Current state of pediatric sarcoma biology and opportunities for future discovery: A report from the sarcoma translational research workshop.

Sarcomas are a rare subgroup of pediatric cancers comprised of a variety of bone and soft-tissue tumors. While significant advances have been made in improving outcomes of patients with localized pediatric sarcomas since the addition of systemic chemotherapy to local control many decades ago, outcomes for patients with metastatic and relapsed sarcoma remain poor with few novel therapeutics identified to date. With the advent of new technologies to study cancer genomes, transcriptomes and epigenomes, our understanding of sarcoma biology has improved tremendously in a relatively short period of time. However, much remains to be accomplished in this arena especially with regard to translating all of this new knowledge to the bedside. To this end, a meeting was convened in Philadelphia, PA, on April 18, 2015 sponsored by the QuadW foundation, Children's Oncology Group and CureSearch for Children's Cancer that brought together sarcoma clinicians and scientists from North America to review the current state of pediatric sarcoma biology and ongoing/planned genomics based clinical trials in an effort to identify and bridge knowledge gaps that continue to exist at present. At the conclusion of the workshop, three key objectives that would significantly further our understanding of sarcoma were identified and a proposal was put forward to develop an all-encompassing pediatric sarcoma biology protocol that would address these specific needs. This review summarizes the proceedings of the workshop.

Toward a drug development path that targets metastatic progression in osteosarcoma.

Despite successful primary tumor treatment, the development of pulmonary metastasis continues to be the most common cause of mortality in patients with osteosarcoma. A conventional drug development path requiring drugs to induce regression of established lesions has not led to improvements for patients with osteosarcoma in more than 30 years. On the basis of our growing understanding of metastasis biology, it is now reasonable and essential that we focus on developing therapeutics that target metastatic progression. To advance this agenda, a meeting of key opinion leaders and experts in the metastasis and osteosarcoma communities was convened in Bethesda, Maryland. The goal of this meeting was to provide a "Perspective" that would establish a preclinical translational path that could support the early evaluation of potential therapeutic agents that uniquely target the metastatic phenotype. Although focused on osteosarcoma, the need for this perspective is shared among many cancer types. The consensus achieved from the meeting included the following: the biology of metastatic progression is associated with metastasis-specific targets/processes that may not influence grossly detectable lesions; targeting of metastasis-specific processes is feasible; rigorous preclinical data are needed to support translation of metastasis-specific agents into human trials where regression of measurable disease is not an expected outcome; preclinical data should include an understanding of mechanism of action, validation of pharmacodynamic markers of effective exposure and response, the use of several murine models of effectiveness, and where feasible the inclusion of the dog with naturally occurring osteosarcoma to define the activity of new drugs in the micrometastatic disease setting.

Preclinical evaluation of the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy in pediatric solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) signals DNA damage and facilitates DNA repair. PARP inhibitors are being evaluated in cancers with defective DNA repair mechanisms or in combination with cytotoxic therapy or radiation. We evaluated the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in combination with chemotherapy using in vitro and in vivo pediatric solid tumor models. PROCEDURE: The IC50 of olaparib alone and in combination with cytotoxic agents was determined in 10 pediatric solid tumor cell lines. Synergy was assessed using the combination index of Chou-Talalay. Olaparib alone and in combination with topotecan/cyclophosphamide was evaluated in xenograft models of Ewing sarcoma (RD-ES) and neuroblastoma (NGP). PAR activity was evaluated in cell lines and tumor lysates. RESULTS: Olaparib induced growth inhibition, median (range) IC50 = 3.6 (1-33.8) µM, and inhibited PAR activity in pediatric solid tumor cell lines. The addition of olaparib to DNA damaging agents resulted in additive to synergistic interactions. In RD-ES and NGP xenografts, olaparib inhibited PAR activity by 88-100% as a single agent and 100% when administered with cyclophosphamide/topotecan. Although the addition of olaparib did not antagonize the activity of cyclophosphamide/topotecan, clear evidence of synergy could not be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric solid tumor cell lines, clinically achievable concentrations of single agent olaparib caused growth inhibition. Although the in vitro data demonstrated synergistic efficacy of olaparib when added to the camptothecins and alkylating agents, synergy was not discernible in vivo. Clinical trials of PARP inhibitors in combination DNA damaging agents are necessary to establish the role of PARP inhibitors in childhood cancer.

Phase 2 trial of pemetrexed in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed is a multi-targeted antifolate that inhibits key enzymes involved in nucleotide biosynthesis. We performed a phase 2 trial of pemetrexed in children with refractory or recurrent solid tumors, including CNS tumors, to estimate the response rate and further define its toxicity profile. PROCEDURE: Pemetrexed, at a dose of 1910 mg/m(2) , was administered as a 10-minute intravenous infusion every 21 days. Patients also received vitamin B(12) , daily multivitamin supplementation, and dexamethasone. A two-stage design (10 + 10) was employed in each of the following disease strata: osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET), rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, ependymoma, medulloblastoma/supratentorial PNET, and non-brainstem high-grade glioma. RESULTS: Seventy-two eligible subjects (39 males) were enrolled. Median age was 11 years (range 3-23). Sixty-eight were evaluable for response. The median number of cycles administered was 2 (range 1-13). No complete or partial responses were observed. Stable disease, for a median of 5 (range 4-13) cycles, was observed in five patients (ependymoma, Ewing sarcoma, medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma, osteosarcoma; n = 1 each). Neutropenia (44%), anemia (35%), and elevated alanine transaminase (35%) attributable to pemetrexed were the most commonly recurring toxicities observed in patients receiving multiple cycles. Other toxicities attributed to pemetrexed occurring in ≥10% of cycles included thrombocytopenia (30%), fatigue (18%), nausea (14), hyperglycemia (13%), rash (11%), vomiting (13%), and hypophosphatemia (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed, administered as an intravenous infusion every 21 days, was tolerable in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors, but did not show evidence of objective anti-tumor activity in the childhood tumors studied.

A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of sorafenib in children with refractory solid tumors or leukemias: a Children's Oncology Group Phase I Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib in children with refractory extracranial solid tumors and evaluate the tolerability of the solid tumor MTD in children with refractory leukemias. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sorafenib was administered orally every 12 hours for consecutive 28-day cycles. Pharmacokinetics (day 1 and steady-state) and pharmacodynamics were conducted during cycle 1. RESULTS: Of 65 patients enrolled, 60 were eligible. In the solid tumor cohort (n = 49), 4 of 6 patients experienced a DLT [hypertension, pain, rash/urticaria, thrombocytopenia, alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST)] at the starting dose (150 mg/m(2)/dose) which resulted in de-escalation to 105 mg/m(2)/dose. After eligibility criteria modification and dose re-escalation, the MTD was 200 mg/m(2)/dose for solid tumors and 150 mg/m(2)/dose for leukemias. Sorafenib exposure was highly variable between patients but was within the ranges reported in adults. The apparent sorafenib clearance increased with patient age. Diarrhea, rash, fatigue, and increased ALT/AST were the most common sorafenib-related toxicities. Stable disease for 4 or more cycles was observed in 14 solid tumor patients, and 2 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3ITD) experienced a decrease in bone marrow blasts to less than 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose of sorafenib administered every 12 hours continuously for children with solid tumors is 200 mg/m(2)/dose and 150 mg/m(2)/dose for children with leukemias. Sorafenib toxicities and distribution in children are similar to adults. The activity of sorafenib in children with AML and FLT3ITD is currently being evaluated, and a phase II study for select solid tumors is ongoing.

Preclinical evaluation of lestaurtinib (CEP-701) in combination with retinoids for neuroblastoma.

PURPOSE: Lestaurtinib (CEP-701), a multi-kinase inhibitor with potent activity against the Trk family of receptor tyrosine kinases, has undergone early phase clinical evaluation in children with relapsed neuroblastoma. We studied the interaction of CEP-701 with isotretinoin (13cRA) and fenretinide (4HPR), two retinoids that have been studied in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: In vitro growth inhibition was assessed following a 72-hour drug exposure using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay in eight neuroblastoma cell lines with variable TrkB expression. When appropriate, the combination index (CI) of Chou-Talalay was used to characterize the interaction of 13cRA (non-constant ratio) or 4HPR (constant ratio) with CEP-701. RESULTS: The median (range) IC(50) of single-agent CEP-701 across all cell lines was 0.09 (0.08-0.3) µM. The combination of 13cRA and CEP-701 resulted in additive to synergistic interactions in four of the five cell lines studied. Addition of 1 or 5 µM of 13cRA decreased the median (range) CEP-701 IC(50) 1.5-fold (1.1-2.8-fold) and 1.7-fold (1.5-1.8-fold), respectively. With 10 µM 13cRA, less than 50% of cells survived when combined with various concentrations of CEP-701. The combination of 4HPR and CEP-701 trended toward being antagonistic, with a median (range) CI at the ED(50) of 1.3 (1.1-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 13cRA and CEP-701 was additive or synergistic in a spectrum of neuroblastoma cell lines, suggesting that these agents can be potentially studied together in the setting of minimal residual disease following intensive chemoradiotherapy for children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

Glucarpidase, leucovorin, and thymidine for high-dose methotrexate-induced renal dysfunction: clinical and pharmacologic factors affecting outcome.

PURPOSE: To assess the role of the recombinant bacterial enzyme, glucarpidase (carboxypeptidase-G(2)), leucovorin, and thymidine in the management and outcome of patients with high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) -induced nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Patients with HDMTX-induced nephrotoxicity received one to three doses of intravenous (IV) glucarpidase and leucovorin rescue. The initial cohort (n = 35) also received thymidine by continuous IV infusion. Subsequently, thymidine was restricted to patients with prolonged exposure (> 96 hours) to methotrexate (MTX) or with substantial MTX toxicity at study entry. Plasma MTX, leucovorin, and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-mTHF) concentrations were measured pre- and postglucarpidase. Toxicities were monitored, and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of baseline characteristics to the development of severe toxicity and death. RESULTS: Glucarpidase was administered at a median of 96 hours (receiving thymidine, n = 44) and 66 hours (not receiving thymidine, n = 56) after the start of the MTX infusion. Plasma MTX concentrations decreased within 15 minutes of glucarpidase by 98.7%. Plasma 5-mTHF concentrations also decreased more than 98% after administration of glucarpidase. Of 12 deaths, six were directly attributed to irreversible MTX toxicity. Presence of grade 4 toxicity before administration of glucarpidase, inadequate initial increase in leucovorin dosing, and administration of glucarpidase more than 96 hours after the start of the MTX infusion were associated with development of grade 4 and 5 toxicity. CONCLUSION: Early intervention with the combination of leucovorin and glucarpidase is highly effective in patients who develop HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction. Severe toxicity and mortality occurred in patients in whom glucarpidase rescue was delayed and occurred despite thymidine administration.

Fluconazole dosing for the prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in young infants.

BACKGROUND: Young infants are susceptible to developmental factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of drugs. Fluconazole is increasingly used to prevent and treat invasive candidiasis in infants. Dosing guidance remains empiric and variable because limited pharmacokinetic data exist. METHODS: Our population pharmacokinetic model derived from 357 fluconazole plasma concentrations from 55 infants (23-40 week gestation) illustrates expected changes in fluconazole clearance based upon gestational age, postnatal age, weight, and creatinine. We used a Monte Carlo simulation approach based on parametric description of a patient population's pharmacokinetic response to fluconazole to predict fluconazole exposure (median: 10th and 90th percentile population variability range) after 3, 6, and 12 mg/kg dosing. RESULTS: For the treatment of invasive candidiasis, a dose of at least 12 mg/kg/d in the first 90 days after birth is needed to achieve an area under the concentration curve (AUC) of >400 mg*h/L and an AUC/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >50 for Candida species with MIC <8 microg/mL in > or =90% of <30 week gestation infants and 80% of 30 to 40 week gestation infants. The more preterm infants achieve a higher median AUC (682 mg*hr/L) compared with more mature infants (520 mg*hr/L). For early prevention of candidiasis in 23 to 29 week infants, a dose of 3 or 6 mg/kg twice weekly during the first 42 days of life is equivalent to an AUC of 50 and 100 mg*hr/L, respectively, and maintains fluconazole concentrations > or =2 or 4 microg/mL, respectively, for half of the dosing interval. For late prevention, the 6 mg/kg dose every 72 hours provides similar exposure to 3 mg/kg daily dose. Infants with serum creatinine > or =1.3 mg/dL have delayed drug clearance and dose adjustment is indicated if creatinine does not improve within 96 hours. CONCLUSIONS: A therapeutic concentration of fluconazole in premature infants with invasive candidiasis requires dosing substantially greater than commonly recommended in most reference texts. To prevent invasive candidiasis, twice weekly prophylaxis regimens can provide adequate exposure when unit specific MICs are taken into account.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed in children with refractory solid tumors: the Children's Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: We report results of a phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed (LY231514) in children and adolescents with refractory solid tumors. Pemetrexed is a novel antifolate that inhibits multiple enzymes necessary for the biosynthesis of thymidine and purine nucleotides. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetic properties of pemetrexed in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pemetrexed was administered as a 10-minute intravenous infusion every 21 days. Patients received vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation as well as dexamethasone prophylaxis. Cohorts of three to six children were enrolled at dose levels of 400, 520, 670, 870, 1,130, 1,470, 1,910, and 2,480 mg/m2. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed during the first course of treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (31 assessable) with a median age of 12 years were enrolled. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 1,470 mg/m2 and two of four patients at 2,480 mg/m2. The MTD was 1,910 mg/m2. The primary DLTs were neutropenia and rash. No objective antitumor responses were seen. Mean plasma clearance, half-life, and steady-state volume of distribution values were 2.3 L/h/m2, 2.5 hours, and 5.4 L/m2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed is well-tolerated in children with refractory solid tumors at doses similar to the MTD in adults. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 1,910 mg/m2 administered every 21 days with dexamethasone, folic acid, and vitamin B12 supplementation.

The pharmacokinetics of esmolol in pediatric subjects with supraventricular arrhythmias.

Esmolol is often used in the acute management of children with arrhythmias and/or hypertension; however, pharmacokinetic studies of the drug in children have been limited. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of esmolol in children with a history of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) who were scheduled for diagnostic electrophysiology study or a catheter ablation procedure. Subjects were stratified into two age groups: 2-11 and 12-16 years. After an episode of stimulated or spontaneous SVT, esmolol was administered intravenously as a 1,000 microg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion at 300 microg/kg/min. Blood samples were collected before, at 5, 10 and 15 min after the loading dose, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20 min after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentration of esmolol was quantitated by a specific LC/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic data were available for 25 subjects. Arterial esmolol concentrations were approximately five times greater than venous concentrations. Esmolol had an extremely short distribution half-life (0.6 min), a rapid terminal elimination half-life (6.9 min), and a rapid clearance (119 +/- 51 mL/min/kg) which was not related to subject age or weight. Seventeen of the subjects (63%) converted to normal sinus rhythm in an average of 2 min (range 0-5 min). The pharmacokinetics of esmolol and its efficacy in terminating SVT in children is similar to that observed in adults.

Understanding and managing methotrexate nephrotoxicity.

Methotrexate (MTX) is one of the most widely used anti-cancer agents, and administration of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) followed by leucovorin (LV) rescue is an important component in the treatment of a variety of childhood and adult cancers. HDMTX can be safely administered to patients with normal renal function by the use of alkalinization, hydration, and pharmacokinetically guided LV rescue. Despite these measures, HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction continues to occur in approximately 1.8% of patients with osteosarcoma treated on clinical trials. Prompt recognition and treatment of MTX-induced renal dysfunction are essential to prevent potentially life-threatening MTX-associated toxicities, especially myelosuppression, mucositis, and dermatitis. In addition to conventional treatment approaches, dialysis-based methods have been used to remove MTX with limited effectiveness. More recently carboxypeptidase-G(2) (CPDG(2)), a recombinant bacterial enzyme that rapidly hydrolyzes MTX to inactive metabolites, has become available for the treatment of HDMTX-induced renal dysfunction. CPDG(2) administration has been well tolerated and resulted in consistent and rapid reductions in plasma MTX concentrations by a median of 98.7% (range, 84%-99.5%). The early administration of CPDG(2) in addition to LV may be beneficial for patients with MTX-induced renal dysfunction and significantly elevated plasma MTX concentrations.

Testing of new agents in childhood cancer preclinical models: meeting summary.

A workshop on pediatric preclinical testing, sponsored by the National Cancer Institute and the Children's Oncology Group Phase 1 Consortium, was held on June 26-27, 2001 in Bethesda, Maryland. Drs. Peter Adamson, Peter Houghton, and Malcolm Smith organized and hosted the meeting. There were 20 participants from 12 institutions. The primary objectives of the workshop included: (a) development of a working inventory of available preclinical models (including human tumor xenografts in immunodeficient mice, transgenic and syngeneic tumors, and selected in vitro models), with a basic understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each as possible components of a preclinical testing program; (b) identification of the key scientific issues related to establishment of a program for preclinical testing of new agents for their applicability to childhood cancers; and (c) identification of the key infrastructure requirements for a program for preclinical testing of new agents for their applicability to childhood cancers. This report is a synthesis of the workshop's presentations and discussions.