The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature.

CONTEXT: The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3). CONCLUSIONS: Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.

Development and Validation of a Novel Integrated Clinical-Genomic Risk Group Classification for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Purpose It is clinically challenging to integrate genomic-classifier results that report a numeric risk of recurrence into treatment recommendations for localized prostate cancer, which are founded in the framework of risk groups. We aimed to develop a novel clinical-genomic risk grouping system that can readily be incorporated into treatment guidelines for localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods Two multicenter cohorts (n = 991) were used for training and validation of the clinical-genomic risk groups, and two additional cohorts (n = 5,937) were used for reclassification analyses. Competing risks analysis was used to estimate the risk of distant metastasis. Time-dependent c-indices were constructed to compare clinicopathologic risk models with the clinical-genomic risk groups. Results With a median follow-up of 8 years for patients in the training cohort, 10-year distant metastasis rates for National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) low, favorable-intermediate, unfavorable-intermediate, and high-risk were 7.3%, 9.2%, 38.0%, and 39.5%, respectively. In contrast, the three-tier clinical-genomic risk groups had 10-year distant metastasis rates of 3.5%, 29.4%, and 54.6%, for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively, which were consistent in the validation cohort (0%, 25.9%, and 55.2%, respectively). C-indices for the clinical-genomic risk grouping system (0.84; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.93) were improved over NCCN (0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.86) and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.84), and 30% of patients using NCCN low/intermediate/high would be reclassified by the new three-tier system and 67% of patients would be reclassified from NCCN six-tier (very-low- to very-high-risk) by the new six-tier system. Conclusion A commercially available genomic classifier in combination with standard clinicopathologic variables can generate a simple-to-use clinical-genomic risk grouping that more accurately identifies patients at low, intermediate, and high risk for metastasis and can be easily incorporated into current guidelines to better risk-stratify patients.

Variation in Locoregional Prostate Cancer Care and Treatment Trends at Commission on Cancer Designated Facilities: A National Cancer Data Base Analysis 2004 to 2013.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary treatment trends for prostate cancer show increased rates of active surveillance. However, nationwide applicability of these reports is limited. Additionally, the effect of Commission on Cancer facility type on prostate cancer treatment patterns is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2013. Our cohort was stratified on the basis of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classes. Cochran-Armitage tests were used to evaluate temporal trends. Random effects hierarchical logit models were used to assess treatment variation at Commission on Cancer facility and institution level. RESULTS: In 825,707 men, utilization of radiation therapy declined and utilization of radical prostatectomy increased for all prostate cancer risk groups between 2004 and 2013 (P < .0001). Observation for low-risk prostate cancer increased from 16.3% in 2004 to 2005 to 32.0% in 2012 to 2013 (P < .0001). Significant treatment variation was observed on the basis of Commission on Cancer facility type. Across all risk groups, the lowest rates of radical prostatectomy and highest rates of external beam radiation therapy were observed in community cancer programs. The highest rates of observation for low-risk disease were observed in academic centers. Treatment variation according to institution ranged from 14% (95% confidence interval, 0.12-0.15) for androgen deprivation therapy up to 59% (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.73) for cryotherapy. CONCLUSION: The increased utilization of observation in low-risk prostate cancer is an encouraging finding, which appears to be mainly derived by a decrease in radiotherapy utilization in this risk group. Regardless of tumor characteristics, significant variations in treatment modality exist among different facility types and institutions.

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Retzius-sparing (posterior) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may expedite postoperative urinary continence recovery. OBJECTIVE: To compare the short-term (≤3 mo) urinary continence (UC), urinary function (UF), and UF-related bother outcomes of posterior RARP compared with standard anterior approach RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 120 patients aged 40-75 yr with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer (per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) underwent primary RARP at a tertiary care institution. INTERVENTION: Eligible men were randomized to receive either posterior (n=60) or anterior (n=60) RARP. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Primary outcome was UC (defined as 0 pads/one security liner per day) 1 week after catheter removal. Secondary outcomes were short-term (≤3 mo) UC recovery, and UF and UF-related bother scores (measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS] and IPSS quality-of-life scores, respectively) assessed at 1 and 2 wk, and 1 and 3 mo following catheter removal. Continence outcomes were objectively verified using 24-hr pad weights. UC recovery was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression; UF and UF-related bother outcomes were compared using linear generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Perioperative complications, positive surgical margin, and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) represent secondary outcomes reported in the study. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Compared with 48% in the anterior arm, 71% men undergoing posterior RARP were continent 1 wk after catheter removal (p=0.01); corresponding median 24-h pad weights were 25 and 5g (p=0.001). Median time to continence in posterior versus anterior RARP was 2 and 8 d postcatheter removal, respectively (log-rank p=0.02); results were confirmed on multivariable regression analyses. GEE analyses showed that UF-related bother (but not UF) scores were significantly lower in the posterior versus anterior RARP group at 1 wk, 2 wk, and 1 mo on GEE analyses. Incidence of postoperative complications (12% anterior vs 18% posterior) and probability of BCRFS (0.91 vs 0.91) were comparable in the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center randomized study, the Retzius-sparing approach of RARP resulted in earlier recovery of UC and lower UF-related bother compared with standard RARP. These results require long-term validation and reproduction by other centers, as well as studies on men with high-risk localized disease. PATIENT SUMMARY: In our hands, men with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer undergoing Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) had earlier recovery of urinary continence and lower urinary function-related bother than those undergoing standard RARP.

North American Population-Based Validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guideline Recommendation of Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Contemporary Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) if a nomogram predicted risk of lymph node invasion (LNI) is ≥2%. We examined this and other thresholds, including nomogram validation. METHODS: We examined records of 26,713 patients treated with RP and PLND between 2010 and 2013, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Nomogram thresholds of 2-5% were tested and external validation was performed. RESULTS: LNI was recorded in 4.7% of patients. Nomogram accuracy was 80.4% and maintained minimum accuracy of 75.6% in subgroup analyses, according to age, race, and nodal yield >10. With the NCCN recommended 2% nomogram threshold, PLND could be avoided in 22.3% of patients at the expense of missing 3.0% of individuals with LNI. Alternative thresholds of 3%, 4%, and 5% yielded respective PLND avoidance rates of 60.4%, 71.0%, and 79.8% at the expense of missing 17.8%, 27.2%, and 36.6% of patients with LNI. NCCN cut-off recommendation was best satisfied with a threshold of <2.6%, at which PLND could be avoided in 13,234 patients (49.5%) versus missing 141 patients with LNI (11.2%). CONCLUSION: NCCN LNI nomogram remains accurate in contemporary patients. However, the 2% threshold appears to be too strict, since only 22.3% of PLNDs can be avoided, instead of the stipulated 47.7%. The optimal 2.6% threshold allows a higher rate of PLND avoidance (49.5%), at the cost of 11.2% missed instances of LNI, as recommended by NCCN guidelines. PATIENT SUMMARY. External validation in contemporary SEER prostate cancer patients showed that the NCCN nomogram remains accurate for predicting lymph node invasion and seems to be optimal at an alternative 2.6% threshold, with best ratio of avoided pelvic lymph node dissections (49.5%) and missed LNIs (11.2%), as recommended by NCCN guideline. Prostate 77:542-548, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: adherence and accuracy of the recent guidelines.

OBJECTIVES: The 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines recommend pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy. We sought to examine the adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and to test the their accuracy, as well as the accuracy of the most contemporary National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Urological Association, and European Association of Urology guidelines to predict lymph node metastases. METHODS: A total of 33 037 radical prostatectomy patients were identified, between 2004 and 2006. Adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was calculated using three clinically plausible cut-offs: 2, 5 and 10%. The accuracy was tested using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Overall, 63% of patients underwent pelvic lymph node dissection. Of those, 61, 49 and 45% were managed according to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline cut-off of 2, 5 and 10%, respectively. The accuracy of all the examined guidelines ranged from 61% to 71%. The highest accuracy was recorded for the European Association of Urology and the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network cut-off 5% guidelines. The lowest accuracy was recorded for the most contemporary National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the 2004 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was suboptimal. The accuracy of all the examined guidelines ranged from 61% to 71%. None of the examined guidelines can be regarded as an ideal indication for pelvic lymph node dissection.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines 2011: Need for more accurate recommendations for pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The 2011 NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines for prostate cancer recommend pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy in all individuals with a nomogram predicted lymph node invasion probability of 2% or greater. We examined the ability of these guidelines to correctly predict lymph node invasion in patients treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 3,064 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2000 and 2010. We formally validated the NCCN guideline nomogram using discrimination, calibration and decision curve analysis as benchmarks. Moreover the performance characteristics of the 2% nomogram cutoff as well as other cutoff values (range 1% to 10%) were tested. RESULTS: Overall 10.0% of patients had lymph node invasion. The discrimination accuracy of the NCCN guideline nomogram was 79.8%, with a maximum underestimation of the lymph node invasion risk of 41.2%. On decision curve analysis the NCCN nomogram fared better than not performing pelvic lymph node dissection in all patients. However, in the prediction range between 0% and 9% the nomogram did not fare better than performing pelvic lymph node dissection in all patients. The use of the 2% cutoff would allow the avoidance of 49.3% of pelvic lymph node dissections, at the cost of missing 20.3% of patients with lymph node invasion. CONCLUSIONS: The NCCN nomogram tends to significantly underestimate the real lymph node invasion rate. Moreover the use of the currently recommended cutoff of 2% to trigger pelvic lymph node dissection might not be appropriate.

Serum sex steroids depict a nonlinear u-shaped association with high-risk prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the association between preoperative serum total testosterone (tT), 17ß-estradiol (E(2)), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and tT-E(2) ratio values with high-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines) at radical prostatectomy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Serum E(2), tT, and SHBG were dosed the day before surgery (7:00-11:00 am) in a cohort of 724 candidates to radical prostatectomy. Restricted cubic spline functions tested the association between predictors (i.e., model 1: age, body mass index, and serum tT, E(2), and SHBG levels; model 2: tT-E(2) values instead of tT and E(2) levels) and high-risk prostate cancer. RESULTS: Low-, intermediate-, or high-risk prostate cancer was found in 251 (34.7%), 318 (43.9%), and 155 (21.4%) patients, respectively. Patients in the high-risk class showed the lowest tT, E(2), and tT-E(2) ratio values (all P ≤ 0.02). At univariate analysis, only age, tT, E(2), and tT-E(2) ratio values were significantly associated with high-risk prostate cancer (all P ≤ 0.006). At multivariate analyses considering model 1 variables, age (P = 0.03), serum tT (all P < 0.001), and E(2) (all P ≤ 0.01) were associated with high-risk prostate cancer; only tT-E(2) ratios achieved independent predictor status for high-risk prostate cancer (all P < 0.001) when considering model 2. Both the lowest and the highest tT, E(2), and tT-E(2) values depicted a nonlinear U-shaped significant association with high-risk prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These data showed that preoperative serum sex steroids are independent predictors of high-risk prostate cancer, depicting a nonlinear U-shaped association.

Blood transfusions in radical prostatectomy: a contemporary population-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the homologous blood transfusion (HBT), autologous blood transfusion (ABT) and intraoperative blood conservation technique (IOBCT) rates and trends at open (ORP) and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP). METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried. Multivariable logistic regression models focused on all three transfusion types. Covariables consisted of procedure specific annual hospital caseload (AHC), year of surgery, age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and region. RESULTS: Overall, 119,966 patients underwent radical prostatectomy between 1998 and 2007. The HBT, ABT, and IOBCT rates were 6.2%, 6.0%, and 1.2%, respectively. HBT rates ranged from 5.1-5.1% between 1998 and 2007 (P=.49) vs 9.4-2.7% (P<.001) for ABT vs 1.9-0.9% (P=.003) for IOBCT in the same time period, respectively. In multivariable analyses, ORP patients treated at intermediate (odds ratio [OR] 1.48, P=.003) and low (OR 2.73, P<.001) AHC institutions were more likely to receive an HBT than ORP patients treated at high AHC institutions. Conversely, MIRP patients treated at high (OR 0.46, P=.040), intermediate (OR 0.27, P=.001), and low (OR 0.59, P=.015) AHC institutions were less likely to receive an HBT than ORP patients treated at high AHC institutions. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the overall transfusion rate at radical prostatectomy decreased within the last decade because of a substantial decline in ABT use. Moreover, MIRP protects from HBT, even when performed at low AHC Centers.

A population-based assessment of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guideline indications for pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the ability of the threshold recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) in correctly predicting histologically-confirmed lymph node invasion (LNI). The 2010 NCCN practice guidelines for prostate cancer recommend a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) at radical prostatectomy in all individuals with a nomogram predicted LNI risk of ≥2%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed 20,877 patients who were treated with radical prostatectomy and PLND between 2004 and 2006, within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The 2% nomogram threshold, as well as other threshold values (range 1-10%) were tested. Finally, we externally validated the NCCN guideline nomogram. RESULTS: Overall, 2.5% of patients had LNI. The use of the 2% threshold would allow the avoidance of 23% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 1.7% of patients with LNI. Conversely, the use of a 3% threshold would allow the avoidance of 58% of PLNDs, at the cost of missing 15% of patients with LNI vs 72% and 26%, respectively, for the 4% threshold. Overall, the accuracy of the NCCN guideline nomogram quantified according to the receiver-operator characteristics-derived area under the curve was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: In a population-based sample, the NCCN guideline nomogram is highly accurate. However, the 2% threshold will permit the avoidance of only 23% of PLNDs, instead of the 48% intended by the NCCN guidelines. The use of a 3% threshold may allow a lower rate of PLND overtreatment, although it will miss more patients with LNI.

Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT) is a commonly used noninvasive procedure for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. All previous studies addressing the ability of CT scan to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) were based on historical patients treated with limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). OBJECTIVE: Assess the value of CT in predicting LNI in contemporary PCa patients treated with extended PLND (ePLND). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated 1541 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and ePLND between 2003 and 2010 at a single center. All patients were preoperatively staged using abdominopelvic CT scan. All lymph nodes with a short axis diameter ≥ 10 mm were considered suspicious for metastatic involvement. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent preoperative CT scan, radical retropubic prostatectomy, and ePLND, regardless of PCa features at diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: The performance characteristics of CT scan were tested in the overall patient population, as well as according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) classification and according to the risk of LNI derived from a nomogram developed on an ePLND series. Logistic regression models tested the relationship between CT scan findings and LNI. Discrimination accuracy was quantified with the area under the curve. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, a CT scan that suggested LNI was found in 73 patients (4.7%). Of them, only 24 patients (32.8%) had histologically proven LNI at ePLND. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT scan were 13%, 96.0%, and 54.6%, respectively. In patients with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk PCa according to NCCN classification, sensitivity was 8.3%, 96.3%, and 52.3%, respectively; specificity was 3.6%, 97.3%, and 50.5%, respectively; and accuracy was 17.9%, 94.3%, and 56.1%, respectively. Similarly, in patients with a nomogram-derived LNI risk ≥ 50%, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were only 23.9%, 94.7%, and 59.3%, respectively. At multivariable analyses, inclusion of CT scan findings did not improve the accuracy of LNI prediction (81.4% compared with 81.3%; p=0.8). Lack of a central scan review represents the main limitation of our study. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary patients with PCa, the accuracy of CT scan as a preoperative nodal-staging procedure is poor, even in patients with high LNI risk. Therefore, the need for and the extent of PLND should not be based on the results obtained by CT scan.

Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: A formal validation and head-to-head comparison of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) practice guideline lymph node invasion (LNI) nomogram, Partin tables, and D'Amico risk-classification was conducted for prediction of LNI at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: We focused on 20,877 patients treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) between 2004 and 2006 within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The discrimination of the 3 tools in predicting histologically confirmed LNI was quantified using the area under the curve (AUC). Calibration plots were used to graphically depict the performance characteristics of the examined tools. In addition, we relied on decision curve analyses to compare the 3 models directly in a head-to-head fashion. RESULTS: Overall, 2.5% of patients had LNI. The NCCN LNI nomogram (AUC 82%) outperformed the Partin tables (73%) and the D'Amico risk-classification (75%) for prediction of LNI. Calibration plots revealed that all 3 tools overestimated the risk of LNI. Partin tables showed the highest net-benefit for probability threshold range between 1% and 4%. Conversely, the NCCN LNI nomogram showed the highest net-benefit for the remaining threshold probabilities. CONCLUSION: The NCCN LNI nomogram had the highest discrimination accuracy. However, using the decision curve analysis, the Partin tables demonstrated the highest net benefit when a threshold probability of LNI is <4%. In contrast, the NCCN LNI nomogram had the highest net benefit when the threshold probability used to perform PLND is greater than 4%.

The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in the elderly population: implications for interpreting the 2010 National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines for bladder cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: National Comprehensive Cancer Network practice guidelines indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection can be omitted at radical cystectomy in elderly patients. We examined the pelvic lymph node dissection rate in patients 80 years old or older and the impact of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the records of 11,183 patients treated with radical cystectomy in 17 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to test the effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality. RESULTS: Overall pelvic lymph node dissection was omitted in 25% of patients, including 24.2% younger than 80 years and 30.8% 80 years old or older (p <0.001). The 5-year rate of freedom from cancer specific mortality for pelvic lymph node dissection vs no pelvic lymph node dissection was 62.5% vs 59.9% in patients younger than 80 years, and 50.0% vs 46.1% in those 80 years old or older (p = 0.01 and 0.005, respectively). The 5-year rate of freedom from overall mortality for the same categories was 48.8% vs 43.9% and 28.3% vs 24.7% (p <0.001 and 0.01, respectively). On multivariate analysis omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was associated with a 1.3-fold higher cancer specific rate at ages less than 80 and 80 years or greater (each p <0.001). Omitting pelvic lymph node dissection was also associated with a 1.3-fold higher overall mortality rate, including 1.3 at ages less than 80 years and 1.2-fold at ages 80 years or greater (each p ≤0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that pelvic lymph node dissection was more often omitted in patients 80 years old or older than in those younger than 80 years. However, the protective effect of pelvic lymph node dissection on cancer specific and overall mortality was virtually the same in the 2 age categories. Thus, advanced age should not be a limiting factor for performing pelvic lymph node dissection at radical cystectomy.

The role of transrectal saturation biopsy in tumour localization: pathological correlation after retropubic radical prostatectomy and implication for focal ablative therapy.

OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate the accuracy of an initial 24-core prostate biopsy scheme (PBx24) in predicting unilateral prostate cancer (PCa) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Between 2005 and 2008, 203 consecutive patients underwent PBx24 followed by RP for PCa. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the accuracy of unilateral PCa on PBx24 to predict unilateral PCa in RP specimens. • The positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated. Moreover, in patients with unilateral PCa on biopsy, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses tested the relationship between the presence of unilateral PCa in an RP specimen and the variables: age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), total prostate volume, clinical stage, primary Gleason grade, secondary Gleason grade and the number of positive cores. RESULTS: • PCa cores were unilateral in 115 patients (56.7%) on biopsy. Of those, only 26 (22.6%) had unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (AUC, 72.9%; PPV, 22.6%; NPV, 98.8%). In patients with clinically low-risk tumours, only 17 of 63 (27%) had a unilateral PCa on PBx24 and in the RP specimen (AUC, 59.1%; PPV, 27.0%; NPV, 100.0%). • None of the examined variables was an independent predictor of the presence of unilateral PCa in the RP specimen (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: • Initial PBx24 is not sufficiently accurate to be dependable as a method of predicting tumour laterality in RP specimens. Therefore, the use of PBx24 to guide hemi-ablation therapy of PCa may lead to mistreatment in a considerable proportion of patients. • Moreover, none of the routinely available clinical and pathological characteristics appears to improve the ability of unilateral PCa on biopsy to predict unilateral PCa in the RP specimen.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and holmium laser ablation of the prostate: indications and outcome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been proposed as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate and to open prostatectomy for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms because of large benign prostatic enlargement. The aim of this review is to critically analyze currently available evidence-based reports regarding HoLEP, with particular interest in long-term follow-up results. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of holmium laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia was first reported in 1996. HoLEP seems to represent a valid alternative to both transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy, with valid long-term functional results, a low rate of short-term and long-term complications, and very low rates of reintervention. SUMMARY: HoLEP represents a valid alternative to both transurethral resection of the prostate and open prostatectomy for treatment of patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement. The recently published long-term follow-up data demonstrate the durability of functional results. HoLEP can be offered as the size-independent gold standard treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms because of benign prostatic enlargement.