Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MED-EL Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System, for adults with residual low-frequency hearing and severe-to-profound hearing loss in the mid to high frequencies. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, repeated measures. SETTING: Multicenter, hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-three subjects implanted with PULSAR or SONATA cochlear implants with FLEX electrode arrays. INTERVENTION: Subjects were fit postoperatively with an audio processor, combining electric stimulation and acoustic amplification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unaided thresholds were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postactivation. Speech perception was assessed at these intervals using City University of New York sentences in noise and consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet. Subjective benefit was assessed at these intervals via the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit and Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty-seven of 73 subjects (92%) completed outcome measures for all study intervals. Of those 67 subjects, 79% experienced less than a 30 dB HL low-frequency pure-tone average (250-1000 Hz) shift, and 97% were able to use the acoustic unit at 12 months postactivation. In the EAS condition, 94% of subjects performed similarly to or better than their preoperative performance on City University of New York sentences in noise at 12 months postactivation, with 85% demonstrating improvement. Ninety-seven percent of subjects performed similarly or better on consonant-nucleus-consonant words in quiet, with 84% demonstrating improvement. CONCLUSION: The MED-EL EAS System is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with normal hearing to moderate sensorineural hearing loss in the low frequencies and severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in the high frequencies who do not benefit from traditional amplification.

Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.

HYPOTHESIS: Utilizing the cochlear implant to record electrophysiologic responses during device placement is a feasible and efficacious technique for monitoring near real-time cochlear physiology during and following electrode insertion. BACKGROUND: Minimizing intracochlear trauma during cochlear implantation has emerged as a highly researched area to help improve patient performance. Currently, conventional cochlear implant technology allows for the recording of electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs). Acoustically evoked potentials may be more sensitive in detecting physiologic changes occurring as a result of electrode insertion. Electrocochleography obtained from within the cochlea allows hair cell and neural response monitoring along the cochlear spiral at locations where changes most likely would occur. METHODS: Intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) was recorded from the cochlear implant during surgery in 14 subjects. A long acquisition time (54.5 ms), capable of measuring potentials from the low frequency-serving apical region of the cochlea (125 and 500 Hz) was employed. Two distinct intracochlear processing methods were used and compared in obtaining electrophysiologic data. RESULTS: Measureable intracochlear ECochG responses were obtained from all 14 participants. The 1st harmonic distortions (cochlear microphonic and auditory nerve neurophonic) generally increased steadily with electrode insertion. Electrode and frequency scan following insertion revealed that response amplitude varied based on location of recording electrode and frequency of stimulation. Exquisite sensitivity to manipulation during round window muscle packing was demonstrated. CONCLUSION: Intracochlear ECochG recorded from the electrode array of the cochlear implant is a highly feasible technique that sheds light on cochlear micromechanics during cochlear implant electrode placement.

Intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: Electrophysiologic responses to acoustic stimuli are present in nearly all cochlear implant recipients when measured at the round window (RW). Intracochlear recording sites might provide an even larger signal and improve the sensitivity and the potential clinical utility of electrocochleography (ECoG). Thus, the goal of this study is to compare RW to intracochlear recording sites and to determine if such recordings can be used to monitor cochlear function during insertion of a cochlear implant. METHODS: Intraoperative ECoG recordings were obtained in subjects receiving a cochlear implant from the RW and from just inside scala tympani (n = 26). Stimuli were tones at high levels (80-100 dB HL). Further recordings were obtained during insertions of a temporary lateral cochlear wall electrode (n = 8). Response magnitudes were determined as the sum of the first and second harmonics amplitudes. RESULTS: All subjects had measurable extracochlear responses at the RW. Twenty cases (78%) showed a larger intracochlear response, compared with three (11%) that had a smaller response and three that were unchanged. On average, signal amplitudes increased with increasing electrode insertion depths, with the largest increase between 15 and 20 mm from the RW. CONCLUSION: ECoG to acoustic stimuli via an intracochlear electrode is feasible in standard cochlear implant recipients. The increased signal can improve the speed and efficiency of data collection. The growth of response magnitudes with deeper intrascalar electrode positions could be explained by closer proximity or favorable geometry with respect to residual apical signal generators. Reductions in magnitude may represent unfavorable geometry or cochlear trauma.

Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant (CI) recipients with postoperative hearing preservation may utilize an ipsilateral bimodal listening condition known as electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). Studies on EAS have reported significant improvements in speech perception abilities over CI-alone listening conditions. Adjustments to the hearing aid (HA) settings to match prescription targets routinely used in the programming of conventional amplification may provide additional gains in speech perception abilities. PURPOSE: Investigate the difference in users' speech perception scores when listening with the recommended HA settings for EAS patients versus HA settings adjusted to match National Acoustic Laboratories' nonlinear fitting procedure version 1 (NAL-NL1) targets. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective analysis of the influence of HA settings. STUDY SAMPLE: Nine EAS recipients with greater than 12 mo of listening experience with the DUET speech processor. INTERVENTION: Subjects were tested in the EAS listening condition with two different HA setting configurations. Speech perception materials included consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet, AzBio sentences in 10-talker speech babble at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of +10, and the Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences in noise (BKB-SIN) test. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The speech perception performance on each test measure was compared between the two HA configurations. RESULTS: Subjects experienced a significant improvement in speech perception abilities with the HA settings adjusted to match NAL-NL1 targets over the recommended HA settings. CONCLUSIONS: EAS subjects have been shown to experience improvements in speech perception abilities when listening to ipsilateral combined stimulation. This population's abilities may be underestimated with current HA settings. Tailoring the HA output to the patient's individual hearing loss offers improved outcomes on speech perception measures.

Cochleostomy versus round window insertions: influence on functional outcomes in electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential influence of 2 different surgical access routes to scala tympani for hearing preservation cochlear implantation on outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS: Twenty adult subjects participating in a prospective clinical trial on electric-acoustic stimulation. Subjects underwent cochlear implantation with attempted hearing preservation and subsequent ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. INTERVENTIONS: Eight subjects (40%) were implanted using a round window-related cochleostomy and 12 subjects (60%) via a round window approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative acoustic hearing preservation and speech perception measures were obtained at defined intervals and compared for both groups with and without the use of the external speech processor. RESULTS: The data demonstrate no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes for both preservation of residual hearing and unaided and aided speech perception between the cochleostomy and round window groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this investigation suggest that hearing preservation cochlear implantation can be performed either via a round window-related cochleostomy as well as via the round window membrane itself with similar outcomes in terms of both hearing preservation rates as well as speech perception measures.

Distinguishing hair cell from neural potentials recorded at the round window.

Almost all patients who receive cochlear implants have some acoustic hearing prior to surgery. Electrocochleography (ECoG), or electrophysiological measures of cochlear response to sound, can identify remaining auditory nerve activity that is the basis for this residual hearing and can record potentials from hair cells that are no longer functionally connected to nerve fibers. The ECoG signal is therefore complex, being composed of both hair cell and neural signals. To identify signatures of different sources in the recorded potentials, we collected ECoG data across frequency and intensity from the round window of gerbils before and after treatment with kainic acid, a neurotoxin. Distortions in the recorded waveforms were produced by different sources over different ranges of frequency and intensity. In response to tones at low frequencies and low-to-moderate intensities, the major source of distortion was from neural phase-locking that was sensitive to kainic acid. At high intensities at all frequencies, the distortion was not sensitive to kainic acid and was consistent with asymmetric saturation of the hair cell transducer current. In addition to loss of phase-locking, changes in the envelope after kainic acid treatment indicate that sustained neural firing combines with receptor potentials from hair cells to produce the envelope of the response to tones. These results provide baseline data to interpret comparable recordings from human cochlear implant recipients.

Round window electrocochleography just before cochlear implantation: relationship to word recognition outcomes in adults.

HYPOTHESES: Electrocochleography (ECoG) to acoustic stimuli can differentiate relative degrees of cochlear responsiveness across the population of cochlear implant recipients. The magnitude of the ongoing portion of the ECoG, which includes both hair cell and neural contributions, will correlate with speech outcomes as measured by results on CNC word score tests. BACKGROUND: Postoperative speech outcomes with cochlear implants vary from almost no benefit to near normal comprehension. A factor expected to have a high predictive value is the degree of neural survival. However, speech performance with the implant does not correlate with the number and distribution of surviving ganglion cells when measured postmortem. We will investigate whether ECoG can provide an estimate of cochlear function that helps predict postoperative speech outcomes. METHODS: An electrode was placed at the round window of the ear about to be implanted during implant surgery. Tone bursts were delivered through an insert earphone. Subjects included children (n = 52, 1-18 yr) and postlingually hearing impaired adults (n = 32). Word scores at 6 months were available from 21 adult subjects. RESULTS: Significant responses to sound were recorded from almost all subjects (80/84 or 95%). The ECoG magnitudes spanned more than 50 dB in both children and adults. The distributions of ECoG magnitudes and frequencies were similar between children and adults. The correlation between the ECoG magnitude and word score accounted for 47% of the variance. CONCLUSION: ECoGs with high signal-to-noise ratios can be recorded from almost all implant candidates, including both adult and pediatric populations. In postlingual adults, the ECoG magnitude is more predictive of implant outcomes than other nonsurgical variables such as duration of deafness or degree of residual hearing.

Hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes with electric-acoustic stimulation after 12 months of listening experience.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To report on single-center data of an FDA-approved clinical trial on the objective benefits of cochlear implantation and subsequent ipsilateral Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS). STUDY DESIGN: Single-center data from a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. METHODS: Eighteen subjects completed the 12-month EAS evaluation and were included in this evaluation. Each patient underwent cochlear implantation using a standardized hearing preservation approach. Both hearing preservation and speech perception abilities were evaluated at various intervals. Speech testing included performance measures obtained in quiet (CNC words) and noise (adaptive CUNY protocol) in three listening conditions: hearing aid (HA) alone, cochlear implant (CI) only, and combined ipsilateral EAS. RESULTS: Various levels of hearing preservation were achieved with cochleostomy and round-window surgical approaches in 17 of the 18 subjects. Mean CNC word scores at the 12-month interval were 14.9 ± 12.1, 45.3 ± 15.4, and 70.7 ± 11.7% correct in the HA only, CI only, and EAS conditions, respectively. Average CUNY scores at 0 dB SNR were 14.6 ± 17.2, 47.1 ± 22.1, and 72.2 ± 21.5 for the three test conditions obtained after 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained during this clinical trial correlate well with previous reports. Hearing preservation appears successful in a high number of subjects, and combined EAS offers excellent speech perception abilities in quiet and in noise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Intraoperative round window recordings to acoustic stimuli from cochlear implant patients.

HYPOTHESIS: Acoustically evoked neural and hair cell potentials can be measured from the round window (RW) intraoperatively in the general population of cochlear implant recipients. BACKGROUND: Cochlear implant performance varies greatly among patients. Improved methods to assess and monitor functional hair cell and neural substrate before and during implantation could potentially aid in enhanced nontraumatic intracochlear electrode placement and subsequent improved outcomes. METHODS: Subjects (1-80 yr) undergoing cochlear implantation were included. A monopolar probe was placed at the RW after surgical access was obtained. The cochlear microphonic (CM), summating potential (SP), compound action potential (CAP), and auditory nerve neurophonic (ANN) were recorded in response to tone bursts at frequencies of 0.25 to 4 kHz at various levels. RESULTS: Measurable hair cell/neural potentials were detected to 1 or more frequencies in 23 of 25 subjects. The greatest proportion and magnitude of cochlear responses were to low frequencies (<1,000 Hz). At these low frequencies, the ANN, when present, contributed to the ongoing response at the stimulus frequency. In many subjects, the ANN was small or absent, whereas hair cell responses remained. CONCLUSION: In cochlear implant recipients, acoustically evoked cochlear potentials are detectable even if hearing is extremely limited. Sensitive measures of cochlear and neural status can characterize the state of hair cell and neural function before implantation. Whether this information correlates with speech performance outcomes or can help in tailoring electrode type, placement or audiometric fitting, can be determined in future studies.

Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants (CI) perform especially well if residual acoustic hearing is retained and combined with the CI in the same ear (also termed hybrid or electric-acoustic stimulation). However, in most CI patients, residual hearing is at least partially compromised during surgery, and in some it is lost completely. At present, clinicians have no feedback on the functional status of the cochlea during electrode insertion. Development of an intraoperative physiological recording algorithm during electrode insertion could serve to detect reversible cochlear trauma and optimal placement relative to surviving hair cells. In this report, an animal model was used to assist in determining physiological markers for these conditions using a flexible electrode similar to human surgery. DESIGN: The animal model was the normal-hearing gerbil. The flexible electrodes had 1 to 2 platinum-iridium contacts embedded in a 200 µm diameter silastic carrier. As control experiments some insertions were also made with much smaller (50 µm diameter) rigid electrodes. In either case, the electrode was positioned at or just inside the round window membrane and subsequently advanced into the scala tympani longitudinally in 50 to 100 µm increments. After each advancement, acoustic stimulation was used to elicit a cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP). Stimuli were suprathreshold tone bursts of 1 to 16 kHz in octave steps with 2 msec rise and fall times and a 10 msec plateau. Anatomical integrity of the cochlea was subsequently assessed using a whole-mount preparation. RESULTS: In contrast with the CAP, which was relatively stable during insertion, the CM showed a variety of changes related to electrode movement. To tone bursts of 1 to 8 kHz the CM typically remained stable or increased during the insertion before contact with cochlear structures. After contact, the potentials often dropped dramatically. The CM to 16 kHz was the most variable; in some cases it increased but in other cases it decreased early in the insertion and later showed large and abrupt increases. In some instances, this pattern was seen to progressively lower frequencies as well. Histological analysis and the gerbil frequency map indicate that electrode travel was limited to the basal turn (~4 mm from the hook) and did not intrude into the characteristic frequency regions of most frequencies used. CONCLUSIONS: First, the CM provides a more sensitive indication of cochlear trauma than does the CAP. Second, stable or steady increases in the CM are a physiological marker for unimpeded travel through the scala tympani as the electrode approaches responding hair cells. Third, abrupt reductions in the CM across frequency are a physiological marker of contact with cochlear structures. Fourth, abrupt increases after a decline, which occurred primarily to 16 kHz but to a lesser degree to other frequencies as well, are a physiological marker for a release from contact. The interpretation is that as the tip of the electrode bends the shaft can move in the mediolateral dimension, sometimes contacting the basilar membrane and sometimes not. Overall, the results indicate that recordings during cochlear implantations can provide valuable feedback to the surgeon regarding electrode position and the integrity of surviving hair cells.

Detection of intracochlear damage during cochlear implant electrode insertion using extracochlear measurements in the gerbil.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: An intraoperative monitoring algorithm during cochlear implant electrode insertion could be used to detect trauma and guide electrode placement relative to surviving hair cells. The aim of this report was to assess the feasibility of using extracochlear recording sites to monitor acoustically evoked responses from surviving hair cells and neural elements during implantation in an animal model. STUDY DESIGN: Animal experiments. METHODS: The normal-hearing gerbil was used. Two recording methods, one using a lock-in amplifier and another using Fourier analysis of recorded signals, were used to obtain frequency-specific information about the responses to tones. Amplitude and threshold determinations were made at the round window and at three extracochlear sites. To induce intracochlear damage, a platinum-iridium wire was inserted through the round window. The wire was advanced, and changes in the potentials were correlated with cochlear contact. Anatomic integrity was assessed using cochlea whole mount preparations. RESULTS: In general, the lock-in amplifier showed greater sensitivity and lower thresholds at higher frequencies relative to the Fourier method. Also, the lock-in amplifier was more resistant to masking effects. Both systems were able to detect loss of cochlear potentials secondary to intracochlear trauma. Histologic damage was seen in all cases and corresponded to electrophysiologic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Impact of electrodes on cochlear structures affecting cochlear performance could be detected from several extracochlear sites. The lock-in amplifier demonstrated greater sensitivity and resistance to noise when compared to the fast Fourier transform recording paradigm. The latter showed greater flexibility of detecting and separating hair cell and neural potentials.

Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) significantly decreases the subjective impairment in speech perception. OBJECTIVES: To assess the subjective benefit of EAS over the first 12 months after EAS fitting using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). METHOD: Twenty-three EAS users, implanted with either the PULSAR(CI)(100) FLEX(EAS) provided with the DUET EAS processor or the COMBI40+ Medium provided with the TEMPO+ speech processor, were included. Electric stimulation was activated about 1 month postoperatively; ipsilateral acoustic stimulation was added 2 months thereafter. EAS benefit was measured preoperatively with only a hearing aid and postoperatively at EAS fitting and then 3, 6 and 12 months after EAS fitting using the APHAB. RESULTS: Subjects reported significant improvements in the global score with a mean decrease in impairment from 74% preoperatively to 45% after 3 months of EAS use. Furthermore, clinical relevance was demonstrated in multiple subscales between preoperative and first fitting reflecting a true benefit of EAS with a probability of 95%.

Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

OBJECTIVE: : The pathophysiologic mechanisms resulting in hearing loss during electrode implantation are largely unknown. To better understand the functional implications of electrode implantation, we recorded the effects of cochlear damage on acoustically evoked intracochlear measurements using normal-hearing gerbils. METHODS: : A metal electrode was placed on the surface of the round window, and recordings of the cochlear microphonic (CM) and compound action potential (CAP) were made in response to stimulation with tone-bursts at various frequencies in 1-octave intervals and at intensities of 15 to 72 dB sound pressure level. The electrode was then advanced incrementally, with CM and CAP measurements obtained at each step. These data were compared with data obtained at the round window, and the electrode was withdrawn when a significant change was observed. After electrophysiological analysis, the cochlea was examined histologically. RESULTS: : Results show that on electrode insertion, loss of amplitude in the CM and CAP occurs after damage to cochlear structures. Loss of activity was typically first apparent in the CAP rather than the CM. CONCLUSION: : These results suggest that a reduction of the CAP can be an early marker of interaction of the electrode with cochlear structures. Such measurements are potentially available with slight modifications to current cochlear implant technology.

Correlation of early auditory potentials and intracochlear electrode insertion properties: an animal model featuring near real-time monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to assess electrophysiologic response changes to acoustic stimuli as an intracochlear electrode impacted cochlear structures in an animal model of hearing preservation cochlear implantation. The ultimate goal is to develop efficient procedures for assessing the status of cochlear physiology for intraoperative use. METHODS: Sixteen gerbils and 18 ears were tested. A rigid electrode was inserted through a basal turn cochleostomy and directed toward the basilar membrane/osseous spiral lamina complex. We recorded acoustically evoked early auditory potentials including cochlear microphonics (CMs) and compound action potentials (CAPs) to a short stimulation sequence consisting of one stimulus frequency and intensity as the electrode was advanced. A microendoscope was used to visualize the electrode insertion progress and to identify the site of electrode impact. After each experiment, the site of intracochlear trauma was confirmed using whole mount preparations. RESULTS: Electrophysiologic changes correlated well with the degree and location of trauma. We observed four distinct patterns. In addition, the endoscope in conjunction with the short recording sequence allowed for the detection of response changes that were reversible when the electrode was retracted. These cases were associated with less than full-thickness damage on histology. CONCLUSION: The short recording sequence to obtain acoustically evoked intracochlear potentials and the microendoscope allowed us to detect various levels of cochlear trauma including minor and reversible damage. Recordings of this type are potentially available using current implant technology. Future improvements in the measurements can be expected to improve the efficiency of the recording paradigm to produce a clinically useful tool.

Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether combined electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) provides a significant hearing-in-quiet advantage over ipsilateral electrical stimulation alone, ipsilateral acoustic stimulation alone, or full-length cochlear implantation without preserved hearing. SETTING: Tertiary care academic referral center. PATIENTS: Two matched groups of cochlear implant (CI) patients that were implanted with either an EAS or full-length device and use similar speech processing strategies. INTERVENTION: EAS cochlear implantation and hearing preservation (n = 10, EAS group) or conventional CI (n = 10, conventional CI group) without hearing preservation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Status of residual hearing and speech perception data in quiet at 3 and 6 months after fitting. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean aided Consonant Nucleus Consonant Word Test word score was 24.2 +/- 8.3% for the EAS group and 20.7 +/- 11.36% for the conventional CI group (p = 0.14). In the conventional CI group, hearing was not preserved after surgery in any subject, whereas 9 of the 10 subjects in the EAS group had hearing preservation. Mean CNC word scores at 6 months after activation using electrical stimulation alone were 50.3 +/- 11.53% in the EAS group and 53.8 +/- 17.32% in the conventional CI group (p = 0.81). Between-condition comparisons among the EAS subjects revealed that combined stimulation was significantly better than either the electrical or acoustic stimulation condition alone (p < 0.05). When compared with the conventional CI group, combined stimulation in EAS subjects was again superior (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Limited length CI with ipsilateral hearing preservation provides comparable speech perception performance results to conventional CI when electric stimulation alone is used. The addition of ipsilateral acoustic stimulation in ears with preserved residual hearing provides an additional benefit over electrical stimulation alone.

Minimizing intracochlear trauma during cochlear implantation.

Several clinical trials have now demonstrated the feasibility and benefit of ipsilateral bimodal electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system for patients with varying degrees of hearing loss. Surgical techniques employed as a part of these investigations have been similar and focus on the implementation of atraumatic surgical principles. Each procedural step aims at minimizing intracochlear damage. A cochleostomy site inferior and slightly anterior to the round window membrane forms the basis for creating an opening into the scala tympani that avoids the critical structures of the inner ear. Electrode arrays have also been developed and refined to allow for relatively limited insertion-related damage. Using these specialized approaches, hearing preservation rates approaching 90% have been achieved. While impressive, this number reflects the conservation of only some degree of residual hearing. Complete preservation of hearing without any loss in pure tone thresholds and/ or discrimination abilities remains unusual, especially in subjects that have received a full-turn insertion. Thus, further work is clearly needed to optimize surgical protocols in an attempt to achieve total hearing preservation in all cases. A variety of biological and technological areas of investigation hold promise for fulfilling these goals. This report will review the current state of hearing preservation cochlear implantation as it relates to combined ipsi-lateral bimodal or electric acoustic stimulation.

Ipsilateral electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of long-term hearing preservation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term ipsilateral hearing preservation in patients who underwent cochlear implantation for the combined electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted at a tertiary referral center. Twenty-three subjects were implanted with the MED-EL C40+ standard or C40+ medium electrode using an atraumatic surgical protocol via an anterior-inferior cochleostomy approach. The desired insertion depth was 18-24 mm or 360 degrees. All patients showed significant low-frequency hearing prior to surgery and monosyllabic word scores did not exceed 40% in the best aided condition. Pure-tone audiometry was performed prior to implantation and at distinct intervals after surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients (39.1%) showed complete pure-tone audiometric hearing preservation (0-10 dB) over an average of 29 months. Seven subjects (30.4%) showed partial preservation of residual hearing (hearing loss 15-40 dB) until an average of 25 months. Delayed loss of residual hearing was observed in 5 cases (21.7%) and 2 patients (8.6%) completely lost residual hearing during or immediately after surgery. Freiburger Monosyllabic word understanding scores in a group of patients with complete hearing preservation increased from 13.1% preoperatively to 75% in the electric acoustic stimulation condition. CONCLUSION: This study documents that complete and partial preservation of ipsilateral hearing after cochlear implantation can be achieved in about 70% of cases over an average period of 27.25 months when using 360 degrees electrode insertions.