Clinical Utility of Autologous Salvaged Blood: a Review.

INTRODUCTION: Autologous salvaged blood, commonly referred to as "cell saver" or "cell salvage" blood, is an important method of blood conservation. Understanding the mechanism of action and summarizing the existing evidence regarding the safety, efficiency, and the relative costs of cell salvage may help educate clinicians on how and when to best utilize autotransfusion. METHODS: This review focuses on issues concerning the quality of red blood cells (RBC), efficiency, and the cost effectiveness relative to autotransfusion. The key considerations of safe use and clinical applicability are described along with the challenges for wider dissemination. RESULTS: Cell salvage can reduce requirements for allogeneic transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Autologous salvaged RBCs provide high-quality transfusion, since the cells have not been subjected to the adverse effects of storage as occurs with banked blood. The risks for RBC alloimmunization and transfusion-related infectious diseases are also avoided. With a careful selection of cases, salvaged blood can be more cost effective than donor blood. Cell salvage may have a role in cardiac, major vascular, orthopedic, transplant, and trauma surgeries. However, there remain theoretical safety concerns in cases with bacterial contamination or in cancer surgery. CONCLUSION: In addition to other methods of blood conservation used in patient blood management programs, autologous salvaged blood adds value and is cost effective for appropriate surgical cases. Evidence suggests that autologous salvaged blood may be of higher quality and confer a cost reduction compared with the allogeneic banked blood, when used appropriately.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the cell saver system in instrumented posterior fusion with thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intraoperative autotransfusion that uses the cell saver system (CSS) in patients undergoing posterior instrumentation and fusion of thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures. METHODS: We divided 121 patients who were to undergo posterior instrumentation and fusion due to thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures into two groups: 59 patients (23 males and 36 females) were in the cell saver group, and 62 patients (22 males and 40 females) were in the control group. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, and red blood cell (RBC) values were recorded for all patients preoperatively, on the postoperative first, second, and third days, and on the hospital discharge day. Transfusion rates and numbers of allogeneic erythrocyte transfusions, as well as the costs of transfused total auto- and allogeneic transfusions were compared. RESULTS: The numbers of erythrocyte suspensions transfused perioperatively were 0.2±0.6 units in the cell saver group and 0.7±1.4 units in the control group (p=0.01). Statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups on the postoperative first, second, and third days in terms of hemoglobin, hematocrit, and RBC values. These differences had disappeared by the hospital discharge day. The average cost of perioperative blood transfusions was $431±27.4 in the cell saver group and $34.5±66.25 in the control group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of the CSS was not cost-effective, but it was particularly successful at reducing the rate and the number of units of postoperative allogenic blood transfusions.

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Different Methods of Blood Management in Total Knee Replacement.

Perioperative blood management is essential to minimize allogeneic blood transfusion in total knee replacement. The effect of preoperative administration of erythropoietin, intraoperative cell saver, tranexamic acid, and restrictive transfusion strategies on allogeneic transfusion is studied in total knee replacement. A retrospective comparative study of 106 patients who underwent total knee replacement in different time periods was performed. Group A (n 1 = 45) underwent restrictive strategies of transfusion between 2009 and 2010. Group B (n 2 = 24) includes patients where erythropoietin of either 10.000 IU or 20.000 IU was given preoperatively. Patients of Group C (n 3 = 21) underwent autologous washed erythrocytes transfusion through a cell saver. Lastly, in Group D (n 4 = 15) tranexamic acid dose of 1 gr IV was given intraoperatively. The preoperative and discharge hemoglobin together with total units of blood transfusion and creatinine levels was studied. Tranexamic acid noted the least units of blood transfusion (mean = 0.82 units/patient, p < 0.001, CI 95%) in contrast to the two regimens of erythropoietin (1.16 units/patient) OrthoPAT (1.43 units/patient) and restrictive strategies (1.92 units/patient). The mean preoperative hemoglobin was 13.37 g/dL with no statistical difference among the groups of patients. The postoperative mean hemoglobin was 10.59 with no statistical difference among the groups of patients too. Additionally, the mean creatinine level was 0.93 mg/dL; however, no statistical difference among the groups of patients was noted. Finally, tranexamic acid seemed to be the most cost-effective regime. In our study, tranexamic acid proved its superiority concerning the postoperative blood transfusion on patients undergoing total knee replacement, in comparison with the other existing methods of perioperative blood management. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Randomized trial of Cell Saver in 2- to 3-level lumbar instrumented posterior fusions.

OBJECTIVEThe goal of this study was to determine efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Cell Saver in 2- and 3-level lumbar decompression and fusion.METHODSPatients seen at a tertiary care spine center who were undergoing a posterior 2- or 3-level lumbar decompression and fusion were randomized to have Cell Saver used during their surgery (CS group, n = 48) or not used (No Cell Saver [NCS] group, n = 47). Data regarding preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, estimated blood loss, volume of Cell Saver blood reinfused, number of units and volume of allogeneic blood transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively, complications, and costs were collected. Costs associated with Cell Saver use were calculated based on units of allogeneic blood transfusions averted.RESULTSDemographics and surgical parameters were similar in both groups. The mean estimated blood loss was similar in both groups: 612 ml in the CS group and 742 ml in the NCS group. There were 53 U of allogeneic blood transfused in 29 patients in the NCS group at a total blood product cost of $67,688; and 38 U of allogeneic blood transfused in 16 patients in the CS group at a total blood cost of $113,162, resulting in a cost of $3031 per allogeneic blood transfusion averted using Cell Saver.CONCLUSIONSCell Saver use produced lower rates of allogeneic transfusion but was found to be more expensive than using only allogeneic blood for 2- and 3-level lumbar degenerative fusions. This increased cost may be reasonable to patients who perceive that the risks associated with allogeneic transfusions are unacceptable.■ CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: therapeutic; study design: randomized controlled trial; evidence: class III.

Clinical Experience of Autologous Blood Transfusion in Neurosurgery: Prospective Study in Central India.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of intraoperative autologous blood transfusion in intracranial procedures and to conserve precious homologous blood due to shortage of donor and associated complications. METHODS: This was a prospective study performed at Bansal Hospital, Bhopal. Predetermined autologous blood was collected in a well-labeled bag containing citrate phosphate dextrose adenine solution after induction of general anesthesia. Then appropriate amount of crystalloid solution was transfused in to the body. All collected autologous blood was transfused back to the patient at the end of the surgery or during the surgery if excessive blood loss occurred. Demographic data, hemodynamic changes (mean arterial pressure, heart rate) before and after donation, complications, and any additional homologous blood requirement were noted. Pre- and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit values were compared. RESULTS: In total, 32 patients were included in this study. In our study, mean age was 48.87 years; male-to-female ratio was 1:1.4. The mean amount of autologous blood collected was 461 mL, and the mean amount of blood loss during surgery was 1048 mL. In our study, there was no statistically significant difference was found in mean arterial pressure and heart rate before and after autologous blood collection (P > 0.05). When we compared pre- and postoperative mean hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, there was a statistically significant difference present (P < 0.05); this was due to the fact that many patients had meningiomas (15 of 32). Additional homologous blood was required only in 25% of cases (8/32). Of 8 patients, 5 were again cases of deep-seated meningiomas. No complications were observed during or after autologous blood collection. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous blood transfusion is a safe, effective, and affordable method of blood transfusion in patients undergoing intracranial surgery. Complications associated with homologous blood transfusion can be avoided with autologous blood transfusion.

The role of intraoperative cell salvage system on blood management in major orthopedic surgeries: a cost-benefit analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency and cost of cell salvage systems with allogeneic blood transfusions in patients who had major elective orthopedic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive 108 patients who had intraoperative cell saver (CS) performed routinely constitute the study group. In control group, consecutive 112 patients who were operated without intraoperative CS were investigated. Hemoglobin (Hb) level less than 8 mg/dL was regarded as the absolute transfusion indication. The patients were evaluated for age, gender, body mass index, operation period, mean intraoperative estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative hemovac drainage volume; preoperative, postoperative first day and discharge Hb levels, allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) volume, hospitalization and cost parameters. RESULTS: The mean intraoperative EBL was 507 mL in the study group and 576 mL in control group. The mean ABT was 300 mL in the study group and 715 mL in control group. In the study group, intraoperative EBL, ABT usage and hospitalization period were significantly lower compared with the control group (p = 0.009, p = 0.000 and p = 0.000; p < 0.05, respectively). The mean cost was 771 Turkish liras (TL) in the study group and 224 TL in control group. In the study group, the cost was significantly higher than the control group (p = 0.000). The postoperative first day Hb level was significantly higher in the study group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Although CS usage was determined to increase the costs in this study, it significantly decreases intraoperative and postoperative ABT requirements. We believe that the increase in cost may be neglected when the complications and prolonged hospitalization due to ABT usage were regarded.

