Comparison of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of acute portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been becoming prevalent in recent years and are increasingly used in the treatment of port vein thrombosis. The difference of the efficacy and safety between rivaroxaban and dabigatran remains unclear in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT). METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis in our institute from January 2020 to December 2021. The patients received oral anticoagulation with rivaroxaban or dabigatran. The demographic, clinical, and imaging data of patients were collected. The diagnosis of acute PVT was confirmed by imaging examinations. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed using Child-Pugh score and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Outcomes included recanalization (complete, partial, and persistent occlusion), liver function, bleedings, and survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were included, 52 patients (55%) received rivaroxaban and 42 (45%) with dabigatran. The complete and partial recanalization of PVT was observed in 41 patients. There was no significant difference in complete recanalization, partial recanalization, and persistent occlusion between the two groups. With multivariate analysis, D-dimer (HR 1.165, 95% CI 1.036-1.311, p = 0.011) was independent predictors of complete recanalization. The Child-Pugh score (p = 0.001) was significantly improved in both two groups after anticoagulation, respectively. However, there was no difference between the two groups. The probability of survival was 94%, 95% in the rivaroxaban and dabigatran groups (log-rank p = 0.830). Major bleedings were reported in 3 patients (6%) in rivaroxaban group and 1 patient (2%) in dabigatran group (p = 0.646). Six patients (12%) in rivaroxaban group experienced minor bleeding, and five (12%) from dabigatran group (p = 0.691). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety were comparable between rivaroxaban and dabigatran in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with acute portal vein thrombosis. And D-dimer can contribute to the prediction of PVT recanalization in cirrhotic patients.

Cerebral venous thrombosis with hyperhomocysteinemia due to loss of heterozygosity at methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) locus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) locus has been reported in tumor tissue. But the mutation was never reported in cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) with hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) before. CASE PRESENTATION: A 14-year-old girl was admitted with an intermittent headache and nausea for 2 months. The plasma homocysteine level was 77.2 µmol/L. Lumbar puncture revealed an intracranial pressure > 330 mmH2O. Cerebral MRI and MRV revealed superior sagittal sinus thrombosis. Whole-exome sequencing revealed LOH at Chr1:11836597-11,867,232 affects exons 10-21 of C1orf167, the entire MTHFR, and exons 1-2 of the CLCN6 gene. The normal allele was the c.665 C > T/677 C > T variant in MTHFR. The patient was treated with nadroparin for 2 weeks, followed by oral rivaroxaban. Supplemental folate and vitamins B12 and B6 were prescribed. One month later, she had no headache and the intracranial pressure had decreased to 215 mmH2O. MRI showed shrinkage of the thrombosis in the superior sagittal sinus, the degree of stenosis had significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Rare LOH at the MTHFR locus should be analyzed in CVT with HHcy. With anticoagulation treatment, the prognosis was good.

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors or oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a condition in which a clot forms in the deep veins, most commonly of the leg. It occurs in approximately one in 1000 people. If left untreated, the clot can travel up to the lungs and cause a potentially life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Previously, a DVT was treated with the anticoagulants heparin and vitamin K antagonists. However, two forms of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed: oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) and oral factor Xa inhibitors, which have characteristics that may be favourable compared to conventional treatment, including oral administration, a predictable effect, lack of frequent monitoring or dose adjustment and few known drug interactions. DOACs are now commonly being used for treating DVT: recent guidelines recommended DOACs over conventional anticoagulants for both DVT and PE treatment. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2015. It was the first systematic review to measure the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in the treatment of DVT. This is an update of the 2015 review.  OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of oral DTIs and oral factor Xa inhibitors versus conventional anticoagulants for the long-term treatment of DVT. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov trials registers to 1 March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which people with a DVT, confirmed by standard imaging techniques, were allocated to receive an oral DTI or an oral factor Xa inhibitor compared with conventional anticoagulation or compared with each other for the treatment of DVT.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), recurrent DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and quality of life (QoL). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 10 new studies with 2950 participants for this update. In total, we included 21 RCTs involving 30,895 participants. Three studies investigated oral DTIs (two dabigatran and one ximelagatran), 17 investigated oral factor Xa inhibitors (eight rivaroxaban, five apixaban and four edoxaban) and one three-arm trial investigated both a DTI (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban). Overall, the studies were of good methodological quality. Meta-analysis comparing DTIs to conventional anticoagulation showed no clear difference in the rate of recurrent VTE (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.65; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.66; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.02; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.59; 3 studies, 5994 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.08; 1 study, 2489 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). DTIs reduced the rate of major bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89; 3 studies, 5994 participants; high-certainty evidence).   For oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation, meta-analysis demonstrated no clear difference in recurrent VTE (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01; 13 studies, 17,505 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), recurrent DVT (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.01; 9 studies, 16,439 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), fatal PE (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.02; 6 studies, 15,082 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), non-fatal PE (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.27; 7 studies, 15,166 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.14; 9 studies, 10,770 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-analysis showed a reduced rate of major bleeding with oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with conventional anticoagulation (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.89; 17 studies, 18,066 participants; high-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current review suggests that DOACs may be superior to conventional therapy in terms of safety (major bleeding), and are probably equivalent in terms of efficacy. There is probably little or no difference between DOACs and conventional anticoagulation in the prevention of recurrent VTE, recurrent DVT, pulmonary embolism and all-cause mortality. DOACs reduced the rate of major bleeding compared to conventional anticoagulation. The certainty of evidence was moderate or high.

A case of Vp4 hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis extending into the confluence of the splenic/portal vein achieved a good prognosis with emergent hepatectomy and postoperative adjuvant therapy with lenvatinib.

In this report, we describe a case of highly advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor thrombosis extending into the main portal vein of the pancreas that was successfully treated with adjuvant lenvatinib after right hepatic resection with thrombectomy. A 70-year-old woman was referred from the clinic because of elevated hepatobiliary enzymes. The patient was positive for the hepatitis B virus antigen at our hospital. The tumor markers were highly elevated with alpha-fetoprotein (14.5 U/mL) and protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKAII) (1545 ng/mL), suggesting hepatocellular carcinoma. Dynamic abdominal computed tomography showed an early enhanced tumor approximately 6 cm in size and portal vein tumor thrombosis filling the main portal vein, but not extending into the splenic or superior mesenteric vein (SMV). On magnetic resonance imaging 1 week after CT, portal vein tumor thrombosis had extended to the confluence of the splenic vein with the SMV, indicating rapid tumor growth. Thus, we performed emergent right hepatectomy with tumor thrombectomy. Postoperatively, we treated the patient with lenvatinib for a tumor reduction surgery. Fortunately, the patient was alive 2 years postoperatively without recurrence. This case report suggests that a favorable outcome may be achieved with multidisciplinary treatment including resection and postoperative treatment with lenvatinib.

Isolated unilateral thalamic venous infarct in a toddler.

Isolated deep cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), especially involving only the right thalamus, is one of the rarest forms of intracranial venous thrombosis in a child. The anatomy and flow patterns of the deep cerebral venous system are complex and usually, the thrombosis of the internal cerebral veins (ICV) results in thalamic infarction bilaterally. The focal infections, thalamic tumours and vascular malformations may have overlapping clinicoradiological patterns. The treating team should be able to recognise the atypical phenotypes of the deep CVT at the earliest, which can facilitate apt treatment and obviate the need for unnecessary investigations and interventions. We present a rare case of an isolated right thalamic acute venous infarct secondary to bilateral ICV thrombosis in a toddler who was successfully managed by timely diagnosis and with only conservative therapy.

Outcomes after Rivaroxaban Treatment of Extensive Deep Vein Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Regression of thrombus in response to treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with extensive deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been fully evaluated. This study aimed to determine the therapeutic efficacy of rivaroxaban in the treatment of extensive DVT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients treated with rivaroxaban among 728 new DVT patients, at our hospital from January 2018 to March 2021. Extensive DVT was defined as thrombus connecting to 2 or more segments of the inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vein, femoral vein, or popliteal vein. Localized DVT was defined as a thrombus confined to 1 segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vein, femoral vein, or popliteal vein. We compared the changes in thrombus between the extensive DVT group (36 patients) and the localized DVT group (40 patients). RESULTS: In the localized DVT group, 14 (37%) had total recanalization within 3 weeks after DOAC initiation, and 30 (79%) had total recanalization within 3 months. In the extensive DVT group, only 3 (9%) had total recanalization within 3 weeks after starting DOAC, and even after 3 months, only 5 (15%) had total recanalization. Symptoms (P = 0.01) and extensive DVT (P < 0.01) were significantly associated with the risk for failure of total recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban was highly effective for total recanalization of localized DVT but not for symptomatic or extensive DVT. In patients with symptomatic extensive DVT, catheter-based thrombolysis may be considered in selected cases.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: a case-control study.

AIM: To study the treatment efficacy and survival of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) with compensated cirrhosis in comparison with sorafenib as the standard of care therapy versus best supportive care (BSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This case-control study included 91 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT divided into three groups: Group 1 20 treated with HAIC, (50 mg adriamycin and 50 mg cisplatin were infused in hepatic artery); Group 2, 42 patients treated with BSC; and Group 3, 29 patients treated with sorafenib. Patients were followed up for assessment and comparison of treatment outcome by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and survival. RESULTS: There was no significant difference among the groups studied regarding baseline demographic and tumour characteristics. The majority of patients who received sorafenib therapy (82.8%) had stable disease. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was significantly better in the HAIC group. HAIC patients had the longest survival compared with the best supportive care and sorafenib groups, which was statistically significant (29.2 ± 21.8, 4.55 ± 11.41, and 11.52 ± 8.72 months respectively, p=0.007) CONCLUSION: HAIC is a safe procedure with a better response rate and longer survival than best supportive care or sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC and PVTT.

Embolia pulmonar aguda extensa como complicação de COVID-19 oligossintomática: relato de caso / Extensive pulmonary embolism as complication of oligosymptomatic COVID-19: case report

Resumo Apesar de a fisiopatologia da coagulopatia associada à doença do coronavírus 2019 (COVID‐19) não ser bem conhecida, a ocorrência de embolia pulmonar (EP) é frequentemente observada. No entanto, foram descritos na literatura poucos casos de pacientes que tiveram COVID-19 oligossintomática, sem nenhum fator de risco para tromboembolismo venoso (TEV) e que apresentaram EP aguda extensa. Relatamos um caso de paciente com COVID-19 oligossintomática, complicada por trombose venosa profunda e, posteriormente, EP aguda extensa, sugerindo que esses quadros devem ser considerados de forma sistemática mesmo em pacientes com COVID-19 oligossintomática e sem fatores de risco conhecidos para TEV.

Abstract Although the pathophysiology of coagulopathy associated with the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is not well known, occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) is frequently observed. However, few cases have been described in the literature in which patients who had asymptomatic COVID-19, with no risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE), presented extensive acute PE. We report the case of a patient with asymptomatic COVID-19, complicated by deep vein thrombosis and later by extensive acute PE, suggesting that these conditions should be systematically considered, even in asymptomatic COVID-19 patients with no known risk factors for VTE.

Leg massage during pregnancy with unrecognized deep vein thrombosis could be life threatening: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Traditional massage seems to be safe but not entirely risk free, though serious adverse events are very rare. This report is aimed at illustrating a rare but fatal presentation of massive pulmonary embolism caused by leg massage and also to encourage both massage providers and pregnant women to be aware of undetected or subtle deep vein thrombosis, which could be a life threatening condition as a consequence of leg massage. CASE PRESENTATION: A 25-year-old primigravid Thai woman underwent massage at a traditional massage shop at 25th week of gestation. Shortly after leg and foot massage, she had a sudden onset of dyspnea, followed by consciousness alteration, brief spastic-like convulsion, became unconscious and suffered a cardiac arrest. Basic life support (BLS) at the event scene as well as during transfer and advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) at the hospital were provided, resulting in successful resuscitation but persistent coma. Bedside echocardiography showed poor contractility of the dilated right ventricle, and pulmonary embolism was suspected. CT angiography (CTA) revealed multiple concentric intraluminal filling defects within the right and left pulmonary arteries, indicating massive pulmonary embolism. The fetus died in utero and spontaneous labor and vaginal delivery occurred. CONCLUSION: Leg massage in patients with deep vein thrombosis can dislodge thrombi, leading to life threatening pulmonary embolism, and should be contraindicated. Since pregnant women are at a higher risk of undetected or subtle thromboembolism, traditional massage in pregnant women should be contraindicated unless they are proven to have no such risk.

Sorafenib vs. Lenvatinib as First-line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to compare the outcomes between sorafenib and lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with major portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp3/4). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 41 HCC patients with Vp3/4 and Child-Pugh A. RESULTS: The outcomes in the lenvatinib group (n=13) were significantly better than those in the sorafenib group (n=28) [best objective response rate according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: 53.8% vs. 14.3%; p=0.0193, best disease control rate: 92.3% vs. 35.7%; p=0.0008, median overall survival (OS): not reached vs. 187 days; p=0.0040, respectively]. Lenvatinib treatment was the only significant predictor of better OS and time to tumor progression. No patient needed to discontinue lenvatinib treatment due to drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Compared with sorafenib, lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC with Vp3/4 may lead to more favorable outcomes.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with and without sorafenib as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT.Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions.The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 ±â€Š10.07 months and 15.33 ±â€Š22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively.The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.

Dietary Intake of Marine Polyunsaturated n-3 Fatty Acids and Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Limited knowledge exists on the association between intake of long-chained n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) and risk of recurrence and all-cause mortality in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). OBJECTIVES: This article investigates whether intake of marine n-3 PUFAs was associated with risk of recurrence and mortality in patients with incident VTE. METHODS: A total of 595 patients with incident VTE and available data on n-3 PUFA intake were derived from the Tromsø Study surveys 4 (1994-1995) and 6 (2007-2008). Weekly intake of n-3 PUFAs was categorized as low, medium, and high based on tertiles. Recurrent VTEs and all-cause mortality were registered up to December 31, 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression models with the low intake category as reference. RESULTS: There were 98 recurrent VTEs and 227 deaths during follow-up. Overall, we found no association between intake of n-3 PUFAs and risk of recurrent VTE. However, inverse associations were found for high intakes in patients with unprovoked VTE (HR 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-1.01), cancer-free patients (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) patients (HR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.97). The inverse associations were more evident when follow-up was restricted to the time after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. No association was observed between intake of n-3 PUFAs and mortality after incident VTE. CONCLUSION: A high dietary intake of marine n-3 PUFAs was associated with lower risk of recurrent VTE after unprovoked index events, DVT, and in cancer-free patients.

Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Combined with Sorafenib in Treatment of HBV Background Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains a challenge in management. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been used for patients with PVTT but efficiency was limited with a median overall survival of 4 to 6.1 months. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of TACE combined with sorafenib in HBV background HCC with PVTT. METHODS: A total of 498 patients were enrolled in the study including 69 patients who received TACE combined with sorafenib and 429 patients treated with TACE alone between January 1st, 2008, and April 30st, 2014. Using the 1:2 propensity score matching, 138 well-balanced patients were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate the OS, and the differences between groups were analyzed with a log-rank test. RESULTS: TACE combined with sorafenib improved the OS of the patients compared with TACE alone (13.0 vs 6.0 months, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, the median OS of combination therapy and TACE were 13.0 and 7.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that the patients younger than 60 years old, male patients, AFP more than 400ng/ml, tumor size more than 5cm, or type III/IV PVTT had OS benefits from TACE combined with sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TACE therapy alone, TACE combined with sorafenib could improve OS in HBV background HCC patients with PVTT. The patients who are younger, male, or with more tumor burden may benefit more from combination therapy.

Oral Rivaroxaban in Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral rivaroxaban compared to warfarin in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). STUDY DESIGN: Open label randomized controlled study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of General Medicine, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad from January 2016 to January 2018. METHODOLOGY: Patients of both genders between 18 and 60 years of age with Doppler ultrasound-confirmed DVT were included in the study. Pregnant patients and those with advanced liver, renal disease, those with a previous history of DVT, malignancy, with a platelets count of less than 50000/ul were excluded from the study. Rivaroxaban was given in a dose of 15 mg twice daily for 21 days followed by 20 mg once daily. Patients in the warfarin group were given heparin for 3 to 5 days followed by warfarin for 3 to 6 months. The primary efficacy outcome was patency of the vessel at 3 and 6 months of treatment. The principal safety outcomes were major and minor bleeding during the study period. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients with acute symptomatic deep vein thrombosis were enrolled in the study. Half of the patients were given warfarin and the other half rivaroxaban for 6 months. At three months, there were no significant differences observed in vessel patency in the rivaroxaban group (22.4%) as compared to warfarin group (26.7%) but after 6 months of therapy, vessel patency was significantly more in the rivaroxaban group. Adverse events did not show any significant differences Conclusion: Rivaroxaban had an efficacy superior to warfarin in terms of vessel patency after six months of therapy but adverse events were similar in both the groups.

A Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Dalteparin for Long-Term Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is low-molecular-weight heparin. The use of direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated VTE has increased; however, their efficacy and safety in lung cancer patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: We examined the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin for cancer-associated VTE in patients with primary lung cancer. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of 204 patients with primary lung cancer who were prescribed rivaroxaban (n = 131) or dalteparin (n = 73) for VTE was performed. The primary endpoint was a composite event including recurrence and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of recurrence, major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, all-cause mortality, and bleeding or pulmonary embolism-related mortality. RESULTS: The composite event occurred in 38 (29.0) and 12 (16.4%) patients in the rivaroxaban and dalteparin (p = 0.045) groups, respectively. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, and bleeding risk factors revealed the rivaroxaban group showed a 1.176-fold composite event risk without statistical significance (0.595-2.324, p = 0.641). There was no statistically significant intergroup difference for the incidence of VTE recurrence (5.3% in the rivaroxaban group versus 2.7% in the dalteparin group, p = 0.495) and major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (23.7% in the rivaroxaban group versus 13.7% in the dalteparin group, p = 0.089). There was no significant difference in the all-cause mortality rate (hazard ratio 0.864, 95% CI 0.624-1.196, p = 0.337). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the safety and efficacy profile of rivaroxaban compared with dalteparin. Therefore, rivaroxaban may be a valuable treatment option for lung cancer-associated VTE.

[Intranodal lymphangiography in pediatric chylothorax, a diagnostic and therapeutic tool]. / Linfangiografía intranodal en quilotórax pediátrico, una herramienta diagnóstica y terapéutica.

INTRODUCTION: High morbidity has been described in secondary chylothorax. Thoracic duct embolization (TDE) after intranodal lymphangiography (IL) is one of the treatments in adults but there is poor experience in children. We aim to describe our experience with this technique for refractory pediatric chylothorax. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with refractory chylothorax treated with thoracic duct embolization at our Institution in the last 4 years was performed. Lymphatic vessels visualization was obtained by intranodal lymphangiography with ethiodized oil. Demographic and clinical data as well as imaging findings were collected. RESULTS: A total of 4 patients were treated during the study period with a median of age and weight of 2.5 months (1-16) and 4.25 kg (2.8-10) respectively. Chylothorax was secondary to cardiothoracic surgery in 3 patients and to venous thrombosis in the other one. Medical treatment was provided during a median of 47 days (13-56) without benefit in thoracic output [median: 46 ml/kg/day (19-64)]. After IL, thoracic duct catheterization was achieved in one patient however embolization was not possible. Chylothorax stopped in the 3 post-surgical patients regardless of how much lymphatic visualization was achieved in IL. In the venous thrombosis patient surgical treatment was performed 6 days after the study. CONCLUSION: IL can be a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in children. Ethiodized oil seems to seal lymphatic leak in postsurgical chylothorax. IL could be an option for chylothorax in patients too sick for surgical treatment or in whom thoracic duct embolization is not feasible.

INTRODUCCION: El quilotórax secundario es una entidad rara con una alta morbilidad. La embolización del conducto torácico (CT) mediante linfangiografía intranodal (LI) con aceite etiodizado (AE) forma parte del arsenal terapéutico del quilotórax en el adulto. Presentamos nuestra experiencia con esta técnica en pacientes pediátricos con quilotórax refractario al tratamiento médico. METODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes tratados en nuestro centro por quilotórax refractario con LI en los últimos 4 años. Se recogieron los datos epidemiológicos, clínicos, terapéuticos y linfangiográficos. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 4 pacientes, con unas medianas de edad y peso de 2,5 meses (1-16) y 4,25 kg (2,8-10) respectivamente. En 3 de los pacientes el quilotórax fue secundario a cirugía cardiaca y en el restante a trombosis extensa de vena cava superior. La mediana de débito fue de 46 ml/kg/día (19-64) y la de tiempo de tratamiento médico de 47 días (13-56). En todos ellos se realizó LI, opacificándose el CT solo en un paciente, sin lograrse la embolización. A pesar de ello, tras la LI, el quilotórax cesó en el grupo postquirúrgico independientemente del nivel de opacificación del árbol linfático. En el paciente secundario a trombosis, se realizó ligadura quirúrgica del CT 6 días después del estudio. CONCLUSIONES: La LI es una técnica diagnóstica e incluso terapéutica en casos de quilotórax refractario, que comienza a ser necesaria y realizable en centros con experiencia. El AE parece sellar la fuga linfática por un mecanismo embolizante en casos postquirúrgicos, eliminando la necesidad del cierre quirúrgico.

Comparison of Radioembolization and Sorafenib for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of radioembolization with that of sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT treated with radioembolization or sorafenib. Meta-analyses of cumulative overall survival (OS) and Kaplan-Meier survival rates according to the time to progression (TTP) and incidence of adverse events (AEs) were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted on 1-year OS data. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were identified (four involving radioembolization, 10 involving sorafenib, and three comparing both). Pooled OS rates were higher in the radioembolization group, notably at 6 months {76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-85%) vs. 54% (95% CI, 45-62%)} and 1 year (47% [95% CI, 38-57%] vs. 24% [95% CI, 18-30%]); TTP was also longer with radioembolization. In patients undergoing radioembolization, the proportion of patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status 0 (p < 0.0001), Child-Pugh A (p < 0.0001), extrahepatic metastasis (p = 0.0012), and a history of cancer treatment (p = 0.0048) was identified as a significant source of heterogeneity for the 1-year OS. Radioembolization was associated with a lower incidence of grade 3/4 AEs than sorafenib (9% [95% CI, 3-27%] vs. 28% [95% CI, 17-43%]). CONCLUSION: Compared with sorafenib, radioembolization is a safer and more effective treatment for HCC with PVTT and is associated with prolonged survival, delayed tumor progression, and fewer grade 3/4 AEs.