Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(4): 296-300, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32542786

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compositae plant sensitization in children is relatively frequent. From 1995-2006, we found a prevalence of 1.8% sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix/parthenolide patch test positives among consecutive eczema patients <18 years. OBJECTIVES: To report the results of patch test screening for Compositae sensitization in patients <18 years in the last 13 years. METHODS: Children and adolescents <18 years, diagnosed with Compositae sensitization between 2007 and 2019, were included. RESULTS: Among 388 children tested, 12 (3%) were Compositae-sensitized, and 11 (2.8%) had positive reactions to SL mix. Compositae mix 5% pet. elicited positive reactions in six of seven patients tested, and dandelion extract 2.5% pet. in six of 10 patients tested. The mean age of the five girls and seven boys was 9.4 years and 11.7 years, respectively. Eleven children had a personal and one a family history of atopy, and 11 children had hand eczema. Only two were mono-sensitized to Compositae. CONCLUSIONS: SL mix is a suitable screening agent among children and adolescents in our area, well supplemented with Compositae mix 5% and dandelion extract. The study emphasizes the importance of Compositae screening in children with a personal and/or family history of atopy, hand eczema or widespread airborne dermatitis, summer exacerbation, and plant exposure.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Sesquiterpenos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Criança , Dinamarca , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/administração & dosagem
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 82(1): 18-23, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31483868

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both florists' chrysanthemums (Chrysanthemum cultivars) and marguerite daisies (Argyranthemum frutescens [L.] Sch.Bip. and its varieties and cultivars) are popular ornamental plants in Denmark. OBJECTIVES: To present results of aimed patch testing with chrysanthemum and marguerite daisy extracts in Danish patients with Compositae sensitization. METHODS: The results of patch testing with chrysanthemum extract 3% petrolatum (pet.) and marguerite daisy extract 3% pet. (and possibly 1% pet.) from 1998 to 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: Altogether, 111/191 (58%) patients tested positive to chrysanthemum extract and 104/179 (58%) tested positive to marguerite daisy. The majority was recreationally exposed, and most reactions were considered relevant. Feverfew extract 1% pet., Compositae mix 5% or 6% pet., or parthenolide 0.1% pet. may cross-react with chrysanthemum; Compositae mix seems to be best at detecting sensitization to marguerite daisy. CONCLUSIONS: In areas where exposure to chrysanthemum or marguerite daisies is prevalent, it is suggested to include extracts of these plants in the plant series to improve diagnosis of, and advice to, Compositae-allergic patients.


Assuntos
Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Flores/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Chrysanthemum/efeitos adversos , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 81(5): 368-373, 2019 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31265134

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compositae contact sensitization may be difficult to diagnose, because of a lack of reliable screening allergens. OBJECTIVES: To assess the suitability of Compositae mix II 2.5% pet. (CM2.5) as a screening mix in the baseline series combined with sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix and parthenolide (PTH). METHODS: CM2.5 was added to the baseline series, which included SL mix and PTH 0.1% pet., in January 2015, and PTH was included in TRUE Test Panel 3 in October 2015. All Compositae-sensitive patients diagnosed or tested in the next 4 years were assessed. RESULTS: Altogether, 57 patients (2.7%) presented with Compositae allergy. On primary testing in 53 newly diagnosed patients, SL mix elicited positive reactions most frequently (53% positive), followed by CM2.5 (47% positive), and PTH (45% positive). CM2.5 and PTH pet. elicited a few irritant reactions. Three patients had late reactions. Altogether, 16 patients (28%) were not detected by any of the three screening agents. CONCLUSIONS: SL mix is an indispensable, although insufficient, screening mixture in Denmark. It may be relatively safely supplemented with CM2.5 and PTH in the TRUE Test system for screening, but, when Compositae sensitization is suspected, further extracts should be tested on the basis of the history.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Lactonas/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Adulto Jovem
4.
Contact Dermatitis ; 76(5): 280-286, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28194806

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Australian cushion bush (Leucophyta brownii) of the Compositae family of plants has become a popular pot and container plant. The plant produces the sesquiterpene lactone allergen calocephalin. OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitizing potential of sesquiterpene lactones from cushion bush. PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS: Eleven Compositae-sensitive patients were patch tested with seven sesquiterpene lactones isolated from cushion bush. RESULTS: Six of seven sesquiterpene lactones elicited positive reactions in 4 of 11 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The well-known sesquiterpene lactone pseudoivalin and its derivative pseudoivalin acetate, as well as calocephalin and tomentosin, were confirmed to be sensitizers, whereas leucophytalin A and 4α-hydroxy-5αH,10αH-1,11(13)-guaidien-8ß,12-olide were shown to be allergenic for the first time. The patch test reaction patterns seem to follow the chemical patterns, which may eventually make it possible to trace primary sensitizers and advise patients more precisely.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos de Guaiano/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro/métodos
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 73(1): 21-8, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25817831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the 1980s, a striking increase in natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy was seen. Since then, many measures have been taken to prevent NRL allergy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate changes in the prevalence of NRL sensitization/clinical NRL allergy over time from 2002 to 2013. METHODS: All patients prick tested for NRL at the Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital were included in this study (n = 8580). In NRL-sensitized patients, the clinical relevance was evaluated for NRL. Furthermore, concomitant positive prick test results for birch pollen were recorded, together with food-related symptoms and sensitization in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: The prevalence of NRL sensitization declined from 6.1% in 2002-2005 to 1.9% in 2006-2009, and then to 1.2% in 2010-2013 (p < 0.0001). The prevalence of clinical NRL allergy declined from 1.3% in 2002-2005 to 0.5-0.6% in 2006-2013 (p < 0.004). Among the NRL-sensitized patients, 64% had a concomitant positive prick test reaction to birch pollen, and 52% had a history of reaction to oral intake of related fruits or vegetables. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a statistically significant decline in the number of patients sensitized/clinically allergic to NRL. Many of the NRL-sensitized patients without clinical allergy to NRL had concomitant birch pollen sensitization, and reported food-related symptoms.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Adulto , Alérgenos/imunologia , Betula/imunologia , Comorbidade , Reações Cruzadas , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/imunologia , Feminino , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/epidemiologia , Hipersensibilidade Alimentar/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pólen/imunologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Testes Cutâneos
6.
Contact Dermatitis ; 69(5): 303-10, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23808909

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cushion bush [Leucophyta brownii Cass. = Calocephalus brownii (Cass.) F. Muell.] is an Australian Compositae shrub that has been introduced into Scandinavia as a pot plant. The first case of sensitization occurred in a gardener, and the main allergen was identified as the guaianolide calocephalin. OBJECTIVE: To present the identification of the main allergen, and to assess the prevalence of sensitization to calocephalin in Compositae-allergic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Calocephalin was isolated from a dichloromethane extract of aerial parts of cushion bush. Calocephalin 0.1% ethanol was included in the plant series in Malmö, Sweden, and Odense, Denmark. RESULTS: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis of calocephalin resulted in a revision of its chemical structure to 4α-acetoxy-1α,2α-epoxy-5α,10αH-guai-11(13)-en-12,8ß-olide. The prevalence of patch test positivity was up to 28% in aimed patch testing. Despite strongly positive patch test reactions, the relevance was unknown in the majority of cases, and only 1 person was occupationally sensitized. CONCLUSION: Calocephalin is a potent contact allergen, but, as cushion bush is a low-maintenance pot plant, primary sensitization is most likely to occur through occupational exposure. Positive reactions in Compositae-sensitive persons probably occur because of cross-reactivity, and patients should be warned about contact with cushion bush plants.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/isolamento & purificação , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Asteraceae/química , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/isolamento & purificação , Sesquiterpenos de Guaiano/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos de Guaiano/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , Idoso , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estrutura Molecular , Testes do Emplastro/métodos
7.
Contact Dermatitis ; 68(5): 277-85, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23601063

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: An association between Compositae sensitization and atopic dermatitis has been suggested on the basis of case reports and clinical studies. OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics of sensitization in Compositae-allergic patients with current and/or past atopic dermatitis. PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS: Consecutive Compositae-sensitive patients were selected for analysis if they had a history of (i) present and/or past atopic dermatitis or (ii) childhood flexural eczema or (iii) childhood eczema of any kind and a positive prick test result. RESULTS: Fifty-one persons (35 females and 16 males) were included. The mean age was lower and the percentage of males was slightly higher than in non-atopics. Testing with sesquiterpene lactone mix, parthenolide and Compositae mix 6% or 5% detected 96% of the patients. Occupational sensitization occurred in 22%. The sensitizing pattern did not differ much from that of non-atopics, except that dandelion was an important allergen in children. Cobalt allergy was the most frequent other contact allergy, occurring in 37%. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with current or past atopic dermatitis may become sensitized to Compositae at any age, both occupationally and non-occupationally. They should be screened for Compositae allergy on equal terms with non-atopics, except that dandelion extract should always be tested in children. Co-sensitization to cobalt was frequent, but probably not related to the plant allergy.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Alérgenos/química , Asteraceae/química , Feminino , Humanos , Lactonas/química , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Extratos Vegetais/química , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
8.
Contact Dermatitis ; 67(6): 321-7, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22860619

RESUMO

The tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum) is an important crop worldwide. Whereas immediate-type reactions to tomato fruits are well known, contact dermatitis caused by tomatoes or tomato plants is rarely reported. The aims of this study were to present new data on contact sensitization to tomato plants and review the literature on contact dermatitis caused by both plants and fruits. An ether extract of tomato plants made as the original oleoresin plant extracts, was used in aimed patch testing, and between 2005 and 2011. 8 of 93 patients (9%) tested positive to the oleoresin extracts. This prevalence is in accordance with the older literature that reports tomato plants as occasional sensitizers. The same applies to tomato fruits, which, in addition, may cause protein contact dermatitis. The allergens of the plant are unknown, but both heat-stable and heat-labile constituents seem to be involved. The fruit contains fragrance compounds that are also present in Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru), possibly accounting for cross-reactivity. The proteins in pulp and peel may contribute to protein contact dermatitis. Until more is known about the allergens, the diagnosis of contact dermatitis caused by tomato plants and fruit may be established with the use of ether extracts and fresh fruits, respectively.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/prevenção & controle , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/prevenção & controle , Solanum lycopersicum , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Extratos Vegetais , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
11.
Contact Dermatitis ; 66(5): 241-6, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22486566

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The development of mixes containing Compositae plant extracts has improved the diagnosis of Compositae contact allergy, but none of them has fulfilled the criteria for an ideal European plant mix. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate which constituents of two commercial Compositae mixes were most useful as screening agents. PATIENTS: These comprised 76 patients testing positive to Compositae mix 6% in petrolatum and 29 patients testing positive to Compositae mix 5% pet., all of whom were tested with constituents of the respective mixes. RESULTS: The majority of patients tested positive to parthenolide or parthenolide-containing extracts, followed by German chamomile, yarrow, and arnica. As German chamomile is a weak sensitizer, the results suggest cross-reactions or reactions to unknown allergens. No one was positive to Roman chamomile. CONCLUSIONS: Even though parthenolide seems to be a suitable supplement to the baseline series, the results emphasize that it is important to patch test with extracts of native or locally grown plants, not only because of the geographical variation, but also because of the potential unknown allergens contained in short ether preparations and the variability in the individual patient's exposure and cross-reaction patterns.


Assuntos
Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Extratos Vegetais , Alérgenos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sesquiterpenos
12.
Contact Dermatitis ; 64(2): 96-103, 2011 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21138444

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix is the only commercial Compositae allergy screening agent that consists of pure allergens; its detection rate is lower than that of Compositae plant extracts. OBJECTIVE(S): To report a 15-year experience with routine screening with SL mix and another allergen, parthenolide, the optimal reading times when testing with SL mix constituents, and the advantages and drawbacks of using pure allergens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SL mix 0.1% and parthenolide 0.1% petrolatum were included in the baseline series. RESULTS: Of individuals undergoing routine testing, 157/7163 (2.19%) tested positive to SL mix, 161/7162 (2.25%) to parthenolide, and 141 to both in the 15-year period. The overall detection rate between the two was 177 persons, and 10% would have been missed without parthenolide testing. Two cases of possible active sensitization to parthenolide were recorded. Costunolide elicited positive reactions most frequently, followed by dehydrocostus lactone, and alantolactone. An important observation was that the prevalence of positive reactions to SL mix constituents was lower if they were applied 3-5 days after application of SL mix in those with 1+ or 2+ reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of detecting 10% more Compositae-sensitive patients with parthenolide in the baseline series must be weighed against a small risk of active sensitization, which may be reduced by lowering the test concentration.


Assuntos
Alérgenos , Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Lactonas , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Sesquiterpenos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Lactonas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Sesquiterpenos/efeitos adversos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Contact Dermatitis ; 63(3): 146-50, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20690937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Compositae plant feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) has long been recognized as an important sensitizer in European Compositae-allergic patients, mainly because of its content of the sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide. Recently, a parthenolide-depleted feverfew extract with claimed anti-inflammatory properties has been developed for use in cosmetics. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to test, on the basis of patch test reactions, whether persons with contact allergy to feverfew could tolerate creams containing this feverfew extract. PATIENTS/MATERIALS/METHODS: Seven patients with feverfew contact allergy were patch tested with two creams containing the feverfew extract. Subsequently, the creams were analysed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry to detect parthenolide. RESULTS: Four of the patients tested positive to one of the creams; reactivity was associated with simultaneous positive reactions to parthenolide. This cream was analysed about 2 years later, and no parthenolide was detected, probably because of degradation of the compound. CONCLUSIONS: Topical products containing parthenolide-depleted feverfew extracts may elicit positive patch test reactions in feverfew-sensitive patients. The reactivity may be enhanced by simultaneous testing with parthenolide, but the reactivity is lost over time, probably because of degradation of parthenolide.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/imunologia , Testes do Emplastro , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Tanacetum parthenium/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pomadas , Sesquiterpenos/química
14.
Contact Dermatitis ; 62(4): 201-9, 2010 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20236156

RESUMO

Common ivy (Hedera helix subsp. helix) is a well-known native and ornamental plant in Europe. Reports on contact dermatitis from ivy have regularly appeared since 1899. Recently, it has been suggested that allergic contact dermatitis from the plant may be under-diagnosed, partly due to lack of commercial patch test allergens. The objective of the article is to present the results of aimed patch testing with the main common ivy allergen, falcarinol, during a 16-year period and review the newer literature. Consecutive patients tested with falcarinol 0.03% petrolatum from May 1993 to May 2009 were included. Cases published since 1987 were retrieved from the PubMed database. One hundred and twenty-seven Danish patients were tested with falcarinol and 10 (7.9%) tested positive. Seven were occupationally sensitized. Between 1994 and 2009, 28 new cases of contact dermatitis from ivy were reported, 2 of which were occupational. Only 11 of the 28 patients were tested with pure allergens. Falcarinol is not only widely distributed in the ivy family, but also in the closely related Apiaceae. Sensitization may occur in childhood or in adults pruning ivy plants or handling them in an occupational setting. In view of the ubiquity of falcarinol-containing plants and the relatively high prevalence of positive reactions in aimed patch testing, falcarinol should be the next plant allergen to be commercially available and included in the plant series worldwide.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Hedera/toxicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Reações Cruzadas , Dinamarca , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Di-Inos/imunologia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Álcoois Graxos/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro
15.
Contact Dermatitis ; 59(1): 1-6, 2008 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18598305

RESUMO

Screening for Compositae contact allergy has documented fairly high prevalence in adults, and recent studies indicate that the allergy may be more common in children than previously believed. However, detailed information on sensitization in this age group is sparse. The objective of this study was to present another 2 cases in children and review the literature. Screening with sesquiterpene lactone (SL) mix has shown prevalence of 0.5% and 1.8% in 2 studies, while screening with 2 different Compositae mixes detected 4.2% and 2.6% positives among children and adolescents. All individual case reports describe sensitization in atopic children, and the largest screening study showed a prevalence of Compositae mix sensitization that was significantly higher in children with atopic dermatitis compared with non-atopics. Compositae sensitization should be considered in children with a family or personal history of atopy, summer-related, or -exacerbated dermatitis of any kind, and a history of plant exposure. Screening with SL mix is recommended but should be supplemented with plant extracts based on exposure history. Compositae weeds, especially dandelions, seem to be important sensitizers in children.


Assuntos
Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Lactonas/efeitos adversos , Sesquiterpenos/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Asteraceae/química , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro/métodos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Taraxacum/efeitos adversos
16.
Contact Dermatitis ; 58(1): 15-23, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18154553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Compositae-sensitive patients are routinely warned against topical use of Compositae-containing cosmetics and herbal remedies. However, the risk of elicitation of dermatitis in presensitized persons is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to assess the significance of direct plant allergen contact via Compositae-derived cosmetics and herbal remedies in Compositae-allergic patients with special reference to arnica (Arnica montana) and German chamomile (Chamomilla recutita). METHODS: 8 of 12 chamomile-sensitive patients tested positive to chamomile-containing preparations, including tea, creams, ointments, and oil. 5 of 6 arnica-sensitive persons tested positive to arnica-based products. RESULTS: When the group was patch tested with cosmetic and/or herbal product ingredients, plant allergens elicited positive reactions most frequently, but fragrances, emulsifiers, and preservatives tested positive as well. Plant allergens were mainly derived from Compositae, but avocado oil, and Hamamelis virginiana tincture were unexpectedly detected as sensitizers too. Chemical analyses indicated that the Compositae allergens were both sesquiterpene lactones and other naturally occurring compounds. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Compositae-allergic persons should be warned against topical use of Compositae-containing products, not only because of the plant allergens, but also because of allergenic cream constituents that may cause reactions in the group of patients who have multiple contact allergies beside the Compositae allergy.


Assuntos
Asteraceae/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Fitoterapia/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Administração Cutânea , Arnica/efeitos adversos , Camomila/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/administração & dosagem , Cosméticos/química , Feminino , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Hamamelis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro , Persea/efeitos adversos , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Óleos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Preparações de Plantas/administração & dosagem , Preparações de Plantas/química , Estudos Prospectivos
17.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 86(6): 523-7, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17106600

RESUMO

Patients with suspected cutaneous adverse drug reactions are often referred to allergy clinics or departments of dermatology for evaluation. These patients are selected compared with patients identified in prospective and cross-sectional studies of hospital populations. This explains the observed variation in prevalence of specific reactions and of eliciting drugs. This study investigated the prevalence of cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a university hospital department of dermatology that is specially focused on allergy. An 8-month survey was carried out during the period April-December 2003. Consecutive patients suspected of having cutaneous adverse drug reactions during this period were examined by dermatologists and investigated. Drug imputability was assessed in the 194 patients included; 33.5% had an exanthema with certain or likely drug imputability. Urticaria and local reactions at injection sites were the most frequent reactions (25% and 18.8%, respectively). Beta-lactam antibiotics, extracts for desensitization and insulins were the main drug groups involved, and accounted for 22.8%, 17.1% and 14.2%, respectively, of the reactions. Extracts for desensitization and insulins elicited more reactions than expected. This probably reflects the referral pattern to an allergy clinic.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Exantema/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/efeitos adversos , Insulina/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Extratos Vegetais/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Urticária/induzido quimicamente , Urticária/epidemiologia , beta-Lactamas/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA