Association of Glycated Hemoglobin With a Risk of Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk Individuals Based on Genetic and Family History.

INTRODUCTION: Screening for pancreatic cancer (PC) is suggested for high-risk individuals. Additional risk factors may enhance early detection in this population. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study among patients with germline variants and/or familial pancreatic cancer in an integrated healthcare system between 2003 and 2019. We calculated the incidence rate (IR) by risk category and performed a nested case-control study to evaluate the relationship between HbA1C and PC within 3 years before diagnosis (cases) or match date (controls). Cases were matched 1:4 by age, sex, and timing of HbA1c. Logistic regression was performed to assess an independent association with PC. RESULTS: We identified 5,931 high-risk individuals: 1,175(19.8%) familial PC, 45(0.8%) high-risk germline variants ( STK11, CDKN2A ), 4,097(69.1%) had other germline variants ( ATM, BRCA 1, BRCA 2, CASR, CDKN2A, CFTR, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PRSS1, STK11, and TP53 ), and 614(10.4%) had both germline variants and family history. Sixty-eight patients (1.1%) developed PC; 50% were metastatic at diagnosis. High-risk variant was associated with greatest risk of PC, IR = 85.1(95% confidence interval: 36.7-197.6)/10,000 person-years; other germline variants and first-degree relative had IR = 33 (18.4, 59.3), whereas IR among ≥2 first-degree relative alone was 10.7 (6.1, 18.8). HbA1c was significantly higher among cases vs controls (median = 7.0% vs 6.4%, P = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, every 1% increase in HbA1c was associated with 36% increase in odds of PC (odds ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.72). Pancreatitis was independently associated with a risk of PC (odds ratio 3.93, 95% confidence limit 1.19, 12.91). DISCUSSION: Risk of PC varies among high-risk individuals. HbA1c and history of pancreatitis may be useful additional markers for early detection in this patient population.

Medication adherence, molecular monitoring, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in a large HMO.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the association between adherence to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and molecular monitoring and the risk of disease progression or mortality among patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). DESIGN: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with CML (chronic phase, no prior cancer history, and confirmed to be Philadelphia chromosome positive) using data from electronic health records and chart reviews. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was used to measure drug adherence. SETTING: A large, community-based, integrated health plan in Southern California. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of 245 adult patients (≥18 years old) with Philadelphia positive chronic phase CML diagnosed from 2001 to 2012 and followed through 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In survival analyses, we examined the association of TKI adherence (MPR) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring test frequency with the composite clinical outcome, progression to accelerated phase disease-blast crisis or mortality (progression-free survival). The cohort was followed for a maximum of 13 years (median 4.6 years). RESULTS: Over 90% of the cohort initiated TKI therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, and the mean MPR was 88% (SD 18%). Virtually all patients (96%) started on imatinib. The rates of progression to accelerated phase-blast crisis and mortality were lower in patients with greater TKI adherence (20.4/1000 person-years) versus lower adherence (27.0/1000 person-years). Patients who underwent PCR monitoring had a significantly reduced risk of progression or mortality, which was seen in patients with high and low TKI adherence status from both the groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.07 [95% CI 0.03-0.19 if MPR >90%] and HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.02-0.21 if MPR<90%]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that close clinical monitoring, which includes PCR monitoring in patients with high and low TKI drug adherence, is associated with a lower risk of progression or mortality.

Impact of breast cancer subtypes and treatment on survival: an analysis spanning two decades.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes and treatment on survival in a cohort of medically insured women followed for more than 20 years. METHODS: We examined 934 female members of an integrated health care delivery system newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1988 and 1995 and followed them through 2008. Tumors were classified into four molecular subtypes on the basis of their expression profile: luminal A; luminal B; basal-like; and HER2-enriched. We followed women from the surgery date to death, health plan disenrollment, or study's end. HR and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were fit using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for cancer treatments and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 223 (23.9%) women died because of breast cancer during the 21-year study period. Compared with women with luminal A tumors, women with HER2-enriched (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.53-4.29) and luminal B tumors (HR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.08-3.54) had roughly a two-fold increased adjusted risk of breast cancer mortality. In addition, the survival curves suggest that risk of late mortality persists in women with luminal A tumors. CONCLUSION: Among women with health care coverage, molecular subtypes were important predictors of breast cancer mortality. Women with HER2-enriched tumors and luminal B subtypes had the poorest survival despite adjusting for important covariates. IMPACT: In a cohort followed for more than 20 years, women with HER2-enriched tumors had worse survival, but interestingly, the survival curve for women with luminal A tumors continued to steadily decline after 10 years of follow-up.