Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Serv Res ; 56 Suppl 3: 1358-1369, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34409601

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare within-country variation of health care utilization and spending of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and diabetes across countries. DATA SOURCES: Patient-level linked data sources compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care across nine countries: Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. DATA COLLECTION METHODS: Patients were identified in routine hospital data with a primary diagnosis of CHF and a secondary diagnosis of diabetes in 2015/2016. STUDY DESIGN: We calculated the care consumption of patients after a hospital admission over a year across the care pathway-ranging from primary care to home health nursing care. To compare the distribution of care consumption in each country, we use Gini coefficients, Lorenz curves, and female-male ratios for eight utilization and spending measures. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In all countries, rehabilitation and home nursing care were highly concentrated in the top decile of patients, while the number of drug prescriptions were more uniformly distributed. On average, the Gini coefficient for drug consumption is about 0.30 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27-0.36), while it is, 0.50 (0.45-0.56) for primary care visits, and more than 0.75 (0.81-0.92) for rehabilitation use and nurse visits at home (0.78; 0.62-0.9). Variations in spending were more pronounced than in utilization. Compared to men, women spend more days at initial hospital admission (+5%, 1.01-1.06), have a higher number of prescriptions (+7%, 1.05-1.09), and substantially more rehabilitation and home care (+20% to 35%, 0.79-1.6, 0.99-1.64), but have fewer visits to specialists (-10%; 0.84-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Distribution of health care consumption in different settings varies within countries, but there are also some common treatment patterns across all countries. Clinicians and policy makers need to look into these differences in care utilization by sex and care setting to determine whether they are justified or indicate suboptimal care.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/economía , Comparación Transcultural , Diabetes Mellitus , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Australia , Enfermedad Crónica , Países Desarrollados , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/economía , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , América del Norte , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Rehabilitación/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 27(2): e408-e413, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32941315

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgical treatment pathways for apical prolapse. STUDY DESIGN: We constructed a stochastic Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of vaginal apical suspension, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and robotic sacrocolpopexy. We modeled over 5 and 10 years, with 9 pathways accounting for up to 2 separate surgical repairs, recurrence of symptomatic apical prolapse, reoperation, and complications, including mesh excision. We calculated costs from the health care system's perspective. RESULTS: Over 5 years, compared with expectant management, all surgical treatment pathways cost less than the willingness-to-pay threshold of US $50,000 per quality adjusted life-years. However, among surgical treatments, all but 2 pathways were dominated. Of the remaining 2, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy followed by vaginal repair for apical recurrence was not cost-effective compared with the vaginal-only approach (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER], >$500,000). Over 10 years, all but the same 2 pathways were dominated. However, starting with the laparoscopic approach in this case was more cost-effective with an ICER of US $6,176. If the laparoscopic approach was not available, starting with the robotic approach similarly became more cost-effective at 10 years (ICER, US $35,479). CONCLUSIONS: All minimally invasive surgical approaches for apical prolapse repair are cost-effective when compared with expectant management. Among surgical treatments, the vaginal-only approach is the only cost-effective option over 5 years. However, over a longer period, starting with a laparoscopic (or robotic) approach becomes cost-effective. These results help inform discussions regarding the surgical approach for prolapse.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas/economía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/economía , Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Árboles de Decisión , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/economía , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Cadenas de Markov , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Espera Vigilante
3.
JAMA Dermatol ; 155(12): 1380-1389, 2019 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31617856

RESUMEN

Importance: Systemic psoriasis treatments vary in efficacy and cost but also in time until onset of action. Patients with no response to a first induction treatment are typically switched to another, and some patients require several treatments before they see an improvement. Objective: To determine the most cost-effective sequence of induction treatment through a comparative time-effectiveness analysis of different systemic treatment sequences currently licensed in Germany for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This time-effectiveness analysis used a decision-analytic model set in the German health care system. The population simulated to receive the treatment sequences consisted of adult men and women with psoriasis vulgaris or plaque type psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment. Systematic reviews were performed to generate model input values. Data were collected from November 1 through December 15, 2017, and analyzed from January through August 2018. Interventions: Five treatment sequences frequently used in Germany, identified through an online expert survey (response rate, 10 of 15 [66.7%]), and 4 theoretical sequences starting with a biological agent. Treatments included methotrexate sodium (MTX), cyclosporine (CSA), fumaric acid esters (FAE), adalimumab (ADA), ixekizumab (IXE), infliximab (INF), and secukinumab (SEC). Main Outcomes and Measures: Two health states were defined: responder (patients achieving a Psoriasis Area Severity Index [PASI] ≥75) and nonresponder (PASI <75). Probability values were defined as response rates of PASI-75. Treatment effects were determined by the mean change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. Time until onset of action was assessed as weeks until 25% of patients reach PASI-75. Individual time-effectiveness ratios were calculated per treatment sequence as time until onset of action (in weeks) per minimally important difference (MID) in DLQI and were subsequently ranked. Results: Treatment sequences starting with a biological agent, including IXE-INF-SEC (1.4 weeks per DLQI-MID), INF-IXE-SEC (2.05 weeks per DLQI-MID), SEC-IXE-ADA (2.1 weeks per DLQI-MID), and ADA-IXE-SEC (2.8 weeks per DLQI-MID) were more time-effective than frequently used treatment sequences, including MTX-SEC-ADA (6.8 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-ADA-IXE (7.0 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-ADA-SEC (7.2 weeks per DLQI-MID), MTX-FAE-ADA (10.05 weeks per DLQI-MID), and FAE-MTX-CSA (11.5 weeks per DLQI-MID). The results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: When allocating monetary resources, policy makers and regulators may want to consider time until patients experience an MID in their quality of life as an additional outcome measure. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42017074218.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Modelos Económicos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Fármacos Dermatológicos/economía , Dermatólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de los Medicamentos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/economía , Psoriasis/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 76(16): 1219-1225, 2019 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31369118

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Results of a study incorporating real-world results into a predictive model to assess the cost-effectiveness of procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic use in intensive care unit patients with sepsis are reported. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to determine whether reductions in antibiotic therapy duration and other care improvements resulting from PCT testing and use of an associated treatment pathway offset the costs of PCT testing. Selected base-case cost outcomes in adults with sepsis admitted to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) were assessed in preintervention and postintervention cohorts using a decision analytic model. Cost-minimization and cost-utility analyses were performed from the hospital perspective with a 1-year time horizon. Secondary and univariate sensitivity analyses tested a variety of clinically relevant scenarios and the robustness of the model. RESULTS: Base-case modeling predicted that use of a PCT-guided treatment algorithm would results in hospital cost savings of $45 per patient and result in a gain of 0.0001 quality-adjusted life-year. After exclusion of patients in the postintervention cohort for PCT test ordering outside of institutional guidelines, the mean inpatient antibiotic therapy duration was significantly reduced in the postintervention group relative to the preintervention group (6.2 days versus 4.9 days, p = 0.04) after adjustment for patient sex and age, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, study period, vasopressor use, and ventilator use. Total annual hospital cost savings of $4,840 were predicted. CONCLUSION: Real-world implementation of PCT-guided antibiotic use may have improved patients' quality of life while decreasing hospital costs in MICU patients with undifferentiated sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Monitoreo de Drogas/economía , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/sangre , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Costos de los Medicamentos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud/economía , Costos de Hospital , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/mortalidad
5.
PLoS One ; 14(7): e0210917, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31291250

