Argon plasma coagulation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in chronic radiation proctopathy, effectiveness and impact on tissue toxicity.

BACKGROUND: chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is associated with recurrent rectal bleeding and transfusional requirements. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) have been shown to be effective in the control of CRP. No prospective comparisons have been reported between these treatments. AIM: the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and impact on tissue toxicity of APC compared to HOT in patients with CRP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a prospective study for evaluating treatment response was conducted. Patients with cervical cancer and CRP with rectal bleeding were recruited. They had not received previous treatment. Collected data included: demographics, previous radiation dosage, duration and severity of rectal bleeding. Hemoglobin, transfusional requirements, and tissue toxicity (SOMA LENT questionnaire) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months follow up were recorded. RESULTS: thirty-one patients were included, 14 in the APC group and 17 in the HOT group. No response was noted in 13 and 18% of patients in the APC and HOT group respectively (p = NS). At the 1 and 2 months follow-up, the APC group showed a significantly better response in terms of transfusional requirements (0.6 vs. 3.4 and 0.7 vs. 2.5) and tissue toxicity score (5.3 vs. 8.6 and 3.8 vs. 7.248). After 3 months, both groups showed further improvement in all parameters without significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: APC and HOT were effective, safe and decreased the tissue toxicity scores in patients with CRP. However, response rate was higher and faster in the APC group.

Argón plasma y oxígeno hiperbárico para el control de la rectorragia crónica secundaria a la proctopatía por radiación / Argon plasma coagulation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in chronic radiation proctopathy, effectiveness and impact on tissue toxicity

Introducción: la proctopatía por radiación (PPR) se asocia con rectorragía recurrente y requerimientos de trasfusiones. La coagulación con argón plasma (APC) y la terapia con oxígeno hiperbárico (HOT) han sido efectivas en el control de la PPR. No hay estudios prospectivos comparativos entre ambas técnicas. Objetivo: el objetivo del estudio es evaluar la efectividad, seguridad y el impacto en la toxicidad tisular de la APC comparado con el HOT en los pacientes con PR. Material y métodos: se realizó un estudio prospectivo para evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento. Se incluyeron a pacientes con cáncer cervicouterino y PPR con rectorragia recurrente, sin haber recibido tratamientos previos. Se tomaron datos demográficos, dosis de radiación, duración y severidad de la rectorragia, niveles de hemoglobina, requerimientos de trasfusiones y la toxicidad tisular (Cuestionario de SOMA-LENT) al inicio, y a los 1, 2 y 3 meses del tratamiento. Resultados: se incluyeron a 31 pacientes con PPR, 14 en el grupo de APC y 17 en el grupo de HOT. No hubo respuesta en el 13 y 18% de los pacientes en el grupo de APC y OHT respectivamente (p = NS). Al primer y segundo mes de seguimiento, el grupo APC mostró una mejoría significativa en los parámetros de requerimientos trasfusionales (0,6 vs. 3,4 y 0,7 vs. 2,5) y en la toxicidad tisular (5,3 vs. 8,6 y 3,8 vs. 7,2). Después de 3 meses de seguimiento, ambos grupos mostraron mejoría en todos los parámetros sin haber diferencias estadísticamente significativas. Conclusiones: APC y HOT fueron efectivos, seguros y disminuyeron la toxicidad tisular en los pacientes con PPR. Sin embargo la respuesta fue más efectiva y rápida en el grupo del APC(AU)

Background: chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is associated with recurrent rectal bleeding and transfusional requirements. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) have been shown to be effective in the control of CRP. No prospective comparisons have been reported between these treatments. Aim: the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and impact on tissue toxicity of APC compared to HOT in patients with CRP. Material and methods: a prospective study for evaluating treatment response was conducted. Patients with cervical cancer and CRP with rectal bleeding were recruited. They had not received previous treatment. Collected data included: demographics, previous radiation dosage, duration and severity of rectal bleeding. Hemoglobin, transfusional requirements, and tissue toxicity (SOMA LENT questionnaire) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months follow up were recorded. Results: thirty-one patients were included, 14 in the APC group and 17 in the HOT group. No response was noted in 13 and 18% of patients in the APC and HOT group respectively (p = NS). At the 1 and 2 months follow-up, the APC group showed a significantly better response in terms of transfusional requirements (0.6 vs. 3.4 and 0.7 vs. 2.5) and tissue toxicity score (5.3 vs. 8.6 and 3.8 vs. 7.248). After 3 months, both groups showed further improvement in all parameters without significant differences between them. Conclusions: APC and HOT were effective, safe and decreased the tissue toxicity scores in patients with CRP. However, response rate was higher and faster in the APC group(AU)