Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Immunol ; 11: 615240, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33679703

RESUMEN

Although the discovery and characterization of multiple tumor antigens have sparked the development of many antigen/derived cancer vaccines, many are poorly immunogenic and thus, lack clinical efficacy. Adjuvants are therefore incorporated into vaccine formulations to trigger strong and long-lasting immune responses. Adjuvants have generally been classified into two categories: those that 'depot' antigens (e.g. mineral salts such as aluminum hydroxide, emulsions, liposomes) and those that act as immunostimulants (Toll Like Receptor agonists, saponins, cytokines). In addition, several novel technologies using vector-based delivery of antigens have been used. Unfortunately, the immune system declines with age, a phenomenon known as immunosenescence, and this is characterized by functional changes in both innate and adaptive cellular immunity systems as well as in lymph node architecture. While many of the immune functions decline over time, others paradoxically increase. Indeed, aging is known to be associated with a low level of chronic inflammation-inflamm-aging. Given that the median age of cancer diagnosis is 66 years and that immunotherapeutic interventions such as cancer vaccines are currently given in combination with or after other forms of treatments which themselves have immune-modulating potential such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the choice of adjuvants requires careful consideration in order to achieve the maximum immune response in a compromised environment. In addition, more clinical trials need to be performed to carefully assess how less conventional form of immune adjuvants, such as exercise, diet and psychological care which have all be shown to influence immune responses can be incorporated to improve the efficacy of cancer vaccines. In this review, adjuvants will be discussed with respect to the above-mentioned important elements.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia Activa/métodos , Neoplasias/terapia , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/clasificación , Factores de Edad , Compuestos de Alumbre/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Citocinas/administración & dosificación , Citocinas/inmunología , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Emulsiones , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/inmunología , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Estilo de Vida , Liposomas/administración & dosificación , Depleción Linfocítica , Proteínas de la Membrana/administración & dosificación , Proteínas de la Membrana/inmunología , Nanopartículas/administración & dosificación , Radioterapia , Saponinas/administración & dosificación , Saponinas/inmunología , Receptores Toll-Like/agonistas , Receptores Toll-Like/inmunología , Potencia de la Vacuna , Virosomas/administración & dosificación
2.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(4): 1144-1149, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30991121

RESUMEN

Nanotechnology is an emerging branch of science that involves the engineering of functional systems on the nanoscale (1-100 nm). Nanotechnology has been used in biomedical and therapeutic agents with the aim of providing novel treatment solutions where small molecule size may be beneficial for modulation of biologic function. Recent investigation in nanomedicine has become increasingly important to cutaneous pathophysiology, such as functional designs directed towards skin cancers and wound healing. This review outlines the application of nanoparticles relevant to dermatologic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Portadores de Fármacos/uso terapéutico , Nanopartículas/uso terapéutico , Quitosano/administración & dosificación , Quitosano/uso terapéutico , Dendrímeros/administración & dosificación , Dendrímeros/uso terapéutico , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Fulerenos/administración & dosificación , Fulerenos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Liposomas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Óxido Nítrico/administración & dosificación , Óxido Nítrico/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Adhesivos Tisulares/administración & dosificación , Virosomas/administración & dosificación , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
3.
Artículo en Ruso | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19338232

RESUMEN

New Russian virosomal split vaccine against influenza "Grifor" was developed. The vaccine is represented by mix of highly purified protective external and internal antigens of influenza A (H1N1 and H3N2) and B viruses. Developed technology of manufacture allowed to provide presentation of external antigens of influenza virus in the form of virosomes, and presentation of internal antigens in the form of micelles with maximal preservation of their antigenic activity. Using electron microscopy, electrophoresis in 10% polyacrilamide gel with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and polymerase chain reaction, morphologic and biochemical properties of the vaccine were studied. Preclinical study, including assessment of antigenic characteristics of "Grifor" vaccine compared to vaccine "Vaxigrip" (France), was performed. It was established that administration of the vaccine did not result in death of experimental animals, decrease of body mass, development of pathologic (including inflammatory, dystrophic and necrobiotic) changes in viscera or render adverse effects on blood hematologic and biochemical parameters and on the immune system. The vaccine was not pyrogenic and allergenic, did not have local irritating effects. Obtained results supported the appropriateness of conducting the clinical trials of "Grifor" vaccine on limited number of volunteers.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Subtipo H3N2 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Virus de la Influenza B/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Animales , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Cobayas , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Esquemas de Inmunización , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Micelas , Conejos , Vacunación , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Virosomas/administración & dosificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA