Coffee consumption protects against progression in liver cirrhosis and increases long-term survival after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options to treat progression of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) or improve long-term survival after liver transplantation remain scarce. We investigated the impact of coffee consumption under these conditions. METHODS: We recorded coffee consumption habits of 379 patients with ESLD awaiting liver transplantation and 260 patients after liver transplantation. Survival was analyzed based on coffee intake. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five patients with ESLD consumed coffee on a daily basis, while 184 patients did not. Actuarial survival was impaired (P = 0.041) in non-coffee drinkers (40.4 ± 4.3 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.0-48.9) compared with coffee drinkers (54.9 ± 5.5 months, 95% CI: 44.0-65.7). In subgroup analysis, the survival of patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD; P = 0.020) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; P = 0.017) was increased with coffee intake while unaffected in patients with chronic viral hepatitis (P = 0.517) or other liver disease entities (P = 0.652). Multivariate analysis showed that coffee consumption of PSC and ALD patients retained as an independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR]: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.15-3.28; P = 0.013) along with MELD score (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.09-1.17; P = 0.000). Following liver transplantation, long-term survival was longer in coffee drinkers (coffee: 61.8 ± 2.0 months, 95% CI: 57.9-65.8) than non-drinkers (52.3 ± 3.5 months, 95% CI: 45.4-59.3; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coffee consumption delayed disease progression in ALD and PSC patients with ESLD and increased long-term survival after liver transplantation. We conclude that regular coffee intake might be recommended for these patients.

Association of serum zinc levels with liver function and survival in patients awaiting liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: Zinc is an important trace element with catalytic and defensive functions. We assessed the impact of zinc deficiency in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation. METHODS: Serum zinc levels were measured at the time of evaluation for liver transplantation (n = 368). Patients were dichotomized in two groups based on low and normal zinc serum levels. RESULTS: Serum zinc levels are tightly associated with liver function as patients with low zinc levels (n = 226) had a higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (15.0 [5.0-40.0]) than patients with normal zinc (n = 142) levels (9.0 [6.0-34.0]; p < 0.00). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that serum zinc levels function as an independent predictor of hepatic decompensation (hydropic decompensation: odds ratio [OR] 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.96; p = 0.015; hepatic encephalopathy: OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.71-0.90; p = 0.000; spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.72-1.00; p = 0.047; hepatorenal syndrome: OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.95; p = 0.011). Actuarial survival free of liver transplantation was reduced for low-zinc patients (26.7 ± 4.0 months; 95% CI 18.8-34.6) compared to patients with normal zinc levels (30.9 ± 3.0 months; 95% CI 24.9-36.9; p = 0.008). Reduction of zinc levels for patients on the transplantation list resulted in a 28.3-fold increased risk of death/liver transplantation (95% CI 3.2-244.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Serum zinc levels are associated with reduced survival in end-stage liver disease patients. Whether or not zinc supplementation might be beneficial for patients on a liver transplantation list requires further study.