Intrahepatic Tumor Burden as a Novel Factor Influencing the Introduction of Second-line Chemotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To examine the factors influencing the introduction of the second-line chemotherapy and discuss the selection of first-line agent for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 154 patients with HCC who received sorafenib therapy. RESULTS: A total of 109 (70.8%) patients, maintained Child-Pugh grade A and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≤1 upon sorafenib discontinuation. Multivariate analysis revealed that the up-to-seven criteria status in the hepatic lesion [p=0.019; odds ratio=OR, 2.685], albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade (p=0.002; OR=3.589), and macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) (p=0.008; OR=2.972) were significant factors at sorafenib initiation that influenced the maintenance of Child-Pugh grade A and ECOG-PS ≤1 upon therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Not only ALBI grade and MVI, but also up-to-seven criteria status in the hepatic lesion influence the introduction of second-line therapy, and could affect the selection of the first-line therapy.

Phase II Trial of Transarterial Embolization Using an n-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate/Lipiodol Mixture (JIVROSG-0802).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the embolic effect and the safety of transarterial embolization (TAE) using n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in a prospective multicenter trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial. The inclusion criteria were (1) active bleeding or pseudoaneurysm, (2) true aneurysm, (3) arteriovenous malformation (except cerebral lesion), (4) arteriovenous fistula, or (5) need for arterial distribution before transarterial treatment. Selective TAE with NBCA diluted 2-10 times was performed. The primary endpoint was the success rate of embolization with a per-patient analysis based on the angiographic findings. Secondary endpoints were safety, evaluated based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4, and the success rate of embolization with a per-vessel calculation. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were initially enrolled, but due to protocol violation in two patients, efficacy was ultimately analyzed in 63 patients (103 vessels) and safety was analyzed in 64 patients. The success rate per patient was 98.4% (62/63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 91.5-100.00), and the success rate per vessel was 99.0% (102/103; 95% CI, 94.7-100.0). Adverse events of grade 3 or above based on CTCAE version 4 occurred in 22/64 patients (34.4%). Twelve intraoperative or postoperative adverse events grade 3 or above, which may have been related to embolization using NBCA, occurred in 11/64 patients (17.2%). Three patients died after embolization using NBCA, but their deaths were unrelated to TAE. CONCLUSION: In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, the efficacy of TAE using NBCA was 98.4% and adverse events were clinically acceptable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3b.

Phase I/II study of first-line combination therapy with sorafenib plus resminostat, an oral HDAC inhibitor, versus sorafenib monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in east Asian patients.

PURPOSE: Resminostat is an oral inhibitor of class I, IIB, and IV histone deacetylases. This phase I/II study compared the safety and efficacy of resminostat plus sorafenib versus sorafenib monotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In phase I, resminostat (400 mg or 600 mg/day on days 1 to 5 every 14 days) was administered with sorafenib (800 mg/day for 14 days) to determine the recommended dose for phase II. In phase II, patients were randomized (1:1) to sorafenib monotherapy or resminostat plus sorafenib. The primary endpoint was time-to-progression (TTP). RESULTS: Nine patients (3: 400 mg, 6: 600 mg) were enrolled in phase I, and the recommended dose of resminostat was determined to be 400 mg/day. Then 170 patients were enrolled in phase II. Median TTP/overall survival (OS) were 2.8/14.1 months with monotherapy versus 2.8/11.8 months with combination therapy (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 0.984, p = 0.925/HR: 1.046, p = 0.824). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups (98.8% versus 100.0%). However, thrombocytopenia ≥ Grade 3 was significantly more frequent in the combination therapy group (34.5% versus 2.4%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that median TTP/OS was 1.5/6.9 months for monotherapy versus 2.8/13.1 months for combination therapy (HR: 0.795, p = 0.392/HR: 0.567, p = 0.065) among patients with a normal-to-high baseline platelet count (≥ 150 × 103/mm3). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HCC, first-line therapy with resminostat at the recommended dose plus sorafenib showed no significant efficacy advantage over sorafenib monotherapy.

A multicenter Phase II study of sorafenib in Japanese patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and Child Pugh A and B class.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prospectively the efficacy and safety of sorafenib, which has been the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in Japanese HCC patients (pts) with not only Child-Pugh (C-P) A class but also C-P B class. METHODS: Sorafenib was administered orally at the dose of 400 mg twice daily for pts with HCC and liver function of C-P score of 5-8. Administration was continued until the detection of disease progression or appearance of unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and toxicity and the secondary endpoints included objective response, overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Forty C-P A pts and 12 C-P B pts were enrolled. The median TTP in the C-P A pts and C-P B pts was 3.3 months and 3.2 months, respectively. Among the pts with C-P A, complete response, partial response, and stable disease were achieved for 2.5%, 7.5% and 47.5%. Among the pts with C-P B, there were no treatment responses, 66.7% of pts had stable disease. The median OS in the C-P A pts and C-P B pts was 13.4 months and 7.4 months, respectively. With regard to toxicities, fewer C-P A pts experienced Grade 3/4 toxicities than C-P B pts (77.5% vs. 91.6%). There were no treatment-related deaths in either group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows sorafenib has similar effectiveness in the recent post-approval studies and is well-tolerated in Japanese pts with HCC and Child Pugh A class. Sorafenib should be used with great care for Child Pugh class B pts.

Prospective study of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian cooperative study between Japan and Korea.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization used for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with an Asian cooperative prospective study between Japan and Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable HCC unsuitable for curative treatment or with no prior therapy for HCC were enrolled. The patients underwent transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with emulsion of Lipiodol and anthracycline agent, followed by embolization with gelatin sponge particles, which was repeated on an as-needed basis. The primary endpoint was 2-year survival rate, and the secondary endpoints were adverse events and response rate. RESULTS: The 2-year survival rate of 99 patients was 75.0% (95% confidence interval, 65.2%-82.8%). The median time-to-progression was 7.8 months, and the median overall survival period was 3.1 years. Of 99 patients, 42 (42%) achieved a complete response, and 31 (31%) had a partial response. The response rate was 73% using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The grade 3-4 toxicities included increased alanine aminotransferase level in 36%, increased aspartate aminotransferase level in 35%, thrombocytopenia in 12%, and abdominal pain in 4% of patients. All other toxicities were generally transient. CONCLUSIONS: Asian transcatheter arterial chemoembolization demonstrated sufficient safety and reasonable efficacy as a standard treatment for unresectable HCC. These results could be useful as reference data for future trials of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

Hepatic arterial embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas: do technical factors affect prognosis?

PURPOSE: To evaluate retrospectively whether technical factors of hepatic arterial embolization affect the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria of this study were the following: (1) patients received embolization as the initial treatment during 2003-2004, (2) Child A or B liver profile, (3) five or fewer HCCs with maximum diameter of 7 cm or smaller, and (4) no extrahepatic metastasis. Patient data were gathered from 43 centers. Prognostic factors were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifteen patients were enrolled. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall survival rates were 92.0 % (95 % CI 90.1-93.9), 62.9 % (95 % CI 59.3-66.6), 39.0 % (95 % CI 35.1-43.0), and 26.7 % (95 % CI 22.6-30.8) in all patients. Univariate analysis showed a Child-Pugh class-A, alpha-fetoprotein level lower than 100 ng/ml, tumor size of 3 cm or smaller, tumor number of 3 or fewer, one-lobe tumor distribution, nodular tumor type, within the Milan criteria, stage I or II, no portal venous invasion, use of iodized oil, and selective embolization were significantly better prognostic factors. In the multivariate Cox model, the benefit to survival of selective embolization remained significant (hazard ratio 0.68; 95 % CI 0.48-0.97; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Selective embolization contributes to survival in patients with HCCs.

Radiologic placement of side-hole catheter with tip fixation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the technical outcome of radiologic catheter placement with use of a side-hole catheter with distal fixation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and September 1999, 426 patients were referred to our department to undergo intraarterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable malignant liver tumors. A subclavian artery was exposed under local anesthesia and a catheter was inserted. After inserting the tip of the side-hole catheter into the gastroduodenal artery, splenic artery, or peripheral branch of the hepatic artery, the catheter tip was fixed to the vessel with use of coils and a mixture of n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and iodized oil. The proximal end of the catheter was connected to an implanted port, and the port system was embedded subcutaneously. RESULTS: Placement was successful in 425 of 426 patients (99.8%) in a mean time of 76 minutes. Catheter dislodgement was noted in 12 patients (2.8%). Cumulative patency rates of the hepatic artery calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method for the entire group were 91.0%, 81.4%, and 58.1% at 6 months and 1 and 2 years, respectively. Complications related to catheter placement were observed in nine cases and included dysfunction of the implanted system (n = 3), significant bleeding around the implanted port (n = 2), improper infusion of NBCA and iodized oil (n = 2), and cerebral infarction (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Radiologic catheter placement via a subclavian artery with side-hole catheter placement with distal fixation for hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is a highly successful procedure with a reduced risk of catheter dislodgment and arterial occlusion.