NCCN Asia Consensus Statement prostate cancer.

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an NPO organization comprised of university hospitals and cancer centers in the US. The publication of clinical practice guidelines on the treatment, diagnosis, prevention and screening is one of important activities. Background factors of prostate cancer patients, such as the prevalence, age at the diagnosis and mortality are markedly different between Western countries and Asia. Thus, various factors should be taken into consideration at the treatment choice for individual patients. Experts from Asian countries were published as the Asia Consensus Statement. In this review, we explain important points of the Asia Consensus Statement such as differences in the epidemiological backgrounds of patients, differences in treatment options and differences in medical insurance systems.

Little Impact on Renal Function in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib--Analyses of Postmarketing Surveillance in Japan in over 3,200 Consecutive Cases.

BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of sorafenib on renal function in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) included in a postmarketing surveillance. METHODS: All patients in Japan with advanced RCC treated with sorafenib between February 2008 and September 2009 were followed for 12 months. Baseline characteristics, renal function, survival, safety, and dosage were stratified according to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): G1 (eGFR≥90), G2 (eGFR≥60-<90), G3a (eGFR≥45-<60), G3b (eGFR≥30-<45), G4 (eGFR≥15-<30), and G5 (eGFR<15). A total of 3,255 and 3,171 patients were included in this analysis for safety and efficacy, respectively. RESULTS: The mean eGFRs (mL/min/1.73 m2) were not substantially changed for each group at baseline and 12 months, respectively. Median daily doses of sorafenib were 726 mg (G1), 522 mg (G2), 524 mg (G3a), 517 mg (G3b), 483 mg (G4), and 400 mg (G5). Renal failure, reported as an adverse event, occurred more frequently in the G4 and G5 groups (9%and 3%, respectively) than in other groups. Objective response rates for each subgroup were as follows: G1, 23%; G2, 28%; G3a, 29%; G3b, 26%; G4, 24%; and G5, 18%. One-year survival was higher in the G3a and G3b groups (82% and 78%, respectively) and lower in the G1 group (50%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated little impact of sorafenib on renal function in advanced RCC patients during the observational period. Patients showed sufficient clinical response and safety irrespective of baseline eGFR value.

A large-scale prospective registration study of the safety and efficacy of sorafenib tosylate in unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan: results of over 3200 consecutive cases in post-marketing all-patient surveillance.

OBJECTIVE: Real-life safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma in a nationwide patient population were evaluated by post-marketing all-patient surveillance. METHODS: All patients with unresectable or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Japan who started sorafenib therapy from February 2008 to September 2009 were registered and followed for up to 12 months. Baseline characteristics, treatment status, tumor response, survival and safety data were recorded by the prescribing physicians. RESULTS: Safety and efficacy were evaluated in 3255 and 3171 patients, respectively. The initial daily dose was 800 mg in 78.2% of patients. Median duration of treatment was 6.7 months and the mean relative dose intensity was 68.4%. Overall, 2227 patients (68.4%) discontinued the treatment by 12 months, half of which (52.0% of discontinued patients) were due to adverse events. The most common adverse drug reactions were hand-foot skin reaction (59%), hypertension (36%), rash (25%) and increase in lipase/amylase (23%). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% confidence intervals: 6.7-8.1), and the overall survival rate at 1 year was 75.4% (73.5-77.1). Prognostic factors for overall survival were mostly consistent with those in previous clinical trials in the univariate analysis and largely similar to those for progression-free survival and duration of treatment in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma under the labeled dose was feasible in daily medical practice, for its acceptable toxicity profile and favorable clinical benefit that were consistent with those in clinical trials.

[NCCN Asian consensus statement - can Asian patients with cancer accept treatment modalities from NCCN guidelines ?].

To spread the National Comprehensive Cancer Network(NCCN)guidelines widely in Asia, committee members from Asian countries have been preparing an Asia Consensus Statement(ACS)along the NCCN guidelines. The ACS for Kidney Cancer guidelines and Prostate Cancer guidelines were issued in 2009 and in 2011, respectively. In addition, second versions of both these guidelines were issued in 2011 and 2013, respectively. In this review, the process and contents of NCCN ACS have been described.

