Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The use of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for pancreatic cancer has been advocated for its potential ability to optimize patient selection for surgical resection and to downstage locally advanced tumors. This article reports our experience with neoadjuvant CRT for localized pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Since 1995, 111 patients with radiographically localized, pathologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma have received neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; median, 4500 cGy) with 5-flourouracil-based chemotherapy. Tumors were defined as potentially resectable (PR, n = 53) in the absence of arterial involvement and venous occlusion and locally advanced (LA, n = 58) with arterial involvement or venous occlusion by CT. RESULTS: Five patients (4.5%) were not restaged due to death (n = 3) or intolerance of therapy (n = 2). Twenty-one patients (19%) manifested distant metastatic disease on restaging CT. Twenty-eight patients with initially PR tumors (53%) and 11 patients with initially LA tumors (19%) were resected after CRT. Histologic examination revealed significant fibrosis in all resected specimens and two complete responses. Surgical margins were negative in 72%, and lymph nodes were negative in 70% of resected patients. Median survival in resected patients has not been reached at a median follow-up of 16 months. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant CRT provided an opportunity for patients with occult metastatic disease to avoid the morbidity of resection and resulted in tumor downstaging in a minority of patients with LA tumors. Survival after neoadjuvant CRT and resection appears to be at least comparable to survival after resection and adjuvant (postoperative) CRT.

Complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer does not influence survival.

BACKGROUND: Up to 30% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer have a complete clinical or pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation. This study analyzes complete clinical and pathologic responders among a large group of rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. METHODS: From 1987 to 2000, 141 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven, locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and radiation. Clinical restaging after treatment consisted of proctoscopic examination and often computed tomography scan. One hundred forty patients then underwent operative resection, with results tracked in a database. Standard statistical methods were used to examine the outcomes of those patients with complete clinical or pathologic responses. RESULTS: No demographic differences were detected between either clinical complete and clinical partial responders or pathologic complete and pathologic partial responders. The positive predictive value of clinical restaging was 60%, and accuracy was 82%. By use of the Kaplan-Meier life table analysis, clinical complete responders had no advantage in local recurrence, disease-free survival, or overall survival rates when compared with clinical partial responders. Pathologic complete responders also had no recurrence or survival advantage when compared with pathologic partial responders. Of the 34 pathologic T0 tumors, 4 (13%) had lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical assessment of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation is unreliable. Micrometastatic disease persists in a proportion of patients despite pathologic complete response. Observation or local excision for patients thought to be complete responders should be undertaken with caution.

A pilot study of preoperative continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, external microwave hyperthermia, and external beam radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of combining external beam radiotherapy, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and external microwave hyperthermia in patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the rectum. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 7/95 through 2/99, 15 patients were enrolled in the study. The treatment regimen consisted of continuous infusion 5-FU 250 mg/m(2)/d 7 days/week beginning on day 1, external beam radiotherapy to the pelvis, 4500 cGy, 180 cGy/d 5 days/week using a 3 or 4-field technique, and external microwave hyperthermia on days 3, 8, 15, 22, and 29. Chemotherapy was stopped on the last day of radiotherapy. Surgical resection, if feasible, was scheduled 3-6 weeks after completing thermochemoradiotherapy. For this regimen to be considered feasible, no more than 2 of the 15 patients should fail to complete therapy due to life-threatening toxicity. Toxicity was scored using National Cancer Institute Criteria. RESULTS: All patients completed the chemoradiotherapy portion of the protocol. Eleven of the 15 patients completed all 5 hyperthermia treatments. Of the 4 patients who did not receive the full course of hyperthermia, only 1 patient had treatment stopped due to life-threatening toxicity. The other 3 patients did not complete hyperthermia due to scheduling errors (n = 2) or patient request (n = 1). Five of 15 patients required a treatment interruption due to toxicity > or = Grade 3. Seven patients experienced lesser degrees of toxicity which did not require treatment interruption. Three patients experienced no side effects. The most common toxicities were dermatitis and diarrhea. Of the 14 patients in whom surgery was planned, 11 (79%) were resectable. There was one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to deliver thermochemoradiotherapy, as prescribed in this study, to patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer. The therapy is moderately toxic, with one-third of patients requiring temporary treatment interruptions. The regimen appears active against rectal cancer, and appears to warrant further consideration as a treatment option for this patient population.

Combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 1987 to 1994, 30 patients received combined external beam irradiation and external regional hyperthermia for locally advanced prostate cancer. The results of the 21 patients with newly diagnosed (n = 18) or locally recurrent (n = 3) adenocarcinoma are reported herein. No patient had evidence of distant metastases. Total radiotherapy doses of 65-70 Gy to the prostate were planned using a four-field box technique. Hyperthermia treatments were delivered using an annular phased array microwave device. The treatment goal was to achieve temperatures > or = 42 degrees C in all measured points within the prostate. RESULTS: Of the newly diagnosed patients, 16 out of 18 (89%) had T3 or T4 tumors, 11 out of 18 (61%) had Gleason scores of 7-9, and the mean pretreatment Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was 69 ng/ml. The median follow-up of all 21 patients was 36 months. None of the patients achieved the treatment goal of all intratumoral temperatures > or = 42 degrees C. The mean CEM 43 T90 was 2.34 min. The disease-free survival at 36 months is 25%; 12 out of 18 (67%) of the patients have relapsed. The only significant predictor of relapse was pretreatment PSA. There were no complications > Grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the inability to achieve high tumor temperatures, the relapse-free survival rate in this population of patients with very advanced localized prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy plus hyperthermia compares favorably with most series using radiation therapy alone. Further studies aimed at improving the ability to deliver hyperthermia to the prostate are warranted.

Prostate bed massage as a means to determine the source of a rising prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of prostate bed massage as a means to determine whether a rising prostate specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy is due to local recurrence or distant metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eighteen patients referred for pelvic radiotherapy because of a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy had PSA levels measured immediately before and 5 minutes after a vigorous 30-second massage of the prostate bed. RESULTS: Only one of the 18 (5%) patients experienced a rise in their PSA following vigorous prostate bed massage. Fifteen of the 18 (83%) patients' PSA levels declined after radiotherapy, suggesting that recurrent prostate cancer had been present in the prostate bed at the time of prostate massage in these patients. Only 1 of these 15 patients (7%) had a rise in their PSA after massage. CONCLUSION: Prostate bed massage, as performed in this study, was not helpful to determine whether a rise in PSA after radical prostatectomy was due to local or distant recurrence.

Simulation of electromagnetically induced hyperthermia: a finite element gridding method.

A finite element gridding method for simulating electromagnetically (EM) induced hyperthermia is presented. The method uses patient CT data as its primary input, with critical structures manually outlined (on a graphics workstation) for explicit demarcation. The paper outlines the various stages involved in mesh creation, including procedures for conforming the finite element representation of critical structures to their smooth boundaries, modelling of heating equipment, and modelling of the outer boundaries. The procedure for generating the finite element model is illustrated for an example treatment. Additionally, the results of computing the SAR in six patients are compared to measured values. The comparison reveals agreement between the model prediction and actual treatment within the limits of measurement error.

Topical application of WR-2721 to prevent radiation-induced proctosigmoiditis. A phase I/II trial.

Patients undergoing x-ray therapy to the pelvis have intestinal symptoms proportional to the volume treated and the dose delivered. WR-2721, S-2 (3-aminopropylaminoethyl) phosphorothioic acid, is an organic thiophosphate compound that selectively protects normal tissues against radiation effects. A Phase I/II study was done to test the ability of topical application of WR-2721 to protect the mucosa of the rectosigmoid from radiation damage. Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study, of which, seven were control subjects. Twenty-four patients received WR-2721 daily, in enema form, 45 minutes before treatment. The patients were assigned by groups of three to receive increasing doses of WR-2721 beginning with 100 mg/enema to 450 mg/enema. Rectal mucosal biopsies were obtained within the treated field before, during, and at the end of therapy. The degree of damage to the rectal mucosa was scored on the basis of a 0 to 4 scale (with 0, least damage to 4, most damage) as determined by the percentage of damaged mucosal crypt glands. The patients' symptoms were recorded once a week during the entire course of therapy. The biopsy scores of the control group were slightly higher than those of the treatment groups; however, this difference did not appear to be significant. In the treated groups, there was a slight decrease in the biopsy scores with increasing doses of WR-2721, but this trend was not sustained. There were no differences among any of the groups in the symptoms experienced during the course of therapy. This study showed that WR-2721 could be administered safely in enema form in doses ranging from 100 to 450 mg/enema, but this drug did not protect the rectosigmoid mucosa from radiation damage at the doses administered.

Phase I/II study of external radio frequency phased array hyperthermia and external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: technique and results of intraprostatic temperature measurements.

As part of an ongoing Phase I/II study at Duke University Medical Center investigating the toxicity and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy plus hyperthermia for deep-seated, locally advanced or recurrent solid tumors, 12 patients with prostate malignancies (adenocarcinoma--11, leiomyosarcoma--1) were treated with radiotherapy plus hyperthermia. Hyperthermia was given after radiotherapy using a Radio Frequency Phase/Amplitude Control Sigma 60 annular phased array device. All patients had simultaneous temperature measurements made in the rectal lumen and within the prostate during at least one hyperthermia session. Intraprostate thermometers were placed via a unique method described herein using both computerized tomography scan and a rigid sigmoidoscope for guidance. We were able to achieve the desired tumor temperature of > or = 42.5 degrees C in only 1/28 (3.5%) of hyperthermia treatments. Subjective symptoms of pain and/or pressure limited power deposition in 79% of hyperthermia treatments. Higher temperatures were achieved in the distal rectum than in the prostate in all treatments, although the differences were not statistically significant. This temperature differential could not be compensated by using phase and amplitude steering. Rectal temperatures adjacent to the prostate were predictive of prostate temperatures. We conclude that using this regional heating technique we were unable to demonstrate an ability to get an advantageous temperature differential between the prostate and normal tissue. This technique is not useful as an adjuvant to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The usefulness of other regional heating techniques and devices should be explored.