Treatment for palmoplantar pustular psoriasis: systematic literature review, evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustular psoriasis (PPPP) is a variant of psoriasis whose the association with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been recently described. There is limited evidence regarding how to best reduce palmoplantar pustular psoriasis severity and to maintain remission once achieved. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elaborate evidence-based recommendations for PPPP treatment supported by a systematic literature review. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in Embase, Medline and Cochrane Library databases from 1980 to February 2013 searching for any trial in patients with PPPP assessing therapeutic interventions not including a systemic biotherapy. The selection of articles was limited to human subjects and English or French languages. RESULTS: Among the 675 articles identified, 29 including one Cochrane review were analysed. The Cochrane review summarised 23 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in chronic PPPP until February 2003, including 724 patients. The authors concluded that oral retinoid therapy (acitretin), photochemotherapy or combination of both, low dose of ciclosporin or topical corticosteroids under occlusion appeared to be helpful in relieving symptoms of PPPP. Since the publication of this review, 9 open studies on PPPP treatment have been published. Three new studies evaluated the benefits of PUVA on PPPP. They all showed a better efficacy of PUVA compared to UVB therapy. One open study concluded that a retinoid treatment with an arotinoid ethylesther showed a good efficacy. Five prospective studies (level of evidence of 3) assessed Laser Excimer UVB-NB (Excimer 308 nm) in PPPP. The combined analysis of these studies showed that 64% of patients experienced an improvement of 70% at the end of treatment. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy, ciclosporin and topical corticosteroids seem to be able to control PPPP. However, the standard of care for PPPP remains an issue and there is a strong need for reliable RCTs to better define treatment strategies for PPPP.

Significant delay in the introduction of systemic treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: a prospective multicentre observational study in outpatients from hospital dermatology departments in France.

BACKGROUND: There is a low rate of systemic treatment usage in moderate to severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the present study was to assess the time period between lack of control of moderate to severe psoriasis with topical treatment or phototherapy as perceived by patients and the medical decision to introduce a systemic treatment. METHODS: This was a prospective multicentre study, which included patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. A standardized questionnaire was completed by physicians and patients at the time the decision was taken to introduce a systemic treatment. The primary outcome was the duration of uncontrolled psoriasis, as estimated by the patient, prior to the introduction of systemic treatment. Factors associated with a delay in systemic treatment defined as > 2 years of uncontrolled psoriasis were assessed. The agreement between patients and physicians on the duration of uncontrolled psoriasis was estimated. RESULTS: The study included 142 patients. The mean age was 48 years, the mean Psoriasis Area and Severity index (PASI) was 18·5 and the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was 12. The median duration of uncontrolled psoriasis estimated by patients and physicians was 3 years and 2 years, respectively. Factors associated with a delay in the introduction of systemic treatment as assessed by patients were fewer than three physician visits since psoriasis was uncontrolled [odds ratio (OR) 3·05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·29-7·21], Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale < 10 (OR 2·83; 95% CI 1·19-6·71), continuous psoriasis evolution (OR 2·67; 95% CI 1·12-6·42), low consumption of topical treatment (OR 2·35; 95% CI 1·03-5·34). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant delay in the introduction of systemic treatment in moderate to severe psoriasis. Patients with low level anxiety and limited use of healthcare resources appear to be at higher risk of experiencing long delays.

Evidence-based recommendations on topical treatment and phototherapy of psoriasis: systematic review and expert opinion of a panel of dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: Although topical treatments and phototherapy are available for more than 40 years, there is a paucity of evidence-based recommendations regarding their use. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to develop evidence-based recommendations on topical treatments and phototherapy in psoriasis for daily clinical use. METHODS: A scientific committee selected clinically relevant questions on efficacy and safety of topical agents and phototherapy in psoriasis. This selection was made using the Delphi method. A systematic literature search was performed in Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library. The articles selected for analysis were reviewed and the level of evidence was appraised according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence. An Expert consensus meeting took place in June 2011, including 42 dermatologists. Recommendations for use of topical treatments and phototherapy were made during interactive workshops where the evidence was presented and discussed. Agreement among participants was assessed on a 10-point scale. The participants systematically assessed the impact of the recommendations on clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 3555 references were identified, among which 312 articles were included in the systematic reviews. Three recommendations were issued on phototherapy including both PUVA and narrow-band UVB. The recommendations related to administration schedule, clearance rate and risk of side-effects. The mean agreement between participants was good varying from 8.5 to 9.5. Six recommendations were issued on topical treatments focusing on administration schedule, clearance rate, risk of side-effects, cost-effectiveness and measures to improve treatment adherence. The mean agreement between participants varied from 7.3 to 9.9. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations for the use of topical agents and phototherapy in psoriasis are evidence-based and supported by a panel of dermatologists. The next step will be to disseminate these recommendations and assess the opinion of physicians who were not involved in generating the recommendations.

Efficacy of psoralen UV-A therapy vs. narrowband UV-B therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Oral 8-methoxypsoralen-UV-A (PUVA) and Narrowband UV-B (NB-UVB or UVB TL-01) are well established treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis but there is limited evidence regarding their respective efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To prepare for evidence-based recommendations concerning the practical use of oral 8-methoxypsoralen-UV-A and Narrowband UV-B in psoriasis, a systematic review to assess respective response rates, remission duration and predictive factors of efficacy was performed. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases, using the key words 'Psoriasis', 'UVB therapy', 'UVA therapy' for the period from 1980 to December 2010. RESULTS: The initial literature search identified 773 articles. The final selection included 29 randomized controlled trials: 18 were about the efficacy of PUVA, eight about the efficacy of NB-UVB and three directly compared PUVA vs. NB-UVB. The response rate defined by 75% or more improvement in PASI was 80% with PUVA vs. 70% with NB-UVB. The meta-analysis of the three comparative studies found a higher probability of remission at 6 months with PUVA than with NB-UVB [OR = 2.73 (95% CI 1.19-6.27), P = 0.02]. The choice of initial dose, according to skin type, the minimal erythemal dose or minimal phototoxic dose, incremental regimen and periodicity of the sessions did not appear to be predictive factors of efficacy for PUVA or NB-UVB. Despite methodological limitations in trials, the number of sessions needed for psoriasis clearance appeared to be lower with PUVA than with NB-UVB (approx. 17 vs. 25, respectively). CONCLUSION: PUVA and NB-UVB are both effective therapies in treatment of psoriasis. Our results suggest that compared with NB-UVB, PUVA tends to clear psoriasis more reliably, with fewer sessions, and provides with longer lasting clearance. However, the long-term safety of PUVA, especially its cutaneous carcinogenic risk, and the easier administration procedure often lead dermatologists to prefer NB-UVB as first line phototherapy treatment in plaque type psoriasis.

Carcinogenic risks of psoralen UV-A therapy and narrowband UV-B therapy in chronic plaque psoriasis: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Oral 8-methoxypsoralen-UV-A (PUVA) and narrowband UV-B (NB-UVB or UVB TL-01) are effective and widely used treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis. Although the role of PUVA therapy in skin carcinogenesis in humans with psoriasis has been clearly demonstrated, there is still controversy regarding the risk of skin cancer with NB-UVB. Furthermore, there is no clear evidence about the maximum cumulative number of sessions not to be exceeded in a lifetime. OBJECTIVES: To assess the respective cutaneous carcinogenic risks of PUVA or NB-UVB in psoriasis; to estimate the respective dose-relationship between skin cancers and PUVA or NB-UVB; to estimate a maximum number of sessions for PUVA or NB-UVB not to be exceeded in a lifetime. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from1980 to December 2010 in English and French, with the keywords 'Psoriasis' AND 'UVB therapy' AND 'UVA therapy' AND 'cancer' AND 'skin' OR 'neoplasm' OR 'cutaneous carcinoma' OR 'melanoma'. RESULTS: Of 243 identified references, 49 published studies were included. Most of them (45/49) concerned PUVA therapy, with 41 assessing the risk of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) following PUVA. All publications referring to the US prospective PUVA follow-up study revealed an increased risk of NMSC with the following characteristics: risk most pronounced for squamous cell carcinomas developing even with low exposures and increasing linearly with the number of sessions, tumors occurring also on non-exposed skin including invasive penile tumors, risk persisting after cessation of treatment. An increased risk of basal cell carcinomas was observed in patients receiving more than hundred PUVA sessions. The four prospective European studies selected in our review and most of the pre-1990 European and US retrospective studies failed to find a link between exposure to PUVA and skin cancer. Only the most recent cohorts, including three large long-term retrospective European studies comparing records with their respective national cancer registries reported on an independent increased risk of NMSC with PUVA, The risk was lower as compared to the US prospective PUVA follow-up study. Six studies assessed the risk of melanoma following PUVA therapy: two of the three US publications coming from the same PUVA prospective follow-up study revealed an increased risk with more than doubled incidence of both invasive and in situ melanoma among patients exposed to at least 200 PUVA treatments compared with patients exposed to lower doses, whereas the three retrospectives European studies, comparing the incidence of melanoma in PUVA users with national cancer registers, did not find any increased risk of melanoma. No increased risk of skin cancer was evidenced in the four studies specifically assessing the potential carcinogenic risk of NB-UVB. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk of skin cancer following PUVA, shown by both US and European studies. The greater risk measured by the US studies may be at least partly explained by high UVA dose exposure and the lighter phototypes of the treated patients. The lack of prospective studies in psoriasis patients treated with NB-UVB constitutes a barrier to the robust assessment of carcinogenic risk of this phototherapy technique.

Methotrexate in psoriasis: a systematic review of treatment modalities, incidence, risk factors and monitoring of liver toxicity.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To define practical use and to specify the ideal method for monitoring the liver toxicity of MTX in the management of psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature regarding treatment modalities with methotrexate (MTX) in psoriasis, risk of MTX-mediated liver fibrosis and monitoring of hepatic toxicity. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from 1980 to 2010 searching for randomized controlled trials and observational studies on methods of administering MTX in psoriasis and risk factors and assessment of liver toxicity. We limited the literature search to articles on human subjects over 19 years of age, articles in English or French on psoriasis and articles including psoriatic arthritis and original data. RESULTS: Among 949 references identified, 23 published studies were included. There were no studies focusing directly on the question of MTX treatment modalities. Treatment outcome appears to be dose dependent. A single study in rheumatoid arthritis showed the slightly superior efficacy of subcutaneous administration vs. oral dosing with a similar safety profile. Combination with folic acid may decrease the efficacy of MTX while improving tolerability. The extreme variability of the incidence of hepatic fibrosis in the literature does not allow the risk of hepatic fibrosis to be quantified. Type 2 diabetes and obesity, were associated with a significant increased risk of liver fibrosis. Hepatitis B and C and alcohol consumption were associated with a modest and non-significant increased risk of liver fibrosis. Procollagen III for detection of hepatic fibrosis dosing was the most extensively validated method to monitor liver fibrosis showing a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 91.5%. The Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value fluctuated depending on the prevalence of hepatic fibrosis. The sensitivities of the FibroTest and the fibroscan were of 83 and 50%, respectively, with specific features amounting to 61 and 88% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on expert experience, the starting dose of MTX is between 5 and 10 mg/week for the first week. Fast dose escalation is recommended in order to obtain a therapeutic target dose of 15-25 mg/week. The maximum recommended dose is 25 mg/week. A folic acid supplement is necessary. The initiation of treatment by oral administration is preferred. In cases where inadequate response is obtained or in the event of poor gastrointestinal tolerance, subcutaneous dosing can be proposed at the same dose. Published data do not confirm the incidence of hepatic fibrosis. Type 2 diabetes and obesity appear to be significant risk factors in fibrosis. A combination of FibroTests and fibroscans together with measurement of the type III serum procollagen aminopeptide seem to be ideal method for monitoring liver toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of oral retinoids in different psoriasis subtypes: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of retinoids in different psoriasis subtypes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available literature on: (i) modalities of administration and prescription of oral retinoids as single agent or combined therapy for the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis (PV), nail psoriasis and localized and generalized pustular psoriasis : initial and optimal dosage; (ii) skeletal toxicity of retinoid for the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from 1975 to 2010 searching for randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating 1) various dosages of retinoid in psoriasis and 2) skeletal toxicity of retinoid in psoriasis. Articles were limited to human subjects and English/French languages. RESULTS: Efficacy of retinoids in psoriasis. Among 1348 identified references, 44 published studies were included. Starting daily dosages between 10 and 25 mg and stepwise escalation were associated with higher clinical efficacy and lower incidence of adverse events in comparison with higher doses and regimens rapidly reaching optimal dose. Retinoids as single agent therapy appeared to show limited efficacy in PV, while the good clinical efficacy reported in pustular forms should be cautiously considered, given the spontaneously remitting course of the disease. Combining retinoids with phototherapy appeared to be highly effective in patients with PV. Potential skeletal toxicity of retinoids. 15 published studies out of 105 identified references were included. There is no strong evidence of an increased risk of skeletal abnormalities in psoriasis patients treated with retinoids. CONCLUSION: Acitretin appears to provide better efficacy in pustular psoriasis than in PV as a single agent treatment. There is no evidence for skeletal toxicity of retinoids in the setting of psoriasis, and accordingly monitoring this risk through X-ray is not warranted.

Evidence-based recommendations to assess psoriasis severity: systematic literature review and expert opinion of a panel of dermatologists.

BACKGROUND: Severity of psoriasis appears to be multidimensional and its assessment in everyday clinical practice requires a complex holistic approach. OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations to assess severity of plaque-type psoriasis in adult patients in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: A scientific committee (10 members identified on the basis of their expertise in psoriasis) using Delphi methodology selected eight questions in three domains: severity, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and comorbidities. Three systematic literature reviews (one per domain) of all studies published between January 1980 and June 2009 were performed based on Pub-Med, Cochrane and Embase database. Selected articles were systematically reviewed and evidence appraised according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence. On June 2009, a group of 44 French dermatologists both hospital and office based participated in a meeting including three separate rounds of discussions, plenary sessions, and modified Delphi technique votes. Recommendations for clinical practice based on systematic review and clinical experience were formulated by the group. Subsequently, agreements among the participants regarding these recommendations as well as potential impact on clinical practice were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 10 642 references were identified, of which 154 articles were analysed. Ten key recommendations on the assessment of psoriasis severity were formulated: three recommendations relating to severity assessment, three recommendations relating to HR-QoL (including the use of the Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] in clinical practice) and four recommendations relating to comorbidities (including systematic screening for peripheral or axial inflammatory joint damage, regardless of psoriasis severity). CONCLUSIONS: Ten recommendations to assess the severity of plaque-type psoriasis in adult patients in daily practice were developed. The recommendations are based on systematic appraisal of available evidence. They were developed and supported by a panel of dermatologists, which enhances their validity and practical relevance.

[Mechanisms and treatment of psoriasis]. / Mécanismes et traitements du psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a common dermatosis that affects 3-5% of the European population. Current treatments offer considerable clinical benefits, but their use is limited due to tolerance problems. Recent years have seen the development of new treatments, used separately or in combination to improve the chronic lesions caused by this disease. T cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Various techniques target the T cells and the immunological mechanisms involved in their activation. In 2005, treatment of psoriasis is directed essentially towards immunological pathways.

Evaluation of a novel 308-nm monochromatic excimer light delivery system in dermatology: a pilot study in different chronic localized dermatoses.

BACKGROUND: Recently, units have been developed that are capable of delivering large fluences of narrowband ultraviolet (UV) B selectively to cutaneous lesions within a reasonable time. OBJECTIVES: To analyse the efficacy of a novel nonlaser 308-nm monochromatic excimer light (MEL) delivery system in various dermatoses usually treated by narrowband UVB phototherapy. METHODS: Fifty-four patients with chronic and resistant localized dermatoses were enrolled in a prospective study: 17 with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis, seven with plaque-type psoriasis, four with nail psoriasis, eight with chronic atopic dermatitis of the hands, 10 with chronic nonatopic dermatitis of the hands and eight with alopecia areata. The 308-nm xenon chloride MEL delivery system (Excilite; DEKA, Florence, Italy) was used to produce an average incident dose rate of 50 mW cm(-2) at a tube-to-skin distance of 15 cm and with a maximum irradiating area of 512 cm2. The initial dose was based on multiples of a predetermined minimal erythema dose (MED), and subsequent doses were based on the response to treatment. Treatments were scheduled weekly for a maximum of 10 weeks. Clinical responses were evaluated using photographic documentation and (except for alopecia areata) clinical score. RESULTS: The MED ranged from 250 to 350 mJ cm(-2) (mean +/- SD 318.2 +/- 28.4). MEL at 308 nm was the most effective for palmoplantar pustular psoriasis with a mean improvement of 79% after a mean of 5.3 treatments and a mean dose of 11.8 MED per treatment. Plaque-type psoriasis was significantly less sensitive to treatment and nail psoriasis demonstrated no benefit from treatment. Chronic palmar atopic dermatitis was cleared in two patients and the mean improvement was 54% as compared with 46% in patients with chronic nonatopic dermatitis of the hands. Four complete regrowths among the eight patients with alopecia were observed after a mean of 5.1 treatments. The percentages of improvement had significantly decreased at the 6-month visit, and only four patients (24%) with palmoplantar pustular psoriasis still demonstrated a significant improvement. Common side-effects included intense erythema and, more rarely, blisters, but these were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results confirm the efficacy of this novel 308-nm MEL delivery system, which appears to be effective and safe for palmoplantar pustular psoriasis. To a lesser extent, plaque-type psoriasis, chronic atopic and nonatopic dermatitis of the hands and alopecia may also benefit from this treatment.

[Iatrogenic acrodermatitis enteropathica-like syndrome in leucinosis]. / Pseudo-acrodermatite entéropathique per carence alimentaire en isoleucine chez un nourrisson atteint de leucinose.

INTRODUCTION: Leucinosis (maple syrup urine disease) is a metabolic disorder caused by an enzymatic deficiency involved in the degradative pathways of the three branched-chain amino acids. We report an observation of acrodermatitis enteropathica-like syndrome induced by essential amino acid deficiency in a child with leucinosis. CASE REPORT: A child with leucinosis was referred to our hospital for exfoliative dermatitis of the perioral and anogenital regions associated with diarrhea and pancytopenia. The diagnosis of iatrogenic acrodermatitis enteropathica-like syndrome was confirmed after screening showing isoleucine deficiency. Rapid response was observed after adequate isoleucine supplementation. DISCUSSION: The acrodermatitis enteropathica-like eruption in our patient was due to an iatrogenic amino acid nutritional imbalance. Our observation underlines the risk of using a branched-chain amino acid-free formula without adequate supplementation of deficient amino acids. In addition, dietary insufficiency of isoleucine, associated with the treatment of organic aciduria should be added to the causes of acrodermatitis enteropathica-like syndrome.

Genital squamous cell carcinoma in men treated by photochemotherapy. A cancer registry-based study from 1978 to 1998.

BACKGROUND: One single report from the U.S. 16-centre-trial indicated that psoralen and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA) therapy may induce an increased risk of genital tumours in men, and protection of the genital area is, therefore, recommended. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relevance of this risk in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Two groups of patients were included in a 1978-98 retrospective study. Case records of men with genital squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) identified from the Cancer Registry of the Doubs area of France were examined for a history of PUVA therapy, topical tar treatment, psoriasis, human papillomavirus infection or genital dermatitis. In addition, all the dermatologists of the Doubs area (in public and private practice) using PUVA therapy were asked to provide information on the number of patients having received PUVA therapy and whether the genital area was exposed during treatment. RESULTS: Between 1978 and 1998, among the 48 men who had developed a genital SCC in the Doubs area, only one had a history of intensive PUVA therapy. About 150,000 treatments with PUVA therapy had been performed by 15 dermatologists in the Doubs area for 5400 patients since 1978. No case of genital SCC had been reported, despite the fact that the genital area had not been protected during UVA exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrospective, our study demonstrates that the occurrence of genital SCC in men treated with PUVA therapy is a very rare event in common dermatological practice.

Phototherapy in the treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. Our preliminary experience in resistant patients.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)* is a frequent complication of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The potentially beneficial effect of phototherapy for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of GVHD led us to investigate retrospectively the effect of this therapy in a larger series of patients. Eleven patients with cutaneous GVHD (acute GVHD in 4 patients, chronic lichenoid GVHD in 6 patients, and chronic sclerodermatous GVHD in 1 patient) resistant to standard immunosuppressive drugs were treated with phototherapy. Skin lesions showed a complete clearing in 75% of patients with acute GVHD, and a response rate of 70% was observed in patients with chronic GVHD. No effect of phototherapy was achieved in 3 patients. Our results suggest that phototherapy is a nonaggressive treatment that may benefit patients with cutaneous GVHD, who already take high doses of immunosuppressive drugs.