Phase II mixed methods' feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial of a novel community-based enhanced care intervention to improve person-centred outcomes for people living with HIV in Ghana.

Person-centred care (PCC) for people living with HIV (PLWH) is a global goal for WHO and the UNAIDS strategy. We aimed to develop a novel person-centred intervention for community providers, test the feasibility of participant recruitment and retention, intervention delivery and to establish acceptability. Findings from qualitative interviews with PLWH and healthcare professionals were mapped onto a PCC theory in an expert intervention development workshop. A parallel feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) was conducted. We randomly assigned clusters (1:1) either to intervention or to standard care. The primary outcome was trial recruitment and retention. We screened 83 PLWH, enrolled 60 with 30 allocated to each arm. Recruitment and retention rates were 87% and 97%, respectively. Potential effect size achieved at final timepoint: a measure of person-centred outcomes [0.7 (95% CI 0.17-1.23) p < 0.001]; MOSHIV [0.7 (95% CI 0.17-1.23) p < 0.001]; Patient Experience Questionnaire [0.8 (95% CI 0.27-1.31) p < 0.001]; CARE Measure [1.0 (95% CI 0.45-1.55) p < 0.001], POSITIVE OUTCOMES [0.7 (95% CI 0.17-1.23) p < 0.001]. Post-trial interviews revealed general acceptability of the intervention. The results confirm the feasibility and justify a definitive cRCT of the enhanced care intervention to improve person-centred outcomes for PLWH.Trial registration number ISRCTN13630241.

How can we achieve person-centred care for people living with HIV/AIDS? A qualitative interview study with healthcare professionals and patients in Ghana.

Although person-centred care (PCC) has been identified as a means to achieve the 90-90-90 targets, limited research has considered PCC in low- or middle-income settings. We aimed to explore what constitutes PCC from the perspectives of PLWHA and healthcare professionals (HCP) in Ghana. We conducted 39 semi-structured qualitative interviews with PLWHA and HCP in two community clinics in Ghana, West Africa. Interviews were analysed deductively using thematic analysis, and sampling continued until thematic saturation was achieved. Twenty-four PLWHA (median age 42.5, 50% female) and 15 HCP (median age 34, 53% female) were interviewed. Three interconnected themes emerged across PLWHA and HCP: (1) care structures not built around the person, (2) priority outcomes and components of PCC and (3) re-engineering HIV care to be more person-centred. A conceptual model showing the overlap between PLWHA and HCP's perspectives of PCC and a framework to inform PCC delivery have been developed from these findings. Our data revealed that PLWHA want PCC to improve care outcomes, well-being and quality of life. Further testing of this model is required to inform PCC delivery for PLWHA in low- and middle-income countries.

Effectiveness of depression interventions for people living with HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review & meta-analysis of psychological & immunological outcomes.

This meta-analytic review evaluated the effectiveness of depression interventions on the psychological and immunological outcomes of people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. 14 studies, yielding 932 participants were eligible. A random-effects models indicated that depression interventions were followed by large reductions in depression scores (effect size = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.71, 2.01, p < 0.01). No significant effect on immune outcome was observed, however there was a trend toward immune improvement of medium effect size (effect size on CD4 count and/or viral suppression = 0.57, 95% CI = -0.06, 1.20, p = 0.08). Pharmacological interventions appeared to have a significantly larger improvement in depression scores than psychological interventions. The greatest improvement in immune status was demonstrated in psychological treatments which incorporated a component to enhance HIV medication adherence, however these results did not reach significance. Small sample sizes and highly heterogeneous analysis necessitate caution in interpretation. The results of this meta-analysis should thus be treated as preliminary evidence and used to encourage further studies of immunopsychiatry in HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.