RESUMO
AIM: The aim of this study is to determine whether there is any difference in the quality of life of patients with a blind eye with long-term silicone oil compared to without. METHOD: Patients with either long-term silicone oil in situ (N = 17), defined as a period greater than 6 months duration with no plan for future removal, or those with a phthisical, non oil-filled eye were identified (N = 13). Two validated questionnaires (NEI VFQ-25 and the FACE-Q) that cover indicators for visual function, pain and cosmesis were sent to all patients in the two cohorts. RESULTS: There was no significant difference found in quality of life outcomes between the two groups in terms of visual function, pain or cosmesis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support a holistic approach to the consent process before vitreoretinal surgery. Patients that may need to undergo multiple vitreoretinal procedures, where the endstage result is a long-term silicone oil fill, should be informed that their functional outcome may be similar to having no surgical intervention.