Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(2): e13510, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33217119

RESUMO

Infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an emerging threat in both solid organ and stem cell transplant recipients. Invasive CPE infections in transplant recipients are associated with a high mortality, often due to limited therapeutic options and antibacterial toxicities. One of the most therapeutically challenging group of CPE are the metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Gram-negative bacteria, which are now found worldwide, and often need treatment with older, highly toxic antimicrobial regimens. Newer ß-lactamase inhibitors such as avibactam have well-established activity against certain carbapenemases such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), but have no activity against MBL-producing organisms. Conversely, aztreonam has activity against MBL-producing organisms but is often inactivated by other co-existing ß-lactamases. Here, we report four cases of invasive MBL-CPE infections in transplant recipients caused by IMP-4-producing Enterobacter cloacae who were successfully treated with a new, mechanism-driven antimicrobial combination of ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam. This novel antimicrobial combination offers a useful treatment option for high-risk patients with CPE infection, with reduced drug interactions and toxicity.


Assuntos
Compostos Azabicíclicos , Aztreonam , Ceftazidima , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Aztreonam/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias , beta-Lactamases , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Enterobacter cloacae , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Transplantados
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32253214

RESUMO

There are limited treatment options for enterococcal urinary tract infections, especially vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE). Oral fosfomycin is a potential option, although limited data are available guiding dosing and susceptibility. We undertook pharmacodynamic profiling of fosfomycin against E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates using a dynamic in vitro bladder infection model. Eighty-four isolates underwent fosfomycin agar dilution susceptibility testing (E. faecalis MIC50/90 32/64 µg/ml; E. faecium MIC50/90 64/128 µg/ml). Sixteen isolates (including E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and E. faecium ATCC 35667) were chosen to reflect the MIC range and tested in the bladder infection model with synthetic human urine (SHU). Under drug-free conditions, E. faecium demonstrated greater growth restriction in SHU compared to E. faecalis (E. faecium maximal growth 5.8 ± 0.6 log10 CFU/ml; E. faecalis 8.0 ± 1.0 log10 CFU/ml). Isolates were exposed to high and low fosfomycin urinary concentrations after a single dose, and after two doses given over two days with low urinary concentration exposure. Simulated concentrations closely matched the target (bias 2.3%). E. faecalis isolates required greater fosfomycin exposure for 3 log10 kill from the starting inoculum compared with E. faecium The ƒAUC0-72/MIC and ƒ%T > MIC0-72 for E. faecalis were 672 and 70%, compared to 216 and 51% for E. faecium, respectively. There was no rise in fosfomycin MIC postexposure. Two doses of fosfomycin with low urinary concentrations resulted in equivalent growth inhibition to a single dose with high urinary concentrations. With this urinary exposure, fosfomycin was effective in promoting suppression of regrowth (>3 log10 kill) in the majority of isolates.


Assuntos
Enterococcus faecium , Fosfomicina , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Infecções Urinárias , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Enterococcus , Enterococcus faecalis , Fosfomicina/farmacologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico
3.
J Microbiol Methods ; 171: 105861, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035114

RESUMO

The impact of the bladder environment on fosfomycin activity and treatment response is uncertain. Standard laboratory media does not reflect the biomatrix of urine, where limited nutritional factors are important for growth and antimicrobial kill rates. We compared fosfomycin activity against Enterobacteriaceae in laboratory media, human urine and synthetic alternatives. Sixteen clinical isolates (8-Escherichia coli, 4-Enterobacter cloacae, 4-Klebsiella pneumoniae) were studied with broth microdilution (BMD) susceptibility, static time-kill assays and dynamic testing in a bladder infection model simulating a 3 g oral fosfomycin dose. Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) with and without 25 mg/L glucose-6-phosphate (G6P), pooled midstream urine (MSU), pooled 24 h urine collection (24 U), artificial urine medium (AUM) and synthetic human urine (SHU) were compared. BMD susceptibility, bacterial growth and response to static fosfomycin concentrations in urine were best matched with SHU and were distinctly different when tested in MHB with G6P. Fosfomycin exposure in the bladder infection model was accurately reproduced (bias 4.7 ± 6.2%). Under all media conditions, 8 isolates (2-E. coli, 2-E. cloacae, 4-K. pneumoniae) re-grew and 4 isolates (4-E. coli) were killed. The remaining isolates (2-E. coli, 2-E. cloacae) re-grew variably in urine and synthetic media. Agar dilution MIC failed to predict re-growth, whereas BMD MIC in media without G6P performed better. Emergence of resistance was restricted in synthetic media. Overall, SHU provided the best substitute for urine for in vitro modelling of antimicrobial treatment of uropathogens, and these data have broader utility for improved preclinical testing of antimicrobials for urinary tract infections.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Enterobacter cloacae/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Fosfomicina/farmacocinética , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/urina , Meios de Cultura/química , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/fisiologia , Enterobacter cloacae/isolamento & purificação , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Fosfomicina/farmacologia , Fosfomicina/urina , Humanos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Bexiga Urinária/microbiologia , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Urina/microbiologia
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31907184

RESUMO

Oral fosfomycin trometamol is licensed as a single oral dose for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, with activity against multidrug-resistant uropathogens. The impact of interindividual variability in urinary concentrations on antimicrobial efficacy, and any benefit of giving multiple doses, is uncertain. We therefore performed pharmacodynamic profiling of oral fosfomycin, using a dynamic bladder infection in vitro model, to assess high and low urinary exposures following a single oral dose and three repeat doses given every 72 h, 48 h, and 24 h against 16 clinical isolates with various MICs of fosfomycin (8 Escherichia coli, 4 Enterobacter cloacae, and 4 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates). Baseline fosfomycin high-level-resistant (HLR) subpopulations were detected prior to drug exposure in half of the isolates (2 E. coli, 2 E. cloacae, and 4 K. pneumoniae isolates; proportion, 1 × 10-5 to 5 × 10-4% of the total population). Fosfomycin exposures were accurately reproduced compared to mathematical modeling (linear regression slope, 1.1; R2, 0.99), with a bias of 3.8% ± 5.7%. All 5/5 isolates with MICs of ≤1 µg/ml had no HLR and were killed, whereas 8/11 isolates with higher MICs regrew regardless of exposure to high or low urinary concentrations. A disk diffusion zone of <24 mm was a better predictor for baseline HLR and regrowth. Administering 3 doses with average exposures provided very limited additional kill. These results suggest that baseline heteroresistance is important for treatment response, while increased drug exposure and administering multiple doses may not be better than standard single-dose fosfomycin therapy.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/metabolismo , Fosfomicina/administração & dosagem , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/virologia , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/virologia , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/virologia , Klebsiella pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos , Klebsiella pneumoniae/metabolismo , Klebsiella pneumoniae/patogenicidade , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA