Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ital J Dermatol Venerol ; 156(3): 366-373, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33913665

RESUMEN

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has become pandemic on March 11th, 2020. COVID-19 has a range of symptoms that includes fever, fatigue, dry cough, aches, and labored breathing to acute respiratory distress and possibly death. Health systems and hospitals have been completely rearranged since March 2020 in order to limit the high rate of virus spreading. Hence, a great debate on deferrable visits and treatments including phototherapy for skin diseases is developing. In particular, as regards phototherapy very few data are currently available regarding the chance to continue it, even if it may be a useful resource for treating numerous dermatological patients. However, phototherapy has an immunosuppressive action possibly facilitating virus infection. In the context of COVID-19 infection risk it is important to pointed out whether sunlight, phototherapy and in particular ultraviolet radiation (UV-R) constitute or not a risk for patients. In this review we aimed to focus on the relationship between UV-R, sunlight, phototherapy, and viral infections particularly focusing on COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/efectos de la radiación , Luz Solar , Rayos Ultravioleta , Vitamina D/fisiología , Inmunidad Adaptativa/efectos de la radiación , Animales , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/biosíntesis , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/fisiología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata/efectos de la radiación , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Interleucina-6/sangre , Moléculas de Patrón Molecular Asociado a Patógenos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Enfermedades de la Piel/radioterapia , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Receptores Toll-Like/fisiología , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Terapia Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Virus/efectos de la radiación , Vitamina D/biosíntesis , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Catelicidinas
2.
Photochem Photobiol Sci ; 18(11): 2565-2612, 2019 Nov 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31397467

RESUMEN

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-established treatment option in the treatment of certain cancerous and pre-cancerous lesions. Though best-known for its application in tumor therapy, historically the photodynamic effect was first demonstrated against bacteria at the beginning of the 20th century. Today, in light of spreading antibiotic resistance and the rise of new infections, this photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of microbes, such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses, is gaining considerable attention. This review focuses on the PDI of viruses as an alternative treatment in antiviral therapy, but also as a means of viral decontamination, covering mainly the literature of the last decade. The PDI of viruses shares the general action mechanism of photodynamic applications: the irradiation of a dye with light and the subsequent generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which are the effective phototoxic agents damaging virus targets by reacting with viral nucleic acids, lipids and proteins. Interestingly, a light-independent antiviral activity has also been found for some of these dyes. This review covers the compound classes employed in the PDI of viruses and their various areas of use. In the medical area, currently two fields stand out in which the PDI of viruses has found broader application: the purification of blood products and the treatment of human papilloma virus manifestations. However, the PDI of viruses has also found interest in such diverse areas as water and surface decontamination, and biosafety.


Asunto(s)
Luz , Fotoquimioterapia/tendencias , Virosis/terapia , Virus/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Papillomaviridae/efectos de los fármacos , Papillomaviridae/efectos de la radiación , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/química , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/farmacología , Fármacos Fotosensibilizantes/uso terapéutico , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Virosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Virosis/metabolismo , Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Virus/metabolismo
3.
Microb Pathog ; 123: 144-148, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29981853

RESUMEN

High intensity ultrasound is becoming important and more widely used in the food industry for microorganisms decontamination. This sterilization technique has been evaluated to improve food safety and to replace common processing with chemical additive compounds. The efficiency of a horn-type power ultrasound treatment (300 W and 600 W, 28 kHz, 10-30 min) on Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium bacteria suspensions and phytoviruses was examined in this study. The results of this study showed that ultrasonic treatment can be used to eliminate vegetative cells of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria from 1.59 to 3.4 log in bacterial suspensions and some phytoviruses in fruits.


Asunto(s)
Bacterias/efectos de la radiación , Irradiación de Alimentos/métodos , Microbiología de Alimentos , Conservación de Alimentos/métodos , Ultrasonido/métodos , Virus/efectos de la radiación , Bacillus cereus/crecimiento & desarrollo , Bacillus cereus/efectos de la radiación , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Escherichia coli/crecimiento & desarrollo , Escherichia coli/efectos de la radiación , Contaminación de Alimentos/prevención & control , Industria de Alimentos , Inocuidad de los Alimentos , Frutas/virología , Listeria monocytogenes/crecimiento & desarrollo , Listeria monocytogenes/efectos de la radiación , Viabilidad Microbiana/efectos de la radiación , Salmonella typhimurium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Salmonella typhimurium/efectos de la radiación , Ultrasonido/instrumentación , Virus/crecimiento & desarrollo
4.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 166(2): 201-6, 2013 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23973828

RESUMEN

With increasing outbreaks of gastroenteritis associated with produce, it is important to assess interventions to reduce the risk of illness. UV, ozone and high pressure are non-thermal processing technologies that have potential to inactivate human pathogens on produce and allow the retention of fresh-like organoleptic properties. The objective of this study was to determine if UV, ozone, and high pressure are effective technologies compared to traditional chlorine spray on green onions to reduce enteric viral pathogens and to determine the effect of location of the virus (surface or internalized) on the efficacy of these processes. Mature green onion plants were inoculated with murine norovirus (MNV), hepatitis A virus (HAV) and human adenovirus type 41 (Ad41) either on the surface through spot inoculation or through inoculating contaminated hydroponic solution allowing for uptake of the virus into the internal tissues. Inoculated green onions were treated with UV (240 mJ s/cm(2)), ozone (6.25 ppm for 10 min), pressure (500 MPa, for 5 min at 20°C), or sprayed with calcium hypochlorite (150 ppm, 4°C). Viral inactivation was determined by comparing treated and untreated inoculated plants using cell culture infectivity assays. Processing treatments were observed to greatly affect viral inactivation. Viral inactivation for all three viruses was greatest after pressure treatment and the lowest inactivation was observed after chlorine and UV treatment. Both surface inoculated viruses and viruses internalized in green onions were inactivated to some extent by these post-harvest processing treatments. These results suggest that ozone and high pressure processes aimed to reduce the level of microbial contamination of produce have the ability to inactivate viruses if they become localized in the interior portions of produce.


Asunto(s)
Descontaminación/métodos , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Microbiología de Alimentos/métodos , Cebollas/virología , Inactivación de Virus , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de los Virus , Animales , Compuestos de Calcio/farmacología , Línea Celular , Cloro/farmacología , Descontaminación/normas , Ratones , Ozono/farmacología , Presión , Rayos Ultravioleta , Internalización del Virus , Virus/efectos de los fármacos , Virus/efectos de la radiación
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 37(1): 20-7, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18834748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surface-mediated infectious disease transmission is a major concern in various settings, including schools, hospitals, and food-processing facilities. Chemical disinfectants are frequently used to reduce contamination, but many pose significant risks to humans, surfaces, and the environment, and all must be properly applied in strict accordance with label instructions to be effective. This study set out to determine the capability of a novel chemical-free, saturated steam vapor disinfection system to kill microorganisms, reduce surface-mediated infection risks, and serve as an alternative to chemical disinfectants. METHODS: High concentrations of Escherichia coli, Shigella flexneri, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Salmonella enterica, methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, MS2 coliphage (used as a surrogate for nonenveloped viruses including norovirus), Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, and the endospores of Clostridium difficile were dried individually onto porous clay test surfaces. Surfaces were treated with the saturated steam vapor disinfection system for brief periods and then numbers of surviving microorganisms were determined. Infection risks were calculated from the kill-time data using microbial dose-response relationships published in the scientific literature, accounting for surface-to-hand and hand-to-mouth transfer efficiencies. RESULTS: A diverse assortment of pathogenic microorganisms was rapidly killed by the steam disinfection system; all of the pathogens tested were completely inactivated within 5 seconds. Risks of infection from the contaminated surfaces decreased rapidly with increasing periods of treatment by the saturated steam vapor disinfection system. CONCLUSIONS: The saturated steam vapor disinfection system tested for this study is chemical-free, broadly active, rapidly efficacious, and therefore represents a novel alternative to liquid chemical disinfectants.


Asunto(s)
Desinfección/métodos , Microbiología Ambiental , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Viabilidad Microbiana , Vapor , Bacterias/efectos de la radiación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Hongos/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Virus/efectos de la radiación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA