Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vascular ; 25(2): 137-141, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27154976

RESUMO

Aim This pilot study aimed to reveal whether combination of electrostimulation with iloprost treatment achieves better results compared to iloprost alone in patients with critical limb ischemia. Material and methods Patients were randomized into Group 1 ( n = 11, mean age: 65.3 ± 4.2 years, received iloprost infusion protocol alone) or Group 2 ( n = 11, mean age: 62.9 ± 6.7, received iloprost infusion plus standardized protocol of peroneal nerve electrostimulation). Electrostimulation was delivered with 1 Hz frequency, 27 mA current, and 200 ms pulse width. Peak blood flow velocities in the anterior and posterior tibialis arteries were measured with duplex ultrasound. Results There was a slight insignificant increase in blood velocity in anterior tibialis artery in Group 1 (from 17.6 ± 13.0 to 18.6 ± 13.1, p = 0.57), whereas the increase in Group 2 was marked (from 23.8 ± 18.3 to 32.2 ± 19.7, p = 0.01). Blood velocity in posterior tibialis artery also increased in both groups, but it was not of statistical significance. No significant difference was found between two groups in regard to final pulse oximetry oxygen saturation levels. Conclusion Electrostimulation of the peroneal nerve caused a substantial increase in anterior tibialis artery blood velocity when used as an adjunct to medical therapy in patients with critical limb ischemia.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Iloprosta/uso terapêutico , Isquemia/terapia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Nervo Fibular , Artérias da Tíbia/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Terapia Combinada , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Iloprosta/efeitos adversos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional , Artérias da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Artérias da Tíbia/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Turquia , Ultrassonografia Doppler Dupla , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversos
2.
Phlebology ; 31(4): 251-6, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852131

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the potential role of a novel electrostimulation device in augmenting the femoral vein venous blood flow following total knee replacement surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 30 consecutive patients undergoing total knee replacement were allocated to receive either peroneal nerve electrostimulation plus low molecular weight heparin and below-knee compression stockings (Group 1, electrostimulation group, n = 15, mean age: 63.40 ± 5.91 years, male: female ratio 9:6) or low molecular weight heparin and below-knee compression stockings alone (Group 2, control group, n = 15, mean age: 63.86 ± 7.47 years, male: female ratio 8:7). Electrostimulation was performed for 1 h in every 4 h after the operation. Peak blood velocity in the femoral vein was evaluated with Duplex ultrasonongraphy in supine position. Presence of leg edema and calf diameter was also taken into consideration as outcome measures, which were recorded both before surgery and at the time of discharge from hospital. RESULTS: Postoperative peak blood flow velocity in the femoral vein was significantly higher in electrostimulation group compared to control group (17.46 ± 2.86 cm/s vs. 13.84 ± 3.58 cm/s, p < 0.02). Electrostimulation group achieved a significant increase in peak blood flow velocity in the femoral vein after the operation (mean increase 67.48 ± 17.38%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Electrostimulation of the common peroneal nerve enhanced venous flow in the lower limb and may potentially be of use as a supplementary technique in deep venous prophylaxis following lower limb orthopedic operations.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Meias de Compressão , Tromboembolia Venosa , Idoso , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/fisiopatologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA