Knowledge and Practice of the Referral System under the National Health Insurance Scheme among Medical and Dental Practitioners of A Large-Accredited Facility in Kano, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Studies on healthcare professionals' knowledge about the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) are scarce. Therefore, we assessed the knowledge and practice of the NHIS referral system among Medical and Dental practitioners in a tertiary hospital in Northwest Nigeria. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 242 medical and dental practitioners randomly selected from nine departments for over 6-weeks. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: The respondents' mean age was 35.7±6.0 years; they were predominantly males (64.9%). Their mean overall knowledge score was 58.9±23.0%, with 66.9% of respondents having inadequate overall knowledge of the NHIS referral system. Practice department (Fishers 2 exact, P=0.0019), perceived knowledge of the referral system (ꭓ =8.169, P=0.004), and having been referred as an enrolee (ꭓ2 = 6.358, P=0.012) were associated with overall-knowledge. Obstetrics-and-Gynaecology (odds ratio[OR]=0.29, 95% confident interval [CI] [0.88-0.98]), Dental and-Maxillofacial-Surgery (OR=0.08, 95%CI[0.01-0.98]), and Otorhinolaryngology (OR=0.18, 95%CI[0.04-0.80]) respondents were less likely to have adequate overall-knowledge.Although 56.2%, 50.4%, 20.7%, and 89.7% were enrolees, had received treatment as enrolees, had been referred as enrolees and treated other enrolees, respectively, an unimpressive proportion had sighted a referral letter (64.9%) or authorization code on the letter (25.2%), referred an enrolee from their department previously (51.2%) or used the NHIS referral form to write referrals (38.8%). CONCLUSION: The overall knowledge of the NHIS referral system was inadequate. The practice of the referral system was below expectation. Therefore, training medical and dental practitioners on the NHIS referral system is necessary. Training should target those who are least likely to have adequate overall knowledge.

CONTEXTE: Les études sur les connaissances des professionnels de la santé concernant le Régime d'assurance maladie national (NHIS) sont rares. Nous avons donc évalué les connaissances et la pratique du système de référence du NHIS parmi les médecins et dentistes d'un hôpital tertiaire du Nord-Ouest du Nigeria. MÉTHODES: Cette étude transversale a impliqué 242 médecins et dentistes sélectionnés de manière aléatoire dans neuf départements pendant plus de 6 semaines. Un questionnaire structuré auto-administré a été utilisé pour recueillir des données. Les données ont été analysées à l'aide de statistiques descriptives et inférentielles. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des répondants était de 35,7 ± 6,0 ans ; ils étaient principalement des hommes (64,9 %). Leur score moyen global de connaissances était de 58,9 ± 23,0 %, avec 66,9 % des répondants ayant une connaissance globale insuffisante du système de référence du NHIS. Le département de pratique (test exact de Fisher, P=0,0019), la connaissance perçue du système de référence (ꭓ 2 =8,169, P=0,004) et avoir été référé en tant qu'adhérent (ꭓ 2 = 6,358, P=0,012) étaient associés à la connaissance globale. Les répondants en obstétrique-gynécologie (rapport des cotes [OR]=0,29, intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC] [0,88-0,98]), en chirurgie dentaire et maxillo-faciale (OR=0,08, IC à 95 % [0,01-0,98]), et en oto-rhino-laryngologie (OR=0,18, IC à 95 % [0,04-0,80]) étaient moins susceptibles d'avoir une connaissance globale adéquate. Bien que 56,2 %, 50,4 %, 20,7 % et 89,7 % étaient adhérents, avaient reçu un traitement en tant qu'adhérents, avaient été référés en tant qu'adhérents et avaient traité d'autres adhérents, respectivement, une proportion peu impressionnante avait vu une lettre de référence (64,9 %) ou un code d'autorisation sur la lettre (25,2 %), avait référé un adhérent de leur département précédemment (51,2 %) ou avait utilisé le formulaire de référence du NHIS pour écrire des références (38,8 %). CONCLUSION: La connaissance globale du système de référence du NHIS était insuffisante. La pratique du système de référence était en deçà des attentes. Par conséquent, la formation des médecins et dentistes sur le système de référence du NHIS est nécessaire. La formation devrait cibler ceux qui sont moins susceptibles d'avoir une connaissance globale adéquate. MOTS-CLÉS: Connaissances et Pratiques, Professionnels de la santé, Régime national d'assurance maladie, Nigeria, Renvoi.

Pre-clinical efficacy of African medicinal plants used in the treatment of snakebite envenoming: A systematic review.

The World Health Organization has listed Snakebite Envenoming (SBE) as a priority neglected tropical disease, with a worldwide annual snakebite affecting 5.4 million people and injuring 2.7 million lives. In many parts of rural areas of Africa and Asia, medicinal plants have been used as alternatives to conventional antisnake venom (ASV) due in part to inaccessibility to hospitals. Systemic reviews (SR) of laboratory-based preclinical studies play an essential role in drug discovery. We conducted an SR to evaluate the relationship between interventional medicinal plants and their observed effects on venom-induced experiments. This SR was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The Modified collaborative approach to meta-analysis and review of animal data from experimental studies (CAMARADES) and SYRCLE's risk of bias tools were used to appraise the included studies. Data were searched online in Medline via PubMed, Embase via OVID, and Scopus. Studies reporting in vivo and in vitro pharmacological activities of African medicinal plants/extracts/constituents against venom-induced pathologies were identified and included for screening. Data from the included studies were extracted and synthesized. Ten studies reported statistically significant percentage protection (40-100%) of animals against venom-induced lethality compared with control groups that received no medicinal plant intervention. Sixteen studies reported significant effects (p ≤ 0.05) against venom-induced pathologies compared with the control group; these include hemolytic, histopathologic, necrotic, and anti-enzymatic effects. The plant family Fabaceae has the highest number of studies reporting its efficacy, followed by Annonaceae, Malvaceae, Combretaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Olacaceae. Some African medicinal plants are preclinically effective against venom-induced lethality, hematotoxicity, and cytotoxicity. The evidence was extracted from three in vitro studies, nine in vivo studies, and five studies that combined both in vivo and in vitro models. The effective plants belong to the Fabaceae family, followed by Malvaceae, and Annonaceae.

Preclinical efficacy of African medicinal plants used in the treatment of snakebite envenoming: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a high-priority, neglected, tropical disease that affects millions of people in developing countries annually. The only available standard drug used for the treatment of SBE is antisnake venom (ASV) which consists of immunoglobulins that have been purified from the plasma of animals hyper-immunized against snake venoms. The use of plants as alternatives for treatment of poisonous bites particularly snakebites is important in remote areas where there might be limited, or no access to hospitals and storage facilities for antivenom. The pharmacological activity of some of the medicinal plants used traditionally in the treatment of SBE have also been scientifically validated. METHOD: A systematic review will be conducted according to the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies checklist for study quality in animal/in vivo studies. The tool will be modified and validated to assess in vitro models and studies that combine in vivo and in vitro studies. The systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. English published articles on African medicinal plants used in the treatment of snakebite envenoming will be searched in Medline, Embase, and Scopus from 2000 to 2021. DISSEMINATION: The findings of the study will be communicated through publication in peer-reviewed journal and presentation at scientific conferences. Medicinal plants have been important sources for the development of many effective drugs currently available in orthodox medicine. Botanically derived medicines have played a major role in human societies throughout history. Plants components used in traditional medicine gained much attention by many toxinologists as a tool for designing potent antidotes against snake envenoming. Our systematic review will provide a synthesis of the literature on the efficacy of these medicinal plants. We will also appraise the prospects of African medicinal plants with pharmacologically demonstrated activity against snakebite and envenoming.

Treatment regimens for rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis: highlighting a research gap.

Treatment guidance for non-multidrug-resistant (MDR) rifampicin-resistant (RMP-R) tuberculosis (TB) is variable. We aimed to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) data behind such guidelines to identify the most efficacious treatment regimens. Ovid MEDLINE, the Web of Science and EMBASE were mined using search terms for TB, drug therapy and RCTs. Despite 12 604 records being retrieved, only three studies reported treatment outcomes by regimen for patients with non-MDR RMP-R disease, preventing meta-analysis. Our systematic review highlights a substantial gap in the literature regarding evidence-based treatment regimens for RMP-R TB.

Treatment outcome of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: retrospective-prospective cohort study from 2004 to 2007.

United Kingdom (UK) guidelines recommend at least 18 months treatment for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Prior to 2008, data on treatment outcome were only available at 12 months and therefore the proportion completing treatment was unknown. This retrospective-prospective cohort study reports on treatment outcomes for MDR-TB patients notified between 2004 and 2007 and examines factors associated with successful outcomes. 70.6% (144/204) completed treatment in 24 months or more, 6.9% (14) stopped treatment, 6.9% (14) died, 7.8% (16) were lost to follow up, 0.5% (1) relapsed and 4.4% (9) were transferred overseas. Following adjustment for age, being non-UK born, non-compliance and having co-morbidities, treatment with a fluoroquinolone (OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.21-7.88; p<0.05) or bacteriostatic drug (OR 4.23; 95% CI 1.60-11.18; p<0.05) were independently associated with successful treatment outcome. Treatment completion for MDR-TB cases remains below the World Health Organization (WHO) target. Our findings support current WHO guidelines for MDR-TB treatment. The UK should consider adopting individualised regimens based on WHO recommended drugs, taking into account drug sensitivities. Improving treatment completion rates will be key to tackling further drug resistance and transmission from untreated infectious cases.

Health status of UK patients with active tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of tuberculosis (TB) and its treatment on patients' health status. METHODS: Questionnaires were administered prospectively to patients at three clinics in London at diagnosis and 2 months into therapy. We assessed generic health-related quality of life (Short Form 36 [SF-36] and EQ-5D) and psychological burden (State-Trait Anxiety Short-Form, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, worry items). RESULTS: Of the 61 participants (response rate 94%), 89% were non-UK born, 67% had pulmonary TB and 38% were aged 30-45 years. At diagnosis, scores for all eight SF-36 dimensions were significantly worse than UK general population norm scores. At follow-up, scores had improved significantly (P < 0.01), except for physical functioning and general health perception, but remained below the UK norm, except for vitality and mental health. Respondents' mean anxiety and depression scores were high at diagnosis (48 and 22, respectively), and anxiety scores remained high at follow-up. Worries most frequently reported concerned patients' own health (92%) and that of their family (82%). CONCLUSIONS: TB patients suffer from significantly diminished health-related quality of life at diagnosis. Although treatment significantly improved patients' health status within 2 months, scores for many domains remain below UK norm scores. This emphasises the importance of a holistic approach to care and should inform the evaluation of future interventions.