High-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation as consolidation treatment in patients with chemosensitive ovarian cancer: results of a single-institution randomized trial.

The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains controversial. This study was initiated to compare the efficacy and tolerability of HDCT as a consolidation approach in women with chemosensitive advanced EOC (FIGO stages IIC-IV). Patients who had achieved their first clinical complete remission after six cycles of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive or not high-dose melphalan. The primary objective was to compare time to disease progression (TTP). A total of 80 patients were enrolled onto the trial. Patients who were randomized to receive HDCT were initially treated with cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) for PBPC mobilization. HDCT consisted of melphalan 200 mg/m(2). Of the 37 patients who were allocated to HDCT, 11 (29.7%) did not receive melphalan either due to patient refusal (n=5) or due to failure of PBPC mobilization (n=6). In an intent-to-treat analysis, there were no significant differences between the two arms in TTP (P=0.059) as well as in overall survival (OS) (P=0.38).

Postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel primarily on disease-free survival (DFS) and secondarily on overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1997 until November 2000, 604 patients with T1-3N1M0 or T3N0M0 tumors were randomized to three cycles of epirubicin 110 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 followed by three cycles of 'intensified' CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m2, methotrexate 47 mg/m2 and fluorouracil 840 mg/m2) (group A), or to four cycles of epirubicin followed by four cycles of CMF, as in group A (group B). All cycles were given every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: A total of 595 patients were eligible. Median follow-up was 61.7 months for group A and 62 months for group B. The 3-year DFS was 80% in group A and 77% in group B. Survival rates were 93% and 90%, respectively. The effect of treatment on the hazard of death was different according to hormonal receptor status. More specifically, in patients with negative receptor status the hazard of death was significantly higher for group B (hazard ratio 2.42). Both regimens were well tolerated and severe acute side-effects were infrequent. No cases of severe cardiotoxicity or acute leukemia were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to demonstrate a significant difference in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. However, our study has shown clearly that high-dose paclitaxel can be safely incorporated to dose-dense sequential chemotherapy.

Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF in high-risk breast cancer.

Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy appears to be a promising approach in the management of patients with operable breast cancer. We evaluated the tolerability of such a novel chemotherapeutic regimen in high-risk patients. From February 1995 until September 1997, 49 women with histologically confirmed breast cancer and > or =10 involved axillary nodes were treated postoperatively with three cycles of epirubicin (110 mg/m(2)) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion) followed by three cycles of 'intensified' CMF (cyclophosphamide 840 mg/m(2), methotrexate 57 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 840 mg/m(2); E-T-CMF). All cycles were repeated every 2 weeks with G-CSF support. Ovarian ablation with monthly injections of triptorelin for 1 year was performed in premenopausal patients and tamoxifen was prescribed for 5 years to all women with positive receptor status after the completion of chemotherapy. A total of 456 cycles of chemotherapy were administered, 363 (80%) of them at full dose. Forty-seven (96%) patients received all 9 cycles of chemotherapy. Relative dose intensity of epirubicin was 0.98, of paclitaxel 0.97, of cyclophosphamide 0.99, of methotrexate 0.98 and of fluorouracil 0.99. Grade 3--4 toxicities included anemia (8%), leukopenia (8%), peripheral neuropathy (6%), neutropenia (4%), thrombocytopenia (4%), stomatitis (2%), diarrhea (2%), fatigue (2%) and hypersensitivity reaction (2%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 2 patients. Alopecia was universal. After a median follow-up of 3 years, 11 women (22%) relapsed and 4 (8%) died. The 3-year actuarial disease-free survival rate was 72% and the 3-year overall survival rate 90%. The E-T-CMF regimen is well tolerated, as adjuvant treatment, in patients with operable breast cancer with promising activity and deserves further evaluation in phase III studies.

Fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without interferon alfa-2a as adjuvant treatment, in patients with high-risk colon cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown in randomized studies that adjuvant treatment with the combination of fluorouracil (FU) and levamisole reduced the risk of recurrence and deaths of patients with stage III colon cancer. Pharmacological studies of FU led to its use in combination with a number of modulating agents including interferon-alpha and leucovorin (LV) that appear to enhance its activity in vitro. Furthermore, a meta-analysis suggested that the combination of FU with LV increased the response rate as compared to FU monotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant treatment with the combination of FU and LV with or without interferon alfa-2a (IFN) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage II or III colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1989 to July 1997, 280 patients with stage II and III colon cancer entered the study and were randomly assigned to receive either the combination of FU (600 mg/m(2)/week x 6, followed by a 2-week rest) and LV (500 mg/m(2)/week x 6 as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 2-week rest) for 4 cycles (group A, 139 patients), or the same chemotherapy plus recombinant IFN (3 MU subcutaneously 3 times a week) for 1 year (group B, 141 patients). RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (78.9%) of group A and 119 (84.4%) of group B completed four cycles of chemotherapy. Also, 51.4% of patients of group A and 53.9% of group B received > or =80% of the planned dose of FU. One patient (group A) was found to be ineligible and was not included in the analysis. The median relative dose intensity of FU in the two groups was 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. As of August 1998, after a median follow up of 4 years, there was no significant difference in either 3-year DFS (group A, 83.1%; group B, 75.9%, p = 0.14) or OS (group A, 84.5%; group B, 80.0%, p = 0.27). In the Cox model, stage of disease, number of infiltrated nodes, tumor grade and presence of regional implants were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. Grade 3-4 toxicities, mainly diarrhea, were observed in 26.1% of patients of group A and in 24.8% of group B. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IFN to the combination of FU with LV postoperatively does not improve DFS and OS of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.