The Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Solitary Rectal Ulcer and Dyssynergic Defecation.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer (SRU) is challenging and controversial; generally, no response to conventional treatments can be obtained, particularly in patients with dyssynergic defecation (DD). We assessed the efficiency of biofeedback therapy (BFT) in patients who did not respond to conservative treatments and had coexistence of SRU and DD. METHODS: BFT responses, as well as anorectal manometry and rectoscopy results of 20 patients with the coexistence of SRU and DD, were assessed. RESULTS: Mean age was 32.5 years. Of the patients, 12 were female, and 8 of them were male. An average of 12 sessions of BFT was performed on the patients. Ulcer disappeared in 11 patients (55%) after BFT, and the ulcer size decreased in 3 patients (15%). However, ulcers healed in 9 (90%) of 10 patients whose DD pattern disappeared following BFT, and ulcers healed in only 20% of patients whose DD pattern continued (p = 0.005). The change in anal resting pressure after BFT was significant (p = 0.016). Ulcers were healed in 87.5% (7/8) of the patients whose anal resting pressure decreased after BFT and whose DD disappeared, while ulcers remained untreated in 85.7% of the patients whose anal resting pressure decreased, but the DD pattern continued (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: SRU patients with DD are typically unresponsive to medical treatments. Ameliorating anorectal dyssynergia should be the priority of treatment in these patients. BFT is an effective treatment for DD. BFT enhances the healing of ulcers in patients with SRU by restoring coordination of the pelvic floor.

The Efficacy of Biofeedback Treatment in Patients with Fecal Incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The initial treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) includes supportive treatment and medical treatment. If the initial treatment fails, biofeedback therapy (BFT) is recommended. However, there are limited and conflicting results in the literature supporting the beneficial effect of BFT for FI. The aim of the study is to analyze the efficacy of BFT in 126 patients who have FI due to several causes. METHODS: The data of 126 patients (88 females (69.8%) and 38 males (30.2%)) were collected retrospectively. Colonoscopy, anorectal manometry (ARM), and 3D-Endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) were performed for all patients before applying BFT. In addition, all patients received toilet training instruction and training in Kegel and other pelvic floor strengthening exercises from an experienced nurse, before BFT. RESULTS: The median age of participants was 54 years (range 18-75 years). While 80 patients (63.5%) had clinical and manometric benefit from BFT, 46 patients (36.5%) did not respond to BFT. According to the EAUS and ARM findings, BFT was beneficial in patients who had partial external sphincter failure, and was unsuccessful in patients who had both internal and external sphincter failure, both internal and external sphincter tears, and external sphincter tear rates of more than 25%. After BFT, significant increases in squeeze pressures were observed, with this increase being higher in the positive-response group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that BFT is effective in the treatment of FI for specific patient populations.