Alternative Medicine and Oncology: Erroneous Biochemical Failure Following Herbal Supplementation in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are routinely surveilled after oncologic intervention in patients with prostate cancer. Occasionally, PSA levels are elevated because of factors unrelated to disease recurrence, such as herbal supplement use. False-positive PSA elevations may confound the clinical picture and subsequent decision-making processes, potentially leading to unnecessary diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. In this case report, a patient with low-risk prostate cancer who was treated with low-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy presented several years after treatment with an erroneously elevated PSA level after taking an herbal supplement. This case highlights the importance of a holistic approach to patient care, whereby tactful assessment of the psychosocial and spiritual aspects of health led to the identification of an uncommon but potentially morbid entity.

Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy versus conventionally fractionated radiation therapy for stage I small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recently revised recommendations for inoperable stage I small cell lung cancer (SCLC), having added stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)/chemotherapy to the historical paradigm of concurrent conventionally-fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT)/chemotherapy. Despite the conformality, convenience, and cost-effectiveness of SABR, the NCCN continues to recommend both CFRT/chemotherapy and SABR/chemotherapy primarily because these approaches have not been comparatively analyzed to date. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically-confirmed T1-2N0M0 SCLC; all patients received chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression ascertained factors associated with SABR/chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival (OS); multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling examined factors associated with OS. Survival was also calculated following propensity matching. RESULTS: Of 2,107 patients, 7.1% underwent SABR/chemotherapy, and 92.9% received CFRT/chemotherapy. The median (interquartile range) dose of SABR was 50 (48-54) Gy in 4 (3-5) fractions, and 55.8 (45-60) Gy in 30 (30-33) fractions for CFRT. Patients receiving SABR/chemotherapy were more often older, had T1 disease, treated at academic/integrated network facilities, and managed in more recent years (p < 0.05 for all). Respective median survival figures were 29.2 versus 31.2 months (p = 0.77), which persisted following propensity matching (25.4 versus 34.3 months, p = 0.85). On multivariable analysis, radiotherapeutic technique was not associated with OS (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: For stage I SCLC, SABR/chemotherapy affords statistically equivalent outcomes to CFRT/chemotherapy. Because randomized studies addressing this uncommon scenario would almost certainly suffer from inadequate accrual, these retrospective data should be strongly considered in efforts to institute SABR/chemotherapy as the preferred option for this population.

Reimbursing dentists for smoking cessation treatment: views from dental insurers.

INTRODUCTION: Screening and delivery of evidence-based interventions by dentists is an effective way to reduce tobacco use. However, dental visits remain an underutilized opportunity for the treatment of tobacco dependence. This is, in part, because the current reimbursement structure does not support expansion of dental providers' role in this arena. The purpose of this study was to interview dental insurers to assess attitudes toward tobacco use treatment in dental practice, pros and cons of offering dental provider reimbursement, and barriers to instituting a tobacco use treatment-related payment policy for dental providers. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 dental insurance company executives. Participants were identified using a targeted sampling method and represented viewpoints from a significant share of companies within the dental insurance industry. RESULTS: All insurers believed that screening and intervention for tobacco use was an appropriate part of routine care during a dental visit. Several indicated a need for more evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness before reimbursement for these services could be actualized. Lack of purchaser demand, questionable returns on investment, and segregation of the medical and dental insurance markets were cited as additional barriers to coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Dissemination of findings on efficacy and additional research on financial returns could help to promote uptake of coverage by insurers. Wider issues of integration between dental and medical care and payment systems must be addressed in order to expand opportunities for preventive services in dental care settings.