Ablation of Complex Fractionated Electrograms With or Without ADditional LINEar Lesions for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (The ADLINE Trial).

BACKGROUND: For persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, different strategies including complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation and linear lesions (LL) have been used in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, it is still a matter of debate if extended substrate modification improves long-term outcome. The aim of this study was to determine the benefit of LL in addition to PVI and CFAE ablation regarding freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent AF. METHODS: The study was a prospective randomized trial including 90 patients with persistent and longstanding persistent AF. All patients underwent PVI and CFAE ablation. If AF did not terminate to atrial tachycardia (AT) or sinus rhythm, patients were randomized to direct current cardioversion (Group 1; n = 45) or LL (Group 2; n = 45). Primary endpoint was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 12 months. (NCT02059369) RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups with more than half of the patients having structural heart disease. The primary endpoint was reached in 37% in Group 1 (G1) and 16% in Group 2 (G2; P = 0.03). After a total number of 1.4 ± 0.5 (G1) versus 1.7 ± 0.4 (G2; P = 0.01) procedures, freedom from any arrhythmia was reached in 54% in G1 and 65% in G2 (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: In persistent AF ablation, LL in addition to PVI and CFAE show a significantly lower success rate after a single procedure compared to PVI and CFAE. Following LL, significantly more patients needed a reablation to reach a similar success rate during a 12-month follow-up.

Electromagnetic interference in implantable cardioverter defibrillators: present but rare.

PURPOSE: Electromagnetic interference (EMI) with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can cause oversensing and subsequently inappropriate ICD therapies. We retrospectively investigated the current incidence and clinical relevance of oversensing related EMI in a large cohort of ICD patients. METHODS: From January 2005 to April 2013, all ICD interrogations performed at our institution were analyzed for the occurrence of oversensing related EMI. EMI episodes were classified as clinically significant, potentially significant or of minor significance. To identify risk factors for EMI, we also analyzed different lead models in our cohort (integrated vs true bipolar leads). RESULTS: Data of 2940 ICD patients (mean age 63 ± 16 years, 2322 male patients, 7772 patient-years) were retrospectively analyzed for the occurrence of EMI. During the observation period, a total of 145 (hospital environment n = 97, non-hospital environment n = 48) episodes occurred and resulted in an overall EMI incidence, i.e. event rate, of 1.87 % per patient per year. Focusing on clinically significant or potentially significant episodes, the EMI incidence was 0.27 % per patient per year. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant higher hazard of oversensing for patients with integrated bipolar leads compared to patients with true bipolar leads (HR = 2.21; 95 % CI 0.90-5.39; p = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that EMI continues to occur in everyday life. Patients should be well informed about the potential sources and risks of EMI but they need not be overly concerned since the risk of EMI-especially in a non-hospital environment-is low.

Evaluation of a new very low dose imaging protocol: feasibility and impact on X-ray dose levels in electrophysiology procedures.

AIMS: This study presents and evaluates the impact of a new lowest-dose fluoroscopy protocol (Siemens AG), especially designed for electrophysiology (EP) procedures, on X-ray dose levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2014 to March 2015, 140 patients underwent an EP study on an Artis zee angiography system. The standard low-dose protocol was operated at 23 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 120 nGy (cine-loop), the new lowest-dose protocol was operated at 8 nGy (fluoroscopy) and at 36 nGy (cine-loop). Procedural data, X-ray times, and doses were analysed in 100 complex left atrial and in 40 standard EP procedures. The resulting dose-area products were 877.9 ± 624.7 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, standard low dose), 199 ± 159.6 µGym² (n = 50 complex procedures, lowest dose), 387.7 ± 36.0 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, standard low dose), and 90.7 ± 62.3 µGym² (n = 20 standard procedures, lowest dose), P < 0.01. In the low-dose and lowest-dose groups, procedure times were 132.6 ± 35.7 vs. 126.7 ± 34.7 min (P = 0.40, complex procedures) and 72.3 ± 20.9 vs. 85.2 ± 44.1 min (P = 0.24, standard procedures), radiofrequency (RF) times were 53.8 ± 26.1 vs. 50.4 ± 29.4 min (P = 0.54, complex procedures) and 10.1 ± 9.9 vs. 12.2 ± 14.7 min (P = 0.60, standard procedures). One complication occurred in the standard low-dose and lowest-dose groups (P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: The new lowest-dose imaging protocol reduces X-ray dose levels by 77% compared with the currently available standard low-dose protocol. From an operator standpoint, lowest X-ray dose levels create a different, reduced image quality. The new image quality did not significantly affect procedure or RF times and did not result in higher complication rates. Regarding radiological protection, operating at lowest-dose settings should become standard in EP procedures.