In vitro activities of nontraditional antimicrobials against multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated in an intensive care unit outbreak.

Fifteen multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from patients in intensive care units and 14 nonoutbreak strains were tested to determine in vitro activities of nontraditional antimicrobials, including cefepime, meropenem, netilmicin, azithromycin, doxycycline, rifampin, sulbactam, and trovafloxacin. The latter five drugs were further tested against four of the strains for bactericidal or bacteriostatic activity by performing kill-curve studies at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 times their MICs. In addition, novel combinations of drugs with sulbactam were examined for synergistic interactions by using a checkerboard configuration. MICs at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited for antimicrobials showing activity against the multiresistant A. baumannii strains were as follows (in parentheses): doxycycline (1 microg/ml), azithromycin (4 microg/ml), netilmicin (1 microg/ml), rifampin (8 microg/ml), polymyxin (0.8 U/ml), meropenem (4 microg/ml), trovafloxacin (4 microg/ml), and sulbactam (8 microg/ml). In the kill-curve studies, azithromycin and rifampin were rapidly bactericidal while sulbactam was more slowly bactericidal. Trovafloxacin and doxycycline were bacteriostatic. None of the antimicrobials tested were bactericidal against all strains tested. The synergy studies demonstrated that the combinations of sulbactam with azithromycin, rifampin, doxycycline, or trovafloxacin were generally additive or indifferent.

A randomized study of cefepime versus the combination of gentamicin and mezlocillin as an adjunct to surgical treatment in patients with acute cholecystitis.

In patients with acute cholecystitis, antibiotics are used as an adjunct to cholecystectomy to reduce the incidence of postoperative septic complications thought to be related to bactibilia. Combinations of penicillins, or cephalosporins or aminoglycosides, or both, are often used. Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with excellent activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas species. It has a prolonged serum half-life, allowing twice-daily dosing, and is not nephrotoxic. This study was undertaken to determine whether or not cefepime was as effective as the combination of gentamicin and mezlocillin in patients with acute cholecystitis. One hundred and forty-nine patients were randomized, two to one, to receive cefepime or gentamicin and mezlocillin. Cefepime was given intravenously at 2 grams every 12 hours; gentamicin, 1.0 to 1.5 milligrams per kilograms every eight hours, and mezlocillin, 3 to 4 grams every four to six hours. All patients underwent cholecystectomy. Bile cultures were obtained, and concentrations of cefepime in blood, bile, peritoneal fluid and gallbladder were determined in a subset of patients. There were 56 evaluable cefepime-treated and 34 evaluable gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients. Bactibilia was present in 17 of 56 cefepime-treated patients (30.4 percent) and ten of 34 gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated patients (29.4 percent). Enterococci were recovered in six cefepime-treated patients. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were similar for the cefepime-treated and gentamicin and mezlocillin-treated groups, with one failure in each group, a wound infection in a patient receiving cefepime and a subhepatic abscess in a patients receiving gentamicin and mezlocillin. Other measures of outcome, such as the number of days of fever, days nothing by mouth, days of hospitalization and days of antibiotic therapy were similar in both groups. Cefepime, with every 12 hour dosing, achieved extremely high concentrations in all tissues assayed at the time of the operation, a mean of eight hours after administration. Adverse clinical events were similar in both treatment groups. Cefepime is as effective as gentamicin and mezlocillin in preventing septic complications after cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cefepime requires fewer doses, does not require drug monitoring, is not associated with nephrotoxicity and may therefore prove to be a cost-effective alternative to combination therapy that uses an aminoglycoside.

Potential of topical norfloxacin therapy. Comparative in vitro activity against clinical ocular bacterial isolates.

Norfloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone antibiotic related to nalidixic acid, was evaluated as a topical agent for clinical efficacy in bacterial eye infections. This study reports on the comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin and ten topical antibiotics (nalidixic acid, polymyxin B, colistin, bacitracin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, erythromycin, gentamicin, and tobramycin) against 203 pathogenic eye isolates of 17 genera (37 species). In general, norfloxacin had the greatest potency and broadest spectrum of activity of the agents tested. It was active against Staphylococcus aureus (minimal inhibitory concentration against 90% [MIC90], less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/mL), coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC90, less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/mL), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90, less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/mL), and Haemophilus organisms (MIC90, less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/mL).