Axitinib for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Advanced understanding of the pathogenesis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has led to development and approval of several molecularly targeted therapies since 2005. Axitinib is a potent and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3. In the randomized Phase III AXIS trial, axitinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with sorafenib, respectively (6.7 vs 4.7 months; p < 0.0001), and improved objective response rate (19 vs 9%; p = 0.0001), resulting in its approval for advanced or metastatic RCC after failure of one systemic therapy. However, overall survival was similar with axitinib and sorafenib. Common adverse events associated with axitinib include diarrhea, hypertension and fatigue. AREAS COVERED: The properties, clinical efficacy, adverse events, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of axitinib are summarized and its position in the overall therapeutic landscape for metastatic RCC among several targeted therapies is described. EXPERT OPINION: Axitinib is generally well-tolerated and provides definitive clinical benefits in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC as second-line therapy. However, as with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the same class, axitinib does not prolong overall survival; therefore, selection of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, including axitinib, must be carefully considered to maximize outcomes for each patient.

Efficacy and safety of axitinib versus sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis of Japanese patients from the global randomized Phase 3 AXIS trial.

OBJECTIVE: Axitinib is a potent and selective second-generation inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3. The efficacy and safety of axitinib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were evaluated. METHODS: A subgroup analysis was conducted in Japanese patients enrolled in the randomized Phase III trial of axitinib versus sorafenib after failure of one prior systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. RESULTS: Twenty-five (of 361) and 29 (of 362) patients randomized to the axitinib and sorafenib arms, respectively, were Japanese and included in this analysis. Median progression-free survival in Japanese patients was 12.1 months (95% confidence interval 8.6 to not estimable) for axitinib and 4.9 months (95% confidence interval 2.8-6.6) for sorafenib (hazard ratio 0.390; 95% confidence interval 0.130-1.173; stratified one-sided P = 0.0401). The objective response rate was 52.0% for axitinib and 3.4% for sorafenib (P = 0.0001). The common all-causality adverse events (all grades) in Japanese patients were dysphonia (68%), hypertension (64%), hand-foot syndrome (64%) and diarrhea (56%) for axitinib, and hand-foot syndrome (86%), hypertension (62%) and diarrhea (52%) for sorafenib. The safety profiles of axitinib and sorafenib in Japanese patients were generally similar to those observed in the overall population, with the exceptions of higher incidences of hypertension, dysphonia, hand-foot syndrome, hypothyroidism and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib is efficacious and well tolerated in Japanese patients with previously treated metastatic renal cell carcinoma, consistent with the results in the overall population, providing a new targeted therapy for these Japanese patients.

[Serum pancreatic enzyme elevation under treatment with sorafenib].

OBJECTIVE: Sorafenib is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor of Raf-1, VEGF and PDGF receptors and others, resulting in tumor regression and anti-angiogenesis. We studied serum pancreatic enzyme increase associated with sorafenib treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase II study of Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, a total of 131 patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice per day. Serum levels of lipase and amylase were measured on day 7 and every 3-4 weeks thereafter during treatment period. When grade 3 or 4 enzyme abnormalities were observed, ultrasound or computed tomography scan was performed to detect pancreatitis. RESULTS: The incidence of all-grades lipase and amylase increases were 55. 7% and 38. 2%, respectively, while those of grade 3 or 4 were 30. 5% and 5. 3%, respectively. The majority of these events were observed in the first 3 weeks of sorafenib treatment. Grade 3 or 4 lipase increase was detected in 32 patients (24. 4%)on day 7 measurement. These abnormal elevations spontaneously resolved in all patients. Regarding grade 3 lipase increase, the median time to recovery to grade 2 and 1 were 7 and 14 days, respectively. Three patients required interruption of the treatment. No patient showed any clinical manifestation or abnormal imaging finding suggesting pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic enzyme increases observed frequently under sorafenib treatment were transient and asymptomatic. They were not related to symptomatic pancreatitis.

The eighth Asia cancer forum: seeking to advance the outcomes of the UN summit: 'global health as the key to a new paradigm in cancer research'.

To date, the Asia Cancer Forum has focused its efforts on creating a common concept for collaborative efforts in international cancer research with a focus on Asia, where cancer incidence is rising dramatically, and also sharing information and knowledge among cancer specialists about the importance of cancer as a global health agenda issue. The Eighth Asia Cancer Forum was held following the historic outcome of the High-level Meeting of the United Nations General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases held in New York in September 2011, at which cancer was duly recognized as a global health agenda issue. Despite this significant development, however, the issue of cancer, one of the most intractable of all non-communicable diseases, still faces a variety of challenges if it is to be addressed on the global level. The Eighth Asia Cancer Forum sought to address these various issues, seeking ways to capitalize on the outcomes of the UN Meeting and take global collaborative studies and alliances in the field of cancer further. It was recognized that one of the main challenges for the Asia Cancer Forum is to formulate a proposal that demonstrates how middle-income countries can provide a good level of care using only their own limited medical resources. Given that the Asia Cancer Forum is one of the organizations that can provide assistance in working to further boost awareness about cancer research and the situation relating to cancer in Asian countries, discussion also focused on how to concretize activities in the future.

A review of current guidelines and best practice recommendations for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer by the International Bladder Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: Although the European Association of Urology, First International Consultation on Bladder Tumors, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines all provide an excellent evidence-based framework for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, these guidelines vary with respect to important issues such as risk level definitions and management strategies for these risk categories. Therefore, we built on the existing framework provided by current guidelines, and provide consensus on the definitions of low, intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, as well as practical recommendations for the treatment of patients in each of these risk categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international committee of experts on bladder cancer management identified and analyzed the European Association of Urology, First International Consultation on Bladder Tumors, National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Urological Association guidelines as well as the published English language literature related to the treatment and management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer available as of April 2010. RESULTS: Based on review of the current guidelines and literature, the International Bladder Cancer Group developed practical recommendations for the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Complete transurethral bladder tumor resection is recommended for all patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. For low risk disease a single, immediate chemotherapeutic instillation after transurethral bladder tumor resection is recommended. For intermediate or high risk disease there is no significant benefit from an immediate, postoperative chemotherapeutic instillation. For intermediate risk disease intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin with maintenance or intravesical chemotherapy is recommended. For high risk disease bacillus Calmette-Guérin induction plus maintenance is recommended. The appropriate management of recurrence depends on the patient level of risk as well as previous treatment, while the management of treatment failure depends on the type of failure as well as the level of risk for recurrence and disease progression.

Overall survival and good tolerability of long-term use of sorafenib after cytokine treatment: final results of a phase II trial of sorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Interim result of this study had shown promising efficacy, with response rate of 14.7% and median PFS of 7.4 months, and good tolerability of sorafenib in previously-treated Japanese patients with metastatic RCC. Final result of the study adds: (1) the median overall survival of 25.3 months, which is longer than that in the global phase III study TARGET; (2) the response rate which elevated to 19.4% because of 6 late responders achieved after 9.2 months or longer of SD period; (3) lack of either unknown adverse events nor cumulative toxicity in the long-term use of sorafenib. OBJECTIVE: • To explore the long-term efficacy and safety of sorafenib in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in a phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • In all, 131 Japanese patients with metastatic RCC who had received nephrectomy and failed at least one cytokine-containing systemic therapy received continuous sorafenib 400 mg twice daily, and the efficacy and safety parameters were evaluated in these patients, including objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: • Of the total, 129 patients were valid for intention-to-treat analyses and 131 patients were valid for safety analyses. • Twenty-five patients (19.4%) had confirmed partial response and 87 patients (67.4%) had stable disease as best overall response. The 25 patients included six late-responders who achieved response after 9.2 months or longer of stable disease. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 19.4% and 73.6%, respectively. • The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 25.3 and 7.9 months, respectively. • Safety profile was consistent with those previously reported, with hand-foot skin reaction (58.0%), lipase elevation (57.3%) and diarrhoea (42.7%) as the most frequently observed drug-related adverse events. Neither unknown adverse event nor cumulative toxicity was observed over the long-term use of sorafenib. • Despite the dose discontinuation/interruption/reduction, the mean and median relative dose intensities were 86.4% and 97.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: • The final results of this trial showed that long-term use of sorafenib after cytokine treatment was well tolerated and provided new efficacy data, including late-response events and favourable overall survival in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC.

[Sorafenib(Nexavar)].

Sorafenib(Nexavar)is a multikinase inhibitor, with disruptive activity at intracellular C-RAF, B-RAF and mutant BRAF receptors, and extracellular C-KIT, FLT-3, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and PDGFRb receptors. In the phase III study, as compared with placebo, treatment with sorafenib significantly prolonged progression free survival(PFS)in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in whom previous therapy has failed. Diarrhea, rash, fatigue, hand-foot skin reactions, and hypertension were the most common adverse events associated with sorafenib. As sorafenib was associated with similar rates of clinically manageable side effects in elderly patients as compared to younger patients, response rates to sorafenib in elderly patients were comparable to those of younger patients. Sorafenib was approved multinationally for the treatment of advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sorafenib and sunitinib are reference standards of care for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and are recommended by current clinical guidelines. For the future, research of biomarker, adverse drug reaction, and combined regimens are needed to maximize the effects of molecular-targeted drugs.

[Future directions of anticancer drug development in Japan].

At the 13th Oncology Forum, future directions of anticancer drug development in Japan were discussed. Development of anticancer drugs in the 1990s was based on the concept of total cell kill, but now development of molecular targeted drugs becomes the mainstream. Unfortunately, molecular targeted drugs and antibody agents are mostly foreign products and translational research in Japan is poor as it stands now. As future directions of anticancer drug development, international collaborative development is considered essential, but there are various obstacles to the conduct of international collaborative studies. Companies, medical institutions and regulatory agencies must make collaborative efforts to overcome these obstacles. As future development of anticancer agents in individual cancer regions in Japan is considered, gastric cancer therapy is progressing considerably with the advent of S-1 and in the future, development of multi-agent combination therapy including molecular targeted agents is expected. Much progress in colon cancer therapy has been made owing to accumulation of evidence in recent years. Multi-agent chemotherapy combined with antibody agent, which is advancing overseas, is introduced to Japan. Clinical development of combination therapy with a high therapeutic index, including compounds discovered in Japan, is expected in the future. Although conventionally hormone therapy has been considered as first-line treatment of breast cancer and used in combination with chemotherapy, with the advent of antibody agents in recent years, HER2 sensitivity has greatly affected the algorithm of treatment. Future development of molecular targeted drugs and individualised diagnosis using cDNA array, etc. are likely to advance individualisation of treatment. On the other hand, large-scale clinical trials are required to prove a small difference in adjuvant therapy, etc. and accordingly international studies are becoming indispensable. For urological cancers, molecular targeted drugs have been proved effective in renal cancer and future development of molecular targeted drugs for prostate cancer and testicular tumors is desirable. At that time, elucidation of the mechanism of action of molecular targeted drug and strategic drug development designed to increase its efficacy are expected. As a future direction of anticancer drug development, there are many cancers in whose international collaborative studies Japan can participate. Studies of prostate cancer and renal cell carcinoma can be internationalised while internationalisation of studies in ovarian and pancreatic cancers is essential. Phase III should be performed as international collaborative studies and depending on the type of cancer and drug, collaborative studies in an Asian region are effective. When participating in an international collaborative study, Japan needs to recruit subjects at a speed similar to the rest of the world, but differences in medical environment including clinical trials pose a problem. To solve this problem, it is considered effective not only to pursue the Western environment but also to improve staff such as nurses and CRC. The number of Japanese patients necessary for Phase III studies is individual developmental strategy and needs to be examined by both companies and regulatory agencies.

Phase II study to investigate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Sorafenib (Nexavar) is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and angiogenesis. This phase II study investigated efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Nonrandomized, open-label study in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had received nephrectomy and failed >/=1 cytokine-containing therapy. The primary endpoint was response rate. Patients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) on a continuous dosing schedule. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients (median age 63 years) were valid for intention-to-treat analyses. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 16 (12.4%) patients, and investigators assessed that 19 (14.7%) of the patients achieved a partial response. Stable disease was reported in 93 (72.1%) patients, and 103 (80.5%) patients had tumor shrinkage. Median progression-free survival was 224 days and the 25th percentile of overall survival was estimated at 288 days. The most frequently occurring drug-related adverse events (any grade) were elevated lipase (56%), hand-foot skin reaction (55%), alopecia (39%), increased amylase (38%), rash/desquamation (37%), and diarrhea (34%). A total of 14 (10.7%) patients had serious sorafenib-related adverse events, including one adverse event of worst grade 5 (dyspnea occurred 35 days after the last dose of study medication). The C(trough,steady state) values in RCC patients (n = 63) receiving sorafenib 400 mg b.i.d. were similar to those obtained from a Japanese phase I study involving patients with mixed solid tumors. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib showed encouraging efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with metastatic RCC.

The 5th Conference on Asian Trends in Prostate Cancer Hormone Therapy.

The Conference on Asian Trends in Prostate Cancer Hormone Therapy is an annual forum for Asian urologists now in its 5th year. The 2006 conference, held in Bali, Indonesia, was attended by 27 leading urologic oncologists from China, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan and featured a packed program of presentations and discussions on a wide range of topics such as relationships among clinicians and the newly opened Asia Regional Office for Cancer Control of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), detection rates of prostate cancer by biopsy in each of the 6 Asian countries, and favored treatment modalities for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) in each country. The first session of the conference kicked off with a keynote lecture entitled "Activities of the UICC ARO". UICC's new office will be the nerve center for its activities in the Asia region. Along with the Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention (APOCP), UICC aims to shift the focus of attention to cancer control. As such APOCP's long-running publication the APJCP is to be re-launched as the Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Control. Although UICC is primarily concerned with cancer, several risk factors for cancer are common also to other non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and heart disease, and an important strategy is to implement measures to control these various pathologic conditions as a whole. Apart from contributing to an Asian prostate cancer registry the UICC-ARO will provide training courses, working groups, and assistance in collecting and processing data. The keynote lecture was followed by a roundtable discussion on possible ways in which clinicians from each Asian country can work with UICC. A number of suggestions were put forth including better registration, epidemiology research, possible implementation of UICC prostate cancer guidelines, early detection and screening, and roles of diet and phytotherapy. The underlying reasons for the large but dwindling difference in incidence rates of prostate cancer in various regions of Asia should be studied while the opportunity lasts. Session 2 was devoted to 6 presentations on detection rates by biopsy in each country. Although biopsy is the gold standard for detecting prostate cancer in most areas, indications for conducting biopsy are different in each country. For example, in Indonesia doctors may use PSAD 0.15 as the cutoff level. TRUS-guided biopsy is most widely used in Asian countries. Traditional sextant biopsy is often performed, although multiple-core biopsy is commonly available and associated with better detection rates, especially in men with large prostate volume. Positive DRE, high PSA, and older age were identified as factors associated with high biopsy detection rate, although elevated PSA has limited specificity. First biopsy in men with elevated PSA had a positive detection rate of approximately 30% in all countries. Community-based screening in some countries has an overall detection rate of approximately 1%. The favorable treatment modality for HRPC was the subject of the final session. First priority for doctors in all 6 countries is to maintain serum testosterone at castration level. Many therapeutic options are available, from cytotoxic drugs to traditional herbal medicines Chemotherapeutic agents such as estramustine, docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone are often given to patients with HRPC although not all are available in every country. Prednisone and dexamethasone are used for secondary hormonal therapy. External beam radiotherapy, radioisotopic drugs such as strontium 89, and bisphosphonates are common choices to control bone pain.

Higher consumption of green tea may enhance equol production.

BACKGROUND: Our previous case-control study revealed that Japanese living in Japan and Koreans living in Korea can be divided into equol producers who have an ability to metabolize daidzein to equol and non-producers, and that the incidence of prostate cancer is higher in the latter group. In the present study, we examined relationships between type of food intake and the capacity for equol production in Japanese subjects. METHODS: The subjects were the individuals analyzed for the ability to produce equol in our previous study and newly registered cases. From December 2000 to December 2002, 276 hospitalized patients were interviewed face-to-face and blood samples were collected before breakfast. These included 122 patients with prostate cancer and 154 age-matched controls. RESULTS: The frequency of equol producers (0.5 ng/ml or more) among cases and controls was 29% and 45%, respectively (p = 0.004). The consumption of soybeans and green tea were significantly higher in equol producers than in the non-producers (p<0.05). By contrast, the consumption of selenium and fiber was significantly lower in equol producers (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that higher consumption of soybean and green tea are strongly related to the establishment of a capacity for equol production.

Asian trends in prostate cancer hormone therapy.

The first Conference on Asian Trends in Prostate Cancer Hormone Therapy was held in September 2001 to serve as a forum for Asian urologists to compare data on prostate cancer and discuss issues regarding the use of hormone therapy. The conference revealed that due to various cultural and philosophical factors, differences exist in prostate cancer management among the Asian countries. In addition, a lack of databases on hormone therapy was exposed in some countries. It was noted that many decisions in the treatment of prostate cancer are influenced by the strategies adopted in Western countries, and that attempts to formulate uniform guidelines for the Asian region have hitherto been unsuccessful. The main findings of the conference are reported in this review.