The phytochemical, corynoline, diminishes Aurora kinase B activity to induce mitotic defect and polyploidy.

Plants are a rich source for bioactive compounds. However, plant extracts can harbor a mixture of bioactive molecules that promote divergent phenotypes and potentially have confounding effects in bioassays. Even with further purification and identification, target deconvolution can be challenging. Corynoline and acetylcorynoline, are phytochemicals that were previously isolated through a screen for compounds able to induce mitotic arrest and polyploidy in oncogene expressing retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. Here, we shed light on the mechanism by which these phytochemicals can attack human cancer cells. Mitotic arrest was coincident to the induction of centrosome amplification and declustering, causing multi-polar spindle formation. Corynoline was demonstrated to have true centrosome declustering activity in a model where A549 cells were chemically induced to have more than a regular complement of centrosomes. Corynoline could inhibit the centrosome clustering required for pseudo-bipolar spindle formation in these cells. The activity of AURKB, but not AURKA or polo-like kinase 4, was diminished by corynoline. It only partially inhibited AURKB, so it may be a partial antagonist or corynoline may work upstream on an unknown regulator of AURKB activity or localization. Nonetheless, corynoline and acetylcorynoline inhibited the viability of a variety of human cancer derived cell lines. These phytochemicals could serve as prototypes for a next-generation analog with improved potency, selectivity or in vivo bioavailability. Such an analog could be useful as a non-toxic component of combination therapies where inhibiting the chromosomal passenger protein complex is desired.

Enhancing radiosensitisation of BRCA2-proficient and BRCA2-deficient cell lines with hyperthermia and PARP1-i.

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase1 (PARP1) is an important enzyme in regulating DNA replication. Inhibition of PARP1 can lead to collapsed DNA forks which subsequently causes genomic instability, making DNA more susceptible in developing fatal DNA double strand breaks. PARP1-induced DNA damage is generally repaired by homologous recombination (HR), in which BRCA2 proteins are essential. Therefore, BRCA2-deficient tumour cells are susceptible to treatment with PARP1-inhibitors (PARP1-i). Recently, BRCA2 was shown to be down-regulated by hyperthermia (HT) temporarily, and this consequently inactivated HR for several hours. In this study, we investigated whether HT exclusively interferes with HR by analysing thermal radiosensitisation of BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells. After elucidating the equitoxicity of PARP1-i on BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells, we studied the cell survival, apoptosis, DNA damage (γ-H2AX foci and comet assay) and cell cycle distribution after different treatments. PARP1-i sensitivity strongly depends on the BRCA2 status. BRCA2-proficient and deficient cells are radiosensitised by HT, indicating that HT does not exclusively act by inhibition of HR. In all cell lines, the addition of HT to radiotherapy and PARP1-i resulted in the lowest cell survival, the highest levels of DNA damage and apoptotic levels compared to duo-modality treatments. Concluding, HT not only inhibits HR, but also has the capability of radiosensitising BRCA2-deficient cells. Thus, in case of BRCA2-mutation carriers, combining HT with PARP1-i may boost the treatment efficacy. This combination therapy would be effective for all patients with PARP1-i regardless of their BRCA status.