RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy reduces perceptions of mutilation and femininity issues in oncological patients, but surgical complications should not delay chemotherapy. This study evaluated postsurgical complications in patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and silicone implants, along with resulting impacts in delaying chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study utilized a prospectively maintained database. Clinical, surgical, and oncological data from 196 women were collected according to the operated side. Patients were grouped according to the time elapsed between surgery and the first cycle of adjuvant chemotherapy: ≤ 60 days (group 1), 61 to 90 days (group 2), or > 90 days (group 3). RESULTS: A total of 198 immediate reconstructions were performed on 196 patients between August 1, 2010 and March 31, 2020; after surgery, 47.4% had minor complications and 7.1% had major complications. Ninety-six patients (48.5%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The mean time elapsed between surgery and the first chemotherapy cycle was 65.4 days (median: 59), with 52.7% of the patients assigned to group 1, 37.4% to group 2, and 9.9% to group 3. The occurrence of major postoperative complications significantly affected the start of chemotherapy (64.0 vs. 94.5 days; P = .044). Additionally, patients with 2 or more comorbidities were more likely to experience major complications (OR: 3.35; 95% CI: 1.03-10.95; P = .045) than those with 1 or 0. CONCLUSION: Major postoperative complications significantly delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in oncological patients who underwent radical breast surgery followed by immediate reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and silicone implants.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamoplastia , Mastectomía , Colgajo Miocutáneo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Músculos Superficiales de la Espalda , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Músculos Superficiales de la Espalda/trasplante , Adulto , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Colgajo Miocutáneo/trasplante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Implantes de Mama/efectos adversos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The poor prognosis of breast cancer in Sudan could be due to delayed treatment and diagnosis at an advanced stage. Our study aimed to assess the extent of delays from onset of symptoms to treatment in Sudanese women with breast cancer, as well as identify factors contributing to these delays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-center cross sectional study between March and April 2023. Data were collected from the medical records and interviews with women with breast cancer in the two main oncology centers in Sudan. Linear regression was used to identify the predictors of delayed presentation. RESULTS: We interviewed 601 women with breast cancer. The majority of women (50.1%) were diagnosed at locally advanced or metastatic disease. The median interval from the onset of symptoms to receiving oncologic treatment was 221 days (IQRâ =â 92, 496). The longest delay was the presentation delay 61 (31 244) days. The median duration for diagnosis delay and treatment delay was 21 (10.57) days and 27 (10.64) days, respectively. Predictors of early presentation included, being young (ßâ =â -5.3; 95% CIâ =â 0.06 to 10), married (ßâ =â -264; 95% CIâ =â -427 to -101), divorced (ßâ =â -306; 95% CIâ =â -549 to -63), or widowed (ßâ =â -320; 95% CIâ =â --543 to -97), urban residence (ßâ =â -107; 95% CIâ =â -213 to -2.3), and seeking traditional healer (ßâ =â -204; 95% CIâ =â -383 to -26). CONCLUSION: Most Sudanese women with breast cancer experience significant patient delays, often presenting at advanced stages. Factors like being single, older, and living in rural areas contribute to these delays. Increasing breast cancer education, improving healthcare access and addressing sociodemographic barriers can potentially expedite diagnosis and improve outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Diagnóstico Tardío , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sudán/epidemiología , Adulto , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: National Cancer Institute cancer centers (NCICCs) provide specialized cancer care including precision oncology and clinical treatment trials. While these centers can offer novel therapeutic options, less is known about when patients access these centers or at what timepoint in their disease course they receive specialized care. This is especially important since precision diagnostics and receipt of the optimal therapy upfront can impact patient outcomes and previous research suggests that access to these centers may vary by demographic characteristics. Here, we examine the timing of patients' presentation at Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) relative to their initial diagnosis across several demographic characteristics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients who presented to MCC with breast, colon, lung, melanoma, and prostate cancers between December 2008 and April 2020. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from the Moffitt Cancer Registry. The association between patient characteristics and the timing of patient presentation to MCC relative to the patient's cancer diagnosis was examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Black patients (median days = 510) had a longer time between diagnosis and presentation to MCC compared to Whites (median days = 368). Black patients were also more likely to have received their initial cancer care outside of MCC compared to White patients (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45 [1.32-1.60]). Furthermore, Hispanics were more likely to present to MCC at an advanced stage compared to non-Hispanic patients (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.05-1.55]). CONCLUSIONS: We observed racial and ethnic differences in timing of receipt of care at MCC. Future studies should aim to identify contributing factors for the development of novel mitigation strategies and assess whether timing differences in referral to an NCICC correlate with long-term patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Medicina de Precisión , Humanos , Demografía , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Precisión/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancer patient pathways (CPPs) were implemented in Norway to reduce unnecessary waiting times, regional variations, and to increase the predictability of cancer care for the patients. This study aimed to determine if 70% of cancer patients started treatment within the recommended time frames, and to identify potential delays. METHODS: Patients registered with a colorectal, lung, breast, or prostate cancer diagnosis at the Cancer Registry of Norway in 2015-2016 were linked with the Norwegian Patient Registry and Statistics Norway. Adjusting for sociodemographic variables, multivariable quantile (median) regressions were used to examine the association between place of residence and median time to start of examination, treatment decision, and start of treatment. RESULTS: The study included 20 668 patients. The proportions of patients who went through the CPP within the recommended time frames were highest among colon (84%) and breast (76%) cancer patients who underwent surgery and lung cancer patients who started systemic anticancer treatment (76%), and lowest for prostate cancer patients who underwent surgery (43%). The time from treatment decision to start of treatment was the main source of delay for all cancers. Travelling outside the resident health trust prolonged waiting time and was associated with a reduced odds of receiving surgery and radiotherapy for lung and rectal cancer patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Achievement of national recommendations of the CCP times differed by cancer type and treatment. Identified bottlenecks in the pathway should be targeted to decrease waiting times. Further, CPP guidelines should be re-examined to determine their ongoing relevance.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vías Clínicas/normas , Femenino , Geografía , Humanos , Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND This retrospective study aimed to investigate outcomes and hospitalization rates in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of early COVID-19 treated at home with prescribed and non-prescribed treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS The medical records of a cohort of 158 Italian patients with early COVID-19 treated at home were analyzed. Treatments consisted of indomethacin, low-dose aspirin, omeprazole, and a flavonoid-based food supplement, plus azithromycin, low-molecular-weight heparin, and betamethasone as needed. The association of treatment timeliness and of clinical variables with the duration of symptoms and with the risk of hospitalization was evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n=85) was treated at the earliest possible time (<72 h from onset of symptoms), and group 2 (n=73) was treated >72 h after the onset of symptoms. Clinical severity at the beginning of treatment was similar in the 2 groups. In group 1, symptom duration was shorter than in group 2 (median 6.0 days vs 13.0 days, P<0.001) and no hospitalizations occurred, compared with 19.18% hospitalizations in group 2. One patient in group 1 developed chest X-ray alterations and 2 patients experienced an increase in D-dimer levels, compared with 30 and 22 patients, respectively, in group 2. The main factor determining the duration of symptoms and the risk of hospitalization was the delay in starting therapy (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS This real-world study of patients in the community showed that early diagnosis and early supportive patient management reduced the severity of COVID-19 and reduced the rate of hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Betametasona/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Suplementos Dietéticos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Flavonoides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Indometacina/uso terapéutico , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Gravedad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients in Malaysia often present late, delaying diagnosis and treatment. Decisions on health-seeking behaviour are influenced by a complex interplay of several factors. Early detection and subsequent successful treatment are the main goal in order to reduce breast cancer mortality. The aims of this study were to identify the time taken by women with breast cancer for consultation, diagnosis and first definitive treatment and the factors associated with the initiation of definitive treatment. METHODS: In this cohort study, we interviewed 328 women with histologically confirmed breast cancer at five medical centres in Malaysia. Times were measured from recognition of symptoms to first consultation to diagnosis and to the first definitive treatment. The event was initiation of definitive treatment. Data was analysed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: The mean age was 47.9 (standard deviation 9.4) years and 79.9% were ethnic Malays. The median follow-up time was 6.9 months. The median times for first doctor consultation, diagnosis and initiation of treatment were 2 months, 5.5 months and 2.4 weeks, respectively. The percentage of consultation delay more than a month was 66.8%, diagnosis delay more than three months was 73.2% and treatment delay more than one month was 11.6%. Factors associated with not initiating the definitive treatment were pregnancy (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.75; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.07, 2.88), taking complementary alternative medicine (AHR 1.45; 95% CI: 1.15, 1.83), initial refusal of mastectomy (AHR 3.49; 95% CI: 2.38, 5.13) and undergoing lumpectomy prior to definitive treatment (AHR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.28). CONCLUSIONS: Delays in diagnosis and consultation were more serious than treatment delays. Most respondents would accept treatment immediately after diagnosis. Respondents themselves were responsible for a large proportion of the delays. This study was successful in understanding the process of breast cancer patients' experience, from symptoms recognition to consultation, diagnosis and treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Diagnóstico Tardío/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Malasia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
