RESUMO
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The warming effect of low-level light therapy may contribute to its therapeutic mechanism which is beneficial for dry eye management. BACKGROUND: Low-level light therapy is proposed to work via cellular photobiomodulation and a potential thermal effect in dry eye management. This study examined the change in eyelid temperature and tear film stability after low-level light therapy compared to warm compress. METHODS: Participants with no to mild dry eye disease were randomised into control, warm compress, and low-level light therapy groups. The low-level light therapy group was treated with Eyelight mask (633 nm) for 15 minutes, the warm compress group with Bruder mask for 10 minutes, and the control group with an Eyelight mask having inactive LEDs for 15 minutes. Eyelid temperature was measured using the FLIR One® Pro thermal camera (Teledyne FLIR, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), and clinical measures of tear film stability were evaluated before and after treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants (mean age ± SD, 27.3 ± 4.3 years) completed the study. Eyelid temperatures for external upper, external lower, internal upper and internal lower eyelids were significantly greater in the low-level light therapy and warm compress groups immediately after treatment compared to the control group (all p < 0.001). No difference in temperature was observed between the low-level light therapy and warm compress groups at all time points (all p > 0.05). Tear film lipid layer thickness was significantly greater after treatment (mean (95% CI), 13.1 nm (5.3 to 21.0), p < 0.005) but not different between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: A single treatment of low-level light therapy increased eyelid temperature immediately after treatment, but the increase was not significantly different from warm compress. This suggests that thermal effects may in part contribute to the therapeutic mechanism of low-level light therapy.