Cell Saver for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Reduces Cost.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of cell saver reduces overall blood costs in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies have questioned the clinical value of cell saver during spine procedures. METHODS: ASD patients enrolled in a prospective, multicenter surgical database who had complete preoperative and surgical data were identified. Patients were stratified into (1) cell saver available during surgery, but no intraoperative autologous infusion (No Infusion group), or (2) cell saver available and received autologous infusion (Infusion group). RESULTS: There were 427 patients in the Infusion group and 153 in the No infusion group. Patients in both groups had similar demographics. Mean autologous infusion volume was 698 mL. The Infusion group had a higher percentage of EBL relative to the estimated blood volume (42.2%) than the No Infusion group (19.6%, p < .000). Allogeneic transfusion was more common in the Infusion group (255/427, 60%) than the No Infusion group (67/153, 44%, p = .001). The number of allogeneic blood units transfused was also higher in the Infusion group (2.4) than the No Infusion group (1.7, p = .009). Total blood costs ranged from $396 to $2,146 in the No Infusion group and from $1,262 to $5,088 in the Infusion group. If the cost of cell saver blood was transformed into costs of allogeneic blood, total blood costs for the Infusion group would range from $840 to $5,418. Thus, cell saver use yielded a mean cost savings ranging from $330 to $422 (allogeneic blood averted). Linear regression showed that after an EBL of 614 mL, cell saver becomes cost-efficient. CONCLUSION: Compared to transfusing allogeneic blood, cell saver autologous infusion did not reduce the proportion or the volume of allogeneic transfusion for patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity. The use of cell saver becomes cost-efficient above an EBL of 614 mL, producing a cost savings of $330 to $422. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Autologous blood salvage in the era of patient blood management.

Almost 150 years after the first autologous blood transfusion was reported, intraoperative blood salvage has become an important method of blood conservation. The primary goal of autologous transfusion is to reduce or avoid allogeneic red blood cell transfusion and the associated risks and costs. Autologous salvaged blood does not result in immunological challenge and its consequences, provides a higher quality red blood cell that has not been subjected to the adverse effects of blood storage, and can be more cost-effective than allogeneic blood when used for carefully selected surgical patients. Cardiac, orthopaedic and vascular surgery procedures with large anticipated blood loss can clearly benefit from the use of cell salvage. There are safety concerns in cases with gross bacterial contamination. There are theoretical safety concerns in obstetrical and cancer surgery; however, careful cell washing as well as leucoreduction filters makes for a safer autologous transfusion in these circumstances. Further studies are needed to determine whether oncologic outcomes are impacted by transfusing salvaged blood during cancer surgery. In this new era of patient blood management, where multimodal methods of reducing dependence on allogeneic blood are becoming commonplace, autologous blood salvage remains a valuable tool for perioperative blood conservation. Future studies will be needed to best determine how and when cell salvage should be utilized along with newer blood conservation measures.

The safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of intraoperative cell salvage in metastatic spine tumor surgery.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) is associated with substantial blood loss, therefore leading to high morbidity and mortality. Although intraoperative cell salvage with leukocyte depletion filter (IOCS-LDF) has been studied as an effective means of reducing blood loss in other surgical settings, including the spine, no study has yet analyzed the efficacy of reinfusion of salvaged blood in reducing the need for allogenic blood transfusion in patients who have had surgery for MSTS. PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of using IOCS-LDF in MSTS. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective controlled study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 176 patients undergoing MSTS were included in the study. METHODS: All patients undergoing MSTS at a single center between February 2010 and December 2014 were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was the use of autologous blood transfusion. Secondary outcome measures included hospital stay, survival time, complications, and procedural costs. The key predictor variable was whether IOCS-LDF was used during surgery. Logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted by controlling variables such as tumor type, number of diseased vertebrae, approach, number and site of stabilized segments, operation time, preoperative anemia, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). No funding was obtained and there are no conflicts of interest to be declared. RESULTS: Data included 63 cases (IOCS-LDF) and 113 controls (non-IOCS-LDF). Intraoperative cell salvage with LDF utilization was substantively and significantly associated with a lower likelihood of allogenic blood transfusion (OR=0.407, p=.03). Intraoperative cell salvage with LDF was cost neutral (p=.88). Average hospital stay was 3.76 days shorter among IOCS-LDF patients (p=.03). Patient survival and complication rates were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS reduces the need for postoperative allogenic blood transfusion while maintaining satisfactory postoperative hemoglobin. We recommend routine use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS for its safety, efficacy, and potential cost benefit.

Indications and Outcomes of Cell Saver in Adolescent Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Systematic Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the indications and outcomes for intraoperative cell salvage during adolescent scoliosis correction surgery by systematically reviewing all available evidence. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several blood conservation strategies exist to minimize the consequences of blood loss because of scoliosis correction surgery. The utility of intraoperative cell salvage has been contested in the literature with respect to benefits and cost. High-quality randomized control trials are needed to help surgeons make an informed decision about including Cell Saver into their practice. METHODS: The databases Medline, Embase, Ovid Healthstar, and PubMed were searched for English language literature investigating Cell Saver use during adolescent scoliosis correction surgery, mean ages 10 to 19 years inclusively. Qualitative and quantitative findings from relevant studies are presented. RESULTS: There were seven eligible studies that directly compared the use of Cell Saver (349 patients) against a Control (non-Cell Saver) group (244 patients). The majority of the demographic and hematologic data were consistent between both groups. The average volume of blood that was re-infused into patients in the Cell Saver group was 453.8 mL. Patients in the Cell Saver group received significantly fewer allogenic blood transfusions than the Control group, with 32.6% less intraoperatively, 45.9% less postoperatively, and 47.3% less perioperatively. On average, Cell Saver patients received 1.0 fewer unit of allogenic blood compared to the Control group patients. CONCLUSION: Cell Saver reduces the demand for allogenic transfusion. This review supports the use of Cell Saver if the associated monetary costs are expected to be less than the cost of transfusing one unit of allogenic blood. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Topical Tranexamic Acid is Equivalent to Targeted Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Topical tranexamic acid (TXA) was introduced to replace the previous targeted preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) program. This study aims to analyze the efficacy of topical TXA compared with targeted PABD in anemic patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Two thousand two hundred fifty-one patients underwent primary THA between 2009 and 2013 using targeted autologous blood donation for 280 anemic patients (12%; Hb <12.5 g/dL). One thousand nine hundred seventy-one nonanemic patients (88%; ≥12.5 Hb/dL) received no blood management intervention. Starting in 2014, 505 consecutive patients were operated using 3 grams of topical TXA and abandoning PABD. Ninety-one patients (18%) were anemic and 414 (82%) nonanemic. RESULTS: The utilization of topical TXA in anemic patients resulted in higher hemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day (P = .014), but not on the second postoperative day (P = .198) compared with PABD. There was no difference in allogeneic transfusion rates between both groups: 12% vs 13% (P = .848). In the nonanemic group, TXA significantly increased hemoglobin levels on the first postoperative day (P = .001) as well as on the second postoperative day (P < .001), and resulted in a reduction in allogeneic transfusion rates from 8% to 1%. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that topical TXA is equivalent to PABD in anemic patients and reduces transfusion rates and increases Hb-levels in nonanemic patients.

Topical tranexamic acid versus autotransfusion after total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: To compare the use of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) with postoperative autologous transfusion (PAT) in terms of blood loss, need for allogeneic blood transfusion, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Records of 25 men and 125 women (mean age, 67 years) who underwent primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and were randomised to the PAT group (n=50), topical TXA group (n=50), or routine drainage group (control) [n=50] were reviewed. Pre- and post-operative haemoglobin level, total postoperative drainage volume, and the need for allogeneic blood transfusion were recorded. RESULTS: The 3 groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, and preoperative haemoglobin level. The total postoperative drainage volume was lower in the TXA group than the PAT or routine drainage groups (174.48 vs. 735 vs. 760 ml, p<0.001). The postoperative haemoglobin level was lower in the routine drainage group than the PAT or TXA groups on day 1 (11.67 vs. 12.33 vs. 12.40 g/dl, p<0.001) and day 3 (9.9 vs. 10.7 vs. 11.14 g/dl, p<0.001). The number of patients who received allogeneic blood transfusion was higher in the routine drainage group (12 and 4 patients received 1 and 2 units of blood, respectively) than the PAT group (4 patients received 1 unit of blood) or the TXA group (none required transfusion) [p<0.001], and the respective total transfusion cost was $1200, $240, and $0. The total cost was lowest in the TXA group followed by the routine drainage group and PAT group ($200 vs. $1200 vs. $12 390). No patient developed acute infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, or stroke. CONCLUSION: Compared with PAT, topical TXA was more cost-effective and resulted in less total postoperative drainage volume and less need for allogeneic blood transfusion.

Evaluation of autologous platelet rich plasma for cardiac surgery: outcome analysis of 2000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep and superficial sternal wound infections (DSWI & SWI) following cardiac surgery increase morbidity, mortality and cost. Autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) derived from the patient's own blood has been used in other surgical settings to promote successful wound healing. The goal of this study was to analyze the addition of PRP using a rapid point of care bedside system to standard wound care in all patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgical procedures. METHODS: Over a 7 year period, 2000 patients undergoing open cardiac operations requiring sternotomy were enrolled. One thousand patients received standard of care sternal closure. The other 1000 patients received standard of care sternal closure plus PRP applied to the sternum at the time of closure. The outcomes related to wound healing, infection, readmissions, and costs were analyzed. RESULTS: In the 2000 patients, there were more ventricular assist device implants/heart transplants and emergency operations in the PRP group; otherwise there were no significant differences. The use of PRP reduced the incidence of DSWI from 2.0 to 0.6 %, SWI from 8.0 to 2.0 %, and the readmission rate from 4.0 to 0.8 %. The use of PRP reduced the costs associated with the development of deep and superficial wound complications from $1,256,960 to $593,791. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PRP decreases the incidence and costs of sternal wound complications following cardiac surgery. The routine use of platelet rich plasma should be considered for all patients undergoing sternotomy for cardiac surgical procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT00130377 ) for the data registry.

Tranexamic acid: optimal blood loss management in surface replacement arthroplasty.

AIMS: This study investigated whether the use of tranexamic acid (TXA) decreased blood loss and transfusion related cost following surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA). METHODS: A retrospective review of patients treated with TXA during a SRA, who did not receive autologous blood (TXA group) was performed. Two comparison groups were established; the first group comprised of patients who donated their own blood pre-operatively (auto group) and the second of patients who did not donate blood pre-operatively (control). Outcomes included transfusions, post-operative haemoglobin (Hgb), complications, and length of post-operative stay. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, 150 patients undergoing SRA were identified for inclusion: 51 in the auto, 49 in the control, and 50 in the TXA group. There were no differences in the pre-operative Hgb concentrations between groups. The mean post-operative Hgb was 11.3 g/dL (9.1 to 13.6) in the auto and TXA groups, and 10.6 g/dL (8.1 to 12.1)in the control group (p = 0.001). Accounting for cost of transfusions, administration of TXA, and length of stay, the cost per patient was $1731, $339, and $185 for the auto, control and TXA groups, respectively. DISCUSSION: TXA use demonstrated higher post-operative Hgb concentrations when compared with controls and decreased peri-operative costs. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Tranexamic acid safely limits allogeneic transfusion, maintains post-operative haemoglobin, and decreases direct and indirect transfusion related costs in surface replacement arthroplasty.

Outcomes of a Quality Improvement Initiative to Prevent Unnecessary Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusions Among Extremely Low Birth-Weight Neonates.

BACKGROUND: Extremely low birth-weight (ELBW) infants frequently receive packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. Recent studies have shown that more restrictive PRBC transfusion guidelines limit donor exposure and reduce transfusion-related costs without any increase in adverse clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: We developed and implemented an evidence-based PRBC transfusion guideline for ELBW infants treated in our unit and then measured provider adherence to this guideline. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: We performed a retrospective review of all PRBC transfusions given to ELBW infants in 2012 (preguideline) and the first half of 2014 (postguideline). We identified the indication for each transfusion by reviewing physiological/laboratory data and the daily clinical note. We then determine whether each transfusion met criteria according to our new evidence-based guideline. FINDINGS/RESULTS: When extrapolating the newly developed protocol to 2012 data, less than 15% of transfusions among ELBW infants would have met the current evidence-based standard. Conversely, during the first 6 months of 2014, 61% of transfusions were administered in adherence to the guideline (P < 001). Using current cost estimates, this represents a projected cost savings of $31,000 in that 6-month period. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A multidisciplinary approach to improving PRBC transfusion practices results in potentially safer, more cost-effective care for ELBW infants. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Given the frequency, potential harms, and costs associated with PRBC transfusions in ELBW infants, it seems both feasible and important to pursue prospective clinical trials comparing permissive and restrictive approaches to transfusion in this vulnerable population.

Is Autologous Blood Transfusion cost effective in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

The purpose of this study has been to evaluate the use of preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The surgical records of 37 AIS patients, Lenke type 1, were reviewed. Patients were classified according to whether they had entered the PABD (Program of Autologous Blood Donation) (25 patients) or had been rejected to join (12 patients non-donors). Both groups were comparable. All but one of the PADB patients (96%) as compared to only 2 non-donors patients (16.7%) required post-operative transfusion. Moreover, 12 of the PABD patients (48%) did not require the whole stored blood. At discharge both groups had similar haemoglobin levels. The risk of transfusion was much higher in the PABD group. The patients in this group received blood even with high haemoglobin levels (>8 g/dl). Furthermore, 31.4% of the collected blood was never used. Therefore, PABD resulted in an increase in procedure costs and lead to unnecessary blood transfusions.

Preoperative Autologous Blood Donation: Waning Indications in an Era of Improved Blood Safety.

A downward trend in preoperative autologous donation (PAD) continues in Europe and the Americas, with many jurisdictions only funding medically necessary collections at present. This is the result of decreasing real and perceived residual risks of allogeneic transfusion-transmitted disease and the declining need for transfusion due to patient blood management, which have also led to escalating logistical and cost constraints for PAD programs. We outline collection trends in North America, Europe, and Latin America and review the benefits, risks, effectiveness, and safety of PAD. Important elements of informed consent follow from these points. Evidence-based medical criteria for PAD and autologous transfusion are discussed as are methods to optimize autologous collection timing to regenerate donated red cells. Recommendations for identification of patients whose risk-to-benefit ratio suggests substantial benefit compared with other autologous blood salvage and anemia management alternatives conclude the review.

Medical and Economic Advantages of Postoperative Blood Salvage in Total Knee Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Total knee replacement surgery causes large blood loss leading to worsening of the patient's physical capacity, difficulties in rehabilitation and necessity of transfusions. The re-infusion of drainage fluid has been described as an alternative way to improve hematological parameters. The aim of the study was to determine the effectiveness of re-transfusion with regard to the allogeneic transfusion rate, duration of treatment and costs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a prospective randomized study of 101 patients, divided into an RTF group for re-transfusion from the drain and a DRN group for standard drainage. We could not re-transfuse drainage blood in 6 cases. 38 patients (RTF2) received their blood back and the remaining 63 patients (DRN2) did not. Depending on blood loss, laboratory tests and general condition, decisions were made to proceed with allogeneic transfusions. RESULTS: In spite of the re-transfusion, 39.4% of the patients in RTF2 required an additional transfusion, compared to 53.9% of the patients in DRN2 (p=0.15). Mean deterioration in hematological parameters was 72.9% of baseline in RTF2 and 75.0% in DRN2 (p=0.45), mean treatment time was 10.3 days for RTF2 and 11.1 for DRN2 (p=0,24) and mean cost was PLN 5426.5 in RTF versus PLN 5587.21 in DRN (p=0.76). CONCLUSION: The effect of re-transfusion on reducing allogeneic blood usage is not significant, does not alter patients' general condition and lab test results and does not eliminate the need for transfusion or influence the duration of hospital stay and the costs.

Is a preoperative group and save necessary for enhanced recovery joint replacement patients?

AIM: To consider the financial benefit to the authors' trust of omitting a preoperative group and save in enhanced recovery arthroplasty patients, and to estimate the scope for national savings. Patient safety was considered to determine acceptability for routine practice. METHODS: A total of 121 patients receiving a total knee replacement or total hip replacement on the authors' enhanced recovery protocol were selected. Pre- and postoperative haemoglobin levels were obtained. The transfusion team were contacted when the postoperative haemoglobin level was ≤8 g/dl to determine whether blood products had been issued. Costs for group and save were obtained from the pathology department. RESULTS: Mean postoperative reduction in haemoglobin level was 2.6 g/dl (P≤0.001) and 2.1 g/dl (P≤0.001) for total hip replacement and total knee replacement respectively. No patients were transfused. One group and save costs £12.00, and omission of this test in these patients would have saved £1452.00. Potentially, £1 605 408 could have been saved in the 133 784 patients undergoing NHS arthroplasty in 2012. Group and save omission would not affect management of intraoperative haemorrhage where O negative blood would be available. If a transfusion is required postoperatively it would take 100 minutes to issue crossmatched blood - a time delay unlikely to compromise patient safety. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that a preoperative group and save could be omitted in arthroplasty patients on this enhanced recovery programme to prevent needless expenditure, but more long-term follow up is required to ensure patients are not put at risk.