin. Dalbavancin clearance in patient 3 (0.334 L/h) was considerably increased compared with values measured in the other 2 patients (0.054 and 0.075 L/h) and with data reported in the literature (0.04-0.06 L/h). CONCLUSIONS: Our case reports presented preliminary evidence that dalbavancin can be considered a therapeutic option for necrotizing fasciitis in intensive care unit patients. The role of hypoalbuminemia during dalbavancin exposure merits further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Fascitis Necrotizante/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Tasa de Depuración Metabólica , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Teicoplanina/farmacocinética , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico
15.
J Infect Chemother ; 26(5): 459-464, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870587

RESUMEN

Empirical combination therapy with ß-lactams and glycopeptides is recommended for patients with presumed staphylococcal bloodstream infection (BSI). While coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) remain susceptible to vancomycin, such isolates have become less susceptible to teicoplanin. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of teicoplanin in the treatment of BSI caused by methicillin-resistant CNS according to teicoplanin susceptibility. Inclusion criteria were patients with intravascular-catheter related BSIs caused by methicillin-resistant CNS (positive for two or more specimens); teicoplanin therapy; and at least one of the signs or symptoms caused by BSI. Antimicrobial resistance was defined as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥8 µg/mL. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical success evaluated 2 weeks after the completion of teicoplanin therapy [test of cure (TOC)]. Resistant rate of CNS was 0% for vancomycin and 22.9% for teicoplanin, and geometric mean MICs were 1.31 µg/mL and 3.41 µg/mL, respectively (p < 0.001). The catheter was removed in all patients except one, and high early clinical response at 72 h after starting therapy was obtained irrespective of teicoplanin susceptibility. The clinical success rate at TOC was 60% in patients with BSIs caused by teicoplanin-resistant strains, while 90% in patients with BSIs caused by susceptible strains (p = 0.052). In multivariate analyses, teicoplanin resistance was significant factor for decreased clinical success at TOC (adjusted odds ratio 0.138, 95% confidence interval 0.020-0.961, p = 0.045). Because of the poor clinical efficacy of teicoplanin against teicoplanin-resistant CNS, combination therapy comprising vancomycin and ß-lactam antibiotics should be considered in presumed staphylococci BSI.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/microbiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Coagulasa/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus epidermidis/aislamiento & purificación , Staphylococcus haemolyticus/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus haemolyticus/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
16.
PLoS One ; 14(12): e0227009, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31887179

RESUMEN

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is an important clinical concern in patients, and is often associated with significant disease burden and metastatic infections. There is an increasing evidence of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) associated treatment failure. In this study, we aim to understand the molecular mechanism of teicoplanin resistant MRSA (TR-MRSA) and hVISA. A total of 482 MRSA isolates were investigated for these phenotypes. Of the tested isolates, 1% were identified as TR-MRSA, and 12% identified as hVISA. A highly diverse amino acid substitution was observed in tcaRAB, vraSR, and graSR genes in TR-MRSA and hVISA strains. Interestingly, 65% of hVISA strains had a D148Q mutation in the graR gene. However, none of the markers were reliable in differentiating hVISA from TR-MRSA. Significant pbp2 upregulation was noted in three TR-MRSA strains, which had teicoplanin MICs of 16 or 32 µg/ml, whilst significant pbp4 downregulation was not noted in these strains. In our study, multiple mutations were identified in the candidate genes, suggesting a complex evolutionary pathway involved in the development of TR-MRSA and hVISA strains.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/genética , Vancomicina/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , ADN Bacteriano/genética , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Regulación hacia Abajo , Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , India , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutación/efectos de los fármacos , Operón/efectos de los fármacos , Operón/genética , Proteínas de Unión a las Penicilinas/genética , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Teicoplanina/farmacología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Regulación hacia Arriba , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/efectos de los fármacos
17.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 54(5): 668-672, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31400471

RESUMEN

Dalbavancin is a glycopeptide antibiotic with a long half-life, recently marketed in Europe for skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs), but its real-life use is not well known. The aim of this study was to describe all first prescriptions in France over an 16-month period. A retrospective study on all adult patients receiving at least one dose of dalbavancin from 1 June 2017 to 31 September 2018 was performed (75 patients from 29 French hospitals). Data were collected via a standard questionnaire. Failure was defined as persistence or reappearance of signs of infection, and/or switch to suppressive antibiotic treatment, and/or death from infection. The main indications were bone and joint infection (BJI) (64.0%), endocarditis (25.3%), and SSTI (17.3%). The main bacteria involved were Staphylococcus aureus (51.4%), including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (19.4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (44.4%). Median minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for staphylococci to vancomycin and dalbavancin ranged from 0.875-2.0 mg/L and 0.032-0.064 mg/L, respectively. Dalbavancin was used after a mean of 2.3 ± 1.2 lines of antimicrobial treatment. The main treatment regimens for dalbavancin were a two-dose regimen (1500 mg each) in 38 cases (50.7%) and a single-dose regimen (1500 mg) in 13 cases (17.3%). Overall, at the patient's last visit, clinical cure was observed in 54/68 patients, whilst failure was observed in 14/68 patients. First use of dalbavancin in France was mostly off-label. Most were due to BJI, often as rescue therapy for severe infections. Even in off-label situations, dalbavancin appears safe and effective.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Endocarditis/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Teicoplanina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA