Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Kidney Dis (Basel) ; 9(3): 206-217, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37497207

RESUMO

Introduction: Parathyroid hormone-lowering responses after administration of three different therapies capable of raising serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) were evaluated in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), vitamin D insufficiency (VDI), and stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Sixty-nine adult subjects with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ≥85 and <500 pg/mL and VDI (25OHD <30 ng/mL) were randomized after ≥4-week washout to 2 months of open-label treatment with: (1) extended-release calcifediol (ERC) 60 µg/day; (2) immediate-release calcifediol (IRC) 266 µg/month; (3) high-dose cholecalciferol (HDC) 300,000 IU/month; or (4) paricalcitol plus low-dose cholecalciferol (PLDC) 1 or 2 µg and 800 IU/day, used as reference hormone replacement therapy. Serum 25OHD, calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), plasma iPTH, and adverse events were monitored weekly. No clinically significant differences were observed at baseline between treatment groups. Results: Sixty-two subjects completed the study per protocol (PP; 14-17 per group). Mean (SD) 25OHD and iPTH at baseline were 20.6 (6.6) ng/mL and 144.8 (90) pg/mL, respectively. Mean 25OHD increased at end of treatment (EOT) to 82.9 (17.0) ng/mL with ERC (p < 0.001) and 30.8 (11.6) ng/mL with HDC (p < 0.05), but remained unchanged with IRC and PLDC. EOT 25OHD levels reached ≥30 ng/mL in all subjects treated with ERC and in 44% with HDC. All subjects attained EOT 25OHD levels ≥50 ng/mL with ERC versus none with other therapies. iPTH response rates at EOT (≥10, 20 or 30% below baseline) were similar for ERC and PLDC; rates for IRC and HDC were much lower. No significant changes from baseline were observed in ionized or corrected total Ca or P in any group. One episode of hypercalcemia (>10.3 mg/dL) occurred with PLDC. Hyperphosphatemia (>5.5 mg/dL) occurred once with ERC, eight times with HDC, 3 times with IRC, and twice with PLDC. Conclusion: ERC was highly effective in both raising serum 25OHD and decreasing iPTH in patients with SHPT, VDI, and stage 3 or 4 CKD. iPTH-lowering response rates with ERC were similar to daily PLDC, the reference therapy; rates with IRC or HDC were significantly lower. ERC is an attractive alternative to vitamin D hormone therapy in CKD patients.

2.
Am J Nephrol ; 53(6): 446-454, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35551374

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Obesity increases the risk of vitamin D insufficiency, which exacerbates secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease. Recent studies suggest that serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels of ≥50 ng/mL are necessary to produce significant reductions in elevated parathyroid hormone levels in nondialysis patients. Data from real-world and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving these patients were examined for (1) relationships between vitamin D treatments and the achieved levels of serum 25OHD and between serum 25OHD and body weight (BW)/body mass index (BMI); and (2) the impact of BW/BMI on achieving serum 25OHD levels ≥50 ng/mL with extended-release calcifediol (ERC) treatment or vitamin D supplementation (cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol). METHODS: Data obtained from nondialysis patients participating in two real-world studies, one conducted in Europe (Study 1) and the other (Study 2) in the USA, and in two US RCTs (Studies 3 and 4) were analyzed for serum 25OHD outcomes after treatment with ERC, vitamin D supplements, or placebo. RESULTS: More than 50% of subjects treated with vitamin D supplements in both real-world studies (Studies 1 and 2) failed to achieve serum 25OHD levels ≥30 ng/mL, a level widely viewed by nephrologists as the threshold of adequacy; only 7.3-7.5% of subjects achieved levels ≥50 ng/mL. Data from the European study (Study 1) showed that serum 25OHD levels had significant and nearly identical inverse relationships with BW and BMI, indicating that high BW or BMI thwarts the ability of vitamin D supplements to raise serum 25OHD. One RCT (Study 3) showed that 8 weeks of ERC treatment (60 µg/day) raised serum 25OHD levels to ≥30 and 50 ng/mL in all subjects, regardless of BW, while cholecalciferol (300,000 IU/month) raised serum 25OHD to these thresholds in 56% and 0% of subjects, respectively. The other RCT (Study 4) showed that ERC treatment (30 or 60 µg/day) successfully raised mean serum 25OHD levels to at least 50 ng/mL for subjects in all BW categories, whereas no increases were observed with placebo treatment. CONCLUSION: Real-world studies conducted in Europe and USA in nondialysis patients (Studies 1 and 2) showed that vitamin D supplements (cholecalciferol or ergocalciferol) were unreliable in raising serum total 25OHD to targets of 30 or 50 ng/mL. In contrast, ERC was demonstrated to be effective in one real-world study (Study 2) and two RCTs (Studies 3 and 4) conducted in US nondialysis patients in raising serum 25OHD to these targeted levels irrespective of BW.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Calcifediol , Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Ergocalciferóis/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/complicações , Hiperparatireoidismo Secundário/etiologia , Sobrepeso/complicações , Sobrepeso/tratamento farmacológico , Hormônio Paratireóideo , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Deficiência de Vitamina D/complicações , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Vitaminas/uso terapêutico
3.
Am J Nephrol ; 49(3): 225-232, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30820015

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mineral and bone disorder (MBD) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and is associated with risk of fractures, cardiovascular disease, and death. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommend monitoring CKD-MBD biochemical markers, including parathyroid hormone (PTH), phosphorus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25D), calcium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP), in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD. METHODS: To determine guideline adherence, we used administrative claims records from the 20% sample of Medicare beneficiaries with Parts A, B, and D coverage, 2007 to 2015, and identified cohorts of patients with nondialysis stage 3, 4, or 5 CKD. Testing for biochemical markers during follow-up was defined based on laboratory procedure codes. Baseline factors associated with laboratory testing were determined using logistic regression. All analyses were performed separately by CKD stage. RESULTS: A total of 640,946 stage 3, 136,278 stage 4, and 22,076 stage 5 CKD patients, 50.2-52.9% women, mean age 74.4-78.0 years, were followed for a mean of 2.5, 1.3, and 0.7 years respectively. The frequency of testing was low for PTH (35.2-48.2%), phosphorus (46.6-62.0%), and 25D (29.3-46.7%). Testing was somewhat higher for calcium (88.1-95.4%) and ALP (63.5-88.1%); most tests were features of larger panels (e.g., basic metabolic panel). Older age, most comorbid conditions, and lack of prior nephrology care were associated with lower likelihood of testing. CONCLUSIONS: In fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, laboratory testing for CKD-MBD biochemical markers appears to be suboptimal in relation to KDIGO guidelines. Competing priories, such as management of comorbid disease and preparation for renal replacement therapy, may distract from CKD-MBD monitoring.


Assuntos
Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fosfatase Alcalina/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Análise Química do Sangue/normas , Cálcio/sangue , Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/sangue , Distúrbio Mineral e Ósseo na Doença Renal Crônica/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Fósforo/sangue , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Estados Unidos , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangue , Adulto Jovem
4.
Hemodial Int ; 18(1): 38-46, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23968235

RESUMO

Clinical guidelines recommend concurrent treatment of anemia in end-stage renal disease with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron. However, there are mixed data about optimal iron supplementation. To help address this gap, the relationship between iron markers and hemoglobin (Hb) response to ESA (Epoetin alfa) dose was examined. Electronic medical records of 1902 US chronic hemodialysis patients were analyzed over a 12-month period between June 2009 and June 2010. The analysis included patients who had at least one Hb value during each 4-week interval for four consecutive intervals (k - 2, k - 1, k, and k + 1; k is the index interval), received at least one ESA dose during intervals k - 1 or k, had at least one transferrin saturation (TSAT) value at interval k, and at least one ferritin value during intervals k - 2, k - 1, or k. Effect modification by TSAT and ferritin on Hb response was evaluated using the generalized estimating equations approach. Patients had a mean (standard deviation) age of 62 (15) years; 41% were Caucasian, 34% African American, 65% had hypertension, and 39% diabetes. Transferrin saturation, but not ferritin, had a statistically significant (P < 0.05) modifying effect on Hb response. Maximum Hb response was achieved when TSAT was 34%, with minimal incremental effect beyond these levels. Of the two standard clinical iron markers, TSAT should be used as the primary marker of the modifying effect of iron on Hb response to ESA. Long-term safety of iron use to improve Hb response to ESA warrants further study.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Eritropoetina/administração & dosagem , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Diálise Renal , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Epoetina alfa , Feminino , Ferritinas , Humanos , Hipertensão/sangue , Hipertensão/terapia , Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Estados Unidos
5.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 7(14): 1897-905, 2006 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17020416

RESUMO

Hyperphosphataemia is a major problem in patients with chronic kidney disease as it has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Over the last four decades, different modalities have been applied to treat hyperphosphataemia with varying degrees of success. Unfortunately, treatment strategies have led to unforeseen complications. These have prompted the development of new classes of medications with potentially better efficacy and few short-term and long-term side effects. This article reviews the causes, mechanism and management of hyperphosphataemia.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/sangue , Fósforo/sangue , Diálise Renal , Adulto , Cinacalcete , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Naftalenos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Ligação a Fosfato/uso terapêutico , Poliaminas/uso terapêutico , Sevelamer
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA