RESUMO
Cricket-bowling performance is known to be influenced by speed of ball release and accuracy. Currently, training sessions typically involve fielding-specific drills and conditioning exercises. Scientific evidence for inclusion of a comprehensive yoga intervention in daily training and exercise sessions remains unexplored. The present study explored the effect of yoga on bowling performance and physical fitness in cricket bowlers. Sports fitness testing and training were conducted among 60 non-elite recreational-club male cricket players aged 13-25 years. Cricket-bowling speed was e valuated using a speed radar gun, accuracy with a test developed by Portus et al., cardiorespiratory endurance using the yo-yo intermittent recovery test, lower-extremity and trunk strength using a back-leg dynamometer, upper-limb power using a medicine ball-throw test, power using a vertical-jump test, and flexibility using a sit-and-reach test. In addition to bowling practice, the yoga intervention group (n = 30) performed pranayama and standing and prone asana, whereas the control group (n = 30) practiced conventional conditioning exercises, for 45 minutes/day, three times a week, for 12 weeks. Improvement in bowling speed, accuracy, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscle strength, and flexibility were comparable between the two groups. Statistically significant improvements in baseline scores in bowling speed, accuracy, cardiorespiratory endurance, muscle flexibility, strength, and power were comparable between the two groups of non-elite male cricket players. Bowling speed improved by 6.52% in the yoga group and by 5.18% in the control group. Bowling accuracy improved by 35.40% in the yoga group and by 31.29% in the control group. Additional research on long-duration intervention in elite players may help to establish the role of yoga in conventional cricket-bowling training.
Assuntos
Esportes , Yoga , Exercício Físico , Humanos , Masculino , Força Muscular , Aptidão FísicaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bounce rope-skip holds immense scope as an aerobic exercise in space and time constrained urban setting with additional constraints placed by pandemic situations such as Covid 19, wherein adherence to commonly performed weight-bearing, aerobic activities like walking and running is a challenge. Limited knowledge informing biomechanical demands and misconceptions about knee joint loading, confines safe application of bounce rope-skip in health promotion. Thus, present study aimed to explore kinematics and lower-extremity joint loading during rope-skipping compared to walking and running. METHODS: Following ethical approval, 3D motion analysis of bounce rope-skip, walk and run was captured from 22 healthy female participants aged 18-25yr using 12-camera Vicon system and 2AMTI force plates. Three trials for bounce rope-skip were recorded with five skip-jumps on force-plates at a cadence of 105 skips/min. Mid-skip, mid-gait and mid-run data were averaged to compute kinetic and kinematic variables for hip, knee and ankle during loading/initial contact, take-off/push-off and flight/mid-swing phases of rope-skip, walk and run. RESULT: Average time of one rope-skip cycle was 1.2sec; mean foot contact time was 0.55sec and flight time was 0.65sec. In one bounce rope-skip cycle, hip motion ranged between 13.4o-35.3oflexion; knee between 13.6 o-67.9° flexion and ankle between 34.5odorsiflexion to-13.40plantarflexion. Vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during rope-skip (landing-phase) was lower compared to run; however, it was higher than walk (p < 0.001). In coronal plane, peak hip and knee adductor moment during rope-skip were lower compared to run and higher than walk (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Bounce rope-skip generated low lower extremity joint loading compared to run; supporting its prescription as a hip and knee joint-protective aerobic weight-bearing exercise for health promotion in young adults.