To assess real-world effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on delayed neuropsychiatric sequelae (DNS) after carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning we conducted a retrospective review of patients with CO poisoning admitted to Linkou Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan's largest medical center, during 2009-2015. We included patients developing DNS after CO poisoning and compared improvements in neuropsychiatric function, with and without HBOT, after 12 months post-DNS to understand differences in recovery rates. DNS improvement-associated factors were also evaluated. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to assess the role of time elapsed between DNS diagnosis and HBOT initiation in predicting DNS improvement. A total of 62 patients developed DNS, of whom 11 recovered while the rest did not. Possible factors predicting DNS improvement included receiving HBOT post-DNS (72.7% vs 25.5%; P = 0.006), and treatment with more than three HBOT sessions during acute stage CO poisoning (81.8% vs 27.5%; P = 0.003). The relevant area under the ROC curve was 0.789 (95% CI 0.603-0.974), and the best cut-off point was 3 days post-DNS diagnosis, with 87.5% sensitivity and 61.5% specificity. Early HBOT in patients who developed DNS after CO poisoning significantly improved their DNS symptoms, with treatment effects sustained for 1 year after DNS diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/complicaciones , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taiwán , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and associated containment measures dramatically affected the health care systems including the screening of human immunodeficiency virus and the management people living with HIV around the world by making the access to preventive care services and specific medical monitoring more difficult. OBJECTIVE: Objective: To study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the holistic care of people living with HIV in Liège (Belgium). METHODS: Methods: In this retrospective observational study conducted in Liège University Hospital, we compared the out-patient follow-up of HIV-infected individuals as well as the number of new HIV diagnoses between 2019 and 2020 and between the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. RESULTS: Results: In 2020, when compared to 2019, we observed a significant decrease in the number of new HIV diagnoses, especially during the first wave of the pandemic, and in the number of consultations undertaken by sexual health services, psychologists and specialists in infectious diseases at our HIV clinic. We also observed a decrease in the number of viral load assays and blood CD4 + T-cells count analyses performed, although we found less patients with HIV plasma viral load above 400 copies per mL in 2020. Finally, we noted a significant reduction in terms of screening of our HIV-infected patients for hepatitis C, syphilis, colorectal and anal cancers and hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSIONS: Conclusions: Our experience exhibits the deleterious impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the HIV care and the need to implement new strategies to guarantee its continuum.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bélgica/epidemiología , Recuento de Linfocito CD4/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Coinfección/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Sobrevivientes de VIH a Largo Plazo/psicología , Sobrevivientes de VIH a Largo Plazo/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga Viral/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO2) is recommended for symptomatic patients within 24-hour postcarbon monoxide poisoning. Previous studies have reported significantly better outcomes with treatment administered within 6 hours after carbon monoxide poisoning. Thus, we aimed to compare the neurocognitive outcomes according to HBO2 delay intervals. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from our prospectively collected carbon monoxide poisoning registry. SETTING: A single academic medical center in Wonju, Republic of Korea. PATIENTS: We analyzed the data of 706 patients older than 16 years treated with HBO2 with propensity score matching. Based on carbon monoxide exposure-to-HBO2 delay intervals, we classified patients into the early (control, less than or equal to 6 hr) and late (case, 6-24 hr) groups. The late group was further divided into Case-1 (6-12 hr) and Case-2 (12-24 hr) groups. We also compared mild (nonintubated) and severe (intubated) groups. INTERVENTIONS: HBO2. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After propensity score matching, Global Deterioration Scale scores at 6 months postcarbon monoxide exposure showed significantly fewer poor outcome patients in the early than in the late group (p = 0.027). The early group had significantly fewer patients with poor outcomes than the Case-2 group (p = 0.035) at 1 month and than the Case-1 (p = 0.033) and Case-2 (p = 0.004) groups at 6 months. There were significantly more patients with poor prognoses at 6 months as treatment interval increased (p = 0.008). In the mild cohort, the early group had significantly fewer patients with poor 6-month outcomes than the late group (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received HBO2 within 6 hours of carbon monoxide exposure had a better 6-month neurocognitive prognosis than those treated within 6-24 hours. An increase in the interval to treatment led to an increase in poor outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/terapia , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Intoxicación por Monóxido de Carbono/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , República de Corea , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries can be treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR), and more high-quality studies evaluating outcomes after the different treatment courses are needed. The purpose of the present study was to describe and compare 5-year clinical, functional, and physical activity outcomes for patients who followed our decision-making and treatment algorithm and chose (1) early ACLR with preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, (2) delayed ACLR with preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, or (3) progressive rehabilitation alone. Early ACLR was defined as that performed ≤6 months after the preoperative rehabilitation program, and late ACLR was defined as that performed >6 months after the preoperative rehabilitation program. METHODS: We included 276 patients from a prospective cohort study. The patients had been active in jumping, pivoting, and cutting sports before the injury and sustained a unilateral ACL injury without substantial concomitant knee injuries. The patients chose their treatment through a shared decision-making process. At 5 years, we assessed the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Marx Activity Rating Scale, sports participation, quadriceps muscle strength, single-legged hop performance, and new ipsilateral and contralateral knee injuries. RESULTS: The 5-year follow-up rate was 80%. At 5 years, 64% of the patients had undergone early ACLR, 11% had undergone delayed ACLR, and 25% had had progressive rehabilitation alone. Understandably, the choices that participants made differed by age, concomitant injuries, symptoms, and predominantly level-I versus level-II preinjury activity level. There were no significant differences in any clinical, functional, or physical activity outcomes among the treatment groups. Across treatment groups, 95% to 100% of patients were still active in some kind of sports and 65% to 88% had IKDC-SKF and KOOS scores above the threshold for a patient acceptable symptom state. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACL injury who were active in jumping, pivoting, and cutting sports prior to injury; who had no substantial concomitant knee injuries; and who followed our decision-making and treatment algorithm had good 5-year knee function and high sport participation rates. Three of 4 patients had undergone ACLR within 5 years. There were no significant differences in any outcomes among patients treated with early ACLR, delayed ACLR, or progressive rehabilitation alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/terapia , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Vías Clínicas , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/fisiopatología , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirugía , Reconstrucción del Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Atletas/estadística & datos numéricos , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Delaware , Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Noruega , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Volver al Deporte/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in low-income countries, and is the most common direct cause of maternal deaths in Madagascar. Studies in Madagascar and other low-income countries observe low provider adherence to recommended practices for PPH prevention and treatment. Our study addresses gaps in the literature by applying a behavioral science lens to identify barriers inhibiting facility-based providers' consistent following of PPH best practices in Madagascar. METHODS: In June 2019, we undertook a cross-sectional qualitative research study in peri-urban and rural areas of the Vatovavy-Fitovinany region of Madagascar. We conducted 47 in-depth interviews in 19 facilities and five communities, with facility-based healthcare providers, postpartum women, medical supervisors, community health volunteers, and traditional birth attendants, and conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts. RESULTS: We identified seven key behavioral insights representing a range of factors that may contribute to delays in appropriate PPH management in these settings. Findings suggest providers' perceived low risk of PPH may influence their compliance with best practices, subconsciously or explicitly, and lead them to undervalue the importance of PPH prevention and monitoring measures. Providers lack clear feedback on specific components of their performance, which ultimately inhibits continuous improvement of compliance with best practices. Providers demonstrate great resourcefulness while operating in a challenging context with limited equipment, supplies, and support; however, overcoming these challenges remains their foremost concern. This response to chronic scarcity is cognitively taxing and may ultimately affect clinical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals how perception of low risk of PPH, limited feedback on compliance with best practices and consequences of current practices, and a context of scarcity may negatively affect provider decision-making and clinical practices. Behaviorally informed interventions, designed for specific contexts that care providers operate in, can help improve quality of care and health outcomes for women in labor and childbirth.
Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/normas , Servicios de Salud Materna , Hemorragia Posparto , Gestión de Riesgos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Madagascar/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Materna , Partería , Prioridad del Paciente , Hemorragia Posparto/mortalidad , Hemorragia Posparto/prevención & control , Hemorragia Posparto/terapia , Embarazo , Investigación Cualitativa , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/estadística & datos numéricos , Percepción Social , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The German rectal study published in 2004 established neoadjuvant chemoradiation as a standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer and current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines endorse several preoperative regimens. Upfront surgery, however, is considered substandard care. In the era of evolving treatment paradigms for locally advanced rectal cancer, we sought to assess trends and predictors of receipt of upfront surgery for stage II to III rectal cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients diagnosed with clinical stage II to III rectal adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2016. Multivariable logistic regression defined adjusted odds ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals of receipt of upfront definitive surgery. The timing of upfront surgery relative to day of diagnosis and rate of receipt of adjuvant therapy were also estimated. RESULTS: Among 51,562 patients, 6411 (12.4%) were treated with upfront surgery, which decreased from 16.7% in 2006 to 7.1% in 2016 (P<0.001). The majority of patients (5737 [89.5%]) had definitive surgery after initial diagnostic biopsy. Variables associated with receipt of upfront surgery included female sex, older age, higher comorbidity score, and treatment at a community cancer center (P<0.001). Among those receiving upfront surgery, 2904 (45.3%) received adjuvant radiation therapy, 3218 (50.2%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 2559 (39.9%) received no further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with clinical stage II to III rectal cancer treated with upfront surgery has steadily declined since 2006, however, certain subgroups appear to remain at greater risk. Further research is needed to better elucidate patient and systems-level factors contributing to these disparities in care.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Resection of liver-only colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) with perioperative chemotherapy is potentially curative. Specific primary tumor and liver metastasis characteristics have been validated to estimate the risk of recurrence. We hypothesize that the time interval from diagnosis of CRLM to surgery, or time to surgery (TTS), is clinically prognostic. METHODS: Patients from a prospectively maintained institutional database at a Comprehensive Cancer Center from May 2003 to January 2018 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic, perioperative treatment, and TTS data were collected. TTS was categorized into short (< 3 months), intermediate (3-6 months), and long (> 6 months) intervals. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-one patients were identified. While overall survival (OS) was similar across TTS, postoperative overall survival (postoperative OS) of long TTS was associated with worse survival, 44 months (95% CI, 34-52) compared to short TTS, 59 months (95% CI, 43-79), and intermediate TTS, 63 months (95% CI, 52-108), both p < 0.01. With regard to long-term OS, intermediate TTS had 5-year OS of 59% and 8-year OS of 43% compared to long TTS (5-year OS 53% and 8-year OS 18%) and short TTS (5-year OS 54% and 8-year OS 29%). Long TTS was negatively associated with postoperative OS on multivariate analysis (HR 1.6, p < 0.01) when adjusting for resection margin, CRLM size, age, and use of postoperative chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Short and intermediate TTS had similar survival although patients with intermediate TTS may have better odds of long-term OS. While long TTS was associated with worse survival, likely due to higher disease burden, long-term survivors were still observed.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Hospitales , Política Organizacional , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , China/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Pandemias , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer advocate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The aim of this retrospective study was to determine our local patterns of AC use and to examine factors that influenced initiation and completion of AC among patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of stage II/III rectal cancer patients who were treated at the University of Rochester from 2011 to 2014. Chart reviews were conducted to determine rates of AC initiation and completion. The documented reasons for failure to initiate or complete AC were examined. A multivariate analysis was also completed to evaluate factors that may have influenced the initiation and use of AC. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 62 years, and 53 (65.4%) were male. Median time from surgery to initiation of AC in those who received AC was 8.0 weeks. Forty-seven patients (58.0%) completed their prescribed AC course. Twenty-four patients (29.6%) did not start AC and 9 patients (11.1%) were unable to complete their course of AC. Primary reasons for not undergoing AC were patient preference (37.5%) and prolonged surgical recovery (33.3%). Primary reasons for not completing AC were treatment toxicities (55.5%) and patient preference (22.2%). Multivariate analysis identified a positive association between clinical stage III disease at diagnosis and initiation of AC. There was no independent association between pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy at time of surgery and receipt of AC. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of patients at a single academic center did not start or complete their prescribed postoperative AC for locally advanced rectal cancer. Ongoing studies are investigating a total neoadjuvant approach, which may result in better chemotherapy adherence and further improve the pathologic downstaging rate.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prioridad del Paciente , Proctectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Guidelines for nasal injury state that assessment should be at 7-10 days post-injury and manipulation within 14 days. We performed a plan, do, study, act improvement cycle to assess whether a dedicated nasal fracture service led to better outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out of all patients undergoing manipulation under anaesthesia for nasal trauma between February 2013 and December 2016 in a district general hospital. A dedicated nasal fracture clinic providing manipulation under local anaesthesia was implemented followed by a prospective study of all patients presenting to the clinic between February and November 2017. Main outcome measures included time from injury to otolaryngology assessment, time from injury to manipulation and incidence of secondary septorhinoplasty. RESULTS: The retrospective series involved 525 patients including 381 males (72.6%) and 144 females (27.4%). Mean time from injury to assessment was 10 days. Mean time from injury to surgery was 14.5 days. Mean time from assessment to surgery was five days. The incidence of septorhinoplasty was 2.3%. The prospective series involved 119 patients including 78 males (65.5%) and 41 females (34.5%). Following implementation of a nasal fracture clinic, mean time from injury to assessment and manipulation was 6.1 days and 5.4% of patients underwent septorhinoplasty for secondary deformity. DISCUSSION: Implementation of a nasal fracture clinic providing reduction under local anaesthesia reduced the time to assessment and manipulation. The incidence of septorhinoplasty is low following reduction under general or local anaesthesia. Assessment earlier than seven days is feasible and advice for referral can be changed accordingly.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Hueso Nasal/lesiones , Deformidades Adquiridas Nasales/cirugía , Rinoplastia/métodos , Fracturas Craneales/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Hueso Nasal/cirugía , Tabique Nasal/lesiones , Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio Ambulatorio en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rinoplastia/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The healthcare sector is among the most complex ones where partnerships and interdependencies between different hospitals can achieve real technical and managerial operational models aimed at optimizing resources. However, the construction of this type of interdependence is not simple to implement, making it necessary to integrate at different organizational and professional levels. The aim of this work is to present the integration process and results achieved during the first 3 years of experience after a synergic integration of the interventional cath lab units of the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano and the Infermi Hospital Local Health Unit TO 3, Rivoli. METHODS: Starting from March 2016, data concerning number and type of procedures as well as the distribution of workloads of each operator in the two cath labs were recorded and monitored. Moreover, numbers of urgent procedures performed as well as the door-to-balloon time in case of primary angioplasty were recorded. RESULTS: Compared to the first 12 months of non-integrated activity, the number of procedures remained constant with an overall trend of activity increase (total procedures: +2.6% from 2016 to 2017; +8.7% from 2017 to 2018). No statistically significant differences were found in the average door-to-balloon time, either by stratifying by period (year 2015 vs 2016 vs 2017 vs 2017 vs 2018) or by single institution. All ST-elevation myocardial infarctions were treated at the arrival site, displacing the medical availability team. The mortality rate and the number of complications were not different compared to the trend recorded in previous years. The implementation of joint programs with an exchange of expertise between operators has allowed the rapid development of skills necessary for the execution of structural heart procedures not previously performed in one of the operating centers. CONCLUSIONS: The model of an integrated cath lab unit represents an example of a partnership between two hospitals, which allows a synergistic growth of professional skills, even facing daily logistical challenges. The integration has made it possible to expand the number and type of procedures performed as well to join the on-call equipe without impacting on the door-to-balloon time in case of primary coronary angioplasty.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Carga de Trabajo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: While anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFa) therapies for Crohn disease (CD) were initially introduced in 1998 for biologic therapies are often introduced after a minimum of 6 years after diagnosis. The benefit of anti-TNFa early in the course of CD is still controversial, with some studies showing better outcomes but others not. To determine whether earlier introduction of anti-TNFa therapy improves efficacy in clinical trials or clinical series, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing early vs late anti-TNFa use in the management of CD. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus was conducted from each database's inception to November 3, 2019. We included comparative studies of early vs late use of anti-TNFa therapy in adult patients with CD. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the analysis, with a total of 2501 patients. Meta-analysis demonstrated that the early use of anti-TNFa was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the need for surgery (relative risk [RR] = 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.69; I2 = 68%) and disease progression (RR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.75; I2 = 61%). Early use also showed an increase in early remission (RR = 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.46; I2 = 0%) and clinical response. There was no statistically significant difference in achieving late remission (RR = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.94-2.05; I2 = 65%) or mucosal healing (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.63-1.91; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that using anti-TNFa earlier in the treatment of CD (within 3 years) may improve clinical outcomes compared to late administration in terms of achieving early clinical remission, clinical response, disease progression, and the need for surgery.