Ethnopharmacological Study of Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of Skin Burns in the Arab World.

Traditional healers are often practiced in rural areas owing to cultural beliefs and are known to provide various forms of healthcare and home remedies. Patients in the Mediterranean region rely on traditional medicine to cure a variety of health concerns, like skin burns. This study was conducted to identify the various practices used by traditional healers for treating skin burns. The survey was conducted in 18 Arab countries, including Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Bahrain, Palestine, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Lebanon, Yemen, Tunisia, Oman, Morocco, and Sudan. Between September 2020 and July 2021, an online questionnaire was administered to 7530 participants from 12 Asian and 5 African countries. The survey was designed to gather information from common medicinal plant users and herbalists on their practices as specialists in using various herbal and medicinal plant products for diagnosis and treatment. Among the participants, 2260 had a scientific background in plant application, and the study included one phytotherapeutic professional. The crude-extraction technique was favored, by Arabic folk, for plant preparation over the maceration and decoction method. Olive oil was the most commonly used product among participants as an anti-inflammation and for scar reduction. Aloe vera, olive oil, sesame, Ceretonia siliqua, lavender, potato, cucumber, shea butter, and wheat flour are used as crude drugs to reduce pain because of their analgesic and cooling effects. The present study is the first database of medicinal plants with burn-healing properties conducted in Arab countries. These plants can be employed in the search for new bioactive substances through pharmacochemical investigations, as well as in the development of new formulations containing a combination of these plants.

Attitudes of midwives and obstetricians towards midwives practiced roles in hospitals: A national study in Jordan.

AIMS: The aims of this study were to identify midwives' and obstetricians' attitudes towards midwives practised roles in hospitals and to identify the differences in their attitudes towards midwives practiced roles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional, study design was used. A convenience sample of 303 midwives and 143 obstetricians were recruited. Participants were from 12 Ministry of Health (MOH) and Royal Medical Services (RMS) hospitals distributed across seven governorates. Two reliable and valid self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data including socio-demographic data-related characteristics of participants and obstetricians' and midwives' attitudes towards midwives' practiced role in hospitals. RESULTS: There were significant differences between obstetricians in the three subscales of attitudes: midwives women relationship attitude subscale, midwives trust and mutual respect subscale and work environment attitudes subscale. A significant difference by the institution was reported: obstetricians and midwives who worked in MOH reported more positive attitudes than those who worked in RMS. CONCLUSION: The results show that obstetricians recognise that midwives are qualified and competent professionals but still lack the competencies/skills to make them independent practitioners. The findings also confirm the need to improve midwives' practices by moving from being able to perform a specific task to possess all three attributes of "competencies," where they can intervene, manage and make decisions with confidence in each situation. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Based on the current study findings, parallel cooperation between educational/academic policymakers from both midwives and obstetricians may re-evaluate and upgrade the midwifery curriculum to meet the ICM competencies and health sector needs as a step to graduate competent midwives where their responsibility is recognised and organised.