Public perception and attitude towards people living with epilepsy in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the community knowledge, awareness, and attitude towards people living with epilepsy (PLWE) in Lagos, Nigeria. This was to provide background information for formulating evidence-based campaign and intervention to reduce stigma and improve health-related quality of life amongst PLWE and their families. METHODS: Adult respondents (n = 1614) selected via multistage probability sampling completed a set of questionnaires. A case vignette was used to depict epilepsy. The respondents' knowledge of, familiarity with, perceived cause, and preferred treatment option for epilepsy were assessed. Their attitude towards people's attitude was measured with Attitudes and Beliefs about Living with Epilepsy (ABLE) scale. RESULTS: While a total of 1258 (67.6%) could correctly name the illness as epilepsy, only 945 (58.5%) had witnessed an epileptic seizure episode before. The most endorsed causes of epilepsy were brain injury/infection (75.8%), evil spirit/witchcraft (73.0%), God's will (70.0%), and infection by contact (64.9%). Only 67.6% believe that epilepsy is treatable, and 42.5% preferred treatment by spiritualist. Generally, there was a positive attitude to PLWE; however, there were serious risk and safety concerns. The factors associated with negative attitude towards PLWE include male gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98-3.00), lower educational status (AOR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.32-2.16), poor knowledge of epilepsy (AOR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.36-2.22), poor familiarity with epilepsy (AOR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.14-2.42), and endorsement of supernatural causes of epilepsy (AOR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28-1.97). SIGNIFICANCE: Closing the treatment gap for epilepsy in Nigeria and other sub-Saharan Africa countries will involve steps to change the misconception of the Nigerian populace as regards the causes of epilepsy and help seeking pathway. There is need for nationwide educational programs for epilepsy that consider cognitive and affective processes and also involve all the major stakeholders like primary care workers, community leaders, and spiritual and traditional leaders.

Development and feasibility assessment of a collaborative stepped care intervention for management of depression in the mental health in primary care (MeHPriC) project, Lagos, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a primary care worker-led psychological intervention as the main feature of a collaborative stepped care for depression that is effective, affordable, culturally acceptable, tailored to patients' clinical condition and easily integrate-able into the primary care schedule in Nigeria. METHODS: Using the Medical Research Council framework, in the first stage (modelling/theoretical development), experts reviewed and distilled evidence from literature to form the intervention components. In the second (formative) stage, local stakeholders were consulted on the practical application and feasibility of the proposed intervention. The third (piloting) stage involved testing for the clinical efficacy and acceptability of the components of the draft intervention. RESULTS: The final intervention components included a 2-stage screening (red-flagging and further evaluation), psychoeducation, low-intensity psychological therapy (problem-solving therapy for primary care), antidepressant prescription, proactive mobile telephony adherence support and referral to the mental health specialist if needed. At 3 months, 71.6% of depressed patients on the intervention improved. The intervention was perceived to be acceptable and useful by over 70% of health workers and clients and had high ratings (>70% score) by expert panels on intervention simplicity, facilitation strategies, and quality of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The development and feasibility testing of our integrated intervention encompassed review of current literature, expert opinions and consultation with local stakeholders and end users. Our intervention package was largely deemed acceptable, relevant, useful, and feasible. Important lessons learnt with this process will help in future intervention developments.

Doctors' attitude towards people with mental illness in Western Nigeria.

INTRODUCTION: It had been suggested that those more knowledgeable about mental illness are less likely to endorse negative or stigmatizing attitudes. This study aimed to evaluate the attitude of doctors in Nigeria towards the mentally ill. METHODS: Medical doctors (n = 312) from eight selected health institutions in Nigeria completed various questionnaires on knowledge and attitude towards people with mental illness. RESULTS: Beliefs in supernatural causes were prevalent. The mentally ill were perceived as dangerous and their prognosis perceived as poor. High social distance was found amongst 64.1% and the associated factors include not having a family member/friend with mental illness (OR 7.12, 95% CI 3.71-13.65), age less than 45 years (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.23-4.40), less than 10 years of clinical experience (OR 6.75, 95% CI 3.86-11.82) and female sex (OR 4.98, 95% CI 2.70-9.18). CONCLUSION: Culturally enshrined beliefs about mental illness were prevalent among Nigerian doctors. A review of medical curriculum is needed and the present anti-stigma campaigns should start from the doctors.