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The organization of health care for breast cancer (BC) constitutes a public health challenge to ensure quality of care, while also controlling expenditure. Few studies have assessed the global care pathway of early BC patients, including a description of direct medical costs and their determinants. The aims of this multicenter prospective study were to describe care pathways of BC patients in a geographic territory and to calculate the global direct costs of early stage BC during the first year following diagnosis. METHODS: OPTISOINS01 was a multicenter, prospective, observational study including early BC patients from diagnosis to one-year follow-up. Direct medical costs (in-hospital and out-of-hospital costs, supportive care costs) and direct non-medical costs (transportation and sick leave costs) were calculated by using a cost-of-illness analysis based on a bottom-up approach. Resources consumed were recorded in situ for each patient, using a prospective direct observation method. RESULTS: Data from 604 patients were analyzed. Median direct medical costs of 1 year of management after diagnosis in operable BC patients were €12,250. Factors independently associated with higher direct medical costs were: diagnosis on the basis of clinical signs, invasive cancer, lymph node involvement and conventional hospitalization for surgery. Median sick leave costs were €8,841 per patient and per year. Chemotherapy was an independent determinant of sick leave costs (€3,687/patient/year without chemotherapy versus €10,706 with chemotherapy). Forty percent (n = 242) of patients declared additional personal expenditure of €614/patient/year. No drivers of these costs were identified. CONCLUSION: Initial stage of disease and the treatments administered were the main drivers of direct medical costs. Direct non-medical costs essentially consisted of sick leave costs, accounting for one-half of direct medical costs for working patients. Out-of-pocket expenditure had a limited impact on the household.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Costo de Enfermedad , Vías Clínicas/economía , Femenino , Francia , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 186, 2019 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31043169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A model for triaging patients in primary care to provide immediate contact with the most appropriate profession to treat the condition in question has been developed and implemented in parts of Sweden. Direct triaging of patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) to physiotherapists at primary healthcare centres has been proposed as an alternative to initial assessment by general practitioners (GPs) and has been shown to have many positive effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness from the societal perspective of this new care-pathway through primary care regarding triaging patients with MSD to initial assessment by physiotherapists compared to standard practice with initial GP assessment. METHODS: Nurse-assessed patients with MSD (N = 55) were randomised to initial assessment and treatment with either physiotherapists or GPs and were followed for 1 year regarding health-related quality of life, utilization of healthcare resources and absence from work for MSD. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated based on EQ5D measured at 5 time-points. Costs for healthcare resources and production loss were compiled. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERS) were calculated. Multiple imputation was used to compensate for missing values and bootstrapping to handle uncertainty. A cost-effectiveness plane and a cost-effectiveness acceptability curve were construed to describe the results. RESULTS: The group who were allocated to initial assessment by physiotherapists had slightly larger gains in QALYs at lower total costs. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of 20,000 €, the likelihood that the intervention was cost-effective from a societal perspective including production loss due to MSD was 85% increasing to 93% at higher thresholds. When only healthcare costs were considered, triaging to physiotherapists was still less costly in relation to health improvements than standard praxis. CONCLUSION: From the societal perspective, this small study indicated that triaging directly to physiotherapists in primary care has a high likelihood of being cost-effective. However, further larger randomised trials will be necessary to corroborate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02218749 . Registered August 18, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/terapia , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Triaje/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Médicos Generales/economía , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/economía , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas/economía , Fisioterapeutas/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Suecia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Med ; 132(7): 856-861, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659810

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway has been proposed to streamline patient management in an integrated, holistic manner. Compliance to ABC resulted in lower incidence of cardiovascular events, but its impact on health-related costs has not been evaluated. METHODS: Exploratory analysis of costs related to cardiovascular events in the ATHERO-AF prospective cohort study including atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin K antagonists. A Diagnosis-Related Group code provided by the Italian Ministry of Health was assigned to each event to estimate the relative cost. The analysis was performed by dividing patients according to ABC pathway components. RESULTS: Overall, 118 cardiovascular events incurred a cost of 1,017,354 euros (1,149,610 USD). The mean total costs were 13,050 (14,747 USD) and 11,218 euros (12,676 USD) for a non-fatal cardiac event or ischaemic stroke, respectively. The cost-saving was 719 euros (813 USD) per patient-year for patients in group A vs non-A, 703 euros (794 USD) for B vs non-B, 480 euros (542 USD) for C vs non-C and 2776 euros (3,137 USD) for ABC vs non-ABC. The cost per event increased with the number of uncontrolled ABC components: 507 euros (573 USD) for 1, 965 euros (1,091 USD) for 2 and 3,431 euros (3,877 USD) for patients not having any of the three components of the ABC. CONCLUSIONS: Management of atrial fibrillation patients according to the ABC pathway was associated with significantly lower health-related costs. Application of the ABC pathway may help reduce healthcare costs related to cardiovascular events in this high-risk patient population.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Vías Clínicas/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/economía , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Ahorro de Costo , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Modelos Estadísticos , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
8.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 18(1): 933, 2018 Dec 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30514277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of people affected by cataract in the United Kingdom (UK) is growing rapidly due to ageing population. As the only way to treat cataract is through surgery, there is a high demand for this type of surgery and figures indicate that it is the most performed type of surgery in the UK. The National Health Service (NHS), which provides free of charge care in the UK, is under huge financial pressure due to budget austerity in the last decade. As the number of people affected by the disease is expected to grow significantly in coming years, the aim of this study is to evaluate whether the introduction of new processes and medical technologies will enable cataract services to cope with the demand within the NHS funding constraints. METHODS: We developed a Discrete Event Simulation model representing the cataract services pathways at Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital. The model was inputted with data from national and local sources as well as from a surgery demand forecasting model developed in the study. The model was verified and validated with the participation of the cataract services clinical and management teams. RESULTS: Four scenarios involving increased number of surgeries per half-day surgery theatre slot were simulated. Results indicate that the total number of surgeries per year could be increased by 40% at no extra cost. However, the rate of improvement decreases for increased number of surgeries per half-day surgery theatre slot due to a higher number of cancelled surgeries. Productivity is expected to improve as the total number of doctors and nurses hours will increase by 5 and 12% respectively. However, non-human resources such as pre-surgery rooms and post-surgery recovery chairs are under-utilized across all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: Using new processes and medical technologies for cataract surgery is a promising way to deal with the expected higher demand especially as this could be achieved with limited impact on costs. Non-human resources capacity need to be evenly levelled across the surgery pathway to improve their utilisation. The performance of cataract services could be improved by better communication with and proactive management of patients.


Asunto(s)
Extracción de Catarata/estadística & datos numéricos , Catarata/economía , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Presupuestos , Extracción de Catarata/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Predicción , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Reino Unido
9.
Ann Ig ; 30(3): 191-199, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29670988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic Therapeutic Pathways (DTPs) are multidisciplinary plans designed by each healthcare organization for a specific category of patients to reduce the variability of professional behaviors and to ensure greater safety and better overall healthcare outcomes. Hip fractures are a frequent traumatic injury, particularly in the elderly, and DTPs recommend early surgical intervention, often not done due to organizational challenges and bureaucracy. Medical conditions suggesting a delay are not frequent, however long waiting times not only increase the risk of complications and mortality, but also increase the number of diagnostic test and physician consultations. This study tried to understand the benefits of performing surgical intervention within 48 hours in terms of cost savings, reduction of complications and better overall outcomes. We performed statistical analyses on data gathered from 130 patients submitted to DTPs, and we evaluated the benefits obtained by operating within 48 hours in terms of resource saving (number of physician consultations, hospitalization days, etc.), reduction in complications reported in the literature. METHODS: About 40% of clinical records of femoral fractures from 2015 at the Cosenza General Hospital were used in our statistical analysis taking into account independent variables such as age, sex,surgery waiting times and ASA (e.g. American Society of Anesthesiologists) score. Additionally, dependent variables such as: the type of complications during the hospital stay (e.g. infections, delirium, etc), days of hospitalization, and number of physician consultations were considered. RESULTS: The average waiting time for surgical intervention was 5.48 days (132 hr). Patients with ASA score of 4 had a greater chance of complications (p-value 0.03), whereas patients operated within 48 hours avoided complications, and spent fewer days in the hospital. The ASA score value correlated positively with the number of physician consultation, as the ASA score increased in number, so did the number of physician consultations. Moreover, each additional day of waiting increased the possibility of physician consultation by approximately 13. CONCLUSION: The lack of available hospital beds and staff shortages are the main reasons for the delay in performing surgery, this situation does not allow an efficient treatment and timely release of patients from the healthcare system. Therefore, there is an important need to implement standardized orthopedic and geriatric pathways (DTPs), inspired by the collaboration between healthcare system management, orthopedic and geriatric specialists, and physical therapists, to drive shorter days of hospitalization and better overall patient health outcome by performing surgery as soon as possible.


Asunto(s)
Vías Clínicas , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/economía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo , Vías Clínicas/economía , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/economía , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/economía , Hospitales Generales/economía , Hospitales Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento
10.
Pediatrics ; 141(3)2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29467276

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Seattle Children's Hospital sought to optimize the value equation for neonatal jaundice patients by creating a standard care pathway. METHODS: An evidence-based pathway for management of neonatal jaundice was created. This included multidisciplinary team assembly, comprehensive literature review, creation of a treatment algorithm and computer order sets, formulation of goals and metrics, roll-out of an education program for end users, and ongoing pathway improvement. The pathway was implemented on May 31, 2012. Quality metrics before and after implementation were compared. External data were used to analyze cost impacts. RESULTS: Significant improvements were achieved across multiple quality dimensions. Time to recovery decreased: mean length of stay was 1.30 days for 117 prepathway patients compared with 0.87 days for 69 postpathway patients (P < .001). Efficiency was enhanced: mean time to phototherapy initiation was 101.26 minutes for 14 prepathway patients compared with 54.67 minutes for 67 postpathway patients (P = .03). Care was less invasive: intravenous fluid orders were reduced from 80% to 44% (P < .001). Inpatient use was reduced: 66% of prepathway patients were admitted from the emergency department to inpatient care, compared with 50% of postpathway patients (P = .01). There was no increase in the readmission rate. These achievements translated to statistically significant cost reductions in total charges, as well as in the following categories: intravenous fluids, laboratory, room cost, and emergency department charges. CONCLUSIONS: An evidence-based standard care pathway for neonatal jaundice can significantly improve multiple dimensions of value, including reductions in cost and length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/normas , Ictericia Neonatal/terapia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Fluidoterapia , Precios de Hospital , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/normas , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Tiempo de Internación , Readmisión del Paciente , Fototerapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Washingtón
11.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(5): 826-831, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188036

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: An accelerated clinical care pathway for solid organ abdominal injuries was implemented at a level one pediatric trauma center. The impact on resource utilization and demonstration of protocol safety was assessed. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively on patients admitted with blunt abdominal solid organ injuries from 2012 to 2015. Patients were subdivided into pre- and post-protocol groups. Length of hospital stay (LOS) and failure of non-operative treatment were the primary outcomes of interest. RESULTS: 138 patients with solid organ injury were studied: 73 pre- (2012-2014) and 65 post-protocol (2014-2015). There were no significant differences in age, gender, injury severity score (ISS), injury grade, or mechanism (p>0.05). LOS was shorter post-protocol (mean 5.6 vs. 3.4days; median 5 .0 vs. 3.0days; p=0.0002), resulting in average savings of $5966 per patient. Patients in the protocol group mobilized faster (p<0.0001) and experienced fewer blood draws (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis, protocol group (p<0.001) and ISS (p<0.001) were independently associated with LOS. There were no differences between groups in the need for operation, embolization, or transfusion. CONCLUSION: An accelerated care pathway is safe and effective in the management of pediatric solid organ injuries with early mobilization, less blood draws, and decreased LOS without significant morbidity and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, cost effectiveness, level III.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales/terapia , Vías Clínicas , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/economía , Adolescente , Alberta , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/estadística & datos numéricos , Vías Clínicas/economía , Femenino , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Seguridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/economía
12.
Osteoporos Int ; 28(3): 791-798, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27888286

RESUMEN

After the implementation of the multidisciplinary geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway in 2007, the hospital length of stay and the clinical outcomes improves. Moreover, the cost of manpower for each hip fracture decreases. It proves that this care model is cost-effective. INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and the cost of manpower before and after the implementation of the multidisciplinary geriatric hip fracture clinical pathway (GHFCP). METHODS: The hip fracture data from 2006 was compared with the data of four consecutive years since 2008. The efficiency of the program is assessed using the hospital length of stay. The clinical outcomes include mortality rates and complication rates are compared. Cost of manpower was also analysed. RESULTS: After the implementation of the GHFCP, the preoperative length of stay shortened significantly from 5.8 days in 2006 to 1.3 days in 2011. The total length of stay in both acute and rehabilitation hospitals were also shortened by 6.1 days and 14.2 days, respectively. The postoperative pneumonia rate also decreased from 1.25 to 0.25%. The short- and long-term mortalities also showed a general improvement. Despite allied health manpower was increased to meet the increased workload, the shortened length of stay accounted for a mark decrease in cost of manpower per hip fracture case. CONCLUSION: This study proves that the GHFCP shortened the geriatric hip fracture patients' length of stay and improves the clinical outcomes. It is also cost-effective which proves better care is less costly.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/cirugía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vías Clínicas/economía , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/economía , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Hong Kong/epidemiología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Modelos Organizacionales , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/economía , Fracturas Osteoporóticas/mortalidad , Personal de Hospital/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Dig Liver Dis ; 48(10): 1200-7, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27474199

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The advent of new HCV drugs has generated widespread economic concerns, particularly within the Italian setting, characterized by continuous linear cuts and spending review actions. The overall trade-off between investments and savings needs an in depth analysis. AIMS: The study aimed to estimate the budget impact of the introduction of the novel drugs approved during the year 2015, compared with the historical situation based on the different treatment options available prior to 2015. METHODS: A three-year budget impact model was developed, taking into consideration the Lombardy Region (Northern Italy) Health Service perspective. The degree of liver fibrosis, genotypes, presence of only HCV or HIV/HCV co-infections, presence or absence of sustained virological response, and direct healthcare total costs were the variables of the model. RESULTS: With the introduction of the novel regimens, a higher number of HCV patients achieved a sustained virological response (+20%). Further analysis showed that an investment in innovative technologies would have given the Regional System significant economic savings within the 36-month period (-6.64%/-7.15%). CONCLUSIONS: Treating HCV-infected persons in the Lombardy Region with the new drugs would reduce healthcare expenditure on this specific disease, in each forecast implemented, thus reducing the economic burden of the pathology.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Vías Clínicas/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Humanos , Italia
15.
Gastroenterology ; 150(4): 1009-18, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26907603
16.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 21(5): 373-9, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26388274

