RESUMO
Type B insulin resistance syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease and no effective therapy has yet been established. On the other hand, it is known that Saibokuto, one type of Japanese Kampo medicine, may have beneficial effects on various symptoms associated with this disease and it is therefore occasionally prescribed for various immune disorders. We herein describe a case of type B insulin resistance syndrome in which anti-insulin receptor antibody disappeared and the patient's glycemic control markedly improved after the administration of Saibokuto. At first, we administered various anti-oral diabetic drugs and insulin therapy, but the patient's glycemic control became further aggravated. In addition, Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy was not effective, although its benefit has been reported. Interestingly, after the patient started taking Saibokuto, her glycemic control markedly improved. In addition, the patient's plasma insulin levels markedly decreased and anti-insulin receptor antibody became negative after taking Saibokuto. Taken together, there is a possibility that Saibokuto may one of the options for type B insulin resistance syndrome therapy.
Assuntos
Anticorpos/sangue , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Resistência à Insulina , Medicina Kampo , Receptor de Insulina/imunologia , Doenças Autoimunes/sangue , Glicemia , Feminino , Humanos , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , SíndromeRESUMO
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of miglitol and mitiglinide alone or in combination on the metabolic profile and incretin secretion in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients. METHODS: Patients on diet and exercise with or without metformin, were randomized to receive either miglitol, mitiglinide, or a combination, three times daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, HbA1c decreased significantly (p<0.001) and 1,5-AG increased significantly (p<0.001) in all three groups, with the greatest change seen with combination therapy. Effective improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia was demonstrated by a meal-loading test in all three interventions but serum insulin concentration was not increased by miglitol. In a subset of patients without prior metformin administration, faster and better glycemic control was achieved with the initial combination. After meal loading, serum total GLP-1 significantly increased only with miglitol monotherapy (p<0.05) and serum total GIP significantly decreased (p<0.01) in the arms employing miglitol after 12 weeks. CONCLUSION: Miglitol/mitiglinide combination is more potent than monotherapy in improving glycemic control through the reduction of postprandial glucose excursion and the simultaneous sparing of additional insulin secretion. A marked difference in the effects of miglitol and mitiglinide on incretin secretion was also demonstrated.