Emerging biologic therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The approval of belimumab and anifrolumab has expanded the scope of treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. However, many patients remain refractory to currently available therapies and suffer from drug toxicities. This review will discuss approved and target-specific therapeutics in development that bring hope for better SLE treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: Since the last review on this subject in the journal, the FDA has approved anifrolumab and belimumab for SLE and lupus nephritis (LN), respectively. A fully humanized anti-CD20, obinutuzumab, met the primary end point in a phase II trial in LN. A Tyk2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, and an antibody targeting plasmacytoid dendritic cells, litifilimab, met the primary end point in phase II trials in SLE and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). Ustekinumab and baricitinib met the primary end point in phase II but not in phase III trials. SUMMARY: While many drug candidates which met the end points in phase II trials have failed phase III trials, the number of target-specific therapies for SLE has continued to expand.

Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Preventing Penetrating Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Comparative effectiveness of biologics in preventing penetrating disease (PD) in Crohn's disease (CD) is not well established. We compared the risk of developing luminal and perianal PD (LPD and PPD) between biologics used as first-line therapies. METHODS: Adults (>17 years) with CD who initiated their first biologic (anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF], ustekinumab [UST], or vedolizumab [VDZ]) were identified from Merative Commercial Database (2006 and 2020). We excluded preexisting PD using a minimum look-back period of 1 year. Cohorts were balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting based on age, sex, comorbidities, prior CD surgery, and CD severity. Pairwise comparisons were performed by Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for immunomodulator exposure, and with biologic exposure treated as a time-dependent variable based on a medication possession ratio of 0.8. RESULTS: Our analysis included 40,693 patients: 93% anti-TNF, 3% UST, and 4% VDZ. After inverse probability of treatment weighting all comparisons were well balanced. Anti-TNF was protective against LPD (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.78; P < .0001) and PPD (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.96; P = .0045) compared with VDZ and LPD (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.46; P < .0001) compared with UST. There were no significant differences in the risk of LPD and PPD between VDZ and UST. These results were similar after limiting the study period to after 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a lower risk of LPD and PPD compared with VDZ, and lower risk of LPD compared with UST. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and to determine potential reasons for these differences.

Drug survival of biologic therapies for palmoplantar pustulosis: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapies have established efficacy in psoriasis vulgaris. However, palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) has proven difficult to treat, and data on drug survival in these patients remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: To investigate drug survival of biological treatments in a nationwide cohort of patients with PPP. METHODS: We included all patients treated for PPP with a biologic from a prospective Danish nationwide registry between 2007 and 2019. Descriptive statistics were reported. Drug survival was calculated for all patients and specified for the most frequently used biologics. Drug survival was reported as median time to discontinuation. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to visualize drug survival. Trajectories of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were plotted by interpolating between the different visits with a dermatologist for each treatment course. RESULTS: We identified 85 individual patients who received biological therapy for PPP across 194 treatment courses during follow-up. Of the included treatment courses, 151 (77.8%) were discontinued. The most frequent cause of discontinuation was ineffective response to treatment (54.3%), while 18.5% of courses were discontinued due to adverse events. The median drug survival across all therapies for PPP was 9.3 (Inter quartile range (IQR), 3.9-25.6) months. Ustekinumab demonstrated the longest median time to discontinuation of 14.6 (IQR, 9.1-51.8) months. The proportion of bio-naive patients in treatment at 12 months were according to drug 47.9% for adalimumab, 64.3% for ustekinumab and 40.0% for secukinumab. For bio-experienced, it was 58.2% adalimumab, 54.5% for ustekinumab and 51.4% for secukinumab. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of PPP poses significant challenges, with limited drug survival observed across all therapies regardless of prior experience with biologics. Ustekinumab demonstrated the longest median drug survival. Notably, patients discontinuing therapy due to inefficacy exhibited higher DLQI scores, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment selection and timely consideration of therapy changes when inefficacy is established.

