TOPGEAR: a randomised phase III trial of perioperative ECF chemotherapy versus preoperative chemoradiation plus perioperative ECF chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (an international, intergroup trial of the AGITG/TROG/EORTC/NCIC CTG).

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of patients with resectable gastric cancer continues to evolve in Western countries. Following publication of the US Intergroup 0116 and UK Medical Research Council MAGIC trials, there are now two standards of care for adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancer, at least in the Western world: postoperative chemoradiotherapy and perioperative epirubicin/cisplatin/fluorouracil (ECF) chemotherapy. We hypothesize that adding chemoradiation to standard perioperative ECF chemotherapy will achieve further survival gains. We also believe there are advantages to administering chemoradiation in the preoperative rather than postoperative setting. In this article, we describe the TOPGEAR trial, which is a randomised phase III trial comparing control arm therapy of perioperative ECF chemotherapy with experimental arm therapy of preoperative chemoradiation plus perioperative ECF chemotherapy. METHODS/DESIGN: Eligible patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction will be randomized to receive either perioperative chemotherapy alone (3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of ECF) or perioperative chemotherapy plus preoperative chemoradiation. In the chemoradiation arm, patients receive 2 cycles of ECF plus chemoradiation prior to surgery, and then following surgery 3 further cycles of ECF are given. The trial is being conducted in two Parts; Part 1 (phase II component) has recruited 120 patients with the aim of assessing feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of preoperative chemoradiation. Part 2 (phase III component) will recruit a further 632 patients to provide a total sample size of 752 patients. The primary endpoint of the phase III trial is overall survival. The trial includes quality of life and biological substudies, as well as a health economic evaluation. In addition, the trial incorporates a rigorous quality assurance program that includes real time central review of radiotherapy plans and central review of surgical technique. DISCUSSION: TOPGEAR is an international, intergroup collaboration led by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG), in collaboration with the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the NCIC Clinical Trials Group. It addresses a globally significant question that will help inform future international standards for clinical practice in resectable gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000035224 . Registered 30 May 2009.

Effects on heart function of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in patients with cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction - a prospective cohort pilot study within a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy for cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal (GE)-junction is well established. The pros and cons of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy are debated. Chemoradiotherapy might impair cardiac function eliciting postoperative morbidity. The aim of this pilot study was to describe acute changes in left ventricular function following chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with esophageal and (GE)-junction cancer enrolled at our center into a multicenter trial comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy were eligible. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with or without the addition of 40 Gy radiotherapy prior to surgery. Left ventricular function was evaluated using echocardiography and plasma N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary outcome measure was left ventricular global strain (GS). Clinical effects were assessed using repeated exercise tests. Linear mixed models were used to analyze the effects of treatment group, and the interaction between groups. RESULTS: 40 patients participated (chemoradiotherapy, n=17; chemotherapy, n=23). In the chemoradiotherapy group there was no change in left ventricular global strain but mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) of the ventricular septum, early diastolic filling velocity (E-velocity), and the ratio of early to late ventricular filling velocities (E/A ratio) decreased significantly (p=0.02, p=0.01, and p=0.03, respectively). No changes were observed in the chemotherapy group. There was a trend towards an interaction effect for MAPSE sept and E (p=0.09 and p=0.09). NT-proBNP increased following chemoradiotherapy (p=0.05) but not after chemotherapy (p>0.99), and there was a trend towards an interaction effect (p=0.07). Working capacity decreased following neoadjuvant treatment (chemoradiotherapy p = 0.001, chemotherapy p=0.03) and was more pronounced after chemoradiotherapy with a trend towards an interaction effect (p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy but not chemotherapy before surgery for cancer of the esophagus or GE-junction seems to induce an acute negative effect on both systolic and diastolic left ventricular function. Future studies on neoadjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer are suggested to add measurements of cardiac function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01362127 .

The safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy and external beam radiation in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with or without chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy (NBT) as an adjuvant in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) with external beam radiation (EBRT), with or without chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In total, 197 patients with localized, advanced GEJAC received EBRT and NBT with or without chemotherapy. Radiotherapy consisted of external irradiation to a total dose of 40-54 Gy (median 50 Gy) and brachytherapy to 8-25 Gy (median 20 Gy) in two to five fractions. In total, 88 patients received chemotherapy that consisted of two cycles of a regimen with CDDP and 5FU from days l-4. The cycles were administered on days 1 and 29. MMC was given alone in bolus injection on day 1 each week. The cycles were administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. RESULTS: The duration of follow-up ranged from six to 106 months (median 30.4 months). The median survival time for the 197 patients was 13.3 months, and the one, two, three- and five-year rates for overall survival were 57.1%, 35.1%, 23.0% and 9.2%, respectively. For acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula and massive bleeding were observed during this treatment period. In total, 159 (80.7%) patients developed Grade 2 hematologic toxicity and 146 (74.1%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis. The median times of incidence of fistula and bleeding were 9.5 (3-27.3) months and 12.7 (5-43.4) months, respectively. The incidence of severe, late complications was related to higher NBT dose/f (20-25 Gy/5 F) and higher total dose(≥70 Gy). In total, 75.2% of the patients resumed normal swallowing and 2.0% had some residual dysphagia (non-malignant) requiring intermittent dilatation. CONCLUSION: A combination of EBRT and NBT with the balloon type applicator was feasible and well tolerated. Better local-regional control and overall survival cannot achieved by a higher dose, and in contrast, a higher dose caused more severe esophageal injury.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: Due to low tolerance to chemotherapy, the maximum number of cycles of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is 4 in adjuvant gastric clinical trials. The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of resected locally advanced stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From January 2004 to July 2008, ninety-seven consecutive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients in stages T3-4/N+ were treated with postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The recommended treatment plan was radical resection followed by 1-2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and, finally, 4-5 cycles of ACT. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the number of cycles of ACT: group 1 received 4-6 cycles (n = 59), and group 2 received 0-3 cycles (n = 38). The detailed grouping is as follows: RT alone, 2; RT and CT, 18; concurrent RTCT and CT, 41; and CRT, 36. Of the 97 patients, 77 patients received concurrent therapy (CRT, (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine), and 20 received radiotherapy alone because of patient refusal (n = 15) or treatment toxicity (n = 5). After a median follow-up of 44 months, the 3-year disease free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 66.5% and 69.5% for group 1 and 45.5% and 50% for group 2, respectively (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis revealed that 4-6 cycles of ACT, lymphovascular invasion, or peritoneal metastasis were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival or overall survival (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that concurrent chemoradiation with adjuvant epirubicin-based triplet chemotherapy is feasible and tolerable for gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma patients. Patients can benefit from more cycles of ACT.

Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the lower esophageal sphincter improves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

BACKGROUND: The Stretta procedure has been proposed as a novel therapeutic alternative to antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Early reports indicated improvement in GERD symptoms overall, but improvement in patients who have poor outcome after surgery remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with reflux who did not have a hiatal hernia were offered the procedure. All were administered a GERD Health Related Quality of Life survey at preprocedure and at greater than 3 months postprocedure. Differences in pre- and postprocedure responses were deemed significant with the use of the Wilcoxon rank sum test with P <.05. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent the Stretta procedure. There were no complications. All were evaluated postprocedure, with 74% completing a postprocedure survey. Overall heartburn score improved from 3.19 (scale, 0-5) preprocedure to 1.74 postprocedure (P=.0012). Overall symptoms satisfaction score improved from 3.92 to 1.63 (P=.0001). Symptoms satisfaction score of patients who failed antireflux surgery improved from 3.5 to 1.75 (P=.0166), and, in those with a body mass index >30, it improved from 4.11 to 1.56 (P=.0024). Four patients went on to have antireflux surgery after having the Stretta procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Stretta improves heartburn symptoms both overall and in patients with poor outcome after antireflux surgery, with a low procedural risk. It may have a role in the treatment of patients with primary reflux and in those who have failed antireflux surgery or who are a high risk for surgery.

The Stretta procedure: device, technique, and pre-clinical study data.

The initial concept of delivering RF energy to the gastroesophageal junction for the treatment of GERD was based on the well-established safety profile and scientific clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of this technology in other disease states. As described in this article, the Stretta procedure is an endoluminal procedure inducing collagen tissue contraction, remodeling, and modulation of the triggering threshold for transient LES relaxations. The preclinical experience with this device included feasibility studies to determine optimal treatment parameters and device design. This was followed by longitudinal animal studies to elucidate the mechanism of safety and effect of this intervention as it relates to LES physiology and histopathology. In these studies, RF elevated the LES pressure and gastric yield pressure in a porcine model of botulinum toxin induced LES hypotension. The elevation in GYP more than 6 months was confirmed in a subsequent evaluation. Thickening of the LES after RF delivery has been demonstrated using histopathological evaluation and EUS. Additionally, using a canine model of triggered transient LES relaxations (tLESR), RF significantly reduced the frequency of tLESRs and reflux events. Additional evaluation was performed in human subjects undergoing esophagectomy, confirming feasibility and Histopathologic results of the treatment. Subsequent clinical trials confirm the safety and mechanism of action data of these pre-clinical studies and are presented in this publication.

Clinical experience with the Stretta procedure.

The benchmarks in GERD therapy comprise the commonly prescribed anti-secretory drugs (H2RAs and PPIs) and anti-reflux surgery. Although drugs are typically safe, cost and patient compliance are challenges to long-term management. Furthermore, while heartburn may be controlled with aggressive medical therapy, other symptoms such as regurgitation may persist, reducing patient satisfaction and adversely affecting quality of life. Surgical anti-reflux procedures, most commonly laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, improve GERD symptoms and normalize esophageal acid exposure in most patients. Patient perception of the potential risk of abdominal surgery and general anesthesia may limit willingness to undergo surgery resulting in only a small portion of GERD sufferers that actually undergo anti-reflux surgery each year. Overall, the Stretta procedure is well tolerated, with an acceptably low incidence of complications and obviates the need for anti-secretory drug therapy for most patients at the 6- and 12-month follow-up. GERD symptom scores, heartburn, satisfaction, and SF-36 scores significantly improve over the baseline and this effect lasts at least 12 months. The symptomatic improvement after Stretta at 12 months in one trial (GERD score, 27 to 9) is similar to that reported by Velanovich after fundoplication (GERD score, 27 to 3). Furthermore, the significant reduction in median esophageal acid exposure time (distal 10.6% to 6.2%, proximal 1.9% to 0.9%), provides objective evidence of an anti-reflux effect. Although the reported studies have been non-randomized, the objective improvement observed in esophageal acid exposure and the persistence of GERD symptom score improvement with repeated measure analysis over a course of 12 months make a significant placebo effect unlikely. Stretta is a promising new technology for the treatment of GERD that should be considered for patients who wish to discontinue a lifelong anti-secretory medication regimen or who have incomplete GERD symptom control on drugs, but are not yet accepting anti-reflux surgery.