Outcomes and prognostic factors of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy in high-volume peritoneal carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of patients with extensive appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and mesothelioma is controversial. Our aims were to analyze overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and independent prognostic factors associated with high peritoneal cancer index (PCI) status in patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC). METHODS: A prospectively-maintained database for patients with appendiceal neoplasms and mesothelioma undergoing CRS/PIC from year 1996 to 2018 was retrospectively analyzed. Patients who achieved complete cytoreduction were stratified into limited (PCI < 30) and extensive (PCI ≥ 30) disease groups. RESULTS: 260 female and 235 male patients were identified. The 5-year survival for low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMN) was significantly higher in the low PCI group (96.2% vs. 63.5%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the OS across both groups in high-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (HAMN) (63 vs. 69 months; p = 0.942) and mesothelioma (72 vs. 42 months; p = 0.058). Overall mortality was 2%. Grade III/IV complications were significantly higher in extensive disease (68% vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, use of EPIC and blood transfusion (>8 units) were independent positive and negative prognostic factors, respectively, associated with OS. Meanwhile, use of EPIC conferred benefit in DFS while increased blood transfusion (>8 units) and elevated preoperative CA125 were predictive of a poor DFS. CONCLUSION: Long-term survivals following CRS/PIC are achievable with acceptable mortality and higher morbidity rates in extensive appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and mesothelioma. High PCI status does not preclude treatment with CRS/PIC.

Cost-effectiveness of Iterative Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Iterative cytoreduction (iCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a treatment for recurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis. There are considerable upfront costs for this approach for which the cost-effectiveness has not been evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a prospectively maintained database of patients having undergone primary and iterative cytoreduction at St. George Hospital between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017, which was linked with financial data. Cost effectiveness and survival outcomes were used to compare primary cytoreduction (pCRS) and iterative cytoreduction (iCRS) in addition to comparison with other treatment modalities. RESULTS: The average cost per patient in Australian dollars was $69,295 ($14,691-$696,002) and the average cost per life-year was $15,842. There was no difference in cost-effectiveness between those who had undergone pCRS and those who had undergone iCRS. The overall survival was 52.5 months (95% confidence interval=49.7-55.2 months) with no difference in survival between pCRS and iCRS groups. The median length of hospital stay was significantly longer for patients in the pCRS treatment group (25.51 days) when compared to the iCRS treatment group (21.15 days, p=0.034). CONCLUSION: iCRS is a cost-effective treatment in the management of recurrent peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusion (iPRBT) and PCI-normalised iPRBT rates (iPRBT/PCI ratio) negatively affect short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy - An analysis of 880 patients.

BACKGROUND: Most studies on the effects of intraoperative packed red blood cell transfusions (iPRBT) on patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have shown deleterious outcomes. It is unclear if this is a result of the transfusion itself or because iPRBTs serve as a surrogate of more advanced disease. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 880 patients treated from 1996 to 2017. The effect of any exposure to iPRBT as well as the effect of peritoneal cancer index (PCI)-normalised iPRBT rates (ratio of iPRBT/PCI) on patients short- and long-term outcomes (recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS)) were assessed. Equally, the prognostic effect of postoperative PRBTs was analysed and adjusted for. RESULTS: Of the 880 patients included, only 26.4% had no iPRBT whereas 59.2% of patients had no postoperative PRBT. Patients with no iPRBTs had significantly lower PCIs, less high-grade complications, shorter ICU and hospital length of stay, as well as improved RFS and OS. Furthermore, high PCI-normalised iPRBTs resulted in worse perioperative and long-term outcomes, with a median OS of 41 months vs. 103 months (5-year survival rate 36.6% vs. 66.1%; p < 0.001) and median RFS of 13 months vs. 30 months (5-year RFS rate 18.3% vs. 37.6% p < 0.001) compared to those with a low iPRBT/PCI ratio. This independent effect was confirmed upon multivariable Cox regression analysis which corrected for important confounders including complexity of procedures and postoperative PRBTs (adjusted HR [aHR]2.04, 95%CI 1.36-3.04, p = 0.001 for OS; aHR 1.38, 95%CI 1.06-1.81, p = 0.017 for RFS). However, subgroup analysis (stratified by histopathologic disease entities) revealed that this independent prognostic effect was seen in high-grade mucinous appendiceal neoplasms, whereas PCI-normalised IPRBTs were not significantly prognostic in other histopathologic subgroups. CONCLUSION: iPRBTs significantly and independently impact perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. However, this effect mainly seems to occur in patients with high-grade mucinous neoplasms, whereas it may only be of borderline prognostic significance in other patient groups. The development of blood-sparing protocols may help improve outcomes of patients undergoing this complex oncologic procedure.

Preoperative Nutrition Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex surgery to treat peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). PSM and gastrointestinal (GI) resection from CRS can lead to significant GI symptoms and malnutrition. There is limited research into the nutrition status of this patient group and the impact of malnutrition on morbidity. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if preoperative malnutrition, assessed using the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), is associated with postoperative morbidity and increased length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for PSM. METHODS: This study prospectively assessed the nutritional status of patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC using a validated nutrition assessment tool. Preoperative clinical symptoms, Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), intraoperative blood transfusions, operative time, GI resections, postoperative morbidity, and LOS, as well as pre- and postoperative nutritional interventions, were recorded. The impact of preoperative nutritional status was assessed in relation to postoperative complications and hospital LOS. RESULTS: The study included 102 participants; 34 patients (33%) were classified as malnourished (SGA = B or C). Preoperative weight loss (15% vs. 74%; p ≤ 0.001) and the presence of clinical symptoms (18% vs. 47%; p = 0.002) were significantly higher in malnourished patients. While PCI, intraoperative blood transfusions, and GI resections were independent predictors of morbidity, malnutrition was significantly associated with infectious complications and LOS. For each grade of worsening malnutrition, LOS increased by an average of 7.65 days. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative malnutrition is prevalent in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC and postoperative morbidity is common. Malnutrition is linked to LOS and plays a role in postoperative outcomes such as infection. Clear pre- and postoperative nutrition pathways are needed to optimize nutrition support and postoperative recovery.

Iterative cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A multi-institutional experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aims of this multi-institutional study were to assess the feasibility of iterative cytoreductive surgery (iCRS)/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, iCRS in colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC), evaluate survival, recurrence, morbidity and mortality outcomes, and identify prognostic factors for overall survival. METHODS: Patients with CRPC that underwent an iCRS, with or without intraperitoneal chemotherapy, from June 1993 to July 2016 at 13 institutions were retrospectively analyzed from prospectively maintained databases. RESULTS: The study comprised of 231 patients, including 126 females (54.5%) with a mean age at iCRS of 51.3 years. The iterative high-grade (3/4) morbidity and mortality rates were 23.4% and 1.7%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival was 15.0 and 10.1 months after initial and iCRS, respectively. The median and 5-year survivals were 49.1 months and 43% and 26.4 months and 26% from the initial and iCRS, respectively. Independent negative predictors of survival from the initial CRS included peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) > 20 ( P = 0.02) and lymph node positivity ( P = 0.04), and from iCRS, PCI > 10 ( P = 0.03 for PCI 11-20; P < 0.001 for PCI > 20), high-grade complications ( P = 0.012), and incomplete cytoreduction ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: iCRS can provide long-term survival benefits to highly selected colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis patients with comparable mortality and morbidity rates to the initial CRS procedure. Careful patient selection is necessary to improve overall outcomes.

Prevention of peritoneal recurrence in high-risk colorectal cancer and evidence of T4 status as a potential risk factor.

Peritoneal metastasis (PM) following primary resection of colorectal cancer is common. The combined use of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has significantly improved the survival outcome of patients with colorectal PM (CRPM). Diagnosing and treating early PM is essential as its extent is correlated with poorer outcomes. There are two novel therapies - second-look surgery and synchronous hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy - that are proposed to prophylactically treat or intervene early in the disease process to reduce the incidence and adverse outcomes associated with PM. These strategies are limited to patients at high risk of developing CRPM, including those that had synchronous PM or ovarian metastases resected at primary tumour removal, or a perforated primary tumour. The data on advanced primary tumour (T4) as a prognostic factor for PM after primary resection suggest that T4a tumours are prognostically worse than T4b. This literature review outlines the evidence, feasibility and safety regarding the pre-emptive treatments, as well as the relevance of T4a tumours as a risk factor for metachronous CRPM.

Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with survival benefit for appendiceal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal dissemination.

INTRODUCTION: The combined approach of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has achieved encouraging outcomes for patients with PMCA with peritoneal dissemination. However, there is little evidence for the use of EPIC in addition to HIPEC in this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with PMCA who underwent CRS and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy by one surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia between Jan 1996 and Aug 2016. RESULTS: A total of 185 patients formed the cohort of this study. However, there was no significant difference in terms of hospital mortality (p = 0.632), major morbidity rate (i.e. Grade III/IV) (p = 0.444), intensive unit care stay (p = 0.638) and total hospital stay (p = 0.0.078). However, patients who received HIPEC and EPIC had a significant longer stay in high dependency unit (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed combined HIPEC with EPIC is an independent prognostic factor for better overall survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.19-0.92, P = 0.030) and disease free survival (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.44-0.99, p = 0.045), adjusted for age, sex, peritoneal cancer index, completeness of cytoreduction score, CEA ≥ 6.5 mg/L, CA19-9 ≥ 24.0 U/mL and CA125 ≥ 32.0 U/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the combination of HIPEC and EPIC could potentially provide additional survival benefit for patients with PMCA with peritoneal spread as compared to HIPEC alone without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. More studies are warranted to further confirm the potential benefits of EPIC in PMCA and address the question of optimal drug and/or duration of EPIC.

Histological Subtype Remains a Significant Prognostic Factor for Survival Outcomes in Patients With Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm With Peritoneal Dissemination.

BACKGROUND: It has been increasingly recognized that appendiceal mucinous neoplasm with peritoneal dissemination is not a homogenous disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the impact of different histological subtypes on survival of a large cohort of patients with appendiceal mucinous neoplasms uniformly treated by cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal neoplasm who underwent cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. SETTING: The study was conducted by 1 surgical team at St. George Hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 444 patients formed the cohort of this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histological diagnoses were categorized based on Carr criteria to include acellular mucin, disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous neoplasms without signet ring cells, and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis with signet cells. RESULTS: Patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms with neoplastic epithelium absent tended to have lower CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 levels preoperatively (p = 0.109, 0.008, and 0.034). Factor analysis showed that histological diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes (HR = 3.13 (95% CI, 2.34-4.39); p < 0.001), adjusted for peritoneal cancer index >20, completeness of cytoreductive score ≥2, use of early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, transfusion units, CEA >7.0 mg/L, CA19-9 >24.0 U/mL, and CA125 >24 U/mL. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature, lack of uniform classifications of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms in early years, and the heterogeneity of this study cohort given the long study period. CONCLUSIONS: Histological subtype remains a significant prognostic factor for survival outcomes in patients with appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. It should be taken into account when selecting patients for cytoreductive surgery, tailoring appropriate adjuvant therapies and follow-up surveillance plan.

Early Postoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Low-Grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms with Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: Is it Beneficial?

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence for the use of early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) in patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (LAMNs) with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). This study aims to assess the outcomes regarding the use of EPIC in a large cohort of patients with LAMNs with PMP uniformly treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC), all of whom received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and most of whom also received EPIC. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of appendiceal origin who underwent CRS and PIC by one surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia, between January 1996 and November 2015. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with a high Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) >20 and also based on histopathological subtypes of LAMNs. RESULTS: A total of 250 patients formed the cohort of this study. No significant differences were observed in terms of hospital mortality (p = 0.153), major morbidity rate (i.e., grade III/IV; p = 0.593), intensive care unit stay (p = 0.764), and total hospital stay (p = 0.927); however, patients who received HIPEC + EPIC had a significantly longer stay in the high dependency unit. Multivariate analysis showed combined HIPEC with EPIC is an independent prognostic factor for better survival outcomes (hazard ratio 0.30, 95 % confidence interval 0.12-0.74; p = 0.009), adjusted for age, PCI, and histopathological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of HIPEC + EPIC can provide additional survival benefits for patients with LAMNs with PMP compared with HIPEC alone, without increasing postoperative morbidity and mortality. EPIC should be considered following CRS and HIPEC for patients with LAMNs with PMP.

Impacts of Preoperative Serum Albumin Level on Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Only few small studies in the literature have explored the impacts of preoperative serum albumin level and clinical outcomes of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC). This study aimed to evaluate the value of preoperative serum albumin as a prognostic factor for long-term survival outcomes after CRS and PIC in a large patient cohort and to determine whether preoperative serum albumin is correlated with perioperative complications. METHODS: This retrospective study examined prospectively collected data for patients with PSM who underwent CRS and PIC by one surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia. The study used 35 g/L as the cuffoff for normal serum albumin level. RESULTS: The study enrolled 591 patients. Hypoalbuminemia was found to be associated with a significantly higher rate of major morbidity (p < 0.001), a longer ICU stay (p = 0.003), a longer HDU stay (p < 0.001), a longer total hospital stay (p < 0.001), and a shorter overall survival (OS) (p = 0.016). Factor analysis showed preoperative serum hypoalbuminemia to be a prognostic factor for a poor perioperative outcome (p = 0.018) and a poor OS (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is associated with poor perioperative outcomes. More importantly, it is a predictor of poorer OS for patients with PSM independent of the PCI, age, and completeness of cytoreduction. In the future, strategies should be undertaken to improve preoperative nutrition of malnourished patients as a means of improving clinical outcomes for patients with PSM.

Cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is life-threatening without cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC). Only a few studies in the literature addressed the relationship between age and outcomes of peritonectomy. This study was designed to review the clinical outcomes in elderly patients who underwent CRS and PIC. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 611 consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent CRS and PIC by the same surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia, between January 1996 and December 2013. Patients were divided into two groups; group 1 (<65 years old, n = 487) and group 2 (≥ 65 years old, n = 124). Subgroup analysis was performed in patients who were ≥75 years old (n = 20). A significant difference was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: There was no significant statistical difference in terms of mean total hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, high dependency unit stay and complication rates. Postoperative mortality was 2 and 3 % in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Overall survival did not reach a statistical significance between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, patients showed similar morbidity results to patients who were <65 years old. CONCLUSIONS: CRS and PIC can be safely done in the elderly. Age alone should not be the single exclusion criterion but rather taken into consideration along with other factors to determine the suitability of elderly patients.

Effects of sex hormones on survival of peritoneal mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested the presence of steroid receptors as a favourable prognostic factor in peritoneal mesothelioma (PM). This study aims to investigate possible hormonal effects on survival of PM. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 52 consecutive patients with PM who underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) by the same surgical team at St George Hospital in Sydney, Australia, between April 1996 and April 2013. Females were arbitrarily divided into assumed premenopausal (< 51 years old; n = 15) and assumed postmenopausal (≥ 51 years old, n = 9). In each gender group, patients were furthered divided into three age groups (< 40, 40-60, > 60). A significant statistical difference was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Females with epithelial mesothelioma had a significantly higher survival than males (p = 0.023). They also had a better overall median survival (> 60 months) than males (43 months), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.098). Survival of postmenopausal females became similar to males after excluding benign cystic mesothelioma. CONCLUSIONS: The better survival in premenopausal females could probably be explained by higher levels of oestradiol and progesterone. Also, our data suggests that higher rates of benign cystic mesothelioma in females was not the key reason for the better survival in female patients, further supporting the hypothesis of hormonal links with survival of PM. Therapeutic effects of sex steroid hormones on PM may be a valuable area to explore.