Real-world treatment persistence of four commonly prescribed biologic therapies for moderate to severe psoriasis in Australia.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Australian data comparing biologic treatments for moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis are lacking. We compared persistence on therapy across four biologic therapies (adalimumab, guselkumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab) used to treat chronic plaque psoriasis. The impact of prior biologic use on persistence was also investigated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort analysis of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) 10% sample included data from adult patients prescribed ≥1 biologic of interest by a dermatologist from 1 September 2015 to 31 December 2021. Persistence was defined as continued use until 180 days without a prescription. The index date was the date of the first claim of the biologic. Persistence was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank tests, adjusted analyses using Cox's regressions, and propensity score matching. RESULTS: In total, 878 patients, with 1131 index prescriptions, were included. Guselkumab median persistence was not reached in the study period (PBS listed from February 2019). In the adjusted analysis, persistence to guselkumab was significantly greater than to adalimumab (n = 105; median 16 months, HR 2.71 (95% CI 1.94-3.8), p < 0.001), ustekinumab (n = 336; median 19 months, HR 2.91 (95% CI 2.22-3.82), p < 0.001) and secukinumab (n = 305; median 30 months, HR 1.8 (95% CI 1.36-2.38), p < 0.001). Bio-naïve patients had longer persistence on treatment than bio-experienced patients. CONCLUSIONS: The nationally representative PBS dataset can provide real-world insights into the persistence on biologic therapies for psoriasis in Australia, where eligibility criteria for reimbursed treatment are stringent. Persistence is an indirect marker of sustained treatment effectiveness and tolerability. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses found longer persistence for guselkumab compared to adalimumab, secukinumab or ustekinumab.

Effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis: An analysis of real-life data from the BiPe cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is a frequent clinical subtype of childhood psoriasis. This study evaluated the effectiveness of biologic therapies in children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis using data from the two Biological treatments for Pediatric Psoriasis (BiPe) cohorts. METHODS: Data for all 170 patients included in the BiPe cohorts were analyzed. Data on the effectiveness (PGA, PASI between baseline and 3 months of treatment) of biologic therapies were then compared between children with palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (n = 20) and those with generalized plaque psoriasis (n = 136). Clinical and demographic data were also analyzed. RESULTS: Children in the palmoplantar group were more likely to be male (p = .04), with an earlier age of psoriasis onset (p < .001), and more frequent nail involvement (p < .001). After 3 months of biologic treatment, mean PGA scores were higher in the palmoplantar group than in the generalized plaque psoriasis group (p = .004). In the palmoplantar group, continuation rates were higher for adalimumab than for etanercept or ustekinumab (p = .01). Primary inefficacy was a more frequent reason for stopping biologic therapies in the palmoplantar group (p = .01), and disease remission was less frequent (p = .05). Combined systemic and biologic therapies were more frequently used in palmoplantar plaque psoriasis (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the treatment-resistant nature of palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and indicated that adalimumab could be the most effective biologic treatment. Larger studies are needed to allow therapeutic algorithms for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis to be proposed in pediatric psoriasis management guidelines.

Exposure to biologic therapy before and during pregnancy in patients with psoriasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Biologicals have transformed the management of severe disease phenotypes in psoriasis and are often prescribed in women of childbearing age. However, information on safety of biologicals in pregnancy are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis exposed to biologics within 3 months before or during pregnancy, and to estimate the pooled prevalence of spontaneous, elective and total abortions, and congenital malformations in their newborns. Bibliographic searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases up to 14 April 2022. No restrictions on sample size or publication date were applied. Review performance complied with PRISMA guidelines, and two reviewers assessed randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies reporting pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to biologics indicated for psoriasis during the pre-gestational and/or gestational period. Studies focusing on rheumatologic or gastroenterological immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were excluded. Regardless of data heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to pool prevalence estimates. We included 51 observational studies, involving 739 pregnancies exposed to approved biologics for psoriasis. Administration was mostly (70.4%) limited to the first trimester, and the most common drug was ustekinumab (36.0%). The estimated prevalence of miscarriage was 15.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7-18.0) and elective abortions, 10.8% (95% CI 7.7-14.3). Congenital malformations occurred in about 3.0% (95% CI 1.6-4.8) of live births exposed to biologics during pregnancy. Altogether, exposure to biologics for psoriasis during pregnancy and/or conception does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage/abortion or congenital malformations, showing similar rates to the general population. These results suggest that biologic drugs are safe and pose an acceptable risk to the foetuses/neonates.

Biological and JAK inhibitor therapy outcomes for severe psoriasis in trisomy 21.

Little is known about biological outcomes for severe psoriasis in trisomy 21 (T21). Our aim was to review outcomes of patients with T21 and severe psoriasis treated with biologic or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Information on demographics, co-morbidities, and therapeutic responses was retrospectively collated. Twenty-one patients were identified (mean age 24.7 years). Ninety percent (18/20) of TNFα inhibitor trials failed. Almost two-thirds (7/11) of patients achieved an adequate response with ustekinumab. All three patients treated with tofacitinib achieved an adequate response following at least three biologic failures. The mean number of biologic/JAKi therapies received was 2.1 with overall survival of 36%. Eighty-one percent (17/21) of patients required conversion from their index biologic treatment due to failure. In patients with T21 and severe psoriasis, failure of TNFα inhibition is common and ustekinumab therapy should be considered as first-line therapy. The role of JAKi is emerging.

Impact of Functional Polymorphisms on Drug Survival of Biological Therapies in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis.

Biological therapies (BTs) indicated for psoriasis are highly effective; however, not all patients obtain good results, and loss of effectiveness is the main reason for switching. Genetic factors may be involved. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the drug survival of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (anti-TNF) medications and ustekinumab (UTK) in patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. We conducted an ambispective observational cohort study that included 379 lines of treatment with anti-TNF (n = 247) and UTK (132) in 206 white patients from southern Spain and Italy. The genotyping of the 29 functional SNPs was carried out using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with TaqMan probes. Drug survival was evaluated with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves. The multivariate analysis showed that the HLA-C rs12191877-T (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.560; 95% CI = 0.40-0.78; p = 0.0006) and TNF-1031 (rs1799964-C) (HR = 0.707; 95% CI = 0.50-0.99; p = 0.048) polymorphisms are associated with anti-TNF drug survival, while TLR5 rs5744174-G (HR = 0.589; 95% CI = 0.37-0.92; p = 0.02), CD84 rs6427528-GG (HR = 0.557; 95% CI = 0.35-0.88; p = 0.013) and PDE3A rs11045392-T together with SLCO1C1 rs3794271-T (HR = 0.508; 95% CI = 0.32-0.79; p = 0.002) are related to UTK survival. The limitations are the sample size and the clustering of anti-TNF drugs; we used a homogeneous cohort of patients from 2 hospitals only. In conclusion, SNPs in the HLA-C, TNF, TLR5, CD84, PDE3A, and SLCO1C1 genes may be useful as biomarkers of drug survival of BTs indicated for psoriasis, making it possible to implement personalized medicine that will reduce financial healthcare costs, facilitate medical decision-making and improve patient quality of life. However, further pharmacogenetic studies need to be conducted to confirm these associations.

Second-Line Biologic Therapy Following Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Failure: A Real-World Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis.

BACKGROUND& AIMS: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists often are used as first-line medications to treat moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but many patients do not achieve or maintain response. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of second-line treatments (ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second TNF antagonist) after TNF antagonist exposure in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) from 2 electronic health records-based cohorts. METHODS: We identified patients with prior TNF antagonist exposure who switched to a different biologic in the Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) electronic health records (CD, n = 527; UC, n = 165) and the Study of a Prospective Adult Research Cohort (SPARC) from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Plexus Program of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation (CD, n = 412; UC, n = 129). Treatment failure was defined as the composite of any IBD-related surgery, IBD-related hospitalization, new prescription of oral/intravenous corticosteroids, or need to switch to a third biologic agent. Time-to-event analysis was conducted with inverse probability of treatment-weighted data. RESULTS: Overall, treatment failure occurred in 85% of MSHS and 72% of SPARC CD patients. In SPARC, the likelihood of treatment failure was significantly lower with ustekinumab compared with vedolizumab as second-line treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.82; P < .001), a trend confirmed in MSHS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04; P = .15). In both cohorts, the superiority of ustekinumab compared with vedolizumab was shown when considering treatment failure as prescription of steroids or a third biologic agent. In UC, no differences between second-line treatment groups were identified. CONCLUSIONS: In 2 independent real-world cohort settings, second-line therapy in CD with ustekinumab after TNF antagonist treatment failure was associated with a lower likelihood of treatment failure than second-line vedolizumab.

Drug utilization of biologic therapy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: a population-based Danish cohort study 2015-2020.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to characterize the drug utilization and switch patterns of biological treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Using Danish national registries, this nationwide study included individuals diagnosed with UC or CD, bio-naïve at the initiation of treatment with infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, golimumab, or ustekinumab in 2015-2020. Hazard ratios of discontinuing the first treatment or switching to another biological treatment were explored using Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 2995 UC patients and 3028 CD patients, infliximab was used as a first-line biologic treatment in 89% of UC patients and 85% of CD patients, followed by adalimumab with 6%, vedolizumab with 3%, and golimumab with 1% for UC, and adalimumab with 12%, vedolizumab with 2%, and ustekinumab with 0.4% for CD.When comparing adalimumab as the first treatment series to infliximab, there was a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (excluding switch) among UC patients (hazard ratio: 2.02 [95% confidence interval: 1.57; 2.60]) and CD patients (1.85 [1.52; 2.24]). When comparing vedolizumab to infliximab, there was a lower risk of discontinuation for UC patients (0.51 [0.29-0.89]), and for CD patients, although not significantly (0.58 [0.32-1.03]). We observed no significant difference in the risk of switching to another biologic treatment for any of the biologics. CONCLUSION: More than 85% of UC and CD patients initiating biologic therapy had infliximab as their first-line biologic treatment, in accordance with official treatment guidelines. Future studies should explore the higher incidence of treatment discontinuation of adalimumab as the first treatment series.Key summarySeveral biologic therapies are available in the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.Clinical guidelines stipulate that infliximab should be the first-line biologic therapy.Drug utilization studies comparing biologic therapies head-to-head are sparse.In Denmark, during 2015-2020 infliximab remained the most widely used biologic treatment, with adalimumab being second.One in four patients experienced more than one biologic during the study period.The risk of discontinuation of biologic treatment (and not starting a new biologic) was higher for initiators of adalimumab.Clinical and social background factors available from the registers could not account for the observed risk difference in discontinuation.

Long-Term Outcomes of Biological Therapy in Crohn's Disease Complicated With Internal Fistulizing Disease: BIOSCOPE Study From GETECCU.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of penetrating complications in Crohn's disease (CD) increases progressively over time, but evidence on the medical treatment in this setting is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of biologic agents in CD complicated with internal fistulizing disease. METHODS: Adult patients with CD-related fistulae who received at least 1 biologic agent for this condition from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry were included. Exclusion criteria involved those receiving biologics for perianal disease, enterocutaneous, rectovaginal, anastomotic, or peristomal fistulae. The primary end point was fistula-related surgery. Predictive factors associated with surgery and fistula closure were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression and survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 760 patients from 53 hospitals (673 receiving anti-tumor necrosis factors, 69 ustekinumab, and 18 vedolizumab) were included. After a median follow-up of 56 months (interquartile range, 26-102 months), 240 patients required surgery, with surgery rates of 32%, 41%, and 24% among those under anti-tumor necrosis factor, vedolizumab, or ustekinumab, respectively. Fistula closure was observed in 24% of patients. Older patients, ileocolonic disease, entero-urinary fistulae, or an intestinal stricture distal to the origin of the fistula were associated with a higher risk of surgery, whereas nonsmokers and combination therapy with an immunomodulator reduced this risk. DISCUSSION: Biologic therapy is beneficial in approximately three-quarters of patients with fistulizing CD, achieving fistula closure in 24%. However, around one-third still undergo surgery due to refractory disease. Some patient- and lesion-related factors can identify patients who will obtain more benefit from these drugs.

The effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab as third-line biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Ustekinumab (UST) and Vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) as third-line biologic therapies is unclear. AIMS: We performed a multicentre, real-world assessment of the effectiveness of UST and VDZ among highly-refractory patients with CD. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with CD treated with UST and VDZ as third-line biologic therapy until December 2021 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). RESULTS: 143 patients (UST: n = 113; VDZ: n = 30) were included. At the end of induction, the rates of clinical response (CR) were 61.9% for UST and 60.0% for VDZ (p = 1.00), with steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) achieved in 38.1% of patients in the UST group and 43.3% of patients in the VDZ group (p = 0.75). After 52 weeks of observation, the rates of CR were 65.9% for UST and 71.4% for VDZ (p = 0.77), while the rates of SFCR were 51.8% for UST and 57.1% for VDZ (p = 0.78). At multiple Cox proportional hazard regression model, age (HR 0.98; p = 0.04) and need for systemic steroids at baseline (HR 3.29; p = 0.003) were found to be independent predictors of treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Both VDZ and UST showed high effectiveness as third-line biologic therapy in CD, without significant differences between them.

Comparative Efficacy of Biologic Therapies for Inducing Response and Remission in Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: The medical treatment of fistulizing Crohn's disease (CD) remains a challenge to clinicians. Over the last 20 years, biologic therapies have been the mainstay of medical treatment of fistulizing CD. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central databases from inception to December 2021. Inclusion criteria were any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of biologic therapies against an active comparator or placebo for induction of response or remission in adults with fistulizing CD. The proportion of patients with fistula response or remission, as defined by each clinical trial, was our primary study outcome. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to measure treatment effects and results were reported as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: In our analysis, 10 studies were included, and all were RCTs. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab in inducing response (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.04-2.27). Tumor necrosis factor antagonists were superior to placebo in the induction of response (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35-0.750) and remission (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.22-0.58). Infliximab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.17-0.75) and remission (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87). Ustekinumab was superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26-0.860) but not in inducing remission (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.13-1.93). When comparing biologic therapies against each other, there was no statistical difference in inducing remission. Vedolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing remission (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.04-2.29). Certolizumab was not superior to placebo in inducing response (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55) or remission (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor necrosis factor antagonists are effective in inducing response and remission in fistulizing CD. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission. Ustekinumab is effective in the induction of response but not in the induction of remission. When compared against each other, biologic therapies showed no significant difference in the induction of remission. Based on the available data, infliximab is the preferred first-line treatment. As for other biologics, the limited published data do not allow us to make firm recommendations. This study supports current practice and emphasizes the need for dedicated RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of biologic therapies in fistulizing CD.

Despite the era of biologic therapies, the management of fistulizing Crohn's disease remains challenging. This is the first systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of biologic therapies in inducing response and remission in patients with fistulizing Crohn's disease. We found that anti-tumor necrosis factor agents are effective in inducing response and remission. Infliximab was superior to adalimumab for inducing response but not for inducing remission.

Rates and Predictors of Long-term Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Perianal Crohn's Disease on Biologic Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Perianal Crohn's disease (pCD) represents an aggressive phenotype with limited studies on long-term outcomes. We evaluated 5-year outcomes of these patients on biologic therapies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with pCD at a tertiary medical center. We used Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate rates and multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of long-term outcomes. RESULTS: We included 311 patients with pCD of which 168 patients were started on biologics [138 anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α, 14 vedolizumab, 16 ustekinumab] at the time of diagnosis. Anti-TNF use at the time of diagnosis was associated with decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence [hazard ratio (HR)=0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74], whereas ustekinumab use was associated with increased rates of perianal fistula closure (HR=3.58, 95% CI: 1.04-12.35) and decreased rates of perianal abscess recurrence (HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.07-0.56) at follow-up. Among patients who failed their first anti-TNF, switching to another anti-TNF was associated with decreased rates of colectomy (HR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.90) and permanent diversion (HR=0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.94) compared with ustekinumab, whereas vedolizumab use was associated with decreased perianal fistula closure (HR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.05-0.96) compared with ustekinumab. Predictors of colectomy included colonic disease (odds ratio=2.71, 95% CI: 1.36-5.38) and anal stenosis (odds ratio=4.44, 95% CI: 1.59-12.43). CONCLUSION: Type of biologic use at the time of pCD diagnosis or after first anti-TNF failure may be associated with long-term outcomes in patients with pCD.

Comorbidity Influences the Comparative Safety of Biologic Therapy in Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: There are limited data on comparative risk of infections with various biologic agents in older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We aimed to assess the comparative safety of biologic agents in older IBD patients with varying comorbidity burden. METHODS: We used data from a large, national commercial insurance plan in the United States to identify patients 60 years and older with IBD who newly initiated tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNF), vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. Comorbidity was defined using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Our primary outcome was infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare the risk of infections between the different therapeutic classes. RESULTS: The anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab cohorts included 2,369, 972, and 352 patients, respectively, with a mean age of 67 years. The overall rate of infection-related hospitalizations was similar to that of anti-TNF agents for patients initiating vedolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04) and ustekinumab (0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.16). Among patients with a CCI of >1, both ustekinumab (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91, p-interaction <0.01) and vedolizumab (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p-interaction: 0.02) were associated with a significantly lower rate of infection-related hospitalizations compared with anti-TNFs. No difference was found among patients with a CCI of ≤1. DISCUSSION: Among adults 60 years and older with IBD initiating biologic therapy, both vedolizumab and ustekinumab were associated with lower rates of infection-related hospitalizations than anti-TNF therapy for those with high comorbidity burden.

Associations between HLA-Cw1 and Systemic Treatment Response of Asian Psoriasis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease with a strong genetic background, particularly the human leukocyte antigen (HLA). HLA-Cw6 has been shown to be the major disease susceptibility locus and affects the phenotypes and treatment response in psoriasis; however, the prevalence of HLA-Cw6 is far lower than HLA-Cw1 in some Asian countries. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether HLA-Cw1 predisposes psoriasis patients to different treatment responses of biologics and other systemic therapy. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 126 patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis who had been genotyped and treated in a special psoriasis clinic. HLA-Cw1-positive and -negative patients were compared. RESULTS: Our results showed that HLA-Cw1-negative patients were significantly more likely to respond (achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 75 after a 12- to 16-week treatment course) to biologics (including etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and guselkumab; odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.44, p = 0.0122) and especially to ustekinumab (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.03-11.30; p = 0.0496). An HLA-Cw1 allele dose effect was also found. The results remained after multivariate logistic regression analysis. HLA-Cw1-negative patients also showed significantly greater improvement of PASI in ustekinumab and biologics (p = 0.0044 and p = 0.0064, respectively), with other biologics showing non-significant trends. HLA-Cw1 status did not affect the treatment responses of non-biologic systemic treatment, including phototherapy. CONCLUSION: There is an association between HLA-Cw1 and treatment response to biologics, but not to non-biologics, in our Asian population of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis; however, the exact mechanism and role of HLA-Cw1 remain to be investigated.

Dual biologic therapy for severe ulcerative colitis, concomitant extraintestinal manifestations and an orbital osteoma: a successful treatment.

It is difficult to manage UC patients with tumor and extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs). We present this case of acute severe UC patient with peripheral arthritis and orbital tumor could be successfully managed by the concomitant use of two biologics (Dual targeted therapy, DTT) including vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST). VDZ is approved for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe UC, but might have limited efficacy in treating EIMs due to its gut specific mechanism. UST shows clinical efficacy in the treatment of EIMs and is used for UC treatment.

Combining biological therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a Finnish multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapy with two concomitant biologicals targeting different inflammatory pathways has emerged as a new therapy option for treatment refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy (DBT) are scarce and are investigated in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on all patients treated with a combination of two biologicals in four Finnish tertiary centres were collected and analysed. Remission was assessed by a physician on the basis of biomarkers, endoscopic evaluation and alleviation of symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients with 22 trials of DBT were included. Fifteen patients had Crohn's disease. The most common combination of DBT was adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (USTE; 36%) with median follow-up of nine months (range 2-31). Altogether seven (32%) patients were in remission at the end of follow-up and in two trials response to DBT was assessed to be partial with the relief of patient symptoms. In a total of four trials DBT reduced the need for corticosteroids. The majority of patients achieving a response to DBT were treated with the combination of ADA and USTE (56%). At the end of follow-up all nine (41%) patients responding to DBT continued treatment. Infection complications occurred in three patients (19%). CONCLUSION: DBT is a promising alternative treatment for refractory IBD, and half of our patients benefitted from it. More data on the efficacy and safety of DBT are needed especially in long-term follow up.

Long-term, durable, absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and health-related quality of life improvements with risankizumab treatment: a post hoc integrated analysis of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Risankizumab has demonstrated durable, high rates of efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis as assessed by the achievement of relative Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvement and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this post hoc analysis is to assess the achievement of absolute PASI thresholds and related improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis treated with (i) risankizumab compared with ustekinumab, and (ii) long-term (>52 weeks to 172 weeks) risankizumab. METHODS: Data from patients randomised to 150 mg risankizumab or 45 or 90 mg ustekinumab in replicate randomised controlled trials UltIMMa-1 and UltIMMa-2 were analysed for the achievement of absolute PASI thresholds PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0, time to achieve these thresholds, and combined PASI and DLQI endpoints. Data from pat ients initially randomised to risankizumab who continued on risankizumab in the open-label extension study LIMMitless were analysed for the achievement of absolute PASI levels, mean DLQI scores, and DLQI 0/1. RESULTS: Significantly greater proportions of patients treated with risankizumab compared with ustekinumab achieved PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0, as well as combined endpoints for absolute PASI and DLQI [(PASI ≤ 3 and DLQI ≤ 5) or (PASI ≤ 1 and DLQI 0/1)]. The median time to first achieve PASI ≤ 3, PASI ≤ 1, and PASI = 0 was significantly lower for risankizumab-treated patients compared with ustekinumab-treated patients. Among patients treated with long-term risankizumab, more than 90% achieved PASI ≤ 3 though week 172 and more than 80% achieved DLQI 0/1. Low absolute PASI scores corresponded with low mean absolute DLQI scores through week 172 of continuous risankizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab treatment demonstrated high rates of rapid and durable efficacy as measured by absolute PASI thresholds and improvements in patient HRQoL.