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment option and timing for surgery in case of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is still a matter of discussion. Tokyo Guidelines (TG13) offers some rules but they don't reflect entirely the information of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). This study aimed to draw some consideration from our practice in the application of the guidelines and put forward the clinical, economic and organizational effect of it. METHODS: The study is a single center retrospective study based on administrative database formed by gathering information from clinical registry. Data were collected between January 1st, 2008 and April 30th, 2013. A cutoff point was established on May 15th, 2010 when we moved from a single surgeon method to a shared EBM method to treat ACC. The economic aspect was developed considering health service reimburse and hospital costs. RESULTS: Five hundred and two patients were selected, 203 patients before the organizational change (Group 0) and 299 after (Group 1). In Group 0, 24.63% of the patients were treated with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) and 39.4% received surgery delayed in second admission (DLC). After the change, 57.5% of the patients were treated with ELC while 13% were treated with DLC. Median length of stay (LOS) was significantly lower after the change (9.5 vs. 7.3, p<0.0001), and no difference in terms of complication was noticed. CONCLUSION: Application of evidence based medicine in clinical practice resulted in better results. Economically, the clinical change resulted in a proper use of resources with a positive gap between the costs and refund to the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/economía , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vías Clínicas/economía , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Colecistitis Aguda/economía , Colecistitis Aguda/patología , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Italia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Rofo ; 187(11): 990-7, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26230139

RESUMEN

Caused by legal reform initiatives there is a continuous need to increase effectiveness and efficiency in hospitals and surgeries, and thus to improve processes.Consequently the successful management of radiological departments and surgeries requires suitable structures and optimization processes to make optimization in the fields of medical quality, service quality and efficiency possible.In future in the DRG System it is necessary that the organisation of processes must focus on the whole clinical treatment of the patients (Clinical Pathways). Therefore the functions of controlling must be more established and adjusted. On the basis of select Controlling instruments like budgeting, performance indicators, process optimization, staff controlling and benchmarking the target-based and efficient control of radiological surgeries and departments is shown.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/legislación & jurisprudencia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/organización & administración , Vías Clínicas/economía , Vías Clínicas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/legislación & jurisprudencia , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/organización & administración , Eficiencia Organizacional/economía , Eficiencia Organizacional/legislación & jurisprudencia , Alemania , Humanos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administración , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia
19.
Zentralbl Chir ; 140(1): 18-26, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25525949

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This overview comments on the health-care relevance of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). We evaluated different treatment modalities in terms of cost-effectiveness. METHOD: For the literature review, the Medline database (PubMed) was searched under the key words "critical limb ischemia AND cost", "critical limb ischemia AND economy", "peripheral arterial disease AND cost", "peripheral arterial disease AND economy". RESULTS: In the years 2005 to 2009, the hospitalisations of patients with PAOD rose disproportionately in Germany by 20 %, to 483,961 hospital admissions. By comparison, hospital admissions altogether increased by only 8 %. The average in-patient costs were estimated to be approximately € 5000 per PAOD-patient - a rather conservative estimate. For the patient with IC the economic data position is clear, supervised exercise training is by far the most cost-effective treatment option, followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and finally the peripheral bypass. In accordance with the guidelines of the UK, the latter is therefore indicated only if PTA fails or is technically not possible. In patients with CLI, the situation is not obvious. Indeed, a short-term economic advantage can be calculated for the PTA, the long-term comparison of both methods, however, is impossible due to insufficient data. In addition, the risk factors for the patient have to be included in the calculation. This was indeed demonstrated in the short-term, but could not be analysed in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: The issue of greater cost-effectiveness of open or endovascular treatment in patients with CLI is uncertain, the studies and patient populations are too heterogeneous. Further studies are urgently needed to structure the sequence of the various treatment options in guidelines and clinical pathways.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/economía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/economía , Angioplastia/economía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/epidemiología , Arterias/cirugía , Vías Clínicas/economía , Comparación Transcultural , Estudios Transversales , Terapia por Ejercicio/economía , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/economía , Claudicación Intermitente/epidemiología , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/economía , Isquemia/epidemiología , Isquemia/terapia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA