Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia for midline abdominal incisions - a randomized-controlled pilot trial (Painless-Pilot trial; DRKS Number: DRKS00008023).

OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility of a randomized controlled study design comparing epidural analgesia (EDA) with continuous wound infiltration (CWI) in respect to postoperative complications and mobility to design a future multicentre randomized controlled trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: CWI has been developed to address drawbacks of EDA. Previous studies have established the equivalent analgesic potential of CWI compared to EDA. This is a single centre, non-blinded pilot randomized controlled trial at a tertiary surgical centre. Patients undergoing elective non-colorectal surgery via a midline laparotomy were randomized to EDA or CWI. Endpoints included recruitment, feasibility of assessing postoperative mobility with a pedometer and morbidity. No primary endpoint was defined and all analyses were explorative. INTERVENTIONS: CWI with local anaesthetics (experimental group) vs. thoracic EDA (control). RESULTS: Of 846 patients screened within 14 months, 71 were randomized and 62 (31 per group) included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mobility was assessed in 44 of 62 patients and revealed no differences within the first 3 postoperative days. Overall morbidity did not differ between the two groups (measured via the comprehensive complication index). Median pain scores at rest were comparable between the two groups, while EDA was superior in pain treatment during movement on the first, but not on the second and third postoperative day. Duration of preoperative induction of anaesthesia was shorter with CWI than with EDA. Of 17 serious adverse events, 3 were potentially related to EDA, while none was related to CWI. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed the feasibility of a randomized trial design to compare CWI and EDA regarding morbidity. Improvements in the education and training of team members are necessary to improve recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00008023.

Role of Laparoscopic Exploration Under Local Anesthesia in the Management of Hemodynamically Stable Patients with Penetrating Abdominal Injury.

BACKGROUND: In many trauma centers there is an ongoing controversy over the way of managing patients with penetrating abdominal injuries. This study was constructed to evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy performed with local anesthesia for the management of penetrating abdominal injury. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty hemodynamically stable patients with a penetrating stab wound in the anterior abdominal wall were included in this study after consent was obtained. Laparoscopic explorations were done with the patient having local anesthesia. If there was bleeding or intestinal content in the peritoneal cavity or visible injury to any abdominal organ, the procedure was converted to open exploration. If the peritoneal cavities showed no fluid and there was no injury to the abdominal viscera, the patient was followed up for the next 72 hours. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation values. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Student's t test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between the two study groups' means. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the relationship between categorical variables. A significance level of P < .05 was used in all tests. All statistical procedures were carried out using SPSS version 20 for Windows software (IBM, Armonk, NY). RESULTS: From the total of 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic exploration, 13 patients (43.3%) needed open exploration: 11 cases had intrabdominal organ injuries that needed laparotomy, 1 case had intraperitoneal blood collection where the only source of blood was the anterior abdominal wall wound, and 1 case had acute abdominal pain after 48 hours of negative laparoscopic exploration, in which an intestinal tear was found upon re-exploration. For the other 17 (56.7%) cases, 3 cases had no peritoneal penetration, whereas 14 cases had peritoneal penetration without any internal organ injuries, and these patients were followed up and discharged after 2-3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy performed with the patient having local anesthesia is an accurate diagnostic tool in the management of patients with an equivocal penetrating stab wound in the abdominal wall and can reduce the number of patients with negative open exploration.

[Mechanic reinfusion in emergency surgery].

The article highlights techniques and effects of intraoperative mechanic blood reinfusion in patients with trauma and intraabdominal bleeding in extend, exceeding the self circulating blood volume. The high efficacy of the self blood reinfusion during the emergency operation allowed the 2-fold decrease of the hospital and overall mortality. The mechanic blood reinfusion proved to be a safe and clinically effective method of the globular blood volume deficiency compensation, especially in emergency surgery.

Autotransfusion with laparoscopically salvaged blood in trauma: report on 21 cases.

Autotransfusion is being increasingly used to avoid the complications of homologous blood transfusion. In abdominal trauma, however, the collected blood may be contaminated by intestinal contents when digestive or urinary lesions are present. In such situations, the reinfusion of blood is contraindicated. We present our experience with autotransfusion of blood collected by laparoscopy from the abdominal cavity of 21 trauma patients. Laparoscopy allowed the aspiration of blood and, at the same time, permitted diagnosis of visceral lesions, avoiding reinfusion of contaminated blood. No complications occurred, and hematocrit values were significantly elevated. This procedure may represent the only possible method of blood transfusion in Jehovah's Witnesses, as with one patient in our series.

Traumatismo abdominal cerrado: revisión de 53 casos atendidos en el Hospital Central Militar / Closed abdominal trauma: a 53 case review seen at the Central Military Hospital

Se revisa el caso de 53 individuos con traumatismo abdominal cerrado atendidos en el Hospital Central Militar. Las principales causas de traumatismo abdominal cerrado fueron: accidentes automovilísticos (28 por ciento), agresiones (15 por ciento) y los accidentes por atropellamiento de un vehículo automotor (15 por ciento). La mayor parte de las contusiones del abdomen implican el abordaje amplio para descartar lesiones en órganos blandos, por lo que la laparotomía exploratoria está indicada en su manejo y posterior tratamiento. De esta revisión se concluye que el manejo de este tipo de lesiones en la sala de urgencias del Hospital Central Militar y su posterior evolución en las salas de cirugía es satisfactoria