Current Standard and Future Perspectives in Non-Surgical Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive liver tumor with a poor 5-year survival rate. Many HCCs are not amenable to surgical resection, because of tumor size, location, or because of the patient's poor liver function, a common obstacle to HCC therapy, because HCCs almost always develop in chronically inflamed livers. SUMMARY: In recent years, many efforts have been made to improve patient survival by conducting clinical trials investigating local and systemic treatment options for patients with unresectable tumors. These treatment options include radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 (SIRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), proton beam therapy, molecular targeted therapy, and checkpoint inhibition. In this "to-the-point" article, we review the current standard and summarize the most recent findings in unresectable HCC treatment. KEY POINTS: (1) RFA is currently the preferred treatment for patients with tumor burden restricted to the liver and not eligible for surgical resection; (2) TACE is utilized in patients who are not eligible for RFA because of tumor location and/or number of tumor lesions; (3) SIRT might improve treatment responses achieved by TACE and is feasible in patients with portal vein thrombosis; (4) new radiation therapy treatment modalities such as SBRT and proton beam therapy show promising results for local tumor control; and (5) sorafenib remains the first-line systemic treatment option after several large clinical trials have failed to show superiority of other molecular targeted therapies in HCC patients.

Patient characterization and usage trends of proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer in the United States: A study of the National Cancer Database.

PURPOSE: To evaluate usage trends and identify factors associated with proton beam therapy (PBT) compared to alternative forms of external beam radiation therapy (RT) (EBRT) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for men with localized (N0, M0) prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2013, treated with EBRT, with available data on EBRT modality (photon vs. PBT). Binary multiple logistic regression identified variables associated with EBRT modality. RESULTS: In total, 143,702 patients were evaluated with relatively few men receiving PBT (5,709 [4.0%]). Significant differences in patient and clinical characteristics were identified between those men treated with PBT compared to those treated with photon (odds ratio [OR]; 95% CI). Patients treated with PBT were generally younger (OR = 0.73; CI: 0.67-0.82), National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk compared to intermediate (0.71; 0.65-0.78) or high (0.44; 0.38-0.5) risk, white vs. black race (0.66; 0.58-0.77), with less comorbidity (Charlson-Deyo 0 vs. 2+; 0.70; 0.50-0.98), live in higher income counties (1.55; 1.36-1.78), and live in metropolitan areas compared to urban (0.21; 0.18-0.23) or rural (0.14; 0.10-0.19) areas. Most patients treated with PBT travelled more than 100 miles to the treatment facility. Annual PBT utilization significantly increased in both total number and percentage of EBRT over time (2.7%-5.6%; P<0.001). PBT utilization increased mostly in men classified as National Comprehensive Cancer Network low-risk (4%-10.2%). CONCLUSION: PBT for men with localized prostate cancer significantly increased in the United States from 2004 to 2013. Significant demographic and prognostic differences between those men treated with photons and protons were identified.

Technology for Innovation in Radiation Oncology.

Radiation therapy is an effective, personalized cancer treatment that has benefited from technological advances associated with the growing ability to identify and target tumors with accuracy and precision. Given that these advances have played a central role in the success of radiation therapy as a major component of comprehensive cancer care, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop entitled "Technology for Innovation in Radiation Oncology," which took place at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Maryland, on June 13 and 14, 2013. The purpose of this workshop was to discuss emerging technology for the field and to recognize areas for greater research investment. Expert clinicians and scientists discussed innovative technology in radiation oncology, in particular as to how these technologies are being developed and translated to clinical practice in the face of current and future challenges and opportunities. Technologies encompassed topics in functional imaging, treatment devices, nanotechnology, and information technology. The technical, quality, and safety performance of these technologies were also considered. A major theme of the workshop was the growing importance of innovation in the domain of process automation and oncology informatics. The technologically advanced nature of radiation therapy treatments predisposes radiation oncology research teams to take on informatics research initiatives. In addition, the discussion on technology development was balanced with a parallel conversation regarding the need for evidence of efficacy and effectiveness. The linkage between the need for evidence and the efforts in informatics research was clearly identified as synergistic.