Direct impact of cisplatin on mitochondria induces ROS production that dictates cell fate of ovarian cancer cells.

Patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) frequently receive platinum-based chemotherapeutics, such as cisplatin. Cisplatin binds to DNA and induces DNA-damage culminating in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. Interestingly, mitochondrial DNA is critically affected by cisplatin but its relevance in cell death induction is scarcely investigated. We find that cisplatin sensitive HGSC cell lines contain higher mitochondrial content and higher levels of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) than cells resistant to cisplatin induced cell death. In clonal sub-lines from OVCAR-3 mitochondrial content and basal oxygen consumption rate correlate with sensitivity to cisplatin induced apoptosis. Mitochondria are in two ways pivotal for cisplatin sensitivity because not only knock-down of BAX and BAK but also the ROS scavenger glutathione diminish cisplatin induced apoptosis. Mitochondrial ROS correlates with mitochondrial content and reduction of mitochondrial biogenesis by knock-down of transcription factors PGC1α or TFAM attenuates both mtROS induction and cisplatin induced apoptosis. Increasing mitochondrial ROS by inhibition or knock-down of the ROS-protective uncoupling protein UCP2 enhances cisplatin induced apoptosis. Similarly, enhancing ROS by high-dose ascorbic acid or H2O2 augments cisplatin induced apoptosis. In summary, mitochondrial content and the resulting mitochondrial capacity to produce ROS critically determine HGSC cell sensitivity to cisplatin induced apoptosis. In line with this observation, data from the human protein atlas (www.proteinatlas.org) indicates that high expression of mitochondrial marker proteins (TFAM and TIMM23) is a favorable prognostic factor in ovarian cancer patients. Thus, we propose mitochondrial content as a biomarker for the response to platinum-based therapies. Functionally, this might be exploited by increasing mitochondrial content or mitochondrial ROS production to enhance sensitivity to cisplatin based anti-cancer therapies.

Phase I study of domatinostat (4SC-202), a class I histone deacetylase inhibitor in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: Domatinostat (4SC-202) is a selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi). This phase I study investigated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity in patients with advanced hematological malignancies. METHODS: Domatinostat was administered orally once (QD) or twice daily (BID) on days 1-14 with 7 days off or continuously days 1-21 in a 3 + 3 design at 7 dose levels from 25 to 400 mg total daily dose (TDD). Twenty-four patients were treated with domatinostat. RESULTS: No formal maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT, grade 4 hypercalcemia) occurred during 200 mg BID continuous treatment. Six patients were reported with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE; grade 3 hematological in three patients, grade 3 and grade 4 liver enzyme increase in 2 patients, grade 4 pulmonary embolism, and grade 4 hypercalcemia in one patient each). Higher grade hepatic TRAE occurred in the 200 mg BID continuous treatment cohort. Out of 24 patients, 1 achieved a complete response, 1 achieved a partial response, and 18 had stable disease as best response. CONCLUSION: Administration of domatinostat was safe, well tolerated with signs of antitumor activity. Four hundred milligram TDD in a 200 mg BID schedule (14 + 7) is the recommended phase II dose for monotherapy.

Hyperthermia Synergizes with Chemotherapy by Inhibiting PARP1-Dependent DNA Replication Arrest.

Although hyperthermia offers clinical appeal to sensitize cells to chemotherapy, this approach has been limited in terms of long-term outcome as well as economic and technical burden. Thus, a more detailed knowledge about how hyperthermia exerts its effects on chemotherapy may illuminate ways to improve the approach. Here, we asked whether hyperthermia alters the response to chemotherapy-induced DNA damage and whether this mechanism is involved in its sensitizing effect in BRCA-competent models of ovarian and colon cancer. Notably, we found that hyperthermia delayed the repair of DNA damage caused by cisplatin or doxorubicin, acting upstream of different repair pathways to block histone polyADP-ribosylation (PARylation), a known effect of chemotherapy. Furthermore, hyperthermia blocked this histone modification as efficiently as pharmacologic inhibitors of PARP (PARPi), producing comparable delay in DNA repair, induction of double-strand breaks (DSB), and cell cytotoxicity after chemotherapy. Mechanistic investigations indicated that inhibiting PARylation by either hyperthermia or PARPi induced lethal DSB upon chemotherapy treatment not only by reducing DNA repair but also by preventing replication fork slowing. Overall, our work reveals how PARP blockade, either by hyperthermia or small-molecule inhibition, can increase chemotherapy-induced damage in BRCA-competent cells. Cancer Res; 76(10); 2868-75. ©2016 AACR.

A Temperature of 40 °C Appears to be a Critical Threshold for Potentiating Cytotoxic Chemotherapy In Vitro and in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Patients Undergoing HIPEC.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) following cytoreductive surgery is a radical but effective treatment option for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Unfortunately, a standardized HIPEC protocol is missing impeding systematic comparisons with regard to minimal effective temperatures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to systematically analyse the precise minimal temperature needed for potentiation of chemotherapy effects in vitro and for patient survival. METHODS: We established a cell line-based model to mimic HIPEC conditions used in clinical practice, and evaluated intracellular drug concentrations and long-term survival using different temperatures ranging from 38 to 42 °C combined with cisplatin or doxorubicin. In parallel, we evaluated the temperature reached in the clinical setting by measuring inflow and outflow, as well as in two locations in the peritoneal cavity in 34 patients. Finally, we determined the influence of different HIPEC temperatures on survival. RESULTS: Long-term survival of cells treated with either cisplatin or doxorubicin was further improved only at temperatures above 40 °C. In patients, during HIPEC, constant temperatures were reached after 10 min in the peritoneal cavity. A temperature above 40 °C for at least 40 min was achieved in 68 % of patients over the 60 min duration of HIPEC. Importantly, we observed a significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in those patients reaching temperatures above 40 °C. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperthermia significantly potentiated the chemotherapy effects only at temperatures above 40 °C in vitro. Importantly, this temperature threshold was also critical for OS and PFS of PC patients.