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica/métodos , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obstetric hypertensive emergency is defined as having systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg, confirmed 15 minutes apart. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that acute-onset, severe hypertension be treated with first line-therapy (intravenous labetalol, intravenous hydralazine or oral nifedipine) within 60 minutes to reduce risk of maternal morbidity and death. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify barriers that lead to delayed treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed that compared women who were treated appropriately within 60 minutes vs those with delay in first-line therapy. We identified 604 patients with discharge diagnoses of chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, or preeclampsia using International Classification of Diseases-10 codes and obstetric antihypertensive usage in a pharmacy database at 1 academic institution from January 2017 through June 2018. Of these, 267 women (44.2%) experienced obstetric hypertensive emergency in the intrapartum period or within 2 days of delivery; the results from 213 women were used for analysis. We evaluated maternal characteristics, presenting symptoms and circumstances, timing of hypertensive emergency, gestational age at presentation, and administered medications. Chi square, Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and sample t-tests were used to compare the 2 groups. Univariable logistic regression was applied to determine predictors of delayed treatment. Multivariable regression model was also performed; C-statistic and Hosmer and Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the model fit. A result was considered statistically significant at P<.05. RESULTS: Of the 213 women, 110 (51.6%) had delayed treatment vs 103 (48.4%) who were treated within 60 minutes. Patients who had delayed treatment were 3.2 times more likely to have an initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range vs those who had timely treatment (odds ratio, 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-5.68). Timeliness of treatment was associated with presence or absence of preeclampsia symptoms; patients without preeclampsia symptoms were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-4.80). Patients with hypertensive emergencies that occurred overnight between 10 pm and 6 am were 2.7 times more likely to have delayed treatment vs those emergencies that occurred between 6 am and 10 pm (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.83). Delayed treatment also had an association with race, with white patients being 1.8 times more likely to have delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.08). Patients who were treated at <60 minutes had a lower gestational age at presentation vs those with delayed treatment (34.6±5 vs 36.6±4 weeks, respectively; P<.001). For every 1-week increase in gestational age at presentation, there was a 9% increase in the likelihood of delayed treatment (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19). Another factor that was associated with delay of treatment was having a complaint of labor symptoms, which made patients 2.2 times as likely to experience treatment delay (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-4.41). CONCLUSION: Initial blood pressure in the nonsevere range, absence of preeclampsia symptoms, presentation overnight, white race, having complaint of labor symptoms, and increasing gestational age at presentation are barriers that lead to a delay in the treatment of obstetric hypertensive emergency. Quality improvement initiatives that target these barriers should be instituted to improve timely treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Urgencias Médicas , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Hidralazina/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Hipertensión Inducida en el Embarazo/fisiopatología , Labetalol/uso terapéutico , Trabajo de Parto , Nifedipino/uso terapéutico , Preeclampsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Preeclampsia/fisiopatología , Embarazo , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Cardiovasculares del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Población BlancaRESUMEN
The Lesotho guidelines for the management of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) recommend initiation of patients diagnosed with rifampicin resistant (RR)-TB on a standardized drug resistant regimen while awaiting confirmation of rifampicin resistant TB (RR-TB) and complete drug susceptibility test results. Review of diagnostic records between 2014 and 2016 identified 518 patients with RR-TB. Only 314 (60.6%) patients could be linked to treatment records at the Lesotho MDR hospital. The median delay in treatment initiation from the availability of Xpert MTB/RIF assay result was 12 days (IQR 7-19). Only 32% (101) of patients had a documented first-line drug resistant test. MDR-TB was detected in 56.4% of patients while 33.7% of patients had rifampicin mono-resistance. Only 7.4% of patients assessed for second-line resistance had a positive result (resistance to fluoroquinolone). Treatment success was 69.8%, death rate was 28.8%, loss to follow up was 1.0%, and 0.4% failed treatment. Death was associated with positive or unavailable sputum smear at the end of first month of treatment (Fisher exact p < 0.001) and older age (p = 0.007). Urgent attention needs to be given to link patients with RR-TB to care worldwide. The association of death rate with positive sputum smear at the end of the first month of treatment should trigger early individualization of treatment.