Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 67(8): e0040523, 2023 08 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37404159

RESUMO

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%; P = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%; P = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%; P = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%; P = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.


Assuntos
Infecções por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
2.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 28: 288-294, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35121161

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) to colistin-based regimen for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of inpatients who received either C-T or intravenous colistin for treating infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa. The study was conducted in five tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The main study outcomes included clinical cure at end of treatment, in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model were conducted to evaluate the independent effect of C-T on the clinical outcome. RESULTS: A total of 184 patients were included in the study: 82 patients received C-T, and 102 patients received colistin-based regimen. Clinical cure (77% vs. 57%; P = 0.005; OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.32-4.79) was significantly more common in patients who received C-T. After adjusting the difference between the two groups, treatment with C-T is independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.16-5.27). In-hospital mortality (39% vs. 49%; P = 0.175; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37-1.20) was lower in patients who received C-T, but the difference was not significant. AKI (15% vs. 41%; P < 0.001; OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.51) was significantly less common in patients who received C-T. CONCLUSION: C-T is associated with a higher rate of clinical cure and lower rate of AKI compared to colistin. Our findings support the preferential use of C-T over colistin-based regimen for treating these infections.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Injúria Renal Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas , Colistina/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tazobactam/farmacologia , Tazobactam/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA